Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘transport’

Improving cycle safety

Posted by Chris Hipkins on December 31st, 2010

A few weeks ago MPs from across the political spectrum worked together to use social media like Facebook and Twitter to get tips for cyclists, parents and drivers on how we can improve cycle safety. The idea came out of a brain-storming session by a small cross-party group that has been informally meeting over the past few months to push cycling issues at Parliament. Full credit to Green MP Kevin Hague who has been the driving force behind the group.

The top tips for cyclists were:

  1. Maximise visibility, with lights, fluoro clothing, flags etc, but ride as if you are invisible
  2. Make your intentions clear with good signalling and maintaining a consistent line
  3. Be assertive, but not aggressive, riding sufficiently out into the lane to be clear of obstacles like debris on the shoulder or opening doors on parked cars
  4. Be courteous to other road users and follow the road rules

The top tips for motorists to improve safety for people riding bikes were:

  1. Look out for bikes at all times, and don’t assume that they will be travelling slowly
  2. Please be patient – it may hold you up a little to wait before you find a safe place to pass a cyclist, but really seconds or minutes are neither here nor there
  3. Remember that the Road Code specifies a 1.5m separation when passing a cyclist. They need space.

We also asked people about tips for improving safety for kids. In addition to those listed above, people stressed the importance of putting kids through cycle skills courses, getting their skills to a good level before riding on the road, and riding with your kids to begin with. Many people suggested that kids should be allowed to ride on footpaths, and this is something we will need to take a look at, as it is currently illegal.

Good to be working as part of a cross-party group of MPs doing something positive. Let’s hope we can make even more progress in the New Year!


Keep the train lines open

Posted by Chris Hipkins on December 12th, 2010

I recently received a letter from the Kiwirail PR people alerting me to the fact that they will be sending freight trains through the Wairarapa and up to Woodville from Boxing Day until mid-January while upgrade work is done on the Main Trunk Line. The northern part of the Wairarapa line is one of those often cited as unprofitable and under consideration for closure. It’s a good example of how important it is that we maintain a proper rail ‘network’ and don’t make short term decisions that will affect the ability of rail to operate effectively and efficiently in the future.


Cooperation on cycling

Posted by Chris Hipkins on April 5th, 2010

A few weeks ago I attended a cross-party meeting on cycling. MPs from Labour, National and the Greens were all in attendance and Bike NZ gave us an excellent presentation on practical steps they thought we could take to make our roads safer for cyclists. We had quite a lot of discussion about our ‘car is king’ culture. I have to admit that despite being a frequent cyclist myself I’m probably not the most cycle-aware driver when behind the wheel of car.

I’m interested in feedback on some of the suggestions Bike NZ put forward, such as:

  • Lower speed limits in urban/rural areas (eg. around schools, shops, where the road is narrow)
  • More comprehensive ‘Share the Road’ and ‘1.5 metre’ campaigns (should 1.5 metres be the legal passing space?)
  • More designated cycle lanes and cycle routes (and should school kids be allowed to ride on footpaths?)
  • A national bike skills in schools programme
  • Better integration with public transport (eg. allowing bikes on trains and buses)
  • Higher penalties for distracted driving

We also talked about the fact that a lot of government agencies (including local government) are doing bits here and there on cycling but there doesn’t appear to be an over-arching strategy. That’s certainly something I’d like to see the government address.

Kiwi enthusiasm for cycling is certainly increasing. It’s better for our health, reduces traffic congestion and carbon emissions, and it’s cheaper! We’ve still got a way to go if we’re going to properly address all the issues around cycling, so it’s great to see MPs from across the spectrum coming together to talk about it and work with each other.


Note to self: things to do in Australia

Posted by Darien Fenton on September 28th, 2009

I’m off to Australia this week, with partner John, to meet his two new grandsons, Chance and Chay (yes, well they are Australians) and so John can meet for just the second time his two-year old granddaughter, Mala  - (and before you ask, we’re paying).

Because I can never separate the personal from the politics, I’ve made a list of things to look into including:

  1. Why Australian cleaners are now paid $21 an hour when ours are still paid $12.55, when they’re employed by the same contractors.
  2. What Rudd has done differently to Key to end the recession earlier and with lower unemployment than NZ.
  3. Why increasing workers’ rights in Australia is not seen as reducing productivity or harmful to business when in New Zealand it’s seen as the opposite.
  4. How many firms have really gone bust because they have to pay the same minimum redundancy pay I am proposing in my Redundancy Protection Bill.
  5. What’s happening with the National Transport Commission report that said that excessive client power and poor pay and conditions for truck drivers were a major cause of the high levels of deaths and injuries on Australian roads – and whether Joyce should take note.
  6. What forms of contracting arrangements for independent contractors do they have that give them more rights and collective bargaining power.

Should be a great trip!  I’ll send photos.


The Len and Mike show

Posted by Phil Twyford on September 12th, 2009

Super city mayoral candidate and Manukau mayor Len Brown and Auckland Regional Council chairman Mike Lee starred in two well received conference workshops on Auckland today.

Len Brown talked about the need for the new super city to tackle poverty and inequality. It is something the Government has paid scant attention to, even thought the Royal Commission put a lot of effort into its recommendations on a Social Issues Board.

Mike Lee presented on transport:  how Auckland ripped up 70 km of tram tracks in the early 1950s as the city embraced the Los Angeles model, right through to today’s efforts to get electric rail across the region.

These two guys are giving hope that the super city might be saved from being a complete schemozzle, and might be led by people with the kind of vision and politics Auckland is crying out for. Lots of energy among delegates to campaign against the third super city bill expected in November, and against Rodney Hide’s core services agenda. Hide is due to report back to Cabinet on his review of the Local Government Act in November.

There was a moment at the end of one of the workshops when a delegate asked if the Left would be disciplined enough to field only one candidate in the mayoral election. Mike Lee, who hasn’t ruled himself out, nevertheless told the audience he was confident there would only be one left candidate in the race.

Other highlights of the day were a fringe session on the republic which kicked off a Labour republican network. And watching the footie on the big screen at Ohinemutu marae over dinner with 200 people.


Public transport freeze hits Hamilton

Posted by Sue Moroney on September 9th, 2009

This week, the Waikato Regional Passenger Transport Committee got the bad news from the New Zealand Transport Agency that the funding that had been destined for public transport has been “redirected” by the Government into building more roads.

I must admit that I felt sorry for the councillors as I watched their discomfort at hearing this news.

I imagine some of them felt a bit conflicted, because they had argued so vigorously for the Waikato Expressway to be the top transport priority for the region.

I could see the realisation of how that campaign has been used against them start to dawn on their faces.

However, they are not to blame. They chose that priority for the region when Labour was in Government and they were never going to have to sacrifice one for the other. Labour’s committment to progressively improving public transport had enabled Hamilton’s bus patronage to increase by 9% per annum in recent years.

With the change in Government, this has all changed. The Government funding for public transport for the region will only increase by 3% next year and then will be frozen for the next two years.

With 9% growth in the use of buses in Hamilton, this means that either services will have to be cut and/or passenger fares will have to increase significantly.

Both options will force people off buses and back into their cars. Smart eh?

It also makes it virtually impossible for the Hamilton to Auckland passenger train service to be established even if the proposed trial is successful.

What a great leap backwards.


ARTA seduced by French Kiss – INCIS II

Posted by Trevor Mallard on July 25th, 2009

Transtasman reports that the Auckland Regional Transport Agency has rejected the Infratil led bid for their integrated ticketing system.

They have chosen Thales a french company.

Insiders (not Infratil) tell me that ARTA was conned by consultants into a highly overspeced solution which will be a fresh build rather than the alternative, an extension of the snapper solution currently in use in Wellington.

Extra cost $30 – $50m.  IT jobs exported. Potential for NZ wide solution gone.

Just stupid.


Boy Racers – no quick fixes here

Posted by Darien Fenton on July 17th, 2009

Im just home from a day in Christchurch hearing the first round of submissions on the Government’s two Boy Racer Bills.

Interesting day – far more interesting than I thought it would be, but my clear view after hearing from residents affected by boy racers, from “good” boy racers, the police and officials, is that there is no quick fix here.   Legislation makes us feel like we are doing something, but the question for the Select Committee is will these two bills really make any difference or are they just window dressing?

Tags:
Filed under: transport

Nats Support Labour Anti Drug Driver Amendments

Posted by Trevor Mallard on June 18th, 2009

Steven Joyce has indicated that the government will take on my amendments outlined in a previous post. Good parliamentary process. Congratulations to David Bennett and Nathan Guy who helped me convince Joyce to overide very cautious officials advice.

This is a small but important step towards discouraging people drving with active drugs like P in their blood.


Transport funding

Posted by Pete Hodgson on May 16th, 2009

Answer to Jarhead in the comments regarding your address your question re SH 20 funding. From memory the funds would have come from some combination of  the Land Tranport fund, general taxation, (Cullen had been topping up from that source in more recent years) local taxation and tolls. The local taxation was the Auckland regional petrol tax that the Tories wiped. It was struck so that a portion of the total Auckland expenditure would be paid locally. A toll can only be struck if locals agree. That’s how Orewa to Puhoi was part funded when I was the Minister but the local consultation had not been started at the change of Govt nor do I recall any decision in principle to start it. So the point is that there are a range of mechanisms to which I should add infrastructure bonds. Yes I agree that you could argue that SH16 could be counted as a SH 20 cost. The point I was hoping to make is that the clever new Minister tried to count those costs against our preferred option but not against his. Tacky.


Drug Driving – What do You think?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 10th, 2009

This is a bit of an experiment for me. I want to use cyberspace over the next 36 hours to get feedback on a couple of issues that involve civil liberties and lives.

For the last few months I’ve sat on a select committee working on a transport law reform bill that has two major strands driving while drug impaired and access to motor vehicle registration data. I’ve got two issues. And for the record the issues were in the bill as introduced by Labour and have not been fixed by the select committee where National holds the majority.

  1. If someone fails a breath test then all action related to driving while impaired with drugs ceases.  The evidence the committee got made it very clear that using booze and other drugs together had a multiplicitive effect when it came to having accidents. In an extreme case an offender would get a lesser penalty by having a quick drink when stopped at a checkpoint while high on “P”. Doesn’t seem right to me. My view is that where someone is clearly more impaired than they should be with a given breath test reading then the Police should have the right to move down the drug testing route as well.
  2. When someone is hospitalised then blood taken can be used for a drink but not a drug drive charge. In my opinion anyone who has active class A drugs in their system should be prosecuted – even if they have had an accident where they have been hospitalised.

I want to talk to colleagues about this on Tuesday – tell me what you think.