Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘Sensible Sentencing Trust’

Get your facts right

Posted by Clayton Cosgrove on August 27th, 2010

Labour believes that the Parliament genuinely is a people’s parliament. Even if  people have differing views.So when Labour was asked (by the National Party on behalf of the Speaker) whether we objected to the Sensible Sentencing Trust holding a conference in the parliament, we said no we don’t object. After all the parliament is actually owned by the people.

It is our understanding that all the major parties were asked.

That’s it. The Labour Party was never approached to co-host. I was never approached or asked if my name could appear on the invitation. This happened without my knowledge or my permission.

Perhaps The Standard should have checked.

End of.


Filling the Prisons

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 16th, 2010

For those that did not see it, this article from the Fairfax papers in the weekend is well worth a read. It explores our appalling imprisonment rate, including some statistics where we dont stack up well at all

New Zealand locks up people at a rate of 199 per 100,000. The European average is about 80. Even Australia, our convict cousin, jails a third less than we do, according to figures from the International Centre for Prison Studies.

As I have said before on this blog, we have to get beyond the response that building more prisons is the answer to preventing crime. Of course keeping the likes of Graeme Burton off the streets is important, but that is not going to deal with the overall issue. I like my colleague Lianne Dalziel’s comment in the article that the basis of questioning around these issues should be “what makes our communities safer”. Continuing to lock people up without addressing the reasons behind how they got to be there will not make our communities safer.

Most would accept that crime is the result of addictions, mental ill-health, a bad start in life, poverty and other social factors, rather than because people are inherently evil, she says. So these are the issues we should be targeting with preventative and rehabilitative measures

There is optimism from those quoted in this article that more people are now prepared to look at the drivers of crime and get beyond the empty slogans and dangerous rhetoric of the Sensible Sentencing Trust/David Garrett types. I hope that is true because another election fought around who can throw out the toughest slogans is not what we need as a country. As Greg Newbold says in the article we need to start thinking in terms of 25 year goals to change a culture of violence, rather than in three year political cycles.

As politicians we have a job to come up with better policies, and that is something Labour is working on, but I also think the time has come for a broad based community grouping that can promote the importance of the long term approach to addressing the causes of crime and breaking the cycle. I for one would help that group in any way I can.


Something’s not right here

Posted by Clare Curran on October 14th, 2009

Wasn’t it ACT member, now MP, John Boscowan who ran an extraordinary campaign last year about free speech, haranguing Labour over the Electoral Finance Act?

Is not David Garrett the self appointed voice for the Sensible Sentencing Trust, the organisation that supposedly champions the victims of violent crimes and advocates for harsh punishment and lock em up and throw away the key.

So how come, when a group of workers at Parliament, the admin, security and messengers, who both those MPs deal with every day, face an effective pay freeze and an attempt to clawback on their redundancy conditions and are taking action in order to be able to negotiate, ACT shows them such contempt.

They don’t earn a lot. They have rights too.

Tell us whether you support their position Garrett and Boscowan. And I’d like to hear from all other non-Labour MPs in the House. These are not faceless workers you can distance yourselves from. You eyeball them every day (unless you choose not to acknowledge their presence)

You’re in Parliament to stand up for what you believe. So just what do you believe?