Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘PPTA’

Strike action compounds Chinese concerns

Posted by Raymond Huo on September 16th, 2010

Anyone who is engaging with the Chinese constituency nationwide will appreciate their disappointment at the performance of the NACT Government which culminated in yesterday’s PPTA strike.

280,000 students from more than 450 schools were affected by the strike action.

This is a double-blow to Chinese families. Firstly for those affected by the strike and secondly, for the fact that this proves the NACT Government has no plan to run the country or invest in our future.

Chinese families who value education so highly now realise that the NACT government are not interested in investing in their children’s future.

The PPTA asked the Government for a four percent pay rise to stem the flow of teachers moving overseas and for a cap of 30 students per class.

Negotiations between the PPTA and the Government stalled, sparking the strike action.

The Government said no contingency had been set aside for the increase of funding requested by the PPTA. But, interestingly, the Government had no trouble finding $1.775 Billion to bail South Canterbury Finance out of trouble.

Some members of the Chinese community told me they had voted for John Key because of his banking background. Now two years through the term, all they got was empty rhetoric, talk-fests and no real plan.

Some of them gave a vivid example to show that this government is so entrenched with their business mindset that instead of running the country, they choose to treat the voters as a “tradable commodity”.

For instance, they may give you $30 extra per-week through tax cuts but at the same time they take away much more through inflation, GST rise, water charges and cuts in ACC and health. Like the teacher’s case, the 1.5 per cent wage increase offered by the Government can easily be eroded.

Even worse, the billions to be spent on bailing out the Finance companies are taxpayer’s dollars. What does that mean to taxpayers proportionally?

For National, teachers and our future are not worthwhile in their dollar terms.


Strike One, Strike Two….

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 30th, 2010

The news that secondary teachers are set to strike within the next two weeks sets up an interesting situation. The Ministry of Education do the negotiating on behalf of the government with teachers. My sources tell me that industrial action is looming in the Ministry of Education itself, with pay talks stalled and the mood souring.

Will Anne Tolley soon have on her hands not only the teachers on strike, but her Ministry staff out as well? And will the negotiators for the Ministry of Education be able to come back to the table if there is movement from the teachers, or will they be on strike as well?


ACE vs ACC – they win, we all lose

Posted by Maryan Street on February 23rd, 2010

Tomorrow (Wednesday) the Education and Science Select Committee was meant to be hearing my submission on the 51,000+ signature petitions opposing the cuts to Adult and Community Education (ACE). But the government decided to go into urgency to pass wretched Nick Smith’s wretched ACC legislation – you know the one, where we pay more and get less in the way of supportive entitlements to get us working and playing again after an injury. More on that in another post.

You might have seen this already elsewhere, but it deserves to go up here as well, as a great characterisation of what Anne Tolley has done to ACE in our local communities. It’s PPTA’s clever cartoon:

It’s an amusing antidote to being depressed by the systematic destruction of our ACC system causing heated debate in the House. But whatever it was going to be tomorrow – ACE or ACC – we are all losing. It’s either our easy to access, community-based, second chance education, or our world-class compensation scheme. And people said they wanted a change. :-(


Chopper Tolley’s literacy test

Posted by Trevor Mallard on November 25th, 2009

front

For reasons no one has yet explained Anne Tolley ran out of things to say to a recent PPTA meeting and decided to share her current library book. It is great book for kids and good on her for having some recreational reading but I would have thought she would have had something more substantive to say to teachers. Then again may there are some messages about her role that she was trying to share.

mirror

I really enjoyed my time as Minister – if Anne really feels like this then I’m sure John could find someone else to do the job.

rain

That is a pretty sad place to be. I just about feel sorry for Anne.

less

So although she didn’t get to the end of the book – maybe this is the message she was trying to give to teachers.


PPTA should be listened to, not laughed at

Posted by Moana Mackey on October 27th, 2009

Today in the House my colleague Trevor Mallard questioned the Education Minister about what evidence she had seen to suggest that national standards in literacy and numeracy would improve the quality of teaching and learning. At the end of the question he sought leave to table a variety of documents on the subject, including one put out by the PPTA about the international evidence around improving numeracy and literacy skills.

The Government’s response to the PPTA document was very telling. They guffawed and rubbished it (despite the fact that I guarantee none of them had seen, let alone read it) simply because it was put out by the PPTA. Would they do that to Federated Farmers?

Just because I went to school doesn’t make me an education expert. Teachers are education professionals, and as such I believe they should be involved in Government decisions around teaching and treated with more respect than we saw today.

And if your policy decisions are backed up by the evidence then you should have nothing to fear from involving the experts.


PPTA wrong on integration

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 30th, 2009

The PPTA want to close the door on schools wanting to integrate.

I think that to legislate to do that would result in a rush while the legislation was processed.  I also think that it is wrong. Private schools are very cheap on the taxpayer, are needed as part of the network in some cities and in some cases are either innovative or fulfil specific cultural needs. Exterminating them or integrated schools might sound great rhetoric but it doesn’t make good policy sense.

Just to make it clear I think the government decision to increase the subsidies for private schools was wrong. To do it in this budget by cutting the funding of disabled kids and night classes was evil.

But the real issue is why some integrated schools are allowed to insist on donations well beyond the dues set out in their integration agreements with the crown.  It was an issue in this post on Education Ownership.