Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘oia’

UK to review applicability of their FOI to ministerial communications

Posted by Trevor Mallard on December 30th, 2011

In New Zealand there is no doubt that emails or texts between, to or from Ministers even to and/or from private email addresses or phones are not protected from the OIA. The issue is to be considered in the UK after what some consider a surprise ruling there.

MPs are planning to consider whether freedom of information requests are being too widely granted, following a ruling that they should apply to private emails and even text messages between ministers.

The chairman of the public administration committee, Bernard Jenkin, is understood to be considering a select committee inquiry next year in the wake of the recent ruling by Christopher Graham, the information commissioner.

Graham ruled that information held in private email accounts by public authorities can be subject to FoI law if it relates to official business.

Tags:
Filed under: #OpenLabourNZ

How do Govt Ministers perform on OIA

Posted by Clare Curran on August 31st, 2010

This is interesting.

Would like discussion to be around how government should perform on OIA requests.

Is the issue about resources and priorites? It’s interesting to me as a new-ish MP that getting information out of government can be so difficult.

I think that should change.

Hat tip: @atnorightturnnz (twitter)


What a load of rubbish

Posted by Clare Curran on August 9th, 2010

The DomPost today reported that Steven Joyce has said he is unable to release a Cabinet paper that sanctioned the Government’s $1.35 billion ultrafast broadband investment initiative as some of the information it contains may be misconstrued to indicate bias on the part of the Government.

What a load of rubbish. The law states quite clearly  here and here the grounds on which a Cabinet paper can be with-held. Being misconstrued by journalists, the public (or the Opposition) isn’t one of them.

The DomPost article said:

It is understood the Cabinet paper includes some information provided by Telecom about the viability of the flagship government initiative.

The Dominion Post requested the paper in September. The Office of the Ombudsmen is investigating whether to order its release.

Labour is also seeking this information. We say it’s a lame excuse from Joyce and ask what he’s trying to with-hold? Who does he think will misconstrue it? And shouldn’t a Cabinet paper be robust enough to withstand public scrutiny?

More evidence of the lack of transparency from this government, particularly around the $1.5 billion broadband scheme.  It’s tax payers’ money Steven.


Transparency and accountability

Posted by Chris Hipkins on May 11th, 2009

Fronting up and answering parliamentary questions and Official Information Act requests is a basic ministerial function. Fundamentally it is about accountability. On that score the Minister of Internal Affairs, Dr Richard Worth, has failed miserably. Since December I have been trying to get information out of Dr Worth about what he has been up to whilst receiving his $240k a year ministerial salary. I’ve used written parliamentary questions and Official Information Act requests and he has stonewalled repeatedly. He won’t even answer questions as basic as one asking what reports he has received from his Department.

One would have thought given his recent troubles Dr Worth would be going to some lengths to prove that he had nothing else to hide. Could it be that he is embarrassed by his total lack of action since becoming a Minister? Does he think that he should be exempt from basic accountability requirements? Or does he have something to hide?

I’m pleased that John Key made a commitment on Breakfast TV this morning to investigate Dr Worth’s refusal to answer. I look forward to Dr Worth’s forthcoming conversion to the principles of openness and transparency following Mr Key’s intervention. If he isn’t willing to front up, he shouldn’t be a Minister.

Selection of Dr Richard Worth’s answers (PDF – 60K)