<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Red Alert &#187; OECD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/tag/oecd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz</link>
	<description>A blog written by Labour MPs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Exploding tax myths &#8211; Part 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/02/09/exploding-tax-myths-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/02/09/exploding-tax-myths-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Nash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Key]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=10563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Myth: John Key has said that New Zealand taxes consumption at a relatively low rate.
Reality: The rate of GST in New Zealand, at 12.5%, is relatively low, but the coverage of our GST system is particularly comprehensive. As a result, New Zealand has the sixth highest level of general consumption taxation, as a proportion of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myth: John Key has said that New Zealand taxes consumption at a relatively low rate.</p>
<p>Reality: The rate of GST in New Zealand, at 12.5%, is relatively low, but the coverage of our GST system is particularly comprehensive. As a result, New Zealand has the sixth highest level of general consumption taxation, as a proportion of GDP, out of the 30 countries in the OECD.</p>
<p>The OECD stated in its 2007 edition of <em>Revenue Statistics</em> that:  &#8221; . . contrary to the expectations of some commentators, there has not been any general trend in OECD countries from direct to indirect taxation. Indeed, there has been a slight trend in the other direction over the last thirty years, following a sharper fall in the share of indirect taxes from 1965 to 1975. Over the past forty years, the general trend away from indirect taxes has been so strong that only six countries– Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">New Zealand</span>, Poland and the Slovak Republic – escaped it.&#8221; (p. 38, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">emphasis</span> added)</p>
<p>So despite some general trends in this direction, New Zealand has been an outlier. This reflects our late (1986) adoption of a GST but also its comprehensiveness.
<div class="tw_button" style=";float:left;margin-right:10px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.labour.org.nz%2F2010%2F02%2F09%2Fexploding-tax-myths-part-4%2F&amp;text=&amp;related=&amp;lang=&amp;count="  class="twitter-share-button" target="_blank" style="width:55px;height:22px;background:transparent url('http://blog.labour.org.nz/wp-content/plugins/wp-tweet-button/tweetn.png') no-repeat  0 0;text-align:left;text-indent:-9999px;display:block;"></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/02/09/exploding-tax-myths-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

