Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘national’

Nats promise wholesale ACC privatisation

Posted by Chris Hipkins on October 13th, 2011

Yesterday Nick Smith announced ACC levies were going to be cut. That’s good news. They never should have been hiked up massively in the first place, and Smith’s own press statement highlights just how cynically the National government have manipulated the situation.

There was never a crisis in ACC. It was hit by the global financial downturn and revaluation of existing claims liabilities, leading to deficits. But the problem was not a structural one, and ACC would have returned to surplus even without the levy hike. ACC was already back to a $2.5 billion surplus in 2009/10 before Smith’s levy hike had taken effect.

But don’t get too excited about the levies falling just yet. If National are re-elected, all Kiwis will end up paying more to get less from ACC. Smith has effectively announced the wholesale privatisation of ACC if National gets half a chance. That means money that should go into providing cover for injury victims will go into the profit lines of Aussie insurance companies.

Smith has confirmed that if a National-led government is re-elected, their ACC privatisation agenda will be expanded from only covering workplace injuries to also include injuries sustained in car accidents, around the home, or even on the sports field.

National’s privatisation plans will effectively bring an end to what has been our world-leading system of universal, no-fault, 24/7 cover for accidental injury. Under National, if someone sustains an injury, they can look forward to spending weeks or even months arguing with different insurance providers about who should cover it.

It’s still not clear what problem National are trying to fix here. Independent studies have clearly shown that ACC is among the cheapest providers of accidental injury cover in the world. New Zealand employers already pay on average half of what Australian employers pay, yet National wants to replicate the Australian model.

The choice for New Zealanders is now crystal clear. If they want to keep our system of universal, no-fault, 24/7 cover for accidental injury, then they will need to vote for a change of government.


Renewable energy – we can do better

Posted by Chris Hipkins on August 31st, 2011

Yesterday the National government released their much anticipated Energy Strategy. The first draft that was released for consultation was pretty poor, and the final version is even worse.

While they claim they are still committed to the goal of having 90 percent of our electricity generated from renewable sources, most of their actual plan heads in the other direction.

We have an abundance of renewable energy sources in New Zealand. We could be world leaders in renewable energy. Instead the National government want to focus on extracting more fossil fuels like gas and oil.

It’s a short-sighted approach that does nothing to insulate us from the inevitable price increases that are on the way, not to mention the damage it will do to our environment.

National trumpets the fact that the amount of electricity we’ve generated in the last few years from renewable sources has increased, never mind the fact that it’s rained quite a bit. What happens when we get another dry year? We need more wind, more solar, more local generation, and more of a focus on energy efficiency.

It’s great that the National government have at least said they agree with the 90% renewable target put in place under the last Labour government, but we need to do a lot better if we’re going to meet it.


John Key and that stadium shot

Posted by Chris Hipkins on August 19th, 2011

Remember that video clip of John Key standing in the Westpac Stadium in Wellington before the last election lamenting the number of New Zealanders who leave every year to move to Australia? Well, he’d need a bigger stadium for this year’s campaign video.

After 3 years of John Key’s government, the number of people leaving NZ to move to Australia is at its highest level in 10 years. 46,436 people jumped the Tasman for good in the 12 months to July. By contrast, only 14,807 made the jump back the other way.

Remember what John Key said in his 2008 campaign opening speech?

“Do you want more of the same? The same directionless economy? The same political games and distractions? The same loose management of your money? The same excuses, buck-passing, and the same failure to deliver real results?”

Let’s compare the 9 years of Labour government with 3 years under National. Under Labour we had record low unemployment, more people in the workforce than ever before, more people in tertiary education than ever before. Under National unemployment has sky rocketed and tertiary education funding has been slashed.

As for political games and distractions? This from a PM who walked out of Question Time to avoid answering questions from the Leader of the Opposition. The same PM who backed Rodney Hide, then Don Brash, and has now done a dodgy deal with John Banks in Epsom. The same PM who paid PR firms to get him on Letterman. The same PM who won’t be interviewed on Morning Report but will happily take patsy questions on The Edge…

But of course the state of the economy isn’t National’s fault. Their failure to deliver any meaningful financial relief to those on middle and low incomes isn’t their fault. Youth unemployment isn’t their fault (and in less than a week it’s gone from being John Key’s biggest issue to being a problem that’s ‘overstated’). Now, what was that about “buck-passing”?


An identity crisis for National?

Posted by Chris Hipkins on May 14th, 2011

National MP and farmer Shane Ardern has fired a bit of a broadside at his party, claiming that its farmers have become “lost in action”. During a select committee meeting this week, he took a swipe at fellow National MP Jacqui Dean, asking why her Waitaki seat wasn’t held by a farmer. Dean is a former children’s TV host.

Ardern went so far as to challenge a couple of farmers in attendance at the committee to go back and find someone to replace Dean. Ardern reportedly asked “Who’s the MP now? And why are we absolutely lost in action, absolutely lost in action, as far as MPs in Parliament now are concerned?” Ouch!

Apparently his fellow National MP, the retiring but never shy Sandra Goudie, claimed that farmers had become a “misunderstood minority” within National.

This is an interesting insight into the way National has changed. Farmers used to rule the roost but there has been growing disquiet in recent years that the party has been taken over by financiers and bankers. Interesting to see two of their MPs being so open about it though.

Note: The above comments were reported in a Newsroom story, which is only available if you’re a subscriber.


Armstrong lambasts National

Posted by Chris Hipkins on August 7th, 2010

John Armstrong has unusually harsh words for National in today’s Herald column.

“Shame on National. That party’s behaviour in Parliament over the past couple of weeks has on occasion veered close to being a disgrace both to itself and the institution … National has ended up being done like a dog’s dinner over one of its most fundamental planks – the closing of the gap between what New Zealanders earn in comparison to Australians … such has been the comprehensive mauling of the concept by Labour over the past week or so that National will now be loath to resurrect it. It is now a loser for National and looks like remaining so through to next year’s election”

“What has been disturbing in this debacle, however, has been the way National has responded to parliamentary questions about the income gap. The low point came on Wednesday when Steven Joyce briefly deputised for Brownlee … A week earlier, Brownlee had told the House in response to a question from Labour that “yes”, the Government did have milestones by which it would measure the progress it was making towards closing the income gap … So eyebrows shot through the chamber’s ceiling when Joyce made the startling admission that there were, in fact, no such milestones. Even more startling was what Joyce said next. Brownlee had given Labour what was technically known as a “brush-off”…”

“Brownlee’s gaffe about the income gap having narrowed since National came to power prompted a desperate search by National for anything that served as evidence, however questionable, of that being the case. Much of the evidence is to the contrary – including some of the material National has dug up. The upshot is that Labour – almost by accident – has given National an old-fashioned hiding on that most fundamental of all questions: which party can be can best trusted with the reins of economic management. The one compensating factor for National is that all this has happened largely out of public view.”

The government have had an easy reign so far, but as Armstrong has pointed out, the shine is starting to come off. National is reverting to type with their ‘born to rule’ attitude. They brush off serious questions by making wise cracks. Up until now that strategy has served them well, but people (particularly journos) are getting a bit sick of it. Questions are now being asked about what exactly National’s plan for New Zealand is. The answer seems to be they don’t have one.


National politicising the public service

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 18th, 2010

You might have seen a few quotes emerging from the National Party conference about the impact of the 90 Day fire at will law. This information comes from a Department of Labour report, hard copies of which, it seems, have been circulating at the conference, despite it not yet being publicly available.

Even if it is released publicly after the PMs speech, having a report generated by a public service department circulating at a Party conference before it is available to the rest of the public is a shocking breach of public service rules. This from a party who campaigned on de-politicising the public service. All worthy of a letter to the State Services Commissioner I think.


National: Dumbing Down the Economic Debate

Posted by David Cunliffe on February 20th, 2010

So what is wrong with National’s economic approach?

Here are a few quick starting thoughts for a Saturday afternoon: our economic future has to be about more than the “farm and the mine”  if we want a high value, high wage economy (farming is of course core, but undifferentiated commodities are notoriously vulnerable to exchange rate swings, and the margins are often low).

Sustainable competitive advantage is about developing that something special on top that keeps the margins up and the value coming – that in turn requires innovation, intellectual property rights, and the smart use of technology, capital and skills to leverage our underlying resource base.

I am afraid all we have seen from National so far is a dumbing down of that debate by focussing on “deregulating” – essentially a passive hope that if govt gets out of the way, a thousand flowers will bloom.  In a small, arguably subscale economy it just ain’t that simple, or easy, folks – otherwise we would all have become billionaires years ago.  A more active partnership between government and business is required to fast track high value opportunites and align resources.

Secondly, and controversially, ownership matters.  No point in getting farm or factory productivity up if the financial system captures all the gain and bleeds the value offshore.  About 3/4 of NZ’s external deficit is not the balance of trade but the value of financial flows.  The four Aussie banks typically send home more profit each year than is made by the entire NZX 50 companies.  To fill the gap, the National Government is poised to flog off even more assets and further liberalise the already very liberal overseas investment regime.  Selling Godzone by the acre.

We can’t solve that problem without getting savings up.  Way up.  Shame National gutted Kiwisaver.  Nor can we do it with an outdated monetary policy that targets inflation alone using one tool (the OCR) that makes the housing bubble worse, or at best is not sufficiently focused to fix the bubble without immense collateral damage to exports.  We need a bigger sovereign stake in our own economy, before it irretrievably becomes someone else’s.

Is it too late to fix?  No I don’t believe so, but every year matters in our race against time.  We can’t afford another three years of a National administration that barely understands the problem, has shown itself devoid of ideas, and patently can’t make a decision the latest focus group doesn’t like.  We can’t turn this boat around steering by focus group.  NZ needs clear goals and a plan to get there.  Mr Key may be able to read a map, but he clearly has no compass.

I could go on, and I intend to, as we build up to one of the most crucial Budgets in New Zealand history.


????????

Posted by Raymond Huo on August 2nd, 2009

??????????????????????????????????????,??????????????????— ?????????


Machiavelli McCully rules – Key misses twice

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 2nd, 2009

Blowhole gets it right on the board but misses on the Nat Presidency and then dumps on the new President blogging from the floor of the conference. An earlier post backgrounds the candidates.

I don’t know whether Key’s early support of Sir Wira was naive, polite or a genuine attempt to build bridges with Maori. But the latter doesn’t work with your grassroots voting Nat delegate. That was pretty clear a couple of weeks ago. Then his support switched to Scott Simpson who other Board members wouldn’t back.

In a real example of McCully at work, his old mate and business associate, Peter Goodfellow won the Presidency. Last time there was a real contest McCully ran the Boag campaign – and from what Blowhole says this ones about as good.

What is clear is that when McCully and Joyce work together they are pretty much unstoppable within the national party.  Bill English better watch out.


Melissa Lee Quote of the Day

Posted by Grant Robertson on May 14th, 2009

“If Melissa Lee keeps digging the tunnel will be finished soon.”

(Hat Tip: John Pagani)