Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘Lianne Dalziel’

The curious case of the missing milk (inquiry)

Posted by Clare Curran on August 12th, 2011

I’m feeling somewhat bemused today. I sit on the Commerce Select Committee. I have to be very careful what I say, because under standing orders I’m not allowed to discuss what happened while the committee was “in committee”.

It’s a matter of public record that the committee met yesterday to discuss the terms of reference which will determine the scope of the inquiry.

But when this media release popped into my inbox this morning from the chair, I couldn’t believe my eyes.

Lianne
DALZIEL
Commerce Spokesperson

11 August 2011                                                             MEDIA STATEMENT
Commerce Committee milk pricing inquiry

Labour’s Commerce Spokesperson and Commerce Committee chair, Lianne Dalziel, says she understands people will be disappointed that the Committee has not issued a statement about progress on discussions on the terms of reference for the proposed milk pricing inquiry.

“I know there is a high level of public interest around this. However Standing Orders prevent the chair of the Select Committee issuing a statement on behalf of the committee unless that statement is fully authorised by the committee.

“I regret I can say no more than that at this stage,” Lianne Dalziel said.

Contact: Lianne Dalziel 0275 480 644.

Paid for by Vote Parliamentary Service and Authorised by Lianne Dalziel, Parliament Buildings, Wellington

Immediately after the committee finished sitting yesterday, a group of journalists headed towards myself and Lianne Dalziel who remained in the committee room. They asked whether the terms of reference for the inquiry had been determined and what the outcome was.

Lianne replied, in front of other witnesses, including some National Party MPs,  that she could not say until an agreed statement was released, which was expected to happen later that day. Surely this meant it would.

But it didn’t. Instead we get this release above. I wonder what happened in the interim? I’d like to say but my lips are sealed.

However, I just read this story on the Stuff website. Intriguing.


Filling the Prisons

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 16th, 2010

For those that did not see it, this article from the Fairfax papers in the weekend is well worth a read. It explores our appalling imprisonment rate, including some statistics where we dont stack up well at all

New Zealand locks up people at a rate of 199 per 100,000. The European average is about 80. Even Australia, our convict cousin, jails a third less than we do, according to figures from the International Centre for Prison Studies.

As I have said before on this blog, we have to get beyond the response that building more prisons is the answer to preventing crime. Of course keeping the likes of Graeme Burton off the streets is important, but that is not going to deal with the overall issue. I like my colleague Lianne Dalziel’s comment in the article that the basis of questioning around these issues should be “what makes our communities safer”. Continuing to lock people up without addressing the reasons behind how they got to be there will not make our communities safer.

Most would accept that crime is the result of addictions, mental ill-health, a bad start in life, poverty and other social factors, rather than because people are inherently evil, she says. So these are the issues we should be targeting with preventative and rehabilitative measures

There is optimism from those quoted in this article that more people are now prepared to look at the drivers of crime and get beyond the empty slogans and dangerous rhetoric of the Sensible Sentencing Trust/David Garrett types. I hope that is true because another election fought around who can throw out the toughest slogans is not what we need as a country. As Greg Newbold says in the article we need to start thinking in terms of 25 year goals to change a culture of violence, rather than in three year political cycles.

As politicians we have a job to come up with better policies, and that is something Labour is working on, but I also think the time has come for a broad based community grouping that can promote the importance of the long term approach to addressing the causes of crime and breaking the cycle. I for one would help that group in any way I can.