Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘law commission’

What Veterans Really Want

Posted by Iain Lees-Galloway on March 16th, 2012

Veterans Affairs Minister Nathan Guy has something to announce: Veterans’ Pensions are incresing to cover inflation!! Stop the press.

What would really get veterans excited would be for National to follow through on their promise to implement the Law Commission’s recommendations and replace the War Pensions Act. For older veterans in particular, this is the number one priority.

But other than their election promise, National has been completely silent. They won’t say when they will introduce legislation, they won’t say how much they intend to spend and they won’t say what recommendations they will implement.

They’ve said nothing since the report was tabled in June last year 2010.

Veterans deserve better and breathlessly announcing what should be routine annual inflation adjustments doesn’t make up for dragging the chain on fixing the system.


Privacy Laws under review

Posted by Raymond Huo on August 2nd, 2011

It’s not often I get to blog about my Law Commission portfolio but this is definitely worthwhile mentioning.

The Law Commission has just completed an intensive, four stage review of the 1993 Privacy Act.

The Commission believes the Act could be improved in a number of areas and I have listed below a few key recommendations from the Commission:

• the complaints process under the Act should be streamlined in a number of respects, including giving the Privacy Commissioner the power to make binding decisions on complaints about people’s right to access their own personal information;

• agencies should be required to notify people when personal information held by an agency is lost or otherwise compromised (for example, through computer hacking), if the breach is sufficiently serious;

• there should be a new framework in the Act to allow the sharing of personal information between government agencies where it is in the public interest to do so, but with appropriate safeguards; and

• some exceptions to the privacy principles should be modified, for example to clarify that people can pass on information to an appropriate person where someone’s health is seriously at risk, or report suspected offending to the police.

It’s good to see that the Law Commission is conscious to keep the Act relevant in light of the massive technological and cyber advances over the past 18 years.

If you would like to keep up with this report or any others produced by the Law Commission, visit their website: http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/


Consume these stats

Posted by Raymond Huo on May 5th, 2010

Today I received a letter from Alcohol Action NZ and although I don’t totally agree with their five-step solution to solving New Zealand’s drinking problem, they brought some compelling data to my attention:

• At least 25% of all New Zealand drinkers are heavy drinkers

• A third of all police apprehensions involve alcohol

• Half of all serious violent crimes involve alcohol

• 60 different medical conditions are caused by heavy drinking

• Up to 75% of adult presentations at Emergency Departments on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights are alcohol related

• Over 300 alcohol-related offences every day

• Over 500 serious and fatal injury traffic crashes every year

• 17,000 years of life per-year are lost through alcohol

Also some interesting comments on my blog yesterday about alcohol reform:

1: Queenstown is a party town, The tourists clearly want this drinking as they are participating in it. Those vomit cleaners are in employment because of this and that is food in their mouths.

2: They (tourists) shouldn’t be shocked as plenty of them are partaking in the exercise themselves!

3: I remember when the minimum school leaving age was raised in the UK from 15 to 16. There was much resentment for a couple of years from those who considered they were being forced into an additional unnecessary year of school. Now, of course, no 14 year old Brit considers 15 as a natural age at which to leave school, and hasn’t for a couple of decades.

I wish I could be around such intelligent, witty and insightful people more often!


Once in a generation change needed

Posted by Raymond Huo on May 4th, 2010

Queenstown is the showpiece of New Zealand’s 100% Pure global advertising campaign, but I wonder how many tourists are shocked by the out of control drinking that takes place in New Zealand’s adventure capital every day?

Two people are employed every morning to clean the vomit from the streets in Queenstown – which has the most liberal drinking laws of any ski-resort town in the world. I wonder why these scenes aren’t played out with images of the Remarkables and Lake Wakatipu on the successful television advertisements?

I am sure people who love Queenstown and New Zealand’s many other iconic tourist attractions (like I do) feel obliged to protect and enhance New Zealand’s green, pure image.

New Zealanders spend over $85million a week on alcohol. The damage that is being done to communities is untold.

The Law Commission Report, Alcohol in our Lives, Curbing the Harm addresses all the factors that are contributing to the alcohol problem in our society and as Law Commission President Sir Geoffrey Palmer has advised, should not be cherry-picked.

A clear link has been made between higher crime and violence rates in areas with a larger density and proliferation of liquor outlets. The report states that limiting the availability of alcohol and increasing the price will see a reduction in crime.

However high-flying Justice Minister Simon Power has already ruled out a rise in excise tax.

Another major issue will be the recommendation to raise the alcohol purchase age back up to 20.

Whether this goes down to a conscience vote will be interesting. The evidence shows that since the drinking age was dropped to 18 in 1999, the onset of drinking has begun at a younger age so the debate on this one will be intense.

The feedback from the ethnic community is that they have serious doubts whether the government will act on the reports recommendations. The National-ACT government have been shambolic. Policies like “three strikes” and “boot camps” have let down a voting-public who genuinely believed what National and ACT campaigned for in 2008.

The feeling is that these policies are designed to position the National government to be seen as doing something meaningful, but in reality, they are delivering nothing.

Problem drinking affects all New Zealanders in some shape or form and if enacted properly this report will save the lives (alcohol contributes to 2.8 deaths a day in New Zealand) and improve the wellbeing of thousands of New Zealanders.


Misuse of Drugs Act issues paper published

Posted by Iain Lees-Galloway on February 11th, 2010

The Law Commission has just released its issues paper on the Misuse of Drugs Act (MoDA), titled Controlling and Regulating Drugs.

This paper (all 400 pages of it) is the result of two years’ work after the Labour Government invited the Law Commission to start work on a review of the MoDA.

Still need to read through it. Some key areas of interest and no doubt debate include:

  • No change to the law regarding the large-scale profiting from dealing in drugs.
  • A new framework for dealing with new psycho-active substances – essentially prohibition until appropriately analysed and regulated.
  • Potential for changes in the way possession is dealt with – especially looking at greater use of diversion and treatment rather than conviction.
  • Potential for differential response to ‘social supply’ and dealing for profit.
  • Greater resources for treatment.
  • ‘Civil Detention’ – ie compulsory treatment where it is believed this is appropriate and only as last resort.

Worth having a good read of this to take it all in.

Lianne Dalziel and I are as keen to hear your thoughts as the Law Commission is.

Consultation closes 30 April 2010.

Update: Simon Power rejects medicinal cannabis use.


Price of alcohol

Posted by Iain Lees-Galloway on September 22nd, 2009

This is my second post on matters raised in the Law Commission’s review of Alcohol Legislation. The previous post on the Purchase Age is here.

The question of pricing comes up a lot in discussions about ways to reduce harm caused by alcohol abuse. Much of the evidence available suggests that increasing the retail price of alcoholic beverages does in fact lead to a decrease in binge drinking and other harmful activities.

You may or may not agree with this. If you do, the next question is how best to go about achieving this.

The two options are:

  1. Increasing excise tax
  2. Establishing a minimum price for alcoholic beverages

These two are not mutually exclusive and could be used either in combination or separately.

So the two questions are: Should we be increasing the price of alcohol and if so how best do we go about it?


Alcohol Purchasing Age

Posted by Iain Lees-Galloway on August 26th, 2009

The Law Commission’s Alcohol Issues Paper is, I was told by Sir Geoffrey Palmer, 1.4 kg heavy. It is probably one of the most comprehensive reviews of liquor issues ever created.

At this stage, the law commission is making no recommendations. The issues paper is out for consultation through to October after which the Law Commission has until the end of March to report back to Parliament.

So Lianne Dalziel and I though we’d post some of the issues on Red Alert and give you the opportunity to comment on them one by one.

And since the purchasing age is the point getting the most attention, let’s start there and get it off our collective chests…

There are a range of options for the purchasing age: Stay at 18 or increase to 19, 20 or 21.

There is another option also proposed: Split the purchasing age so it would be 18 for on-licence premises (ie pubs, restaurants etc) and 20 for off-licences (supermarkets, wholesalers etc).

Comment away…


Law Commission ‘Alcohol in our Lives’ issues paper

Posted by Iain Lees-Galloway on July 30th, 2009

The Law Commission’s ‘Alcohol in our Lives’ Issues Paper was released today. My copy arrived at 11:45 so I haven’t had much of a chance to go through it yet but suffice to say Lianne Dalziel and I will be giving the report very serious consideration. Any discussion welcome here and I’ll post again when I’ve digested some of the material.