Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘John Banks’

Contempt for democracy

Posted by on March 2nd, 2013

Even supporters of National’s Charter Schools have asked for changes to draft legislation currently before the Education and Science Select Committee. While the overwhelming majority of the 2,000 or so submitters have opposed the idea, and presented compelling research, facts and arguments against them, a handful of supporters have put forward suggested amendments to the Bill that are practical and sensible.

I don’t agree with the whole concept of Charter Schools, and will continue to oppose them. Nothing I’ve heard from submitters has convinced me that we need them, or that our existing publicly-owned and operated schools can’t deliver the supposed ‘flexibility’ and ‘innovation’ these new for-profit schools are supposed to showcase. But if the government is determined to plough ahead, they could at least work to knock the rough edges off the legislation they’ve hastily cobbled together as payback for the Key/Banks ‘cuppa tea’ deal.

Sadly, the government isn’t listening. They’ve already kick-started the process of setting up these new privatised schools before the Bill has even been reported back from select committee, let alone debated and voted on by the whole House. We only finished hearing public submissions on Wednesday. The committee hasn’t yet had the chance to consider what changes to recommend based on them.

This whole process has been a sham. New Zealanders don’t want to see schools set up as profit making businesses. And they certainly don’t want to see Government funding used for schools that employ unqualified teachers, and don’t have to teach to the New Zealand curriculum.

The composition of the Board to oversee the schools establishment, announced yesterday by John Banks, makes it crystal clear that the Government’s real aim is the commercialisation of the school system – not lifting student achievement. National and Act are obsessed with the idea that competition will somehow improve educational outcomes. Even the Treasury doesn’t believe that.

We should be focused on making sure every school is world-class, instead of wasting time and effort on the ideological experiment of Charter Schools. There are some positive changes in the Bill to other areas of education policy (for example more flexibility around school opening hours) but they are being well and truly over-shadowed by National’s ideological experiment in privatising education.


More from Doyle on Banks

Posted by on May 2nd, 2012

More from Doyle on Banks

Tags:
Filed under: humour

Good point

Posted by on May 1st, 2012

On Twitter this afternoon someone mused on the contrast between the UK parliament being granted a couple of days ago a snap debate on the Leveson Inquiry into  the British press following the News International phone hacking scandal whereas today here in New Zealand, our own Speaker would not grant an application for an urgent debate regarding the John Banks investigation and Key not standing Banks down as Minister.

The Guardian has written a good editorial about the role of parliament in holding the government and its Ministers to account. I would hope that our parliament sees its role in a similar vein.

Jeremy Hunt: the court of parliament

Monday 30 April 2012 20.53 BST

If it is parliament’s job to hold ministerial feet to the fire, then a good parliament will make the government sweat.

The Commons got halfway there yesterday, after Speaker John Bercow accepted an “urgent question” about the position of Jeremy Hunt. In opposition, David Cameron proposed Westminster clawing back power from Whitehall, but as prime minister he was dragged across the road from Downing Street in a palpable rage.


Doyle on Bank’s charter school

Posted by on May 1st, 2012

Banks 2

Tags:
Filed under: humour

From Charter Schools to leaky building syndrome

Posted by on December 6th, 2011

Here we are again!

The charter schools being a model for experiment per se may not be that terrible – should the government have the mandate to do so. But how the agenda unfolds itself in New Zealand shortly after the general election has caused concerns.

Act Party, joyriding into Parliament on a grand total of 21,446 voters nationally (1.07%), is suddenly shaping and dictating key education policy (no pun intended). And Act did not even have an election policy of charter schools for god’s sake.

Secondly, the economy-savvy electorate of Epsom knows that Act’s old mantra of Chicago School of Economics is one of the main reasons the western world is in the doldrums.

Worse, Chicago School of Economics which advocates for unfettered free market and less government intervention (“big market, small government”), came under attack in the wake of the financial crisis we all are experiencing now. It has also been blamed for growing income inequality in Europe and the United Sates.

Unfettered free market leads to deregulation which, in the New Zealand context, caused various problems with one of the worst case scenario being felt by so many in the leaky building syndrome.

Although in a long process, leaky buildings may be repaired, revamped or reconstructed. But as Ehoa commented on Red Alert: “As for charter schools…once again South Auckland schools become lab rats for two Johns and one dunny (SIC)”.

I would be very nervous where our kids – no matter what socioeconomic status – are likely to be treated as guinea pigs. They are our future, not statistics.


John Key’s “cheap shot”

Posted by on November 15th, 2011

It just felt wrong to me when John Key decided to compare the taping, accidental or deliberate, of his conversation with the systemic phone hacking of the News of the World. It’s no real surprise that someone connected with that case, the lawyer for the victims has spoken out describing John Key’s comparison of the recording of his conversation with John Banks with the NOTW phone hacking as a “cheap shot”.

There is a difference between the News of the World hacking into someone’s phone to find out private information and seemingly – whether accidental or on purpose – effectively a journalist investigating some political statement.

I am certainly not condoning covert recording, but I felt uncomfortable when I heard the comparison to NOTW made by John Key. This was an orchestrated media stunt gone wrong, and is not even close to the intrusive, criminal behaviour in the UK.

Then, tonight on TV1 John Key made a comparison to the idea of high profile New Zealanders being recorded talking about a child considering suicide, that being published, and then the child committing suicide.

This just makes me even more uncomfortable. I had given credit to Key for saying he wanted to see coordinated action on youth suicide, but trying to draw that issue ( under which media have operated almost without fail in line with strict reporting guidelines) into what is a political situation seems wrong to me.

These comparisons and claims are all a smokescreen to John Key not wanting to be caught out for what he said to John Banks. He should wind back the rhetoric and just front up to what he said.


Cuppagate- Game Changer?

Posted by on November 14th, 2011

Interesting to read Jonathan Milne from the Herald on Sunday’s account of the cuppagate tape.

Milne says

But the potential disclosure of the contents of that conversation – held only a metre away from the closest reporters – could yet throw a rocket into this election campaign. It is a game-changer.

And therein lies the problem. I am sure as hell not endorsing covert taping of anyone. But this was a major media stunt in a campaign. It was designed to be a public event. As David Farrar has noted if the tape reveals something where Key or Banks is saying one thing publicly and another thing privately, then that gives strong reasons in the public interest to know what was said. Milne uses the langauge “game changer”, which indicates there is something here.

Milne goes on

But it’s the sheer range of comments in Key and Banks’ discussion that is breathtaking – and the pair’s assessment of the prospects of National, Act and NZ First.

Perhaps leadership in ACT discussions? Maybe a discussion about future asset sales? Whatever, this episode has more to play out, and the all guns blazing approach of National against its release indicates there is something of public interest in those tea leaves.


Cuppa Tea gone sour

Posted by on November 14th, 2011

On the Stuff website last night:

Key, campaigning in Hawke’s Bay, said he wasn’t in the “slightest bit concerned” about what was on the tape. He said the conversation was “bland” – but has refused to make public what was said.

I don’t know all the circumstances of the taping of John Key’s and John Bank’s cuppa tea conversation. But I make these points:

  • The event was stage managed by the National Party. It was a hyped up event. Media were invited to film the meeting of Key and Banks, but not the actual conversation. There was an enormous amount of spin around it.
  • National’s intention was for Epsom voters to know that John Key thought they should vote for Banks.
  • The meeting was recorded without their knowledge. The journalist responsible owned up and fronted the media himself.
  • The Herald on Sunday did not publish the contents. They reported they had the tape.
  • John Key is now spinning it as News of the World tactics. He asserts that the journalist deliberately set out to covertly record a conversation. That’s a big accusation. I’d like to know if he wants the journalist charged? What about the Herald on Sunday?
  • Key says the conversation was bland.  But he won’t provide the nation with the contents.
  • There is enormous public interest in this issue. It could result in an Act/National coalition arrangement.
  • If National allowed the cameras and the media part way in for their own ends, then they’ve now got to front up and tell the nation what was said.
  • I cannot fathom what the privacy argument could possibly be that outweighs the public interest on this. There’s an election in 13 days time. These two men were discussing an arrangement between their respective parties. Surely the public has a right to know what it is.

A private conversation is held privately. Not stage managed in public. Tell us what you promised John Banks, John Key!


6 DPS 11 other police and no one noticed a package on the table

Posted by on November 13th, 2011

I reckon the Commissioner will be doing some apologising pretty soon.


Key endorsing act is weird

Posted by on November 11th, 2011

I agree with most of what Vernon Small writes when he describes the Key Banks date as a mistake on Key’s part.

He is absolutely right when he says that any extra Act vote will come from National.

What he doesn’t say is that if Act get the 1 or 2% they would get without Key’s intervention and don’t get into Parliament then National on current polling would effectively get 50% of that wasted vote.

So he has decided to encourage two old racist codgers into Parliament, both surefire causes of trouble for no net gain.

And he will delay the development of a genuine modern party of the right by at least three years.

I’m glad he’s dating Banks but just don’t understand the logic. Maybe there is none.


Texts from Auckland

Posted by on May 10th, 2011

Txts from Banksy 1

Txts from Banksy 2

Txts from Banksy 3


The Bucket List

Posted by on May 2nd, 2011

bucket-list

The meeting of unacceptable social and failed economic policies.


No Country for Old Men

Posted by on May 1st, 2011

no-country-for-old-men

The good thing about this weeks farce is that National’s only guaranteed coalition prospect suddenly became clearly defined in a policy sense. And National has been tied to the failed policies of the Douglas Richardson era. The policies that drove unemployment up, gutted productive industries and encouraged both ideas and people with them to leave New Zealand.

And it is exciting to watch Key, who ruled Douglas out of any Ministerial post three years ago, leave open the possibility of Bill English being fired from both of this roles and them being gifted to Brash. Double Dipton should of course be fired but for a different set of reasons. 92% of punters hate the thought.

Keep those posters flowing in.


Limiting big money in local govt

Posted by on December 11th, 2010

Campaign donation returns for the Auckland mayoral race were filed yesterday and Auckland Mayor Len Brown is taking a bit of heat here and here for channeling $499,000 in campaign donations through a trust. His unsuccessful opponent John Banks accepted $520,086 in anonymous donations.

I think there should be openness about donations to political campaigns. Local government electoral law needs to be changed so donations are transparent, there are sensible spending limits, and limits on third party campaigns.

The parties have argued over these issues in recent years in relation to central government but I don’t think anyone has worried too much about tightening up the rules for local government. With the creation of the Auckland Council the power and resources at stake make it essential there are rules to limit the influence of big money.

Local Government Minister Rodney Hide says he doesn’t want to see any transparency requirements.

To be fair to John Banks and Len Brown, they have both operated within the law. The National Party has a history of using secret trusts. It was pretty obvious John Banks would rely on big anonymous donors. Len Brown would have been tying one hand behind his own back if he hadn’t been willing to accept anonymous donations too. The rules need to be changed so there is a level playing field.

National should have included transparency for campaign donations when it passed the Auckland super city legislation, as well as a lower spending cap, and limits on third parties. Now would be a good time to review the Local Electoral Act to get this sorted out.


Super mayoral win

Posted by on October 9th, 2010

Just to add to Grant’s post, I think Len’s win is a pretty clear rejection of the Rodney Hide-John Key model for the super city.

John Banks said this was a contest between him and a Labour mayor from south Auckland. Well, the people have spoken, and it is great to have a mayor who has campaigned and will govern as an independent but comes from the Labour side of politics.

Rodney Hide has bullied and bulldozed his super city through in a way that has left Aucklanders uncomfortable and uneasy for the last 18 months. This is the first time Aucklanders have had a say on the super city at the ballot box. They have voted for a man who has promised to undo much of the damage done by Rodney Hide.

I don’t think Aucklanders trusted a former National Party Minister to implement the agenda that National has set in place for Auckland. In Len Brown they have chosen a mayor who will not sell our assets, who they trust to give real powers to local boards, and who will hold the powerful council-owned companies to account.


John Banks…What not to say to bright young Pacific Professionals….lessons learnt from last night

Posted by on September 18th, 2010

The Young Pacific Leadership Network Inc Society, is a network of 20 – 40 year old Pacific Professionals from across all areas (academia, arts, public sector, private sector etc etc).  Last night approx 100 of us met to listen to Brown and Banks.  It was suppose to provide them both with an opportunity to ‘sell themselves’ to these voters…however it didn’t go so well for one of them.

Before I launch in to the five, ‘what not to do’ tips with young bright aspirational Pacific people, I do want to say that it was awesome that both of them agreed to speak.  For that I am thankful to both Mayor Brown and Mayor Banks.

If I had more time I’d write some positive things…maybe later…but the reality is that the negative aspects are much much funnier!

Here we go:

LESSONS FOR JOHN BANKS

Don’t…

1. …arrive whilst Len is still speaking and then refuse to come inside until he’s gone.  When you tell one of the organisers that you would rather wait until he leaves out of respect for Len…no one believes you.  Infact you look silly pacing up and down the footpath in the cold!

2.  …spend 80% of the speech time trying to connect with us by talking about your experience in Mt Eden prison and the fact you met 25 good Pacific Island men in there

3. …launch in to passionate speals about the dangers of drugs and alcohol.  PI’s read newspapers as well and are thinking to themselves…’bro no offence but it ain’t just our people and our children that have a bit of a problem with consumption….ya know what I mean Papa John’…

4. …use scripture as a political strategy, when the meeting is being held at a bar and everyone is enjoying a few end of the week work drinks

5. …try and tell us that you have no association with the National Party whatsoever and that you will never take directives from them or undertake any work in association with them (the lies don’t compliment the scripture readings)

I could go on and on but I won’t.  I’m sure my right wing friends will have lots of feedback for me to respond to, throughout the day:)


Goodbye to the slug?

Posted by on July 7th, 2010

The Herald reports Rugby World Cup Minister Murray McCully is furious at the prospect of the ARC and Auckland City cutting a deal to save one of the Queens Wharf cargo sheds.  If the body language at Monday’s opening of the Kingsland rail station upgrade is anything to go by, McCully’s feelings towards Mike Lee are somewhat deathly. One insider at the event told me McCully refused to speak on the same platform as Lee, causing a strange re-jigging of the programme that saw the Minister’s speech separated from the others by a 25 minute tea break.  By contrast John Banks’ and Mike Lee’s speeches were a veritable love-fest.

What’s got Muzza so peeved?  The latest attempt to salvage John Key’s party central was a deal hammered out between ARC Chairman Mike Lee and McCully to knock over both the cargo sheds on Queens Wharf and spend $9.6 million on a semi-temporary party central venue and cruise ship terminal gloriously dubbed a ‘giant slug’ by heritage adviser and blogger Joshua Arbury. Lee and McCully announced the plan in April.

Local architects have waged a spirited campaign to save the sheds and restore them in the way that has been done successfully on the wharves of Sydney and countless other cities. Events supremo Michael Mizrahi made a compelling case for the sheds on Sunday a couple of weeks back. Personally I reckon Queens Wharf is such prime real estate  it should be used for a major long-term development with ample public space that would be a magnet to bring people down to the waterfront.  I have felt uneasy about about the prospect of a semi-temporary development cobbled together for the Rugby World Cup.

Now it appears Mike Lee has found a way to save one of the sheds, probably with the help of some additional funding from Auckland City. We should hear the details after today’s ARC meeting.

Update 2.15pm: Slug stays, shed survives, Muzza not happy.  Herald


Olympics in Auckland – Banks takes the piss ?

Posted by on June 30th, 2010

The Mayor of Auckland John Banks appears to have taken leave of his senses in suggesting Auckland could host the Olympics.

I don’t have a figure as to the cost but it would be several billion dollars.

The government, quite properly in my opinion, decided not to support a Commonwealth games bid on the basis that the cost/benefit didn’t add up. You probably add three zeros to the Comm Games costs to get a figure for the Olympics.

The Olympics ended in tears for the Athens and Sydney hosts, costings are blowing out to high heaven in London and we don’t have the resources of China.

I sometimes get on ok with Banksie but on this one I think he is taking the piss.


Banks on leaky homes: I was there but can’t recall

Posted by on May 19th, 2010

From Morning Report yesterday:

Auckland Mayor John Banks: “I was part of the Government of the time when this legislation was put in place that allowed this untreated timber, that allowed no voids, that allowed chicken wire, that allowed…”

Sean Plunket: Why did that happen?

John Banks: I reflect on this often. I am not a builder. I have no knowledge of these things. It has been a legacy of disaster step by step.

Sean Plunket: No no but why did you vote for that? What was said at your caucus that convinced the Government of the day to remove protections and remove hitherto entirely adequate provisions around building materials and construction methods?

John Banks: I can’t remember. But I’m not going to…

Sean Plunket: It is your job.  Surely. I am sorry Mr Banks, that is not going to stand. What do you mean you can’t remember?

John Banks: You are being silly Sean. You are just being silly.

Building and Construction Minister Maurice Williamson sat around the same Cabinet table with Mr Banks when those fateful decisions were made. I wonder if he remembers?


Snouts in trough

Posted by on February 14th, 2010

The Herald on Sunday reveals former National Party president Michelle Boag has picked up the contract to recruit the third tier of executives for the Auckland super city while also being an unpaid campaign adviser for John Banks’ mayoral campaign.

Welcome to the Auckland super city. That Boag and Banks say in the story they can’t see any conflict of interest says it all. Snout wedged so firmly in  trough all perspective has been lost.

How on earth can Boag be expected to recruit what should be a politically independent public service to run the super city when she is also running the election campaign of the Right’s mayoral candidate?

Says Boag:

My networks are such that I had to be very careful about keeping me away from that tender process. I can’t help knowing the people that I know. I have very good relationships with a great number of people. The trouble for me is I’m a well-connected person.

I’m not saying Boag shouldn’t ever work in this town because her networks are so good, nor that she personally interfered in the tender process. But to work for the Banks campaign while recruiting the executives who are going to run the Council’s business? Please.

To say it is not a good look is an under-statement. It is about as damaging to the super city’s democratic legitimacy as the fact that Rodney Hide is going to hand pick the boards of directors of the commercial entities that are going to run the bulk of the Council’s business in secret, instead of letting the newly elected Council appoint them.

Aucklanders could be forgiven for asking whether this is a backdoor way of funding Banks’ campaign. Michelle Boag gets a million-dollar contract from the super city, and in return she works for Banks for free. With Transition Agency chair Mark Ford her former client, Agency board members Rob Fisher and John Waller fellow members of the Eden Park Trust Board, and Jenny Shipley a fellow principal in her recruitment company, this is getting way too cozy.

I want to know if there was an open public tender. I’ll have an Official Information Act request on Mark Ford’s desk shortly asking for the documents relating to the tender process that led to Michelle Boag getting the recruitment contract, including the evaluation criteria.