Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘hone harawira’

I wonder who wants Hone to be a Minister in Labour led government today

Posted by on May 5th, 2011

There has been some criticism from soft headed lefties at Phil Goff’s ruling out having Hone Harawira as part of the next government. Today’s Herald reinforces his decision.

Hone Harawira has described Osama bin Laden as “a man who fought for the rights, the land and the freedom of his people”.

In tributes on Maori-language television, the leader of the new Mana Party said the al-Qaeda founder should be “honoured” rather than “damned” in death according to Maori culture.

I’m glad Shane was asked for comment rather than me. His response is great.

Labour MP Shane Jones said he did not have the same level of affection for bin Laden as Mr Harawira.

He also scotched Mr Harawira’s claim that it was Maori custom to always pay tribute to the dead.

“In the old days, a great enemy – if he wasn’t eaten – his bones were used to make musical instruments. So this romantic notion that in the old time, Maori spent hours of their time saluting the enemy was not the case.

“Enemies were turned to dust and people rejoiced, because of the suffering they had caused.”


Hone case prejudged ?

Posted by on February 8th, 2011

Hone has been given the boot from his office and is shifting over to the main buidling.

Thought it might have been polite to wait until their disciplinary process had finished.

Farce ?

Tags:
Filed under: M?ori

Hone has the right to criticise his leadership

Posted by on January 23rd, 2011

Not often that I find my self agreeing with Matt McCarten and Fran O’Sullivan at the same time. They have written from different perspectives but come to the same conclusion :- Hone Harawira has a right and possibly even a responsibility to criticise the leadership of the Maori Party for the direction they are taking.

McCarten :-

Political maturity means accepting MPs will have different opinions.

A party having a considered discussion about itself is democratic and can make it more popular.

Trying to crush alternative perspectives will have the opposite effect.

O’Sullivan :-

Backbench MPs are not subject to Cabinet collective responsibility. They should be able to articulate their views on major issues and challenge the powers that be. Trouble is, far too many of today’s crop leave any pretence to owning an independent brain outside the door when they enter Parliament.

and

Harawira is made of sterner stuff. But there has also been a sea change, which I put down to the journalistic tendency to quickly put any backbench MP on to the “must be dumped from caucus’ slipway” when they call their own party to account.

Instead of greasing the ramp, why don’t journalists simply challenge the leadership to respond to the valid points Harawira has made?

Publicly opposing the leadership of your party is never easy. But there are plenty of precedents, more from Westminster than here but can and should still be done.

The process is pretty clear. One resigns from portfolios and shifts to the backbench. One talks it through with the leader and then caucus. And one is honest and straightforward – not the Carter approach.

We don’t have a real tradition of this sort of approach – Muldoon, Minogue, Waring, Anderton, Upton, Lee. Being a small Parliament doesn’t help. And the increased power that has gone to the party and the leadership with MMP hasn’t helped either.

But I do agree with McCarten and O’Sullivan that it is an important part of a democracy that, in the end, MPs have the right to go public with their concerns.

Lots of colleagues disagree. I refer readers to the box at the top right.

And to make it clear to trolls again – I believe Phil Goff is the only person in our caucus who can lead a government this year – and that this post is about MPs right to express their views – nothing wider.


Whither Hone

Posted by on January 20th, 2011

Andrew Geddis on Pundit has a good piece on the dilemma facing the Maori Party.

Another point on the question that hasn’t been focussed on is that the loss of a seat is very real for the Maori Party. If Labour or the Nats lose a seat it is (at the next election) replaced by a list seat, all other things remaining equal, whereas because the Maori Party are in permanent overhang a loss is even more important.

Last Sunday, Hone Harawira penned this opinion piece in the Sunday Star-Times, titled “crunch time for Maori grumbles”. It’s looking like the piece may well have brought about crunch time for him; or, at least, crunch time for his relationship with his Maori Party colleagues.

You can see why the piece has caused so much friction. Not only does he decry “the anti-worker, anti-beneficiary and anti-environment (and therefore anti-Maori) legislation that comes as a natural consequence of having a right-wing government”, he also slams his own colleagues: “because leaders do most of the talking for a party (and control what the rest of their MPs say as well), our public statements over the last couple of years have been rather muted, to say the least.”

His list of “suggestions” for the Party in the lead up to the election also contain a few pretty blatant swipes at his own team. They need to “speak out strongly against National’s anti-social initiatives.” They need to abandon their support for the replacement foreshore and seabed legislation – effectively admitting defeat on this core issue. They need to “most importantly, go back to the people” – because the MPs have become so comfortable in power that they’ve forgotten who they must answer to.


Wednesday poll – do only boorish rednecks think Hone is racist ?

Posted by on August 12th, 2010

Harawira is at it again. The Herald reports that he has written a column repeating his view that inter-racial relationships are not desirable.

In his regular column in the Northland Age this week, Mr Harawira says it seems “some boorish redneck wants to shove his boot right down my throat” every time he speaks.

“And so it was again last week when I made a comment about how I wouldn’t feel comfortable if one of my kids came home with a Pakeha for a date. But what was wrong with that?

Hone Harawira thinks Maori girls shouldn't go out with Pakeha boys

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Good on you Hone

Posted by on May 20th, 2010

I’ve known Hone Harawira for about a decade. Classic case of where one should judge an individual and not the family.

He did great work with a kura in his home patch. Chaired the board. They had some financial issues and there were some honest but unusual approaches. Always done in the interest of kids but sometimes caused trouble with the Ministry.

I always knew where he stood.

Still the case. Don’t always agree with him but never in doubt as to his views. That is one of the things about being an MP, you are elected exresssing opinions and while it is good to develop and learn it is also important not to pretend that you agree with things when they are rubbish.

Hone made it clear last night that he agrees with the Labour Party that putting up GST is an attack on the poor.

It is happenning so John Key and people of similar wealth and income can get a tax cut of over $1,000 a week.

Some loopholes in property taxation law are being closed to neutralise the effects and finance some softening for low income earners.

But the real benefits are not going to the core National supporters who earn $70 – $120k  – but to Key’s very high income mates.

I think the Nats will regret changing the top rate rather than doing a big increase to the threshold.

Because as Hone says it is poor people Maori and Pakeha who will finance the tax cuts for the rich. And thats not the Kiwi way.


Flying the Maori Party flag

Posted by on February 7th, 2010

Tim Watkin has a good post on Pundit which asks if flying the Maori Party flag on government buildings is meaningless and patronising or whether it means something – and if so is that is more disturbing?


Is John Key racist for criticising Hone Harawira but backing Wiremu Pakeha?

Posted by on February 5th, 2010

Kelvin Davis has posted on whether it is appropriate to copyright the Maori Party flag. Interesting discussion but it now appears  that neither Hone Harawira nor his wife has any beneficial interest in any application that may be made in the future.

So why has John Key been so aggressive in his criticism of Hone?

Hone is a sometimes an easy target. He puts his head up and I’ve certainly had a go at him when it is appropriate.

But contrast this question of a perceived (but not actual) conflict of interest of a member of Hone’s family with the decade of the English whanau ripping the taxpayer off by pretending to live in Dipton. And Wiremu was found to have an interest. And it is continuing.

So is Key kicking Hone because he is Maori and if not what is his explanation for his hypocrisy?


Hone may have done some good

Posted by on December 21st, 2009

Hone getting John Key to agree to making the Maori Party flag an official flag of New Zealand may have done some good. It has rekindled the issue of getting a real New Zealand flag – not one designed for minor adjustment when we joined Australia – as many thought inevitable at the time. It would be good to have a flag that brings Kiwis together rather than two that drive us apart.

To vote on your favourite go to John Ansell’s site. Health warning – this is the Iwi/Kiwi guy, if you are easily offended by right wing rubbish don’t go there, or hold your nose as you vote.

Hat tip Kiwiblog.


White mofos not racist?

Posted by on December 4th, 2009

I still don’t get it. How can Hone begin to get away with suggesting that his comments weren’t racist?

And even more amazing is that the editor of the Herald has become an apologist for the Maori Party. You can almost see John Key’s spin team dictating the editorial. At least the Dompost can spot bullshit.

The Herald should not be buying into John Key’s special treatment for his Maori Party support team.

If a Pakeha used the term brown mofos it would be racist.  That standard should apply both ways.


Hone gives Tari finger and gets two months holiday

Posted by on December 2nd, 2009

It was all so predictable. Wet bus ticket and nine week holiday for Hone. Tariana absent but real loser.

Three weeks ago I posed the question Hone or Tariana who will the real party back?

“But isn’t the real issue the shape of Maori Party the supporters and party workers want. While those who are more closely aligned with the corporates may support the Nacts I got the impression that the teams that did the work on the ground were closer to a Hone Mana Motuhake grouping than a Tariana National/Act approach.

There is also the question of where the others stand. I first worked with Pita 32 years ago and he has always been an individual of real personal integrity,  as did Te Ururoa Flavell in our briefer and more recent professional work together. I don’t know Rahui Katene but get the impression she is a hard working woman and is principled.

Everyone knows this debate is not about Hone, bad language or racisim. It is about the future of the Maori Party and in particular how many more times the male members can be humiliated by John Key and Tariana Turia working together as a team.”

I was subsequently reminded of Katene’s humiliation by Turia on the ETS, and accepted that it wasn’t a gender issue.

And now it is clear that they want Hone. The Maori party can’t afford to lose him because it would be seen as total capitulation to the Nact dominated Turia.

Going to be exciting going forward because I’m sure Hone won’t hold back from speaking his mind for too long.

Also of interest was the reappearance of Derek Fox who walked from the Maori party when they folded to McCully on the Rugby World Cup rights issue.

Update  Dunc calls Harawira new Maori Party leader – blog


The politics of abuse

Posted by on November 17th, 2009

But abuse is not the real political issue – politics is a business of abuse.

That’s a quote from Colin James’ piece in yesterday’s Dom Post(and other papers). A good piece analysing the real politick of the Hone Harawira issue and  the implications for John Key in  his lack of tough management of the coalition.

My colleague Grant Robertson posted about this yesterday

Trevor has posted also on the issue. Twice.

For me, the quote above, while taken out of context, reveals the horror of politics. And why we must do politics differently. We cannot accept that politics is the business of abuse. That’s what’s wrong with us.

Politics must not be about abuse. It must be about hope and change. Call me an idealist. But what’s the bloody point, if it’s about abuse and we call it a business?


Matt rallies to Hone’s defence

Posted by on November 15th, 2009

It’s no secret that Matt McCarten, Willie Jackson, John Tamihere and Hone Harawira are mates. A bunch of blokes who stick together and (like to) stick it up the establishment. I get that. They’ve made careers out of being unPC.

But there are times when the best thing you can do for a mate is to tell him (or her) when you’ve crossed the line and that you’ve got to suck it up.

Matt’s column in this morning’s Herald on Sunday is pretty transparently an apologist piece for Hone’s behaviour and an overt warning to the Maori Party.

Watch out Matt. You might have gone too far.


Tariana v Hone who will the real party back?

Posted by on November 14th, 2009

Lots of coverage over the last couple of weeks on problems within the Maori Party and Hone has got a fair amount of flack.

Claire Trevett has some background. Audrey Young a bit more opinion. And stuff is carrying a lighter piece looking more to Key’s reaction.

But isn’t the real issue the shape of Maori Party the supporters and party workers want. While those who are more closely aligned with the corporates may support the Nacts I got the impression that the teams that did the work on the ground were closer to a Hone Mana Motuhake grouping than a Tariana National/Act approach.

There is also the question of where the others stand. I first worked with Pita 32 years ago and he has always been an individual of real personal integrity,  as did Te Ururoa Flavell in our briefer and more recent professional work together. I don’t know Rahui Katene but get the impression she is a hard working woman and is principled.

Everyone knows this debate is not about Hone, bad language or racisim. It is about the future of the Maori Party and in particular how many more times the male members can be humiliated by John Key and Tariana Turia working together as a team.


A new New Zealand flag

Posted by on August 14th, 2009

One of the first things I might do when Labour is next in government, is over two or three months hold up to 21 meetings in community halls around the country to get people to choose a new New Zealand flag.

After intensive consultation amongst Labour colleagues we’ll have four flag options for New Zealanders to choose from.

  1. The current New Zealand flag
  2. The New Zealand Red Ensign
  3. The flag of the United Tribes
  4. The Tino Rangatiratanga flag

At the end of the day I’m not too fussed about which flag is chosen. It’s about building unity through ensuring everybody gets a say.