Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘home help’

More on home help cuts

Posted by Chris Hipkins on March 15th, 2010

Back in February I posted on cuts to home help. My offices here in the Hutt Valley have been dealing with a steady stream of complaints from older residents who’ve had home help hours cut. Last week the Hutt News picked up the issue and on Friday I met with staff from the Hutt Valley DHB to talk about it. I generally have a very good working relationship with our local DHB and I think that overall they’re doing a great job. However on this particular issue I still have real concerns.

The Hutt News article revealed some salient statistics. Between October 2008 and December 2009 reviews of home help to 1950 Hutt Valley elders were carried out. 810 had hours cut, 820 had no change, and just 320 got more hours. In the 12 months to Jan 2009 the DHB spent $3.9 million on home help. Last year they cut $700,000 out of that spend. I simply don’t accept that cost-cutting isn’t part of the agenda here.

Cutting home help is so short-sighted. We should be trying to keep our older citizens in their own homes as long as possible. If a few hours help with the housework and/or grocery shopping helps them to do that then why penny-pinch? More people in rest homes will cost the health system a lot more than a few home help hours will.


Home help cuts disgusting

Posted by Chris Hipkins on February 8th, 2010

Recently my electorate offices have been deluged by complaints about cuts to home help hours. I’ve asked Hutt Valley DHB what’s going on several times and they have constantly claimed there have been no budget cuts, they are just doing a regular review. Frankly that’s rubbish. From what I’ve seen the cuts are deep and they’re disgusting. They are putting the health and wellbeing of our older citizens at risk.

It’s stupid and short-sighted. More seniors will end up in hospital. More will end up going into full-time care. It will cost the DHB a lot more. I just don’t know what they think they are doing. The families concerned are worried. They’re trying to do their bit to help out but often they’re balancing full-time work with raising their own families. There are limits to what they can do.

The carers are worried too. They’re often the people who have the most regular contact. If I were to ask them who will end up in hospital in the next few months, I reckon they could predict it with about 90% accuracy. Why aren’t the DHB tapping into that expertise. Surely prevention is better than treatment further down the track?

I find it particularly disgusting that many of these cuts are being done over the phone. How on earth can someone tell whether or not it is fair/safe to cut an elderly person’s home help hours based on a 5 minute phone call?

I’ve often quoted Hubert Humphrey’s remark that a society should be judged by how it treats those in the dawn of life (children), the twlight of life (the elderly) and the shadows of life (the sick and the needy). If that’s our measure, then sadly we’re not doing too well at the moment…