Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘heather roy’

A Report on Progress

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 4th, 2011

Anyone tuning into Parliament yesterday afternoon and evening may have had a bit of trouble working out quite what was going on, and a few people have been in touch to ask, so, to coin a phrase, here is a report on progress.

Yesterday was Members Day, which happens every second Wednesday when we consider Private Members, Local and Private Bills ( ie not the government’s legislative programme). We began the day with further consideration by the Committee of the Whole House (what Parliament calls itself when it is debating each clause or part of a bill) of the Royal Society Bill. As those who watch Parliament closely will know this Bill is in my name, but is a Private Bill to update the Royal Society Act to reflect some changes they have made to the way they operate. It is fair to say this Bill has been getting a lot of attention in recent months!

Early in the debate Heather Roy moved that the House report progress on the Bill. This is a provision of standing orders that allows debate on a bill to stop for that day and for the Bill to be set down for further discussion the next day. With the support of National this motion was passed, effectively shutting down debate and seeing us move to the next Bill, the hotly debated Voluntary Student Association Membership Bill in Heather’s name.

What followed was some procedural argy-bargy as to whether and how a motion to report progress can be used. This included a few appearances by the Speaker to clarify points of order. The Speaker acknowledged that the use of the provision was something that needed the attention of the Standing Orders Committee, but gave an interim Speakers Ruling that said that a motion to report progress could only be put as the Committee of the Whole considered a new clause or part. ( I bet you are glad you know that!).

I know the procedural argy-bargy can look a bit unedifying, but it is, and always has been, part and parcel of Parliament. There are a lot of rules and precedents, and as seen today all sides use them from time to time.

In any case we went on to the VSM Bill, and some fairly vigorous exchanges. Labour strongly opposes this legislation, because we believe it is an ideological attempt to kill of student associations, and in fact it actually reduces the choice of student associations to decide their own destiny. For me student associations are like local government. Enrolling as a student makes you part of a community, and the student association is the organisation that helps govern that community. You can read more of Labour’s position here and in our minority report on page 5 of here.

I do not apologise for fighting hard to stop VSM. I really think it will be detrimental to students, and their welfare, and to tertiary institutions. I have always felt if you believe passionately in something you have to be prepared to fight for it.

The House rose with the Committee debating Clause 9, the final clause of the Bill. That means we have not yet completed the Committee stages. One confusion to clear up, completing Committee stages does not mean the Bill has passed. That comes with a Third Reading, a two hour debate that will occur after the Committee stages are completed, and can not be on the same day as the Committee stages are completed.

Hope that helps. The next Members Day is the 17th of August. Tune in for another exciting installment.


Silly Heather Roy can’t do maths

Posted by Trevor Mallard on June 3rd, 2011

Poor old Heather Roy has fallen for something no one of her experience should. She has signed off a media release drafted by an Act intern suggesting that Labour opposing the Act bill to gut students’ associations has cost the taxpayer a fortune.

Pity she didn’t read it and think first.

The release is predicated on the assumption that Parliament has sat longer than it would have otherwise. It hasn’t. Not one single minute longer. Not an extra cent has been spent.

I understand why she is unhappy. The Labour Party is using it’s ability to delay legislation to attempt to push the bill past the election. Only Act really supports it. The Nats are lukewarm because they know that the transfer of roles to the institutions will increase fees and thereby loan liabilities for the taxpayer. The bill has never had a proper economic impact report.

She has every right to complain about us raining on her parade.

But for a party that is meant to embrace economic realism she needs to understand and then brief her intern on the difference between average and marginal costs.


Rodney Hide too distracted to be a Minister

Posted by Grant Robertson on September 24th, 2010

As previously noted the last time I asked Rodney Hide where the review of special education was I got a very short shrift.  The review was all but done when Heather Roy was unceremoniously dumped.  Parents, schools and families are anxiously awaiting the outcome.  They appreciated the work Heather Roy had done, but are worried the review seems to have disappeared. It is now a month since Rodney Hide became the Minister responsible for special education and we have not heard a peep from him on the subject.

I am strongly of the view Rodney Hide is not appropriate to be a Minister, and John Key’s continued defence of him is disturbing.  In addition he is clearly far too distracted to actually follow through on the important tasks of being a Minister.  For the good of all those involved in Special Education John Key needs to do the right thing and relieve Rodney Hide of his portfolios.


Hide wins Act loses – perfect result for centre left?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 21st, 2010

There will be lots of analysis over the weekend of  Act’s week.

Yet to see any acknowledement  in mainstream media (or whaleoil, penguin press or the standard) for Red Alert being the first media to foreshadow Roy’s demise. Maybe they don’t like admitting being off the pace.

The Herald has three stories. I think John Armstrong’s column is pretty good.

So Rodney Hide ends the most calamitous week in his party’s history having won (at least for the time being) the debilitating power struggle that has been consuming the Act caucus and the wider party for months.

But at dreadful cost. This is the most pyrrhic of victories – a variant on the old Vietnam war adage of having to destroy the village in order to save it.

In conspiring to oust Heather Roy from the deputy leadership, Hide may well have destroyed Act not only as a parliamentary force, but also wrecked its capacity to resurrect itself

and :-

For many members, the attraction of Act has been as the party of ideas and ideals, not personality. Or the kind of pragmatism that many members see as compromising too much in National’s favour.

At the party’s annual conference this year, both Roy and Douglas argued strongly for Act to get out of the shadow cast by National.

Hide – still weakened at the time over his scandalous use of ministerial perks – appeared to listen.

He delivered stinging criticism of National’s emissions trading scheme, National’s endorsement of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Waikato River treaty settlement.

Then he stopped

There are small stories on Act minor players. Peter Tashkoff who is 2 off being an MP confirms Hide is not a worthy leader and there is the familiar tactic of blame the staff being used to finger Roy’s advisor Simon Ewing-Jarvie.

The Dompost has a similar take. Martin Kay describes the results as toxic for Act.

The chaotic and at times bizarre handling of Mrs Roy’s dumping as ACT deputy this week was “not very tidy” in the same way the disintegration of the Alliance in 2002 could be described as “a bit messy”.

Even as the fallout over her sacking reached its most toxic, with the leaking on Wednesday of her claims of Mr Hide’s shouted abuse and stormy corridor rows

Act will now have no choice but to focus on winning Epsom – the Nats are already publicly moving to the right making it easier for Labour to win back the centre ground.

Still a way to go but thanks for your help Rodney.


Mapp into deep cover

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 20th, 2010

Wayne Mapp was meant to open Innovation Expo @ Weltec this morning. He is a no show. Gone into hiding to avoid telling media Heather Roy is truthful. Pity.


Red Alert first to break the news – lamington boscawen replaces roy

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 17th, 2010

2442650

At 6.29pm yesterday Red Alert was the first medium to report the impending Act firing. Loose National lips. But a good example of the new media being way ahead of the rat pack.

Boscawen’s most memorable act was to keep on talking with a lamington on his head during his pathetic Mt Albert race – look at TV3’s footage


Heather Roy to be sacked tomorrow

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 16th, 2010

Usually very reliable Wellington source tells me that John Boscawen is to replace Heather Roy as Act Deputy in the morning.

Rodney’s revenge ?

Update – this mornings Herald story

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10666622


Gifted and talented – what do standards mean for these kids.

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 7th, 2010

There is a great guest post on Heather Roy’s blog by Assoc Prof Tracy Riley one of our leading academics on the question of education for the gifted and talented.

Assoc Prof Tracy Riley, Massey University, is the Chairperson of giftEDnz: The Professional Association for Gifted Education. Tracy represents her organisation on the Ministerial Advisory Group for Gifted and Talented Education, and has long been an advocate for the needs of gifted and talented students in New Zealand.

Conspicuously missing from the debate around National Standards documentation and discussion is any reference to how these may be implemented for, and their potential impacts upon, our gifted and talented students. Unlike students with special educational needs (as identified by having a disability, rather than advanced abilities) or those who speak English as an additional language, it could be construed that gifted and talented students do not require any special consideration in the implementation and reporting of national standards.

In perusing the material on National Standards, I have become alarmed by the ‘missing’ elements. There is no mention of above-level assessment, well-above average performance, or continuous progress via appropriate educational provisions for gifted and talented students.

Whole blog worth reading and the comments as well. What is really interesting is that despite being the Minister in charge of this area Heather has chosen not to comment herself.


Next Minister to resign – Heather Roy attacks Chopper Tolley

Posted by Trevor Mallard on July 21st, 2009

Just as the government moves to impose badly thought out ineffective standards and massive compliance costs on schools the Associate Minister of Education has decided to come out swinging against Chopper Tolley:

It is very important that all schools are able to focus on the needs of students and parents, rather than on the demands of Government.

I want principals and teachers to lead learning; I want schools to get on with teaching and boards to provide proactive governance. Valuable time and energy shouldn’t be wasted on satisfying an over-powering and needless bureaucracy. Our sole aim needs to be delivering the best education outcomes for all children and young people so they have all the tools and opportunities with which to reach their full potential.

We need to place high trust in leaders at the front-line, and encourage and promote self-managing schools. This means strong educational leadership in every school is critical to achieving education goals be that state, integrated, independent, Rudolph Steiner – whatever the philosophy.

In that bit she sounds Labour!

The rest of the speech not as good but if you have time view it here.

How long can she last?