Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘democracy’

How things change

Posted by Chris Hipkins on December 23rd, 2009

Back on 30 December 2007 the Herald on Sunday ran a story about the Nats working over the summer. Here are a few excerpts:

[John] Key caused a few grumbles in National’s caucus before Christmas when he insisted his team would have a minimal break, and he expected them to be working their shadow portfolios throughout the summer.

Education spokeswoman Katherine Rich took him at his word, and, immediately after Boxing Day, she was hammering Labour for booming salaries in the Ministry of Education …

Similarly, National MP Simon Power stirred himself from his sun lounger to fire off an attack on the Department of Corrections for doubling the amount it spends on consultants to nearly $20 million of taxpayers’ money a year.

How things have changed in 2 years. Back when they were in opposition National MPs thought these were legitimate issues and were happy to work during the summer. Now that they are in charge, they’re outraged that the Labour opposition is holding them to account.


MMP debate

Posted by Maryan Street on September 13th, 2009

There was a good debate on the floor of the conference today about the impending MMP referendum and about the form of our democracy more generally.

One of the things I felt moved to speak on was the need to have a system where any List MP who leaves the original party which put them into Parliament, must leave Parliament also. This “Gordon Copeland provision” we have at the moment is not morally or ethically defensible and I disagreed with it in 1993. If you leave your party of origin while in Parliament, you should have the courage of your convictions and leave Parliament altogether I say. Then stand again under another party name.

This particularly applies to List MPs, like me, who are only there by virtue of their party’s selection and the party votes of the public. Constituency MPs are elected by a different means and the public’s right to unelect a sitting member can be exercised at a byelection or at the end of a Parliamentary term.

So this is one turkey who believes in early Christmases. Even turkeys can have principles!


The people are speaking

Posted by Phil Twyford on July 8th, 2009

Aucklanders are communicating loud and clear with the select committee on the super city which is now into its third day of hearings. Assuming these three days are somewhat representative of opinion across the city, and bear in mind the committee has been sitting in central Auckland and is yet to move around the cities and districts, a number of themes are emerging:

1. People are grumpy about the rushed process.

2. Rodney Hide’s toothless local boards are getting the big thumbs down. People want community councils with the powers and resources to carry out local tasks. Many have argued for the principle of subsidiarity, that is that unless there is a sound reason for putting a task at the top level then it should be done at the second tier. There is quite a range of opinion on the question of how many community councils there should be.

3. Of the individual submitters a strong majority are in favour of all councillors being elected from wards, as opposed to at-large councillors.

4. Most submitters in favour of special Maori representation. (A sub-committee is spending several days hearing submissions on marae but Maori submitters can also choose to address the full committee.)

5. Many submitters in favour of STV as the voting system especially for the mayor but many arguing for it across the board.

6. Particularly from individual submitters, a lot of scepticism about the proposed package of mayoral powers and the ’strong mayor’ model.

7. And although not everyone keen on my member’s bill requiring a referendum before any assets are sold, a strong common view in favour of keeping local government assets in public ownership.

There is plenty of argument and opposing views as you’d imagine. But I have to say it is heartening listening to so many thoughtful and heartfelt submissions by people who care passionately about our democracy. The powerful current coming through from individual submitters today is people wanting a strong local voice, and wanting their politicians to be accountable (not elected at-large, fewer powers for the mayor). Good democratic impulses I’d say.

The Nats are signalling they are ready to move towards empowered community councils. It will be interesting to see how they handle the pressure on Maori representation and at large v.ward-based councillors.


Hikoi people power

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 26th, 2009

Kia ora to Ngati Whatua, Ihiaotearoa, and all the organisers of yesterday’s hikoi for showing leadership. The hikoi was a good natured, vibrant show of people power. Ostensibly a demonstration against the Government’s rejection of the Royal Commission’s recommendations for Maori representation on the new Auckland Council, the Maori organisers generously welcomed all those concerned about the Government’s anti-democratic super city model.  In doing so, they united a rainbow coalition of iwi, the Mayors, countless community groups and concerned citizens, along with the Maori Party, the Greens and Labour. Even conservative pundit Bill Ralston despairs of the Government provoking such a coalition.

Key and Hide downplayed the hikoi, with Key wishing Maori would  just make a submission to the select committee. Hopefully they will do that too, but he misses the point. Yesterday’s demonstration of people power was a healthy indicator of political engagement in our democracy by Maori and non-Maori alike. It was Aucklanders concerned about their communities, and wanting a say in their future. The exact opposite of Key and Hide’s corporate takeover of Auckland democracy.


Auckland: city or corporation?

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 22nd, 2009

Great post on the Auckland Transition Agency over at No Right Turn: this afternoon Rodney Hide announced the oligarchy that is going to run Auckland from now until the local body elections in October next year. It’s a competent looking panel but that is not the point. While rich in corporate governance experience it is weak on democracy or community – with only one of the five, former Rodney mayor John Law, having any political experience in local government.

Any fears that the NACT Government see this process as a corporate merger will have been well and truly underlined.  Rodney Hide in his press release made much of the board’s role “developing the new governance structures and roles to manage the $28 billion of assets effectively” but had nothing to say about communities, neighbourhoods, or the quality of democracy.


Hide sidelined as Carter gets pushed to the front?

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 21st, 2009

Is Rodney Hide becoming an embarrassment to the Government over his handling of the super city?

Rodney got kneecapped at Cabinet over his nominations for the transition agency with senior National Party sources telling the Herald there were concerns about conflicts of interest over Mr Hide’s proposed appointees. Now we have Associate Minister John Carter being wheeled in to chair the Auckland select committee, which is very unusual. You don’t normally have an associate minister who has been actively involved in the policy development deployed to chair a committee charged with scrutiny of the bills. Carter is also fronting the Nats’ raft of taxpayer-funded public meetings – see the caption competition below.

Then this morning Hone Carter tells Radio NZ he’d been asked to chair the select committee  ‘because I am the face now at the, ah, grassroots level of what the Government’s doing and so it is important that I get fully informed.’

Hide has never been a popular figure. His arrogant approach to the super city clearly has the Government worried. It’s only a few weeks since his bull in a china shop impersonation prompted John Key to shuttle around hosing down Auckland mayors with his “I’m listening” mantra.

Check out this week’s incendiary editorial in The Aucklander – APN’s community paper, slamming the Government’s approach to the super city. And the Suburban Newspapers’ ongoing campaign. With the Hikoi shaping up as a fine demonstration of public anger next week, how long will it be until the Nats’ Auckland MPs take a delegation to the leader’s office?


Democracy: tell us what you think?

Posted by Clare Curran on May 14th, 2009

Isn’t real democracy great? Seriously, I think we are so fortunate to live in a country where the Opppostion can hold fast and make it’s point without an uprising. This National Government is arrogant and not listening to people. They’re ramming through anti-democratic legislation as important as this under urgency. It’s not good enough. People expect more from their elected representatives. Tell us what you think.