Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘David Garrett’

Garrett, Boag feature at Hide fundraiser

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 7th, 2011

Don’t often link to Whaleoil. He can write some pretty nasty stuff. Doing it two posts in a row certainly won’t be viewed positively by some colleagues.

But this is too good not to be shared with more reasonable readers.

Whale attended the Hide’s Act fundraiser at the Alan Gibbs farm. Two important political features.

The disgraced former MP Garrett who stole the identity of a dead child has been rehabilitated and is involved in the Act Party again. Maybe fair enough from his perspective because Hide and his friends knew about his previous life before he was selected. And certified him as an appropriate candidate for Act. But they ran away from their mate when his troubles became public.

I wonder whether this will just count as one strike and he will be back on the list again. I suppose it depends on the size of the Sensible Sentencing Trust donation.

But even more interesting is the involvement of Michelle Boag in Act. She has been involved in the National Party since the late 1960s or early 1970s. Involved, generally on the losing side in just about every plot going. McCully and her were (are?) a team straight from Machiavelli. Obviously debate about her role. Maybe they have taken her on to run their campaign in the hope she can do as well for Hide as she did when she ran English’s campaign in 2002 – 22% ?

Possibly she was laundering some of the money from the Waitemata Trust – donated to National but being used to prop up Epsom these days.

Or maybe she is recruiting talent for National and was just there as a spy.

But whatever the reason she was there she certainly demanded and got 5 star treatment.

Update – very reliable source tells me that Boag stayed on for private dinner with the Act inner circle after the fundraiser. Very curious.


John Key is just another politician

Posted by David Parker on September 18th, 2010

So, as others have noted, our Prime Minister John Key has said he thinks Rodney Hide has handled the David Garrett fiasco well. The Herald reports John Key said Hide “has shown very good judgment” and has his full support.

No-one else believes that, so what is going on?

In my opinion, it shows John Key to be just another politician.

It pains me to use that phrase, because it demeans all politicians and our parliamentary democracy.

Sometimes the mistakes made by MPs in any party reflect so poorly on the institution of parliament and MPs that most New Zealanders think less of us as a group and have less confidence in our democracy. Most MPs feel a degree of shame when this happens.   This week’s events are a case in point. It is not so much what David Garrett did many years ago, as the deception and hypocrisy by ACT since.  The public are right to feel misled and distrustful.

So when John Key says he stands by Rodney Hide and ACT’s handling of this, I feel let down by my Prime Minister. I do expect him to uphold the integrity of Parliament. He has not.

Rodney Hide has lost any shred of the moral authority that a Minister needs to maintain the confidence of a Prime Minister.

Now, I am not calling John Key dishonest or corrupt. But he trades on being different. On not being like other politicians. Yet, he so plainly is. The litany of bad mistakes he has tolerated in order to maintain his hold on power is long enough to make the conclusion that he is no higher being.  I won’t list them all but they include:

  • Allowing Hide to criticise National as being weak, lazy and easy to manipulate
  • Giving Hide more rope when the perk buster was busted on his ministerial perks
  • Letting Hide choose Boscawen (an MP with less than 2 years experience) to take over Roy’s portfolio in his Government when Hide and Key both said she had performed well as a Minister and it was clear what was going down was an internal implosion caused in no small part by Rodney Hide’s bullying and other mistakes
  • Allowing  Bill English to stay on as Deputy PM and Minister of Finance after changing accommodation expense rules to profit himself (or his family trust)
  • Brushing over Phil Heatley’s abuses of his Ministerial privileges

Add to that the latest errors of judgment by Hide and ACT, which have exposed ACT to ridicule and irrefutable allegations of hypocrisy and poor judgment.  John Key’s response, to back Rodney Hide and express confidence in him, shows he is in no special category of politician.

What should the leader of our country have done, you ask?  Well, Phil Goff called it correctly.  John Key should have stripped ACT of all its ministerial warrants. They are scandal ridden and unworthy.

After less than two years into its first, and I hope only,  term John Key’s government is tainted by disrepute.  John Key is the leader of that government. The Prime Minister’s own brand is tarnished.

John Key has stopped walking alongside New Zealanders. They know Key is wrong to support Hide and ACT. He is just another politician.


Key Backs Hide, But Not Even Hide is Backing Hide

Posted by Grant Robertson on September 18th, 2010

Key Backs Hide is the headline of the story on the NZ Herald website.

Prime Minister John Key says ACT leader Rodney Hide has shown good judgment and has his full support following the resignation of disgraced MP David Garrett from the party.

The ridiculous thing about that statement is that not even Rodney Hide thinks he has shown good judgement here. He said as much at his press conference. The reality is that Rodney is the person who decided that it was ok for Garrett to be the Sensible Sentencing Trust’s person in the ACT Caucus despite knowing of his conviction and his bizarre and creepy plot. Rodney was the one who was happy for it not to become public. Rodney was the one who made him law and order spokesperson. Good judgement is in short supply in this case.

Rodney Hide and ACT’s days are numbered. John Key knows that, but he needs Hide to keep his government going. Its a messy place to be.


Garrett has to go from Parliament

Posted by Chris Hipkins on September 17th, 2010

The last time an ACT MP left the party to become and independent they went all the way to the Supreme Court to have her thrown out of Parliament. That was just after Rodney Hide became Leader of the party. What did he have to say about it at the time? Here’s a few selected quotes:

“…taxpayers must continue to foot the bill for a non-functioning MP”.

“Standing up for your principles is never cheap, but the country can be assured that ACT does put its principles first.”

“At the last election the people of New Zealand voted for nine ACT Members of Parliament. It was never right that for some time now the people of New Zealand have only been represented by eight ACT MPs. Fair proportionality is a key aspect to the success of MMP and today the wrongs have been put right. Justice has been delivered. The ACT Party will now be more fairly represented and New Zealand will be better served. I believe the reputation of Parliament will be enhanced.”

So will Rodney keep sticking by those principles and insist that David Garrett resign from Parliament now that he has quit the ACT Party? If he’s going to have any credibility at all (and even then it will only be a sliver) he has no choice but to tell Garrett to go completely.


Public want Hide and Garrett to go

Posted by Chris Hipkins on September 17th, 2010

Rodney Hide has rushed home a day early to deal with the fallout from David Garrett’s bizarre admission that he stole the identity of a dead child to get a fake passport. But it seems it might be too little, too late for both Garrett and Hide, and probably the ACT party.

A poll on Stuff this morning reveals that 48% of respondents think both Garrett and Hide should go. Another 28% think just Garrett should be dumped. Only 11% think nothing should happen. The credibility of both men, and their entire party, is now in tatters. Hide knew about all of this before Garrett even became an MP. What grounds does he have to sack him now if he knew all along? He can’t exactly say he was happy for Garrett to keep his job as long as he didn’t get caught.

There are some wider questions for the Prime Minister too. Does John Key still have confidence in Rodney Hide, given Hide knew about this all along and didn’t think to tell him? When did Key first find out, and what did he do about it? Key promised higher standards for his ministry. Has he got the guts to cut Hide adrift and keep that promise? He doesn’t need Hide’s votes, he still has a majority with the Maori Party. ACT are now practically irrelevant. The real focus should now be on what the PM does.


Lions on the hustings – chickens under pressure

Posted by Trevor Mallard on March 5th, 2010

The Dompost reports that Key, Hide and Garrett weren’t available to make substantive comment on Garrett’s plan  to sterilise people.

Smile and wave wouldn’t rule it out. Hide hid. Spokesperson made non comment. And big brave Garrett may have left the country again.

What a dopey idea – have three or four kids, decide you want a vasectomy and to get one free you have to beat up one of the kids.

But both smile and wave and jeckyl and hide wanted the focus group results before they were prepared to put their opinions into the public arena. Talk about being gutless wonders.


Something’s not right here

Posted by Clare Curran on October 14th, 2009

Wasn’t it ACT member, now MP, John Boscowan who ran an extraordinary campaign last year about free speech, haranguing Labour over the Electoral Finance Act?

Is not David Garrett the self appointed voice for the Sensible Sentencing Trust, the organisation that supposedly champions the victims of violent crimes and advocates for harsh punishment and lock em up and throw away the key.

So how come, when a group of workers at Parliament, the admin, security and messengers, who both those MPs deal with every day, face an effective pay freeze and an attempt to clawback on their redundancy conditions and are taking action in order to be able to negotiate, ACT shows them such contempt.

They don’t earn a lot. They have rights too.

Tell us whether you support their position Garrett and Boscowan. And I’d like to hear from all other non-Labour MPs in the House. These are not faceless workers you can distance yourselves from. You eyeball them every day (unless you choose not to acknowledge their presence)

You’re in Parliament to stand up for what you believe. So just what do you believe?