Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘David Carter’

Stingy

Posted by Darien Fenton on December 17th, 2010

The prize for the stingy employer of the week goes to Silver Fern Meatworks, who docked workers’ pay for observing two minutes silence, along with the rest of New Zealand, to pay their respects to the 29 miners who lost their lives in Pike River Mine.

It’s made us famous in Australian newspapers, as news spreads that slaughter chain workers at Te Aroha’s Silver Fern meatworks (which burned down shortly after) were docked between 98 cents and $1.60 each – saving the company at most $500.

Even the farmers are crying foul, with Otorohanga dry stock farmer and Silver Fern shareholder Andre de Haan, the immediate past chairman of Waikato Federated Farmers’ meat and fibre section, calling the decision “a load of crap”.

Someone else should be worried about the reputation of the company – and that’s the Minister of Agriculture, David Carter is who is a shareholder of Silver Fern Farms.

Mr de Haan’s says he doubted shareholders would support management’s decision to dock workers’ pay.

“I would have thought everyone would stand behind any gesture towards people that are in trouble like that.”

Does shareholder David Carter agree?

Come on Mr Carter – say something – anything.


You can’t just smile and wave John – managing interest conflicts is your job

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 6th, 2010

Over the last week while being questioned by Russell Norman John Key has asserted that whether or not a conflict of interest exists is a matter for a Minister to decide.

Well bad news John it isn’t. There is a process and you are responsible both for that process working properly and detailed arrangements for managing conflicts that flow from it.

The case in point, if the facts as alleged by Norman are accurate, is a pretty clear cut one. David Carter as a farmer in Canterbury has a case currently before Ecan to increase his water rights and therefore the value of his land. He takes part in the Cabinet debate and decision to scrap Ecan and short circuit the system for the decision relating to his farm. About as obvious a conflict as one could get and certainly well over the perceived conflict test.

Why do we have rules – the Cabinet Office Manual puts it pretty well:-

2.50 To protect the integrity of the decision-making process of executive government and to maintain public trust in the Executive, Ministers and Parliamentary Under-Secretaries must conduct themselves in a manner appropriate to their office.

And how does the system work in practise:-

the management of any conflicts that are identified is agreed between the Prime Minister and the Minister concerned, with advice as required from the Cabinet Office.

So John you can’t just smile and wave and say it is up to your Ministers. The Cabinet Office, the rules and their implementation has one person responsible to parliament – it is you.


Ministers chairing select committees

Posted by Chris Hipkins on May 22nd, 2009

I was interested in the government’s recent decision to appoint John Carter as chairperson of the special Select Committee that has been established to deal with the second part of the Auckland Super City legislation. It’s highly unusual for a government minister to chair a select committee, and almost unprecedented for a minister to chair a select committee that is considering items of business they have ministerial responsibility for (Carter is Associate Minister of Local Government).

The only other examples I could find of ministers chairing select committees are Peter Dunne (currently chairing the Emissions Trading Scheme Select Committee) and David Carter, who briefly chaired the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee (FEC) in the late 1990s whilst also holding a ministerial warrant (he was Associate Minister of Revenue at the time).

Does the new National government’s decision to establish two special select committees, chaired by ministers, to deal with potentially controversial legislation signal a shift in the conventional separation between the legislature and the executive? Should we be concerned that the executive is dominating the legislative process right down to the select committee level? My gut feeling is we probably should be.