Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘Banking Inquiry’

English – Assets for sale next term – Kiwibank first on block

Posted by Stuart Nash on May 22nd, 2010

Well, at least its out there now – http://tinyurl.com/2c3b273 - Bill English has signalled that assets will be sold if the Nats win another term. First on the block – Kiwibank. 

At Labour’s banking inquiry earlier this year, an analyst said that the introduction of Kiwibank had saved New Zealanders about a $1,000,000,000 in interest payments due to competitive pressure it had bought to the market.

Selling Kiwibank (and other assets) would be a disaster for the country – and is certainly something Labour would never ever contemplate. 

The true Nat agenda (as if we didn’t know) is at least not so secret anymore…


Monetary Policy Reform

Posted by David Cunliffe on November 19th, 2009

Phil Goff’s landmark speech to Federated Farmers today is a highly significant step.

It has three major themes:
- boosting technology to grow productivity in our primary sector
- a strong stand on including agriculture in the ETS (given NZ’s emission profile ag can’t be left out);
- ending two decades of consensus on monetary policy.

This monetary policy announcement is historic.  It will help shape Labour’s economic policy into the next election and beyond.

The core problem is that the officail cash rate (OCR) acting alone has not achieved inflation control alongside reasonable stability of exchange rates and money supply.  Combined with an imbalanced tax structure, high real interest rates helped suck in hot money that drove the housing bubble.  

That was great for banks and baby boomers who already owned houses, but bad for productivity, the foreign debt and younger Kiwis trying to realise their dream of home ownership.

The writing is now on the wall: New Zealand has to earn more, export more, save more and be more resilient: combining a sustainable environment and a decent society with a real plan for growth and high skill, high value jobs.

Kiwis can’t just keep borrowing ever greater amounts of foreign capital, then periodically electing National to flog off what’s left of the family silver to cover the debt.

Government debt is not the principal problem (although the Nats are planning to massively increase it through pollution subsidies to big emitters). Private debt is.  And the way out of that quicksand is more savings combined with monetary policy that achieves a better balance between inflation control, growth and external stability.

These are tough problems, and more work is being done to learn from overeas experience and to refine solutions.

It is important to note that Labour will continue to support an independant, full service central bank. We will continue to fight inflation and guard against inflationary expectations. There will continue to be an important role for the OCR.

But as the recent banking Inquiry rightly pointed out, the OCR should not bear the whole weight of adjustment on its own, nor can one instrument be addressed at several objectives. Complementary tools are required.

We can’t expect exporters to thrive with exchange rates swinging from 35c US to 76c US in a year.

We can’t grow without serious investment in smarts and technology that give us in-country commercialisation and manufacturing capability.

And we can’t deepen domestic capital markets through an effective tax subsidy to real estate speculation, or a banking system that is 97% owned offshore!

Labour is on the move to solve these hard problems. Good on you Phil – great speech!


Multi-party banking inquiry

Posted by Chris Hipkins on November 11th, 2009

The multi-party banking inquiry report has been released today. The inquiry was established after the National government used its majority to block a proper select committee inquiry into banks not passing on cuts in the Official Cash Rate to customers. The full report is available at: http://www.bankinquiry.org.nz

The inquiry found that the major banks did not pass on the full effect of reductions in the Official Cash Rate to hard-working New Zealanders; higher borrowing costs do not fully explain the difference; and weaknesses in monetary and taxation policy need to be addressed.

The combined profits of the ‘big four’ Australian owned banks now exceed the combined profits of all other companies listed on the stock exchange NZX 50 series. In 2008 Banks earned $3.26 billion; the earnings of the NZX 50 were $2.89 billion.


Banking Inquiry progress

Posted by David Cunliffe on September 4th, 2009

Oral hearings concluded at the multi-party Banking Inquiry yesterday after a range of worthwhile submissions from organisations and individuals. Submissions presented orally included KiwiBank, Federated Farmers, Finsec, the Productive Economic Council and others on Wednesday, and the Manufacturers and Exporters Association, Council of Trade Unions, the Family Centre of Anglican Social Services and the Mangere Budgeting and Family Support Services on Thursday, along with some submissions from members of the public.

The Inquiry certainly gathered momentum. There were 48 submissions received or expected, 15 oral presentations to the Inquiry and around 40 press articles, TV clips and a wide range of radio coverage.

Judging by the emails coming in we have succeeded in our short term goal of presenting the Inquiry as a serious and balanced effort to get to the heart of a complex set of issues on behalf of ordinary Kiwis who are being disadvantaged.

While some media at first questioned the non-Select Committee process, none have been able to dispute the range or substantive nature of the submissions received. Between these submissions, Members’ questions and the work of our excellent research team we have the basis for an excellent report to come.

Most submissions will be posted on the website and you can read yesterday’s press release and a brief summary of key oral submissions here.

Research by the Inquiry team is ongoing and a final report is expected to be available in late October.

Stop press: ASB Bank has just announced a cut to its short term varial interest rate which is of course purely coincidental.


Banking inquiry progressing

Posted by David Cunliffe on August 24th, 2009

The Banking Inquiry kicks off in the first week of September, and we recently announced a top line up of experts to assist it.

  • Prof John Quiggin is a distinguished Professor of economics, twice awarded the prestigious Australian Research Council Fellowship, and is a high profile commentator on banking issues in Australia
  • Prof Tim Hazledine is Head of the Department of Economics, University of Auckland, a senior economist with strong experience in competition economics
  • Mr David Preston is an economist, who has formerly served at the New Zealand Treasury and the International Monetary Fund and is now an independent consultant to government and international organisations around the Pacific region

More detail is regularly being added to the Inquiry website www.bankinquiry.org.nz. You can download a background paper, FAQs or make a submission online.

National may not want the truth to be told in public. Our goal is to get all the facts on the table in a responsible manner, with top experts analysing a congent report.


Speaker changes mind on Banking Inquiry rooms

Posted by David Cunliffe on August 7th, 2009

Yesterday we announced that the Speaker, Dr the Hon Lockwood Smith, had changed his mind on whether or not to allocate Parliamentary space for the multi-party banking inquiry.

We had initially requested the use of Select Committee rooms, as these were well set up with tele-conferencing facilities and were an appropriate size and format. He declined that request because he didn’t want to give the impression it was a Select Committee inquiry, he said, and further argued that a multi-party inquiry was not, in his view, part of the business of Parliament.

Jim Anderton, Russel Norman and I took this up with him in discussion. We provided him with past precedents from when the Committee rooms had been used on many occasions by everyone from lobbyists to Parliamentary friendship groups to multi-party announcements to who knows what, including private social functions. We argued based on recent Business Committee decisions, that legitimate Parliamentary business is broader than just the meetings of the House in full session or its Committees.

MPs are rightly accountable to the public for their work around the country in their electorates and on issues of public policy and importance, whether it is inside the Chamber or out. There is no doubt that the issue of bank interest rates is of significance when up to a billion dollars is at stake and it raises important questions about monetary policy and supervision of the system.

We are pleased that on reflection Speaker Smith has changed his mind and now allocated some excellent space on the second floor of the Beehive, which will be ideal for our purpose

Thank you Dr Smith. Your decision has saved a more extended debate on the constitutionality of Parliamentary business at this time.


Banking inquiry – why not?

Posted by Stuart Nash on August 6th, 2009

Interesting to note in response to written questions that finance minister English and Prime Minister Key both answered that they had neither sought or received any advice  on the possibilty of an inquiry into the banking sector’s margins or profits.  Key also stated that this issue hadn’t been discussed around the cabinet table.  Both men have come out against any inquiry.  Wonder why?

Spoke with a leading banker last night and said that whilst we all understand that a sound banking system is fundamental to a strong economy, if the banks had nothing to hide, then why not participate?  He agreed.  Interesting…

From Bill English recently:

… taxpayers are supporting the banks, ands we want the banks to be able to demonstrate that they are going to support businesses and households though a tough time in the economy, even if it affects profits a bit.

Tags: ,
Filed under: bank

Asian community is banking on an inquiry from National

Posted by Raymond Huo on July 31st, 2009

Over the past weeks, a familiar mood has cropped up when I have been out talking to members of the ethnic community on the street, at events and in shops.The mood is one of anger and outrage at the reluctance of the National-led Government to support an inquiry into banking profits and its failure to stand up on behalf of all hard working New Zealand families.

Many people I have spoken to believe they are paying higher interest rates than they should be paying. It seems to me the best way to work out whether hard working New Zealanders and businesses are getting a fair deal is to hold an inquiry into the relationship between the Official Cash Rate and short term interest rates. This way all the facts will be put on the table and people can see whether they are being treated fairly by their banks.

The mood has generated huge media attention in the Asian communities.

As a result, the Auckland-based World TV, which broadcasts 10 channels in Chinese, Japanese and Korean, sent its crew to the electoral office of the Leader of the Opposition, Hon Phill Goff, and invited Labour finance spokesperson, Hon David Cunliffe, to specifically talk to the Asian communities on this issue.

I had the pleasure of appearing alongside Hon Phill Goff and David Cunliffe.

Asians are passionate about numbers, so I reiterate a startling statistic which was mentioned in the interview on World TV:

Over the past year the Reserve Bank has cut the OCR by 575 basis points, but business lending rates have only fallen by 243 points, and the floating first mortgage rate has fallen by 446 points.

The Labour Party, Greens and the Progressives announced on July 27 their intention to hold the equivalent of a parliamentary select committee inquiry into bank profits.

As a member of the Finance and Expenditure Committee, I witnessed how hard the Labour team – led by Hon David Cunliffe – fought in vain to convince the Government to hold such an inquiry.

The feedback from Asian communities has been over-whelming in favour of such a move. Mr Sam Lee of Pakuranga rang me expressing his approval and support of Labour’s move. ”All we ask is an inquiry. What is National worried about? All we want is a fair deal,” said Mr Sam Lee.

If you would like any more information visit the bank inquiry website: http://www.bankinquiry.org.nz


?????“????”??????????

Posted by Raymond Huo on July 30th, 2009

?????”????”??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????575???????????????243???????????446???????????????????????????????????????


Inquiry into banking

Posted by Chris Hipkins on July 21st, 2009

The Labour Party, the Greens and the Progressives will work together to hold the equivalent of a parliamentary select committee inquiry into bank profits. It’s pretty outrageous that the National members on the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee blocked that committee’s own inquiry despite the view of Reserve Bank Governor Alan Bollard that banks have set their interests higher than needed.

The bank inquiry website is at: http://www.bankinquiry.org.nz