Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘Auckland Super City’

It’s the little things that count…

Posted by David Cunliffe on December 7th, 2010

Sometimes it’s the little things that tell a big story.

Parliament is sitting in the press-Xmas period under the shadow of urgency to pass a rush of “priority legislation”. 

Guess what one of the top priorities is?  Abolishing gift duty.

That’s right, at a time when Kiwi families are doing it bloody tough, when the recession is biting this year worse than last, when top earners have had two rounds of generous tax cuts, and when the government is confronted by evidence of large scale tax avoidance, their priority is abolishing gift duty.

Making it easier to transfer assets to the trusts or the kiddies (on lower tax rates) above the existing threshhold of $27k each per annum.

Surely not a prioirty in the Mana electorate, not a priority in New Lynn, nor quake-ravaged Christchurch.

Surely not an example of personal responsibility – where everone pays their fair share.

Surely not bringing relief to the squeezed middle. 

For National it is clearly a prioirty to bring yet further relief to the top. 

Sometimes it really is the little things that count.


CBD Rail Loop – an overwhelming case – 2

Posted by David Shearer on November 26th, 2010

compared-to-ronsJarbury has done a comparative graph of the benefits of all the Roads of National Significance attached. This says it all.


CBD Rail Loop – an overwhelming case

Posted by David Shearer on November 25th, 2010

It’s finally out. The business case for the Auckland’s CBD rail loop. And what a compelling case.

The pure transport cost-benefit is 1.1 (at the standard Treasury 8% discount rate). But the wider economic cost-benefit take it up to a whopping 3.5.

As it says, “the benefits of the CBD Rail Link far exeed the travel time savings due to enhanced transport efficiency”. It “increases CBD employment by 20,000 to 25,000 without requiring additional road capacity or using scarce CBD land for additional parking. This enables the Auckland CBD to become a much more vibrant and exciting pedestrian environment … .”

The overall impact will be a “more exciting and vibarnt sense of place enable Auckland to serve as New Zealand’s outward facing global city for retaining and attracting the highly educated younger workforce that will underpin productivity growth (and also international competitiveness) in the future”.

Now compare the figures with Joyce’s Holiday Highway. It has a transport cost-benefit of 0.8 – less than a dollar back for every dollar spent.

And the wider benefits? Just 1.1. Pathetic versus 3.5 for the CBD loop. We certainly need to upgrade SH 1, it’s just that we don’t need to do it with a brand new motorway.

How can Joyce justify spending up to $2 billion on that road when this case is so compelling.

Our rear-vision minister will need to be creative with his figures to justify his spending.


It wasn’t meant to end this way

Posted by Phil Twyford on November 2nd, 2010

John Key and Rodney Hide were like awkward guests at someone else’s party at last night’s inauguration of Mayor Len Brown and the new Auckland Council.  The Town Hall was packed with Len’s mob who had come to hear the ‘it’s our time’ message so it is not surprising Key and Hide were given only a polite reception.  Key delivered a wooden written-by-officials speech suprisingly lacking in heart for such a big occasion.

It wasn’t meant to end this way. John Key had all but endorsed John Banks for mayor. The Nats set out to remake Auckland in their own image.  But Len Brown’s campaign was driven along by deep public unease with Hide’s over-centralised and corporatised super city. In the end Aucklanders gave a thumping mandate to Brown’s inclusive vision, his pledge to protect communities and save our assets, and his promise to build a modern rail network.

This puts Key in an interesting spot. Any public goodwill for having unified Auckland was long ago corroded away by Hide’s handling of the process. The Nats must be furious with Hide for having stuffed their Auckland agenda and lost the mayoralty for Banks. That alone must be reason enough for pulling the plug on Epsom.

Aucklanders’ expectations however have now been raised.  The mayoral election made one thing clear.  If the super city is to mean one thing it has to mean action on public transport. Len Brown has staked his political career on this. He has invoked the memory of Robbie’s Rapid Rail. But he cannot deliver the level of investment needed on his own. Only central government can do it.

The Mayor dropped several references to rail into his inaugural speech. John Key didn’t take up the challenge, and noted that on some things ‘we will disagree’. National-ACT don’t get it. Auckland cannot go on building motorways, and now must invest in rail the equivalent treasure it has sunk into motorways over the past few decades. Steven Joyce is wedded to his Holiday Highway but won’t commit to the central city rail loop.

So what is Key to do:  Embrace a left-leaning mayor and council who ran against his plan for Auckland? Wean his party off its historic dependence  on the roads lobby by cranking up a big investment in rail?  If he doesn’t, and National are seen to be white-anting the popular mandate of the new Mayor for all of Auckland, I predict Aucklanders will make National pay at the polls next year.


Shot over the bows in Northcote

Posted by Darien Fenton on October 11th, 2010

National MP Jonathan Coleman, along with other Tories around the rohe will be feeling a little concerned at the left leaning results delivered by Aucklanders at the weekend.

Northcote’s Kaipatiki Board has also swung to the left. Three Labour Party members (Grant Gillon, Ann Hartley and Richard Hills) were elected onto the new local board, and of the remaining five, two were former members of the Progress/Alliance party, two are unaffiliated, and the remaining member is Nick Kearny from the ACT Party, who I suggest will find his position a little lonely.

While Coleman has a comfortable majority in Northcote, it was a Labour seat until 2005, These results suggest that he could have a bit of a fight on his hands with Labour’s candidate Paula Gillon, come next year’s election.

Other the


Mark Ford, czar of water and transport

Posted by Phil Twyford on October 7th, 2010

When Mark Ford took the job of chairman of the Auckland Transition Agency 16 months ago he said he would seek no further employment with the Super City once the Auckland Council was set up. That promise was made amid concerns about how much power Mr Ford would wield in the ATA role. The Herald reported at the time that some National Cabinet Ministers were understood to have had concerns about his conflicts of interest heading Watercare and the transport authority.

But such official concerns seem to have dissipated. Mr Ford, working closely with Local Government Minister Rodney Hide, has overseen the establishment of the super city, at times directly advising Cabinet. He was responsible for the recruitment of the executives and hand-picked boards who will run the city. And now he himself has landed two of the most powerful roles. He is the new CEO of the new water monopoly. He is also chair of the powerful transport agency which will spend more than half of Aucklanders’ rates.

I think Mr Ford’s competence is unquestioned but I have been critical of the concentration of power in the hands of one unelected official. It is particularly galling such a significant appointment has been made three days out from a new mayor and council taking office. There is a convention in central government that senior public service managers don’t get appointed during an election campaign. Why couldn’t they have waited until the new mayor and council were in place?


When ’speak to the hand’ isn’t good enough

Posted by Phil Twyford on September 23rd, 2010

ata_board_rounded_370px

Mark Ford was appointed by Rodney Hide to set up the Auckland super city. The ratepayers of Auckland pay him $540,000 a year.

He was responsible for hiring the agency Momentum to recruit 45 senior executives for the super city. Momentum has close ties with the National Party, employing former National Party President Michelle Boag as a senior executive, and with former Prime Minister Jenny Shipley on its board. Back in February it was revealed Ms Boag was working for John Banks’ mayoral campaign as an unpaid adviser while at the same time recruiting the super city’s chief spin doctor.

Now we find out Ms Boag has been soliciting money and votes for John Banks on Momentum letterhead while the agency is recruiting the super city’s top executives. Mr Ford is asked about it by the Herald and he says “I’m not going there.”

When Mark Ford effectively says “speak to the hand” it is a disturbing sign of what could be in store for Auckland after the local body elections.  After overseeing the establishment of the super city, and advising Cabinet against allowing elected representatives on the boards of CCOs, and overseeing the appointment of the CCO boards, Mr Ford finds himself appointed to chair the powerful new transport agency which will spend more than half of Aucklanders’ rates.

He will be responsible for every transport matter from the smallest pot-hole to the second harbour crossing. And this is how seriously he takes public accountability.

But let’s be clear about this. Mark Ford is only a public servant. Rodney Hide is the Minister. He is responsible. He designed the structures of the Auckland super city which have shifted 75% of civic operations into council owned companies run by hand-picked corporate boards.  The entire lot was signed off every step of the way by John Key’s Cabinet.

It is time for Rodney Hide to tell Aucklanders whether this is the standard of public accountability he expects from the people running the super city.

Update: Rodney Hide washed his hands of responsibility for this matter in Question Time this afternoon, even though the Momentum contact is costing Auckland ratepayers $355,000 to recruit 45 managers for the super city. I’m calling on Hide to show some accountability and tell Mark Ford to bring the ATA’s relationship with Momentum to an end.


Rail links – yes, holiday highway – no. Time to listen to Aucklanders, Mr Joyce

Posted by David Shearer on September 20th, 2010

Steven Joyce might want to think about the Herald’s digipoll that asked what Aucklanders most want. Top of the list – and what they’d be willing to increase rates for – is a rail link to the airport. Improving public transport was right up there too. In fourth place was improving roads – Joyce’s infatuation.

Joyce’s rear visionary thinking is not in line with what Auckland wants, or needs.

An inner city loop rated lower but is necessary before a link to the airport becomes feasible. It’s impossible to run the frequency of trains from the airport without it. It’s fair to say the case for the loop has yet to be made as clearly as it could to Aucklanders.

So let’s sink the Holiday Highway – one of the Roads of National Party Significance Joyce is blindly championing – and get in behind what people want, rather than fight on with 1950s thinking.


Let them eat cake

Posted by Phil Twyford on September 9th, 2010

I enjoy a regular correspondence with Rodney Hide’s Auckland Transition Agency each letter prefaced with the phrase “Under the Official Information Act…”.  The ATA is the special group of public servants whose job it is to set up the Auckland super city.  I’ve been critical of their secretive ways but when they do release information they do it in style.

And now their secret is out. The Aucklander has revealed the ATA is writing its letters on replica goatskin parchment which costs $118 for a ream of 500 sheets  – up to 17 times the cost of normal paper.

Why not real goatskin parchment? That’s what I want to know. Tight-wads!

According to The Aucklander the ATA’s paper is Grecian tan rather than shades such as marble white or faint Corinthian green.

I am surprised they don’t go the whole hog and hand deliver their letters on a gold cushion with tassels.

As for the Auckland ratepayers, a majority of whom believe their rates will go up under the super city, I am sure Lord Hide of Epsom would happily let them eat cake.


Hide hoses down Auckland water fears

Posted by Phil Twyford on August 31st, 2010

Local Government Minister Rodney Hide has intervened in the Auckland mayoral and council elections with a carefully contrived announcement on water rates.

You would think water rates would be decided and announced by the new Auckland Council. The election is, after all, only six weeks away. And the water company, is after all, owned  by the Council.

But no, Mr Hide yesterday trumpeted a new water rate that will see all Auckland houses pay the same tariff of $1.30 per 1000 litres of water.

Asked why he was announcing it now, he replied because Aucklanders have been “anxious about water” charges.

Why have they been anxious about water charges? Because the Government wants to roll out volumetric or user pays pricing for waste-water expected to result in hefty increases for most Aucklanders. And because the centre-right Citizens and Ratepayers ticket has the same policy. And the C&R mayoral candidate Mr Banks has been taking heat on this issue.

Mr Hide was happy to announce the new rate on water piped to the home, but he was keeping quiet on the new rate for waste water which is the one that is likely to go up significantly if it gets the full user-pays treatment. If he was going to announce one I don’t see why he couldn’t have announced both, because Watercare has had a full year to do the calculations on both.

The farsighted Mr Hide has legislated that waste water charges, and general rates, won’t be going up until mid-2012 which just happens to be after the mayoral and council elections, and after next year’s general election.

By the time the new waste water and general rates kick in, the Auckland Council will have been in place for 18 months and Mr Hide will be able to wash his hands of any responsibility. He is hoping the Council will have to carry the can for the structures and budgets he put in place 18 months before.

If in 2012 the waste water charges and general rates do go up, as most Aucklanders believe they will, with any luck we won’t have to listen to Mr Hide blaming the Auckland Council.  He will be long gone by then.


Hide’s appointees to run Auckland Corp

Posted by Phil Twyford on August 30th, 2010

Hide and Ford

Rodney Hide’s hand picked appointees to run the new corporatised Auckland have been announced.

Apart from Sir Don McKinnon and Mayor Bob Harvey most Aucklanders won’t know who they are. And that is the point: these people will now wield enormous power over local government in Auckland but they’ve been selected in secret by the Minister, without Aucklanders having a say.

Not only did the Key-Hide Government insist on corporatising the super city against the will of Aucklanders. But Hide couldn’t wait two months and let the newly elected Auckland Council make the appointments – he had to put his own people in there.  Hide promised to consult Auckland Mayors on the appointments and then promptly broke that promise.

The appointment that sticks in the craw is that of Mark Ford. Mr Ford is a former chief executive of Watercare and chair of the Auckland Regional Transport Agency(ARTA). He is Hide’s man put in place to run the Auckland Transition Agency setting up the super city. Along with Hide he is the main architect of the over-centralised and undemocratic corporate jack up that the super city has become. He has been extraordinarily influential, at times advising Cabinet directly.

As well as setting up the super city, and overseeing the appointment process for the directors of these council owned companies, Mark Ford now has arguably the most powerful job in the whole set up. He is going to run the new mega-transport agency which will spend 54% of Aucklanders’ rates.  Transport is the area Aucklanders most want to see fixed. It’s importance cannot be over-emphasised.

Underlying the concerns about the Auckland super city has been a fear that power is being concentrated in the hands of a highly centralised bureaucracy, and corporate boards operating behind closed doors. Mark Ford is the personal embodiment of both.

I think the Auckland Council should hold US Senate-style confirmation hearings on the appointment of these board chairs. Let the newly elected Mayor and Councillors question Hide’s appointees on behalf of the people of Auckland in open session. Ask the questions their electors want asked and then decide whether these appointments should stand.


Minister of Transparency and Accountability

Posted by Phil Twyford on June 4th, 2010

Hide

In case you missed it, this Morning Report interview makes entertaining listening as Rodney Hide tries to explain to Sean Plunket that he doesn’t know how much executive redundancy payouts are going to cost the Auckland ratepayer. Or what impact Hide’s super city will have on rates.


Hide spins on super city costs – hold the front page

Posted by Phil Twyford on June 3rd, 2010

I know the claim that Rodney Hide is sowing confusion over the costs of the super city is likely to be met with a sarcastic “Hold the front page!”  but his performance at select committee this morning took his excellence in the art of spin to dizzying new heights.

The latest best estimate of super city costs is $266 million, which includes $66 million in I.T. integration that the Minister has postponed to next year. But that is today, who knows what it will be tomorrow?

A month ago, and a year after the Government began its “Auckland reforms”,  the only information in the public domain was the figure of $34 million attributed to the work of the Auckland Transition Agency.

Then the Budget papers revealed an additional crown loan to fund the transition. Not a peep from Hide, but the Herald pieced together known information and Official Information Act disclosures and put the total bill at $112 million.

Then last week Hide trumpeted in the House that he had kept costs down to $94 million, explaining in a subsequent press release that the total cost was $160 million. Strangely he omitted $40 million from his tally, including $26 million being spent on setting up the new water organisation, and $14 million spent by Councils doing transition work at the request of the Government. The Herald’s headline: Super City’s set-up costs top $200m and counting

Then at select committee officials revealed another $66 million would be spent on I.T. integration to be spent by the new Auckland Council next year.

For a year now Hide’s approach to all this has been to avoid giving any information out. Last week he obviously concluded he couldn’t do that indefinitely. So now he is re-defining major line items off the balance sheet by pretending they are not “transition costs”.

He argued at select committee this morning that the following are not transition costs: $26 million to set up the water organisation, $14 million spent by Councils on transition work at the request of the Government, and the $66 million on IT integration postponed to next year.

In any case it is all going to be paid by the Auckland ratepayer.

The next bombshell is likely to be redundancy pay outs. Dozens of senior executives are going to be made redundant. It is well known they have gold plated redundancy agreements. A well placed source in Auckland local government has told me the bill for redundancy pay outs could reach $47 million.  Hide wouldn’t confirm this, and just said any such pay outs were the business of the Councils and not his concern.


Message from the (NACTs) heartland

Posted by Darien Fenton on June 3rd, 2010

Letter from Bill Townson of the Northern Action Group to Rodney Hide.

Mr. Rodney Hide,

No I will not use the salutation ‘Honourable’ because clearly you do not deserve it. (although I still retain every respect for the LG portfolio)

To dismiss Darien Fenton’s SOP last night because it was ‘too late’ is the weakest and least plausible excuse you have used yet.

It is you that has caused it to be ‘too late’ with all your delaying tactics. Tactics like initially refusing to meet us, then telling us to delay our petition for two months, then the Select committee delaying hearing it, giving invalid reason after invalid reason why we should be in the Super City.

Neither is it too late. Preparing electoral rolls can be done with the press of an electronic button and especially easy in our case because North Rodney is already a separate electoral division in the Rodney District.

Just how stupid do you think we are?

It is you that will pay in the end and I hope you’ve got some other employment lined up come November 2011 because I confidently predict that neither you or your party will be in Parliament after that time.

The polls are already showing that!

 Good bye!!

William R Townson

Chairman – Northern Action Group


Strange bedfellows

Posted by Darien Fenton on June 1st, 2010

In-Bed-with-LabourThe committee stages of the third bill on the Auckland supercity will be hotly debated in Parliament this week. Meanwhile, Rodney (District) continues its campaign to become a unitary authority.  I have agreed to sponsor their Local Bill and thus the cartoon from “Mahurangi Matters” – the local newspaper with Mayor Penny Webster saying :  ‘You know I don’t normally do this sort of thing.’

I want to make it clear that Labour supports the original boundaries as proposed by the Royal Commission on Auckland.  We haven’t had a change of heart about either Rodney or Northern Rodney, but we feel the Government has mishandled the creation of the Auckland super city, and the decision making around Rodney’s inclusion has been a fiasco. Because of that we believe the bill deserves to go to select committee.

I might be wrong here, but I believe its pretty unusual for a local MP to refuse to sponsor a local bill.  Local authorities may put forward a local bill to deal with specific issues in their area.The local member of Parliament is likely to be the member in charge of a local bill, but in Rodney’s case, they’ve been unable to get any of their National MPs to support it.

So, when the call went out for any MP to sponsor the Bill, Labour put their hand up, because the people of Rodney have a right to have their issues considered through a local bill, just as any other local group have.

Strange bedfellows indeed.



Govt to AKL: Which part of no don’t you understand?

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 24th, 2010

The third super city bill has now been tabled in the House and is due to get its second reading on Thursday.

It’s a two-fingered salute to Aucklanders who have been calling on the Government to re-think its plan to corporatise Auckland local government.  John Key and Rodney Hide have said NO to the two big things Aucklanders have been asking for: the Bill fails to guarantee real powers for local boards, and it continues the Government’s plan to shift three-quarters of operations into council-owned companies.

Rodney Hide and John (Sancho Panza) Carter will try and say they’ve listened to Aucklanders’ concerns.  But this is a massive con job. The bill gives the green light to corporatisation.

  • Making these new council companies publish a glossy brochure and hold a press conference every three months and calling it ‘accountability’ is an insult to Aucklanders.
  • A majority of the initial directors are going to be appointed by Rodney Hide.
  • The Council Controlled Organisations (CCOs) are going to be so big and so powerful it will be difficult for the Council and mayor to  hold them accountable.

Every other Council in New Zealand gets to choose whether or not any part of their operations are corporatised. Why not Auckland?

Worse still, the powerful Transport Agency which will spend more than half of all rates, is a statutory CCO meaning that central government will have to change the law before the Auckland Council could bring it back in house.  Four government departments including Treasury advised against corporatising transport because they said it would reduce the transparency and accountability to ratepayers.

In spite of John Carter’s soothing tones at the select committee, the Government has once again ignored the majority of submitters who said they wanted to see the powers of local boards guaranteed in law.

Is it any wonder 52.7 per cent of respondents in a recent Herald digipoll said a single Auckland Council would be worse for them and only 31.2 per cent said it would be better?

You can read Labour’s Minority Report on the bill here.


96% disapprove of super city

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 20th, 2010

The Government must be getting really sick of hearing poll results about the Auckland super city. Rodney Hide certainly didn’t seem too happy answering questions about the Herald’s recent poll in question time yesterday.

But to add to his woes the Our Auckland people’s referendum results are now out. 96% of those who voted in the referendum said they disapproved of the way the Government has gone about setting up the super city.

8476 people took part in the referendum over an 8 day period. People voted on line, and through ballot papers published in The Aucklander newspaper. Votes were validated against the electoral roll, from people living in the area to be covered by the super city.

Our Auckland spokesperson Mels Barton said the referendum result was a loud and clear rebuke for the Government.

“It’s a very large sample for a poll, albeit self-selecting, but probably 10 times more respondents than your average Colmar-Brunton or Herald poll.”

As well as the referendum question, voters were also asked to answer a series of questions. The answers are here, and there is an overwhelming negative response to the Government’s super city: 95% think the Government has not paid enough attention to the wishes of Aucklanders, 92% against CCOs, 95% against the repeal of the requirement for a referendum before the ports are sold.

Well done to Our Auckland, a coalition of community organisations and individuals concerned about the super city changes. And hats off to The Aucklander newspaper which has campaigned energetically for the past year in defence of Auckland democracy. Together they have given Aucklanders a say when the Government has refused to do so.


Super city weekend

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 16th, 2010

Rod Oram has an interesting piece in the SST on the Government’s plan to reduce costs and put in place lower, uniform regulatory fees across the region for  building and resource consents, land information memorandums and dog registrations. He says the costs could be as low as 10% less than the lowest benchmark charged by current councils. This would undoubtedly be popular with Aucklanders. The cost of building and resource consents is one of the biggest gripes against local government, and not just in Auckland.

But my guess is Aucklanders will take some convincing. The Herald’s digipoll released Friday says 49.5% of Aucklanders do not believe the Government’s main selling point for its super city – that the amalgamation of the 8 councils would improve management of the region.

Oram seems to think the plan to reduce costs is smoke and mirrors anyway. He reports “operating costs for regulatory fees was $102 million across the eight councils in the latest financial year. Of that, fees covered $89m while ratepayers picked up the balance.” Under the new modelling the Government intends to recover $80 million in user fees, but has no accurate projection for operating costs.  The likely outcome?  A greater share of the bill will be picked up by the ratepayer.  Oram says Hide must be hoping no one will notice until after the general election,

At the Herald on Sunday, Matt McCarten writes the Government’s mishandling of the super city reforms has catapulted Len Brown ahead in the mayoral race.  Yesterday the Herald released the rest of its digipoll results: 58.8% opposed the Government’s imposition of CCOs on the Auckland Council (32.4 supported).  53.5% said the Government had not handled the reforms well. 32.3% said they had.  Bernard Orsman and Geoff Cumming do a useful summary of the arguments on the CCOs and the lack of powers for local boards ahead of the third and final bill coming back to the House on May 24.


Polls show Govt fail in Auckland

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 14th, 2010

Independent poll results in today’s Herald are an indictment of the Government’s handling of the Auckland reforms. Pure and simple.

A majority of Aucklanders believe they will be personally worse off under the super city.  Fifty percent more people disagreed than agreed with the suggestion Auckland would be a better place to live under the super city.

Even the Government’s main selling point, that the amalgamation would improve management of the region, is not believed by most Aucklanders.

After a year of John Key putting a smiley face on the creation of the super city, these poll numbers show Aucklanders are far from convinced.

But this is not in my view just a failure of political management.

Aucklanders have real concerns and the Government could address them in the third super city bill which is due to be passed later this month.

First, they should legislate to guarantee real decision-making and rule-making powers to local boards, and give power back to communities.

Second, they should back off imposing council owned companies on Auckland, for example in transport. Don’t treat Auckland as a corporation. Give the power back to the Auckland Council to decide whether it wants to set up these CCOs.

Third, don’t take away Aucklanders’ right to decide in a referendum whether the ports of Auckland get sold.

In the mean time, Aucklanders can have a say by voting in the people’s referendum organised by Our Auckland. It’s the vote on the super city the Government wouldn’t let you have. Voting closes at 5pm today.


The cost of the super city

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 3rd, 2010

The Herald has put together an estimate of the cost of building the Auckland super city – $81 million and rising.

The figure is made up of $34.4 m for the Auckland Transition Agency, $26.5 m for the new water company, and $20.1 m worth of work being done by the Councils.

My guess is this is the tip of the iceberg. It includes only $17.5 m for managing the information technology change over. Industry estimates put the bill at many times that, but the Transition Agency has decided to put in place a much cheaper work-around and leave the job of integrating eight IT systems for the Auckland Council. How many other integration projects will be left for the Auckland Council to implement and pay for?

My prediction? The final cost will be closer to the upper end of the Royal Commission’s projections: $240 million.

The only thing we know for certain is that Aucklanders are going to pick up the tab for this. They didn’t ask for it but they are going to pay for it.

There is a two year moratorium on rates increases, but like the moratorium on asset sales this is a device to protect the Government from political fallout until after next year’s election. When the full size of the debt being dumped on Auckland is revealed, and when rates start to spiral, it won’t be pretty.

And by the way, why is it that a full year after John Key announced his plan to “Make Auckland Greater” his Government will not give Aucklanders any kind of projection of the costs of the transition?

It is no wonder Rodney Hide didn’t return the Herald’s messages about this story.