Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘John Key’

So what are the DPS for ?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 29th, 2010

Hearing that Anne Tolley pleaded for the Diplomatic Protection Squad (DPS) to intervene in the Invercargill creative writing exercise is almost impossible to believe.

These are some of New Zealand’s top cops. Their job is to protect the Governor General, the PM, international political visitors and diplomats when there is a security issue.

It is not their job to run down school kids.

But there is more of an issue with the Nats use of DPS.  And I want to make it clear I’m not criticising them.

It is just the vast numbers that the PM uses. Taking four to Hawaii. Having five escourting him around parliament. Using them as a battering ram around airports. And as personal servants holding his towel in the gym.

Helen had one or sometimes two round parliament. And when we were in UK at the same time she had one.

Of course the PM has to have Police support – but I think that he could do with half the number and real criminals could be caught if the rest of these top cops were turned loose on them.


Let your fingers do the walking

Posted by Phil Twyford on August 24th, 2010

What is going on with the Prime Minister’s diplomatic snub to Australian caretaker PM Julia Gillard?  He reluctantly admits to a journalist’s question that he phoned Opposition leader Tony Abbott after the weekend’s election, but not Prime Minister Julia Gillard, because he did not have her number.

So it is OK for the Prime Minister to phone the Australian Opposition Leader who is a fellow leader of the centre-right…but not call the Australian Prime Minister who happens to be a Labour leader?  He doesnt have the Australian PM’s number in his phone? He couldn’t get foreign affairs to give him the number?

Does he realise that Australia is this country’s most important relationship?


Sticky Fingers Key

Posted by Brendon Burns on August 18th, 2010

John Key’s all but endorsement of Christchurch Mayor Bob Parker last night indicates how out of touch he is with Christchurch voters. Key attended a widely-promoted ‘John and Bob’ gathering at Sticky Fingers in Christchurch last night, their handshake making the front page of The Press. http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch/4034228/Praise-from-PM-but-no-endorsement

Key praises Parker as having done “a very good job.”

Ok, as a Labour MP I’m not dispassionate here. I totally support Jim Anderton’s bid (though I will say Parker is an extraordinarily gifited speaker and his full-time unpaid Mayoress wife Jo deserves better than to be remembered for having muffins and coffee with the Mayor – (even Key referred to ‘muffingate’ last night)

Point is that it’s not just Labour supporters who are openly saying they want to see Parker go. So are card-carrying Nats and many others. On Monday my dentist, just returned from his European holiday, couldn’t wait to say  how much he wanted to see a change. Last night at Saunders Unsworth’s bash, yet another senior Christcurch business leader told me he won’t be voting for Parker. His reason? The way Parker responded to criticism of the $17m bail-out of property developer Dave Henderson. To compound matters for Parker, ‘Hendo’, once praised, defended and befriended by Rodney Hide, has recently been exposed as having not paid IRD for the GST on the $17m paid  to him. So ratepayers and taxpayers are both out of pocket from the deal.

Add to that, the council’s attempt to hike council tenants’ rents by 24% in one go (defeated in the High Court) and the $3m purchase of the “Ellerslie” flower show for Christchurch, have all led to a city-wide view that Bob has to go. Not that Jim is resting on his laurels; he has had a large and vigorous  campaign team from before his launch several weeks ago capitalising on the mood for change.

Key’s handshake alingment with Parker at Sticky Fingers might be a touch of the tar baby for both of them.


Unemployment up, still no plan…

Posted by Chris Hipkins on August 5th, 2010

The latest unemployment stats make for grim reading. Over 19,000 Kiwis have joined the ranks of the unemployed in the past 3 months. Since National has been in office unemployment has increased by 53,000. So what’s the National government focused on? Well they’ve spent most of this week trying to doctor figures to hide the fact that the wage gap between New Zealand and Australia has grown during their time in office, despite John Key’s pledge to make closing it his “fundamental priority”.

We should never regard unemployment as merely a matter of statistics. These are real people with real lives, real families, real homes, real mortgages, real bills to pay. The increase in unemployment from 6% to 6.8% in three short months marks thousands of individual tragedies. It’s a much bigger increase than anyone was predicting and highlights how adrift this government have already become.

Back in May John Key was happy to pronounce that his government is on the right track due to falling unemployment, so by his own standard they must have jumped the track in the past 3 months. Where is their plan? The Jobs Summit was a joke. The cycleway has failed to produce the thousands of jobs Key promised. Gerry’s bold plan to mine in National Parks has been stomped on. So what’s next? The thousands of Kiwis struggling to find work are keen to know…


A question of priorities

Posted by Chris Hipkins on August 3rd, 2010

John Key may not have a plan to catch up with Australia. Gerry Brownlee may not have a plan to achieve the government’s supposed goal of having 90% of our electricity generated from renewable sources. Bill English may not have a plan to pay for the looming baby boomer retirement. Paula Bennett may have no plan for reducing the number of people on benefits. Judith Collins may have no plan to reduce the rate of violent crime in New Zealand… BUT … John Key does have a plan to make himself sound more important. Not content to be merely honourable, he is henceforth to be referred to as the “Right Honourable Prime Minister”. Good to know they’ve got such a clear set of priorities…


Friday Poll: On the wage gap with Australia

Posted by Clare Curran on July 30th, 2010

Before the last election John Key said the ‘fundamental purpose’ of his government would be to narrow the wage gap between New Zealand and Australia. How’s he doing?

(Note: you can answer more than one)

Do you believe the Government:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Tyre Kicker in Chief

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 29th, 2010

Interesting to read Duncan Garner’s take on John Key’s answering on the wage gap between Australia and New Zealand

Yesterday’s performance in Parliament was too selective and too slippery for him to get away with. All the statistics show the gap between Australian wages and Kiwi wages is growing – but Key refused to accept it. He refused to admit it. In fact he went the other way – he said the gap is closing. It’s not, no matter which figures you focus on.

It was an interesting insight into the sensitivity of the government on this issue that Key would try to argue that black was white, when the numbers, even under his chosen construction pointed to the gap widening. It was a bit more than slippery too- it was a very deliberate attempt to mislead.

All of this began as a result of questioning on the absence of an economic plan from National to achieve their stated objective of catching up with Australia. This is a vitally important issue for the country. Concern about this is not only coming from our side of the political spectrum but also from those more closely aligned with the Nats.

Trans-Tasman, the political newsletter today devotes a significant amount of space to concern about the lack of courage in the Government’s programme noting that the obesession with a safety first approach is raising questions about the willingness to take the hard calls and saying poll driven leadership is raising questions about policy intentions.

Many months ago on this blog I described Mr Key as being ” all map and no compass”.  As they say in the House, I stand by that statement.


John Key clambers onto the bandwagon

Posted by Clare Curran on July 29th, 2010

Um I don’t remember John Key making these comments when Telstra Clear decided to send 48 jobs  from Kapiti to a Philippine Call Centre! And now another 70 jobs from the Auckland call centre are under threat.

Or when there was talk about Telecom outsourcing and offshoring several thousand jobs (NB Telecom has  since advised me those plans are “on hold” for now). Steven Joyce is on record as sayign the government has no responsibility for decisions made by a private company on outsourcing.

What’s changed? John Key is reading the political wind. Well I’m glad he’s sticking up for Kiwi jobs. Maybe he could announce support for the Kiwi Jobs Bill which aims to put in place a procurement policy to maximise opportunities for local businesses when tendering for large government projects.

Read what he had to say:

Prime Minister John Key says companies choosing to send their call centres to other parts of the world “are making the wrong choice”.

He wants other New Zealand companies to take note of Canon’s new call centre on the Shore.

Mr Key told the North Shore Times it is a positive move to open call centres in New Zealand because it creates employment for people of different age groups and ethnicities.


The Wage Gap

Posted by Chris Hipkins on July 28th, 2010

Before the last election the wage gap with Australia was John Key’s #1 issue. Key even went as far as to say that the ‘fundamental purpose’ of his government would be to narrow the gap. Listening to Gerry Brownlee and John Key in the House today and yesterday, apparently the problem has been solved already.

Yesterday Brownlee claimed that the gap ‘is certainly a lot less than it was when Labour was in office’ despite the fact that it has blown out by more than $50 a week since National took office. In the last quarter, according to official statistics, Australian wages have increased by $17 a week, compared to $3 for Kiwi workers.

Kiwi workers will fall even further behind from October when they will be paying a consumption tax (GST) that is 50 percent higher than in Australia. We have caught up with Australia in one respect though, when National took over we had a lower unemployment rate – they’ve managed to turn that around in 18 months!

So where is John Key’s plan? Smiling and waving for the cameras won’t get us there. As Annette King said in the House yesterday, “It’s time for the Government to stop kicking the tyres, put some petrol in the tank. start the engine and go somewhere!”. Couldn’t have said it better…!


A breach of trust

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 28th, 2010

I have known Helen Kelly, the President of the CTU for quite a long time now. I admire her greatly. She has been, and is, an exceptional and passionate advocate for workers in New Zealand, and indeed internationally. I can appreciate the position she was in when National was elected and called on the union movement to be part of their Jobs Summit. I was a bit surprised when the CTU had John Key speak at their conference, but they felt this was a PM and the government that they should, and could, work with.

Just how let down Helen, and the workers she represents, are now feeling is clear from the letter that Helen has sent to the PM.

It is easy to feel the sense of betrayal in her words

She said he had breached his undertaking to consult her if the Government was going to move on union access and non-union collective bargaining.

“You also said you wanted to work with the unions,” she wrote. “And you portrayed yourself as a moderating influence in employment law matters. That has changed.”

I saw Helen at a function last night and I can report in person she is every bit as aggreived.

While the on-going debate will be and should be about the substance of the changes to workers rights and conditions, the role and the approach of the PM should not forgotten here. He led the union movement to believe he was their friend, but as soon as his perception of the political environment dictated a change, he moved swiftly to go against his word. That is a serious breach of trust, and one that I think the PM will live to regret.


In defence of sick leave

Posted by Chris Hipkins on July 24th, 2010

This week a few wags (on both sides of the House) had a laugh at my expense as I struggled through a couple of speeches and an oral question with a pretty bad cold. Fair call, I probably would have been better to stay at home in bed rather than solider on and spread my germs around the place. But that’s the Kiwi way, isn’t it? Stay at home to recover and you’re ’soft’ and need to ‘toughen up’. If it’s good enough for Colin Meads to play on with a broken arm, surely we can put up with a bit of cold and flu?

Well actually, that’s a pretty crap attitude. Most of the time we’d be better to spend a day or two in bed, get rid of our germs, and then head back to work. That way we’d avoid spreading our bug and probably be back to full health a lot quicker. If we went to work while crook we’re probably not that productive anyway.

So why on earth does the National government feel the need to perpetuate the idea that anyone who takes a day off to get better is shirking? John Key’s suggestion that someone taking a single day of sick leave could be forced to go to their GP to get a ‘note’ is just stupid. Here in Upper Hutt it’s almost impossible to get an appointment with a GP anyway. Not content with loading them up with the burden of dishing out cold and flu pills, now John ‘the Nanny’ Key wants them to sign-off every sore throat, runny nose, or headache…


The Tyre Kickers

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 22nd, 2010

“Kicking the Tyres” is the John Key/Steven Joyce/Crosby Textor phrase du jour. Anything the government is doing from mining to MMP to asset sales to student loans gets the ‘tyre kicking’ into action.

Its funny when I was growing up a ‘tyre kicker’ was someone who had no idea about a car or how it worked, so they kicked the tyres in a pointless and desperate attempt to look like they knew what they were doing. Sounds about right. Of course for the Nats its about making sure that they dont do anything to risk a scrap of popularity or offend anyone.

But I have also noticed a related tactic- feigned empathy. This is where you show concern for someone’s plight or give them an encouraging word, and then do precisely nothing to help them.  This might sound harsh, and I am sure National MPs have genuine concern, but if you are not prepared to do anything concrete, then for me it amounts to feigned empathy.

Last night we saw this at its worst with the response to Carol Beaumont’s Bill to curb loan sharks. Speaker after speaker from the Nats got up and told us how much they felt for people who fell victim to out of control debt, but they were not prepared to actually do something about it, by voting the Bill through to Select Committee. No real reasons were given (they are reviewing the law so we should all wait and see seemed to be the main argument). It was shameful politicing to stop Carol and Labour being seen to ‘win” something. Privately a number of National MPs are embarrased by the approach.

When it comes to the economy , if we combine John Key being “relaxed” about everything with ‘Kicking the Tyres’  it means the country has no economic plan, no step change, no “aspiration”. Is tyre kicking the extent of John Key’s  “ambition for New Zealand.”? It has gone on long enough.  Its time for the government to stop kicking the tyres and actually put some petrol in the car.


John Key’s Pizza Guy

Posted by Darien Fenton on July 21st, 2010

Sanjay, the Pizza Hutt worker who delivered John Key’s pizza earlier this week and who, according to Mr Key, thinks John Key’s idea of a 90 day trial period is a good idea, should know that Prime Minister John Key voted against him getting minimum wage last year.

Mr Key obviously doesn’t know that workers like Sanjay have no rights anyway because Pizza Hutt drivers are independent contractors and not covered by basic employment laws, let alone trial periods. 

Last year, I tried to persuade the National Party to support my members’ bill (Minimum Wage and Remuneration Amendment Bill) which would have ensured that so-called “independent contractors” like Sanjay would have received at least the minimum wage. 

But guess what, they voted against it and the opportunity was lost.

Much of John Key’s and Kate Wilkinson’s pronouncements about their proposed labour changes this week are based on a view that is sharply skewed by their contact with employers.   The Labour Department evaluation of the 90 day trial period interviewed ar0und 3,500 employers and just 13 workers, so one has to question how balanced the evidence is that the PM is basing his decisions on.

John Key tried to make out he was sympathetic to workers like Sanjay this week by telling the story of this pizza delivery guy who came to his mansion in Parnell. 

But when he had a chance to really make a difference to Sanjay and other contract workers, his government failed.


In support of Gerry (kind of)

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 20th, 2010

There has been a bit of comment yesterday and today (including from Guyon Espiner on TV1) that Gerry Brownlee “over-reached” himself when it came to the mining of Schedule 4 land.  I certainly think that Gerry failed miserably to sell the policy, but its a bit harsh to blame him for over-reaching when we have this from the John Key’s opening statement to Parliament in February this year.

Notwithstanding the public consultation process, it is my expectation that the Government will act on at least some of these recommendations and make significant changes to Schedule 4. This is because new mining on Crown land has the potential to increase economic growth and create jobs.

That is an unequivocal commitment to major changes to Schedule 4 and to new mining. Gerry was only acting with that in mind. I still think that by the time they got to announcing anything they planned to use Great Barrier as a bit of a stalking horse, but the initial blush of enthusiasm was very much John Key’s. Which is why it was so interesting he tried to get as far away as possible from this policy disaster today.

As an aside in Parliament today the pressure of this and the industrial relations package was telling on Mr Key. He got very side-tracked by interjections, launched into Darren about his hair (he may have a point on that score ;-) ) and at one stage totally tossed his toys and sat down in the middle of an answer. Tough day at the office.


Monday poll: Attack on workers and unions or about jobs and growth?

Posted by Clare Curran on July 19th, 2010

Would you describe John Key's employment announcements as:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

All workers to suffer while Key pretends to pander to Act

Posted by Trevor Mallard on July 18th, 2010

John Key has today announced a stinging attack on people who work for a living.

While it is being characterised as anti union it goes much further and is designed to suppress wages and reduce working conditions including holidays for all workers whether or not they are union members.

Remember Key’s promise to close the wage gao with Australia – this policy will do exactly to opposite. It is a sign of Key dropping the “Mr Nice Guy” approach and reverting to old form.

And don’t be taken in by John Key’s lies about this reform being radical in order to get Act party votes. Act will vote for any reform that reduces salaries and working conditions. It didn’t need to be this radical to get their vote.

I think John Key knows that and is a liar – a more generous person might just call him stupid.


Discontent among the black tie set (and the taxi driver)

Posted by Clare Curran on July 18th, 2010

Went to a black tie event last night in Dunedin. Not normally my thing. But the cause was important. What was interesting was the consistent number of similar conversations I had about the government. Horror and discontent would be the major theme. No plan for our economy, lack of investment in local industry. Gutting of tertiary education.

I did not feel defensive once.

People could not understand why the government is so high in the polls.

I found it interesting because these are the people I would expect to be John Key cheerleaders. But was obvious they felt there was nothing to cheer about. Or that they felt led.

And then there was my taxi driver. Had never met him before. Couldn’t shut him up. He has done all the calculations on the effect of a GST rise. Him and his missus absolutely depend on Working for Families. They are terrified it will go. Two young kids.


Should I explain John Key’s policy to him?

Posted by Darien Fenton on July 17th, 2010

As workers gear up to fight against the government’s moves on employment law, it’s clear that Prime Minister John Key doesn’t understand what he’s about to announce tomorrow.

He said on TVNZ last night : “you can’t just sack someone (under the 90 day trial period) – you have to go through a formal process, but what the process avoids is a personal grievance just for the sake of things.”

Well, he’s wrong.  Under the 90 day trial period, an employer can just sack someone. They don’t even have to tell them why. They can just say “Don’t come Monday.”

And a personal grievance just for the sake of things?  Please.  He has no idea what an effort taking a personal grievance is and why would he think someone would do it “just for the sake of things”.  The number of grievances that proceed to mediation or beyond are tiny in comparison to New Zealand’s 2 million workforce.

Key went on to describe the law as “probationary periods”.  We already had those in the law prior to the 90 day Act last year, and still have them for all workers.

John Key needs to study up on his policies. I’m happy to help.


Productive employment relations?

Posted by Carol Beaumont on July 17th, 2010

Members of the National Government say the word productivity a lot.  I certainly agree there is a need to lift our productivity as a nation.  However I get annoyed that there is little real action and no focus at all on workplace productivity.

In fact the track record of this Government, including the recent announcements on extending the 90 Day No Rights provisions and limiting union access to workplaces, has taken a cost reduction approach to employment relations.  Lifting employment standards and improving the quality of our workplaces doesn’t feature. 

In my speech on the Prime Ministers Statement to Parliament in February I made the following comments :

Where is the government investment in industry and regional economic development?  Where is the recognition that we need to lift the quality of workplaces – the wage rates, the work conditions, the quality of interaction. Productive employment relations. This Government sees workers and their rights as a cost to be reduced.

Look at the double speech in the PMs statement. Under the section on Better Regulation we have:

“Whether labour laws are imposing excessive costs on the country and holding back opportunities to create jobs”

Holidays and PGs not to mention union access to workplaces and collective bargaining. Remember what this meant last time and if we want to find reasons for the gap in income between Australia and NZ  this is a good place to start.

Attacking workers rights and reducing current standards will not encourage the motivated workforce we need. Failing to invest in improving skills in our workplace will  similarly not provide for a motivated workforce able to work smarter.  There were no new initiatives in the area of workplace learning in the Budget.  In fact under the Labour portfolio we see money moved from the Skills area to a completely different area of work.  The Skills Forum spoken about very positively by the Prime Minister at the CTU conference last year has met once under this Government (still we know how reliable undertakings made by John Key to the union movement are!)

A recent report on management practices in the manufacturing industry showed that NZ managers surveyed are “average to middling by global standards”  Furthermore people management emerges as the weakest area.  And we are going to give poor people managers the right to fire at will for 90 days (except for discrimination covered by the Human Rights Act)!

 A specific need identified in the Skills Strategy agreed by the last Government, Unions and Employers was around the need for more management training.   We need forward looking people management that recognises that paying more not less, improving conditions of employment and genuine flexibility and respecting the need for independent worker voice that is engaged in improving the workplace and the products and services created/provided  is what is required. Workplaces that are focussed on lifting productivity and where productive employment relations are seen as an integral part of this. We have some of these businesses but we need many more.

Fundamental to this approach is respect.  I know from my own experience as a union organiser that workers value and desire respect at work.   Respect for them as individuals but also respect for their unions.  They also want to work with and for employers they respect.   

I would like to see a real focus on productive employment relations but it will not happen under the approach being promoted by this National Government.


Downright ungrateful

Posted by Darien Fenton on July 12th, 2010

Well, PM Key said it :  Pete Bethune is “downright ungrateful” for the support he had from NZ when he was locked up in a Japanese jail.

That’s a question that has already been hotly debated on Red Alert.  But it set me thinking, especially after a day out in the community (that’s Key’s, McCully’s, Coleman’s, Mapp’s and Lockie’s (electorate) community) about what we should be downright ungrateful for:

  • We should be downright ungrateful for having a PM that no-one challenges (much) because he smiles and waves and everyone forgets to ask the hard questions;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for having a government that is attacking ACC, but hardly anyone notices, because after all, we’re just talking about the injured, the sexually damaged and older people;
  • We should be downright ungrateful that our older people have had their home care and/or their meals on wheels cut, even although it meant they could continue to live at home, rather than costing a fortune elsewhere;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for Anne Tolley, who is the worst Education Minister ever, and who has left the early childhood education sector completely bemused about why her government thinks it’s more important to spend money on prisons than our children;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for the PM’s exhortation that we should all learn Mandarin, even although his government has cut Adult and Community Education – and there’s now no chance to learn anything, let alone Mandarin;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for the vehicle regos going up on 1 July, the increase in ACC levies and power and petrol prices on the up and up, and that’s before we factor in the GST increase coming our way;
  • And we should be really ungrateful that most middle and  lower income people won’t get tax cuts that go anywhere compensating for all of the cost increases either here or ahead of us.

I don’t want anyone to get the wrong message.  There’s a lot I am grateful for, but that’s nothing to do with John Key and his NAct government.

How about you?  Are you an ungrateful b*st*rd too?

(PS, glad Pete’s home safe).