Red Alert

Posts Tagged ‘John Key’

What did smile and wave say about aussie?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on March 12th, 2010

JP Morgan report today that the unemployment differential between NZ and Aussie is the worst since records have been kept.

Remember we had lower unemployment than Aussie when Key became PM. Still not 1k of the cycleway built as part of his recovery package nor 1 metre of fibre in the ground.

Press Release by JPMorgan Australia Limited  at  7:42 am, 12 Mar 2010
* The bullish case for AUD/NZD can be summarised in the very simple mantra that ‘NZ is not Australia in terms of the level of economic activity. In short, NZ had a much worse recession than Australia and is recovering much more fitfully. One specific illustration of this is the unprecedented divergence that has opened up between the unemployment rate in the two countries. We first highlighted this a few months ago and since then the divergence has become even more acute (Australia releases February unemployment data tonight, after the RBNZ policy meeting). As of December the NZ unemployment rate was 2% higher than in Australia, which is the widest gap since the NZ series was first reported in 1985 and 2.8% wider than the average differential over the past 25 years.

So this is smile and wave’s secret plan to stop illegal whaling

Posted by Trevor Mallard on March 8th, 2010

Remember Key had a secret plan to end illegal whaling by Japan which he was going to check out with Clinton when she was to visit here.

It is now out for us all to see.

He wants to legalise it.

But then again the National Party has a history of selling out on widely shared kiwi principles. I had hoped we had got to the point where our Prime Minister never genuflected  kowtowed to overseas interests.

Shame on you John Key.


Henry review on Australian tax system.

Posted by Stuart Nash on March 7th, 2010

The Nats had the Tax Working Group and Australia had the Henry Tax Review.  Dr Henry is the Australian Federal Treasury boss. 

For some reason, Prime Minister Key and Finance Minister English have always operated under the assumption that the Henry review would recomend to the Rudd government that taxes should be cut - esp the company rate.   Key and English’s own tax working group also seemed to be operating under such an assumption. 

Dr Henry presented his report to Federal Treasurer Swan in December, and while the report has not been made public, Dr Henry said in a recent speech that the consequences of the aging population means that Australian’s will need to pay MORE taxes.  Mr Rudd has said that he is putting the Henry tax review on hold as he concentrates on major health reforms. 

Mr Key and Mr English seem to be stuck in a late 20th century economic timewarp when the rest of the world is concentrating on how to stimulate the economy by providing relief for those who actually need it – those 70% of salary and wage earners on $40k or less – those 800,000 New Zealand families with a combined household income of $60k or less.  How about doing something for these Kiwis Mr Key.!   Take a leaf from Mr Rudd’s book and put these tax increases for the many so as to cut taxes for the few on hold – then seek a mandate from the people in 2011 for such radical and unfair changes.  Go on.


Improved Crown Accounts won’t justify savage Budget

Posted by David Cunliffe on March 5th, 2010

The latest Crown Accounts show that recovery is underway. Bill English should be frank with Kiwis that the books are improving, and ensure that he does not talk down recovery as cover for a tough Budget.

The government’s books are significantly improving and now the presure is on Bill English to ensure all Kiwis benefit from the recovery.

Kiwis who have battled through the recession need a credible long term for them to feel like they’re not struggling to pay the bills at the end of the week.

What they don’t need is for prices of groceries, power and services to rise to pay for John Key’s GST money-go-round.

A recurring theme in the Crown Accounts seems to be the investments in the New Zealand Super Fund and ACC both tracked above forecast, and NZSF is now worth $2.5b more than when the government decided to suspend contributions for a decade.

Does anyone now think National’s “decade of deferrals” of payments to the SuperFund at the last Budget was a clever idea

With these improved forecasts, Labour challenges John Key and Bill English to resume payments into the SuperFund.

Gross debt was $2.9 billion lower than forecast, and continues Labour’s legacy of low debt, with gross Crown debt the third lowest in the OECD.

Crucially the operating deficit was $1.4b lower than forecast, now only $630 million. While still significant, this closes the operating gap by about 70% and shows drastic reductions in services are not justified in the 2010 Budget.

New Zealanders have gone without during the recession. The improvement in the Crown accounts should provide comfort that there are better times ahead.

It is essential that all Kiwis share in the recovery and that the government not talk the recovery down as pretext for a tax-cut driven Budget in 2010.


Lions on the hustings – chickens under pressure

Posted by Trevor Mallard on March 5th, 2010

The Dompost reports that Key, Hide and Garrett weren’t available to make substantive comment on Garrett’s plan  to sterilise people.

Smile and wave wouldn’t rule it out. Hide hid. Spokesperson made non comment. And big brave Garrett may have left the country again.

What a dopey idea – have three or four kids, decide you want a vasectomy and to get one free you have to beat up one of the kids.

But both smile and wave and jeckyl and hide wanted the focus group results before they were prepared to put their opinions into the public arena. Talk about being gutless wonders.


Will smile and wave save rally?

Posted by Chris Hipkins on March 2nd, 2010

The New Zealand Herald is reporting that John Key is looking at saving the Rally of New Zealand. He is non-committal though:

“It’s a sport that New Zealand has a very long history in, so I’m going to have a look at it and see whether it’s possible for us to play some part. I can’t guarantee we can ride in as a white knight, but we will look at it.”

As I noted previously, the Rally has a large international following and could have great spin-offs for tourism and other economic activity if the government gets behind it and does it right.

Is this just another example of Key saying whatever the person in front of him wants to hear or will he actually follow through?


Tax tour update – are you listening, Mr Key?

Posted by Stuart Nash on March 1st, 2010

As we travel around the country explaining Labour’s opposition to the govt’s proposed increase in GST, I am pleasantly surprised by the overwhelmingly positive response we are receiving.  People understand the issue: they know that increasing GST means an increase in the price in everything.  This leads to less money in their pocket, budgets that are stretched even further and a growing disparity between the few earning the big bucks and everyone else.

A lot also know that when the Mr Key was campaigning in 2008, he said that there would be not be an increase in GST.  They are pretty annoyed about this reversal.!  Most don’t believe that they will be adequately compensated and think that this is a government looking after the few and ignoring the needs of the many.  Can’t help but agree.!

I actually believe that we have a real chance of forcing a National back down on a GST increase.  Why?  Because we are listening to ordinary kiwis who are telling us how it is – and they do not want any increase in GST.  Can you hear them, Mr Key.?


Another key promise broken – wage gap with aussie to blow out

Posted by Trevor Mallard on March 1st, 2010

A Grant Thornton survey of employers in NZ and Australia reported in the Herald, has resulted in their prediction that the wage gap is set to increase.

They are predicting the brain drain to turn into a full flowing torrent.

Not really surprising. From unemployment being 4.2% in both countries in 2008 we now have 7.3% and going up and they have 5.3% and going down.

And what was the difference. The Aussie government took positive counter measures which minimised the employment flow on from the recession while John Key sat on his hands, ran a talk fest, and in fact made the situation worse with cuts.

I’m not sure whether Key knows what he is doing and is deeply cycnical, or doesn’t know what he is doing.


Whose going into Cabinet? II

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 28th, 2010

Seems to be firming up on Nathan Guy.

Some discussion of Amy Adams getting the out of Cabinet role. Key getting worried about performance of most of the women ministers.


Why did I buy a new mountain bike?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 28th, 2010

Because I thought we would have a cycleway. But according to the Herald not a metre has been built since John Key announced it a year ago.

And btw how much fibre has gone in as a result of Joyce’s work?


Leaders reply strikes a chord

Posted by Raymond Huo on February 26th, 2010

Phil Goff’s response to Prime Minister John Key’s statement on February 9 has resonated strongly within Chinese and Ethnic communities.

The speech has been “heavily” quoted in the Chinese-language media in NZ and been at the heart of many political debates in the community.

Last Friday Phil Goff gave a comprehensive interview with Auckland-based WTV on various issues including GST, R&D, how to grow economy and “catch up with Australia”.

Common sense would tell that if the Government is serious about catching up with Australia we need to look after the bottom 50 percent of wage earners not the top 5.

In New Zealand, the total income earned by the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers is about 17 percent proportionally, and the total tax they pay is 12 percent. While in Australia the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers pay the same proportion of tax of 12 percent, but the total income they earned is 25 percent.

To put it in lay-terms, Australia’s bottom 50 percent of taxpayers have a bigger share of the total income, which means income is more equally distributed in Australia before tax is taken into account.

If National are really keen on closing the gap with Australia, the focus must be on the bottom 50, not the top 5.

Feel free to use this translated version of Phil Goff’s speech.

And to the National supporters that read this, if you read Phil’s speech with no prejudice, you will see why Phil has been so warmly welcomed by Kiwi-Asians.

During the huge Chinese New Year Celebration on Saturday 13 February attended by over 65,000 people, I was proud to learn that Phil Goff had more photos taken from the crowd than the Prime Minister himself!

(more…)


Why don’t Nats want question time ?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 24th, 2010

It is not good form to go into details of discussions that happen “behind the speakers chair” between leaders of the house and their shadow or between whips.

But what is very obvious is that the Nats are very very scared of having a question time today. We are under urgency debating ACC legislation. We know that in the end we will lose and all we can do in debate and delay.  But that has its limits and what normally happens is that a deal is done – questions in and a limit to the length of the debate.

There was a fair deal on the table for the Nats but they have run away from it.

So what are they scared of.  Key or English on the differing views on GST. The housing question to credit card Heatley which goes to his priorities for government expenditure. Or Anne Tolley showing her ignorance of her own standards policy again.

But whatever it is they make chickens look courageous.


Video: John Key on GST

Posted by Chris Hipkins on February 24th, 2010


Steven Joyce used the “r” word today

Posted by Clare Curran on February 23rd, 2010

Finally, Steven Joyce seems to have woken up to the fact that he’s a Minister, and there’s a crisis happening in one of his many portfolios. And when there’s a crisis, the public like to think that the government takes charge.

He’s waited way too long to make a move. And that will cost him. I don’t think he’s behaving like a strong Minister, and I think it’s interesting that despite the persona, the Telecom crisis saw him standing back wringing his hands, saying while it was “concerned, the government couldn’t really do anything”.

Suddenly, this afternoon, that changed. He decided the government did have a role after all. I wonder whether it was because John Key told him to say something and he finally asked for some advice.

For a Minister who has seemed almost unnaturally averse to the concept of regulation, it was a surprise to hear Steven Joyce say today that the government may have to regulate. Out of character.

This is some of what he said: 

… ensuring 111 calls made from mobile telephone networks get through is vital.

“The recent spate of outages on the XT network has exposed some shortcomings in this area and officials have been working urgently with Telecom since last evening to address these issues.”

Currently, Telecom is obliged under the Telecommunications Services Obligation (TSO) to provide emergency calling on its fixed network. However, mobile phones are not covered by the TSO.

Mr Joyce says that the government may need to regulate to ensure that operators prioritise 111 calls in situations where networks become unstable.

Well, it’s taken days for him to come to that view and I believe he’s been negligent in not getting involved earlier.

It’s ironic that he’s talking about regulation, the day after it appeared he would lean towards not regulating the termination rates on mobile calls, after two of the main players, Vodafone and Telecom offered to further phase in a reduction of rates.

Maybe he’s realising that customers need to come first. It’s a reality that there must be a charge for terminating a call or text, but it needs to be fair. For the consumer and also for the third player in the marketplace. But he’s acted too late and and he’s shown himself not to be strong and decisive. 

Maybe he’s finally realised that where a significant public interest is at stake, the government does have a role. Watch this space, because the PM has a political nose and he’ll get involved. And if he does, then Steven will be damaged.

This isn’t just about the XT network. It’s about NZ Inc.


Key’s comments on water a worry

Posted by Brendon Burns on February 23rd, 2010

Comments yesterday by J Key about the need to allocate water more ‘efficiently’ in Canterbury are worrying.

Discussing the review of Environment Canterbury, he said from a purely economic perspective all the evidence supported this in the South Island and he believed this could be well balanced against environmental issues.

After years of handing out water consents with no restraint, Ecan had begun more recently to resist the pressure of big farming interests whose record on the environmental outcomes was woeful.

We’ve lost our birthright of being able to swim safely in Canterbury’s lowland streams, with dairying the biggest contributor.

Ecan has been over-turned in the Environment Court trying to stop extraction in red-zoned areas by corporate interests who can buy the best science and lawyers. That’s part of the reason why Ecan had been one of the slowest to approve resource consents.

If speeding up the allocation of such water is the Prime Minister’s definition of efficiency, then we would have every cause to be worried.

I’ve backed the Ecan-driven Canterbury Water Management Strategy which recommends a five year period of improving existing water quality before any new water is allocated under tougher, new environmental standards.

I support more greening of the Canterbury Plains so long as it doesn’t mean more browning of our waterways. John Key’s comments suggest he wants rapid water allocation for quick economic outcomes. Bowling Ecan and replacing it with a government-appointed board will facilitate such an outcome.


Tax expectations

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 22nd, 2010

Small not too focused group, majority from the right,  but not involved in politics, tongues loosened had a discussion on their expectations of tax changes. I listened.

No real interest in threshold changes. Their consensus was while they wanted more, but thought English and Key didn’t have it in them, the budget in May will drop the top rate to 30c (from 38) the middle income rate to 25c (33) and the under $48k rate to 15c (21). A couple of people thought that Key would phase the top rate change in over two years to make him look less personally greedy. But that it would be announced this May.

Would make for some interesting modelling.


The people smile and wave is relying on

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 22nd, 2010

The government has two very big issues running at the moment. GST (in the context of the budget) and National’s standards in primary education.

But the Ministers leading these areas are the two most damaged Ministers in the government.

Since his housing rorts have been exposed English has had very little credibility when is comes to fiscal prudence. His problem has been both actual and more importantly perception. Even natural allies are asking whether the change will come in the short term (Power) or later (Joyce).

And while those who work closely with her are mainly being polite the degree of exasperation with Anne Tolley is growing by the week. In this case it is pretty simply a Minister who can’t cope with the job. While that was most obvious in the tertiary area where she was removed following approaches to Key from within the sector it is increasingly clear that she can’t get her head around her own flagship standards policy. Tolley might have made a good junior Minister but she just doesn’t have the grunt to cope with the front bench and the education portfolio.

So should Labour be calling for their resignation. Probably not. Ministers who are seen to be performing poorly are like rust – it sometimes takes a long time to surface but eventually will wreck the whole machine.

I say leave them in place – for now.


The Bullshit factor #2

Posted by Clare Curran on February 21st, 2010

Economics. It’s a paradigm. It’s all about money. Not people. Maybe John Key could do a local version.


What happened to smile and wave saving the whales

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 21st, 2010

Hearing Rudd reminded me that smile and wave had a  plan to stop Japanese whaling.

We are still waiting John. You are beginning to look silly.


National: Dumbing Down the Economic Debate

Posted by David Cunliffe on February 20th, 2010

So what is wrong with National’s economic approach?

Here are a few quick starting thoughts for a Saturday afternoon: our economic future has to be about more than the “farm and the mine”  if we want a high value, high wage economy (farming is of course core, but undifferentiated commodities are notoriously vulnerable to exchange rate swings, and the margins are often low).

Sustainable competitive advantage is about developing that something special on top that keeps the margins up and the value coming – that in turn requires innovation, intellectual property rights, and the smart use of technology, capital and skills to leverage our underlying resource base.

I am afraid all we have seen from National so far is a dumbing down of that debate by focussing on “deregulating” – essentially a passive hope that if govt gets out of the way, a thousand flowers will bloom.  In a small, arguably subscale economy it just ain’t that simple, or easy, folks – otherwise we would all have become billionaires years ago.  A more active partnership between government and business is required to fast track high value opportunites and align resources.

Secondly, and controversially, ownership matters.  No point in getting farm or factory productivity up if the financial system captures all the gain and bleeds the value offshore.  About 3/4 of NZ’s external deficit is not the balance of trade but the value of financial flows.  The four Aussie banks typically send home more profit each year than is made by the entire NZX 50 companies.  To fill the gap, the National Government is poised to flog off even more assets and further liberalise the already very liberal overseas investment regime.  Selling Godzone by the acre.

We can’t solve that problem without getting savings up.  Way up.  Shame National gutted Kiwisaver.  Nor can we do it with an outdated monetary policy that targets inflation alone using one tool (the OCR) that makes the housing bubble worse, or at best is not sufficiently focused to fix the bubble without immense collateral damage to exports.  We need a bigger sovereign stake in our own economy, before it irretrievably becomes someone else’s.

Is it too late to fix?  No I don’t believe so, but every year matters in our race against time.  We can’t afford another three years of a National administration that barely understands the problem, has shown itself devoid of ideas, and patently can’t make a decision the latest focus group doesn’t like.  We can’t turn this boat around steering by focus group.  NZ needs clear goals and a plan to get there.  Mr Key may be able to read a map, but he clearly has no compass.

I could go on, and I intend to, as we build up to one of the most crucial Budgets in New Zealand history.