Comments on: A fuzzy future for free-to-air television http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2009/12/23/a-fuzzy-future-for-free-to-air-television/ A blog written by Labour MPs Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:59:44 +1200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Bea http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2009/12/23/a-fuzzy-future-for-free-to-air-television/comment-page-1/#comment-23799 Bea Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:05:44 +0000 http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=9093#comment-23799 So Sky would have the monopoly in provinces. That sucks. I am pleased that Fed Farmers are lobbying forcefully for proper rural broadband though. Proper broadband is a significant asset to rural businesses - I hope Fed Farmers are successful. If I had to weigh it up, I'd choose decent broadband and download what I wanted to watch rather than paying Sky. I doubt I'd be downloading any party political broadcasts though. So Sky would have the monopoly in provinces. That sucks. I am pleased that Fed Farmers are lobbying forcefully for proper rural broadband though. Proper broadband is a significant asset to rural businesses – I hope Fed Farmers are successful.

If I had to weigh it up, I’d choose decent broadband and download what I wanted to watch rather than paying Sky. I doubt I’d be downloading any party political broadcasts though.

]]> By: Spud http://blog.labour.org.nz/index.php/2009/12/23/a-fuzzy-future-for-free-to-air-television/comment-page-1/#comment-23797 Spud Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:33:05 +0000 http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=9093#comment-23797 Oooh grim :-( Keep up the fight! Oooh grim :-( Keep up the fight!

]]>