Red Alert

Archive for the ‘youth’ Category

The H.Y.P.E Movement

Posted by Carmel Sepuloni on February 15th, 2011

H.Y.P.E stands for, Helping Youth Pursue Emancipation.  I learnt about this programme via facebook about a year ago and was intrigued by what I saw.  The movement began in the U.S. by a group of Tongan young people who were concerned about high school dropout rates, incarceration rates, and death rates among young Pacific people in their local community.   They wanted to be engaged in bringing about a positive change and they wanted to be involved in a grassroots movement that would bring all youth together. 

The movement has now begun in NZ.  Last night I had the privilege of attending the H.Y.P.E Fundraising Ball in Auckland.  There was a room filled with inspirational people – young talented sports people, musicians, academics, artists and parents who have done and continue to do – a fantastic job of supporting their children to reach their potential.

The movement is not easily packaged as it’s deliberately designed in a way that young people (12 – 25 year olds) have the room to interpret and define the programme as they go.  Currently there are 300 H.Y.P.E projects happening across the globe.  The projects are all in response to social issues that directly impact on young peoples lives/ well being.  Once the young person/ people, identify the issue – they then go on to develop ways of addressing/ responding to/ resolving, that particular issue.

It’s exciting and I’m looking forward to watching how it develops in NZ!


Young Labour on the road

Posted by Grant Robertson on January 20th, 2011

A group of Young Labour activitists are on the road on their Clarion Tour. A van load are travelling from Auckland down south for 12 days, meeting with other Labour activists on the way taking part in a load of community and political activities. The Clarion Tour started in 2004, with, if memory serves me right a young Jacinda Ardern in charge.

The Waikato Times caught up with this year’s group yesterday. As Eric says in the article the idea is to get involved in grassroots community projects. There has been some awesome stuff so far including at a kindergarten, riding for the disabled and a familiy centre.

Its great to see this kind of grassroots work, just as we have seen from the Te Tai Tonga Poneke Labour Branch’a random acts of labourness. It gives an old fella a warm glow.

You can keep up with progress of the Clarion Tour at their blog


Flossie le Mar could change lives…..

Posted by Trevor Mallard on January 10th, 2011

Don’t often do plugs on Red Alert but this is an issue we still haven’t got our heads around. Self defence for women and especially for girls is an important part of a process that is much more than the physical stuff. I first organised courses in the King Country in the early 1980s. There have been spurts of progress since mainly thanks to a very committed and mainly voluntary group of women. I hope this play helps change the mindset to the point where every girl gets to do at least one self defence course.

I write to interest you in supporting the debut staging of my play The Hooligan and the Lady next Wellington Fringe Festival.  The play is about Florence Warren (1890 – 1951) aka Miss Flossie le Mar, the World’s Famous Ju-Jitsu Girl.  This is the true story of the first woman to teach women’s self-defence in New Zealand – on stage. The play is a period reproduction of an original Edwardian star turn celebrating the achievements of one woman and her campaign to save women from brutes and bullies alike and I seek support to realize it.

(more…)


London Calling #5: Yoof Engagement

Posted by Grant Robertson on November 24th, 2010

We had the most brilliant session at the seminar yesterday on engaging young people in politics. We had speakers from Facebook, the UK Youth Parliament and the House of Commons Education Service. There were loads of interesting and practical ideas.

The Facebook presenter, Luc Delany gave an overview of their political engagement work, including the highly successful Democracy UK which they started for the UK election in May, and now has over 270,000 members. Its goal is to get young people interested in politics. They had a range of material and interactive events during the election campaign. One very practical result was that more than a thousand people downloaded enrolment forms from the site. One issue that made me a little uncomfortable was an application called My Vote Advisor that got you to answer a few questions and then told the person who they should vote for based on that. Maybe taking things too far? Nevertheless a great initiative that is still going.

We discovered that one of the participants is the Indian equivalent of Trevor, in one respect anyway in that he has reached his limit of 5,000 friends on Facebook. He asked the representative from Facebook if there was a way of extending this. But he has an even bigger ‘problem’. He has now reached the limit of 25,000 fans as well. The scale of politics in India is challenging Facebook.

The Education Service at the House of Commons are doing all kinds of innovative things to engage young people in politics.  There were some great ideas about teacher training programmes, films, competitions and the like that I will be bringing back home to share.   They have put a bit of focus on games to get young people interested.  Check out the  MP for a Week  game. Not quite the same as being an MP in NZ, but a really good way to give young people an idea of the kinds of things an MP does.

We also heard from a member of the UK Youth Parliament.  This is similar to the NZ version, but it is on-going, and election to the Parliament is done by young people in different regions. 500,000 young people voted in the last election. They have come up with some really interesting material, including a report on young people’s attitude to politics, called The P Word. Well worth a read.


The H word

Posted by Darien Fenton on October 20th, 2010

Today is an important day for wage and salary earners in New Zealand as they come out in rallies across the country protesting against the government’s determination to drive through unnecessary and unfair changes to industrial and holiday laws.

Update : By lunchtime today, 15,000 workers had attended rallies across NZ in the biggest protests against a government’s attacks on workers rights in more than a decade.  Thousands more are expected to come out during the afternoon. 

But while we’re waiting for reports on their action, here’s an ironical story (or some might use the word we are not allowed to use in parliament, the “h” word) about government members on the Select Committee in charge of the bills that workers are protesting about today.

Yesterday, National MP Tau Henare was publicly refusing to apologise for calling a teenage select committee submitter “a liar”, after he attacked James Sleep, 18, in his submission to the Transport & Industrial Relations Select Committee on the 90 day no rights bill.

James didn’t lie. I know, because I was there. He got one detail in his oral and written submissions a little bit mixed up. All Tau had to do was clarify, but instead, he called James a liar, and a bullshitter. And he’s gone further in the media saying :

Why would I apologise for a little turkey who got found out lying? He was reading out a submission and I was following it and in two parts … it was a completely different story.

He’ll get over it and if he doesn’t, well, then, too bad … He’ll learn from his experience.”

But then there is the NDU member, who had her first ever written submission to the committee sent back to her because, according to the Government members on the Select Committee, she made an “offensive comment”, which was :

Can we put John Key on a 90 day trial and sack him after the 89th day?

What?  It sounds like an absolutely fair point to me – whereas Tau Henare has used his power as a government member of a Select Committee to harass a  young person who had the gumption to show up and make a submission.

It’  s probably lucky the NDU member ddidn’t have to front the committee, because goodness only knows what would have happened to her.


Heather (no not that one) wins her case

Posted by Darien Fenton on August 24th, 2010

The first 90 day trial period case has been heard in the Employment Court, which has found that young pharmacy worker, Heather Smith was unjustifiably dismissed by her employer (due to a failure to comply with the contracting requirements of the Employment Relations Act), and the employer failed to treat her in good faith or to comply with her employment agreement.

The Employment Court says this gives Heather several grounds for compensation for the appalling way she was treated.

However, the President of the CTU, Helen Kelly warns that :

“This law was rushed through Parliament without a proper select committee process and therefore has to some extent failed to achieve what the Government set out to do, creating a high risk for employers that have already sacked workers unfairly under the scheme. The Government intended to allow the reckless dismissal of workers without reasons and without giving reasons. What the Court has found is that the Good Faith requirements prevail and while an employer still may not have to have reasons, where they do, and where they are considering dismissing someone – they will need to tell them.”

“Heather’s employers relied on the law to completely indemnify them from any standards of decent employment practice. They have been found to not only have breached good faith requirements but even the terms of the employment agreement they entered into her with.”

“The disgraceful thing is that the policy intention of the Government is to remove from Heather and every other worker employed on a 90 day agreement the right to take a case against unfair dismissal.”

“While this decision is a real victory for Heather and justifies our decision to stick by workers like her, the Court decision still makes it clear that where employers get it right, and form and perform contracts correctly, this new law will still enable dismissals as unfair as Heather’s to go unchallenged.”

Pleased for Heather, but not pleased about all of the other workers who will be unfairly dismissed under the government’s plan to extend the 90 day trial to all workplaces.

Mind you, the other Heather (Roy) might be out on her ear, according to TVNZ news tonight.


Enough.

Posted by Jacinda Ardern on July 18th, 2010

Saying a policy is going to help young people, doesn’t make it true- and it’s time the Government was called on it.

First, the facts. According to the household labour force survey there are more than 70,000 young people currently not in employment, education, or training. 70,000.  Youth unemployment is at levels we haven’t seen in decades.  We’re not reaching crisis, we’ve reached it.

It’s natural to look to the government for a policy response, especially in a recession- they hold levers which can effect change, that can turn the situation around. So what lever has the government used? The one that sends us racing to the bottom.

The government claims that young people are unskilled, and that employers don’t want to employ them. Their response then, and now is to take away the rights of young people, make it easier to sack them without any reason what so ever, which 1 in 5 have been. It’s hard to measure the impact this will have on a new generation of young people entering the work force,  but  it will inevitably take its toll (and that’s before we even canvas the wider impact on wages and conditions from the package the government announced today.)

But then there’s the second issue, the fact that the government has copped out. Rather than lifting our game, they have chosen to ignore the fact that some of these young people are unskilled in the first place. This was the lever the Aussies used. They pumped millions into their tertiary sector, giving young people greater access to education and training. Our government instead put a cap on training and education, and started turning young people away.

The government can’t get away with claiming that taking away the rights of working young people is somehow a  substitute for fronting up to the hard issues. Call them on it.


Billy at home in the House

Posted by Brendon Burns on July 8th, 2010

41662_100000851554935_2775_n I’ve just rung my youth MP Billy Clemens to commisserate with him about the vagaries of media – this is the photo in today’s Press of him in the House yesterday. No need. Billy has already put the photo on his Facebook page and was quick to say the big yawn snap could only have been taken when Gerry Brownlee was speaking!

 And, he reckons he was able to use his supplementary question to Stephen Joyce to get a commitment to dealing with recidivist drunk drivers as well as being tough on under-20s. Billy is a natural, a credit to Papanui High School and clearly one of to watch. Though having met a bunch of them at Parliament on Tuesday, he’s got company.


Great young people

Posted by Trevor Mallard on June 21st, 2010

The last couple of weeks have not been great for anyone involved in politics. Easy to feel disheartened and cynical.

I’ve just been to a great forum run by the youth MP for Hutt South Thomas  Maharaj helped by Chelsea from Rimutaka and Robert from the list MP.

Forty young people, year nine to thirteen, eight schools.

Discussed a wide range of issues in groups and then plenary, the flag (not worth the hassle and angst to change), the drinking age, (leave it but improve education and supervision), school drug testing (not worth it for dope, Police for anything more serious), music copyright (need to develop a better system to reward musicians), internet access at schools (too many news sites blocked, teachers leave login details in the top right hand top drawers of their desks) and getting Kiwis to come back after OE (cheaper uni fees, better wages).

Wonderful mixture of insight, clarity and idealism of youth and pragmatic approaches. Respect and room for different views.

Made me feel much better about the future.


Child workers in NZ – what to do?

Posted by Darien Fenton on May 29th, 2010

Earlier this week, along with Moana Mackey and Carol Beaumont, I attended a Youth Forum in Gisborne organised by Young Labour, the NZCTU and local unions.

It was a wake-up call for those who were there to listen to the 40 or so young people – almost all of them still at school – talk about the issues facing them as they take on work. One young woman talked about how she thought her employer would go ballistic if she asked for a written employment agreement, even although the law says she is supposed to have one.   Most of the young workers there didn’t have much of an idea about what they could expect from their employer and what their employer could expect from them.  All were being paid less than minimum wage – because for workers under 16, there is no such thing.

I spent a bit of time talking to one young woman who delivers for the local newspaper. Her story was no different to the many thousands of other young people who are taken on as leaflet or newspaper deliverers, told they are independent contractors, and end up being paid a pittance.

NZ has a  tradition of school-kids working for spare money and I’m sure many of did so in our youth.  These days, Kiwi kids work on farms, in convenience stores, in fast food restaurants and retail outlets, and on the streets delivering advertising and newspapers. Kids are often eager to earn the money to buy extras.  In some cases, their families need them to work to supplement family income to help make ends meet.

But children’s work in in NZ is very loosely regulated, and is out of step with the other first-world countries.  There is no minimum age for employment in New Zealand. Our labour legislation defines an employee as “any person of any age”.  But more concerning than that, there is no minimum age for a self-employed person or anyone else who performs work under independent or dependent contracts. In other words, a child can enter into an agreement as an independent contractor, where they have to pay their own ACC, GST and other tax, and where they are expected to understand their rights under commercial law.

The hours of work of young people tends to be much more closely regulated overseas, while NZ only has a  general guideline that work hours should not be such that they endanger health & safety, and in the case of young people 15 and under, the hours should not interfere with school attendance.

Health and Safety legislation applies to young people working as employees under the Employment Relations Act, where generally kids under 15 should not undertake hazardous work and shouldn’t be employed between 10pm and 6am. But these rules don’t apply to kids working as contractors, such as newspaper and leaflet deliverers.

Statistics tell us that one child each year dies from a workplace accident and several hundred are seriously injured, and the working hours of many interfere with their educational progress.

Then there’s the National Government’s 90 day trial period and the obligation-free work of employers who employ children as contractors.

We need to discuss these questions :

  • Should there be a minimum age of employment?
  • Should there be minimum wage and standards for young people working?
  • Should kids under 16 be able to be employed as contractors, without employment rights?

I’m assuming that no-one would want to regulate babysitting arrangements, lawn-mowing and odd jobs, but when our kids get into the corporate world, shouldn’t there be better standards?


Drinking Age Debate

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 22nd, 2010

On Monday 24 May, the Victoria University Debating Society will be holding a public debate on the issue of liquor law reform.

The topic is “THAT WE SHOULD RAISE THE DRINKING AGE”. Each speaker will be invited to speak about the drinking age and other issues related to alcohol and the law, before the debate is opened up to questions from the audience.

Guest speakers will include:

Gerard Vaughan – CEO, Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand
Roger Kerr – Executive Director, New Zealand Business Roundtable
Jenna Raeburn – Spokesperson, Keep It 18
Jo Goodhew MP – National Party MP for Rangitata
Paul Quigley – Wellington Hospital Emergency Department (TBC)

The debate promises to be an informative and a great opportunity to hear from a range of views. Come along to hear from some excellent speakers and have the opportunity to ask any questions you have about the drinking age and liquor laws.

Time:
18:30 – 23:00
Location:
Old Government Buildings, Bunny Street, Wellington

Te Tai Tonga Poneke- Random Acts of Labourness

Posted by Grant Robertson on May 19th, 2010

Following on from their gifts of Easter Eggs to cleaners around the city, the team from Labour’s Te Tai Tonga Poneke branch completed their second random act of labourness by giving away a load of second hand, re-conditioned bikes to the kids at the Arlington Apartments in central Wellington. I was there doing an electorate clinic, and it was just great seeing the delight of the kids at receiving what for many of them was their first bike. Just an awesome gesture. Well done team.


National and Maori

Posted by Grant Robertson on May 16th, 2010

The Herald on Sunday editorial wades into the state of the National Party’s relations with Maori.

The biggest worry about the state of the relationship between National and the Maori Party is that the Prime Minister doesn’t seem to have noticed that there is a problem.

It certainly was a bizzare few days last week as John Key’s political judgement seemed to totally desert him. It would be interesting to know what David Farrar’s polling is telling National about its relations with Maori, but activities of the last week indicate they seem to think it is doing them some damage.

In any case his dumb joke about being eaten by Tuhoe is not really the point here, its where it fits in his view of relations with Tuhoe and Maori in general. As the editorial says

But Tuhoe spokesman Tamati Kruger has made it plain that it was the joke’s timing and context, not its content, that was problematic. A joke’s reception depends entirely on the quality and depth of the relationship between the jokester and his target. To say Key’s comment, a few days after a major slight, was ill-timed and misjudged is an understatement.

Treaty negotiations are a critical element of race relations in New Zealand. Their success relies on good faith and honesty. I am not saying Labour got everything right in this space, but it is essential that both parties in a negotiation know where they stand. I think Michael Cullen particularly understood this in his time as Treaty Negotiations Minister. When Tariana Turia says John Key’s approach lacks “integrity”, that is a problem.

So, where to from here? National’s relationship with the Maori Party is seemingly on shakey gorund. But what is more important for the long term political landscape is not what this means in terms of the Maori Party, but of Maori voters.

With Maori unemployment, especially among young people still sky high, a rising cost of living and the prospects of tax shuffle that will be unfair to many Maori families, Maori voters will be wanting to see their representatives find solutions to those problems. Not propping up a government that seems to have lost interest in their concerns.


The Battalion

Posted by Grant Robertson on April 26th, 2010

Just home from attending a performance of The Battalion. It is being performed in the hall at St Bernards School in Brooklyn, Wellington by the Te Rakau Hua o te Wao Tapu Trust. It is on until Friday this week, and if you are in Wellington you should try to get along. It is stunning. Tickets can be ordered from bookings@stbernards.school.nz.

This is the trust set up by, among others, Jim Moriarty to work with “at risk” youth. It is a residential facility taking boys 12-17 with some very difficult backgrounds. They use theatre, music, dance and tikanga Maori to improve their life chances.

The performance put on by those young men is something quite brilliant to behold. It is professional, passionate, touching and enormously athletic. It is also a chance to see Moriarty perform again, and he is the force around which his young charges orbit. The play, written by Helen Pearse-Otene, for the trust has been around since 2006 and focuses on pair of brothers from a ‘one cow’ town who head off to war, and all that that brings.

Not only is this a great piece of theatre, it is a chance to see how much difference a programme of direct early intervention can make when it is backed by people with the passion and the vision behind Te Rakau.


More Brave Young Nelsonians

Posted by Maryan Street on April 16th, 2010

And here they are again, these bright young things from Nelson. Today I opened and spoke at the SAVE Conference in Nelson. That means Students Against Violence Everywhere. Started by Johny O’Donnell and some mates from Nelson College (that’s the Boys’ College – but it’s never called that in Nelson. Just Nelson College. The Girls’ College is called the Girls’ College.)

They had organised a national event and attracted school students from all over to a one day hui to listen to speakers and participate in workshops. About 60 people there I think. And assorted teachers.

They care. They want to make a difference. They want to change the world. Just one shot of that keeps me going for weeks. Johnny had asked me to talk about CAVE. Now this might jog some old grey cells. Campaign Against Violence in Education – the anti-corporal punishment campaign which I participated in as a young teacher at the end of the 70s-early 80s.

I described how things used to be like. Punishment consisting of an outstretched hand and a doubled up wide leather strop brought down on it with force by someone twice the size of the person with the hand. And that was in primary schools! You could hear the collective intake of breath.

Things got more sophisticated at secondary schools though. I was spared caning because I was a girl, but it involved a thin whippy sort of cane which I believe could leave fine welts. On the hand, or if the teachers really wanted to humiliate, on the backside. And not just once – that was just a tickle. No, 6 times. 6 of the best. Say what? what does that mean? 6 of the best what?? You could see these young people just not getting it.

So we campaigned. So we got the abolition of corporal punishment into the 1984 Labour Party Manifesto. So we won in1984 and Russell Marshall, Minister 0f Education, outlawed it. (His son, Tim, was in the audience, there to support students from Gisborne.) These young people got it now. Movements make laws. Laws change behaviour and eventually, attitudes. We have changed the law to prevent parental control being a defence for beating a child.

These young people today will be the ones who take society on to the next step. They want a violence-free society. All strength to them I say.


Brave young Nelsonians

Posted by Maryan Street on April 11th, 2010

Nelsonians is what Nelsonians call people from Nelson…..! I have lived here for a couple of years now but don’t think I have been admitted to the “Nelsonian” club yet. I think you had to come on a particular ship or waka and I just came over on the Interislander.

But since I have been here, I have become very involved with a group of young people called Q-Youth (short for Queer Youth). I have become their patron(ess?) and chair their Board. It all came out of the now famous Nayland Alliance of Gays and Straights (NAGS) at Nayland College, which some years ago made a conscious effort to support its uncertain, enquiring and definitely gay young people. Having taught a boy once in the 1980s who was clearly gay but who left school and within 2 years had committed suicide, I resolved, on hearing of his death, always to support young people wrestling with their sexuality. These young people in Nelson have gathered lots of supportive straights around them (school counsellors, parents, youth workers, etc) to broaden the support base available to them.

Anyway, the brave bit. I recently hung out with these kids as we dragged ourselves around the Saxton Sports Ground as part of the Relay for Life cancer fundraiser. They had decided to do it as a group. 2 of the young men turned up in drag. They got blisters from walking around and around the track in high heels. But that’s not the brave bit. The brave bit was turning up in drag. These boys will probably end up being trannies of one sort or another but I hope they will be able to be themselves, whatever that turns out to be – and be themselves safely, with dignity and self-respect. They turned heads, words were muttered behind hands, looks cast and even some photos taken. The courage it took for me to walk alongside them was nothing compared with their bravery in insisting on being themselves.


Hope

Posted by Phil Twyford on March 28th, 2010

Amelia MacDonald of Takapuna Grammar has been selected as the Youth MP who will take my seat in this year’s Youth Parliament.  Eleven young people competed for the spot, and each of them posted a short video to this facebook page saying what they thought NZ should do to make the world a safer, fairer and more sustainable place. They give me hope for the future.


One question survey on budget priorities

Posted by Trevor Mallard on March 13th, 2010

James is doing an application to be a representative  at the Youth Parliament. He isn’t from my electorate but is interested on feedback on spending priorities. His survey is here.

Filed under: youth

Youth MP wanted

Posted by Phil Twyford on March 6th, 2010

This is a short video I did for my Youth MP facebook group. If you know any 16-18 year olds interested in international issue please share it with them.

Filed under: youth

National agrees Labour’s right about youth rates

Posted by Darien Fenton on February 25th, 2010

The National Party have done a flip flop on their support of youth rates minimum wages. In 2008, they fiercely opposed the removal of youth rates in the minimum wage, saying that it would increase youth employment and provide an incentive to leave school early.

After Roger Douglas announced his bill to reinstate youth rates, I asked Minister Kate Wilkinson in a written question whether she is in favour of reinstating a minimum youth wage. She answered “no”.

Two weeks ago, the Minister hinted she was open to Roger Douglas’s bill to cut minimum wages, but it looks like she’s had a change of heart.

This is good news for young people, but bad news for Roger.

I’m wondering what discussions, if any, the governmeent has had with their coalition partner, the ACT party and whether Roger has been told that his bill to bring back youth rates won’t get passt first reading.

 Go Kate!