The Dominion Post has been continuing an interesting series of columns on possible local government reform in the past few days with former Wellington Deputy Mayor Alick Shaw arguing in favour of amalgamations yesterday and current Lower Hutt Deputy Mayor Roger Styles arguing today for an amalgamation of the two Hutt councils and the abolition of the regional council.
I’ll start with Roger Styles, who makes some interesting and valid arguments against replicating the Auckland model here in Wellington. In particular I was interested in these figures he quotes:
Both Hutt councils are more conservative when it comes to debt. Lower Hutt’s debt is around $80 million and Upper Hutt’s just $18 million. One hundred million dollars across a population of 140,000 is around $700 per person. Wellington City residents, on the other hand, have a more relaxed attitude to their council building up debt. Currently $323 million, debt is projected to increase to $363 million in the next decade. That’s almost $2000 per person – almost three times as high as the Hutt councils. Wellington City Council’s interest payments are more than $20 million a year – almost the same as Upper Hutt’s entire annual rates income.
Styles concludes, and I am inclined to agree with him here, that the Wellington City view is likely to prevail in any capital city Super Council. I’d be concerned that could lead to the rates paid by Hutt Valley ratepayers being siphoned off to service debt, rather than upgrade local services and infrastructure.
However while I agree with Styles on those issues, I disagree with his proposed solution, which is to do away with the Greater Wellington Regional Council and replace it with up to 3 unitary authorities (eg. Wgtn City, Hutt, Porirua-Kapiti). In my view that could lead to more fragmentation than we have now. One of the GWRC’s biggest responsibilities is regional transport infrastructure and that’s best planned on a regional basis. Take the trains for example - they cover the whole region and couldn’t easily be broken up into 3 pieces.
Alick Shaw makes some interesting arguments in favour of amalgamation, although it is by no means the most compelling case for a Wellington Super City I have ever read, and some of what he writes is simply wrong. For example, he claims that if Wellington had a super council then the old CIT site in Upper Hutt would have been turned into a university. Never mind the fact that we barelyhave the student population to sustain the two we have now, let alone a third. Never mind the fact that the establishment of universities and polytechnics is a central government responsibility, not a local one.
Although I’m a super city sceptic, I think the series of columns the Dom Post is running are useful contributions to the debate. As I have said in previous posts, and in replies to commenters, I’m not opposed to local government reorganisation in Wellington, but it needs to be supported by the communities affected. If there is a compelling case for change, and I’m not yet convinced, then some robust discussion will draw that out.