Red Alert

Archive for the ‘protest’ Category

Meaning the opposite of what they say

Posted by Clare Curran on August 22nd, 2010

work rally august

Today Dunedin-ites hit the streets again to protest against the Government’s unfair, unreasonable work laws.

I don’t know how many people, around 500, turned out on a sunny day. It was a good march and rally. Working people talked about their workplaces and the ridiculous nature of these laws and the effect they’ll have. This issue will continue to grow in momentum.

Last week Minister Kate Wilkinson stood in the House at question time and described the Employment Relations Bill as fair and reasonable.

Every time this government says certain words, you know it means something else. The opposite. It’s called Orwellian language which means an attitude and a policy of control by propaganda,  misinformation, denial of truth, and manipulation of the past.

She says this Bill is not major, it’s only a little change. That means a big change. Just like Tony Ryall who talks constantly about change in health. Change, which equals cuts. Or Bill English who talks about change in the public sector and reprioritisation. Words that mean cuts. Cuts to peoples services and people’s jobs.

And the icing on the cake is when the government talks about its policies being aspirational. Which means “we don’t really mean it”. They are now aspirational about closing the wage gap between NZ and Australia (despite promising to do so before the last election). They are no doubt aspirational about creating 170,000 jobs. And there are countless other things they are “aspirational” about.

Unfortunately they are not aspirational about this Bill. They really mean it. But it’s not, as Kate Wilkinson describes, a small change that is fair and reasonable. It’s a major shift towards fundamentally affecting the reltationship between employers and employees in our NZ workplaces.

It’s taking us backwards as a country. It will affect the morale and productivity of employees. Hard working NZers, people who earn wages and salaries. People who arent liars and slackers.

It will make workplaces harder to be. It entrenches unfairness in our employment relations system. It won’t do anything to address the fact that we don’t have enough jobs in this country, we don’t have an economic plan.

And then I heard yesterday that Paula Bennett plans to force people on  sickness benefits to get jobs, or they’ll be cut in half (and that’s for starters). Leaving aside the issue of whether people who shouldn’t be working will be forced to try to find work, just where are these jobs going to come from? And watch the messaging she uses. Code for people on sickness benefits being bludgers. Just like those on the DPB.

In the meantime there’s higher unemployment. And we’re about to have a GST rise.


Silly idea number 6 – what do you think?

Posted by Pete Hodgson on August 20th, 2010

Change the law so that anyone working for an employer in a small business can be fired in the first three months without notice and without reason. Justify the change on the basis that employers will be more likely to employ people.

Wait a year. Ask officials whether it worked. Receive a paper saying it seems not to have increased employment opportunities.

Claim the exact opposite and extend the fire-at-will provisions to all employers, with the result that for most employers nothing will change but for rat-bag employers things will get abusive.

I think this idea is -

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Friday poll – how much did bill english double dip

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 13th, 2010

How much has Bill English, his family or trusts collected in cash and services as a result of him telling speakers he lives in Dipton ?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Is Bill English continuing to collect money and services either directly or through his family or trusts from telling speakers he lives in Dipton ?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

National announces plan at last – shift to Australia

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 5th, 2010

Sometimes you get leaks of policy through interjections. Today we got a gem from Paul Quinn.

After it was pointed out that twice as many firms in Aussie are increasing staff this year than in NZ, and that 23% more Aussie firms are planning to increase wages we at last got the plan.

Quinn said – Kiwis should move to Australia.


Tyre Kicker in Chief

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 29th, 2010

Interesting to read Duncan Garner’s take on John Key’s answering on the wage gap between Australia and New Zealand

Yesterday’s performance in Parliament was too selective and too slippery for him to get away with. All the statistics show the gap between Australian wages and Kiwi wages is growing – but Key refused to accept it. He refused to admit it. In fact he went the other way – he said the gap is closing. It’s not, no matter which figures you focus on.

It was an interesting insight into the sensitivity of the government on this issue that Key would try to argue that black was white, when the numbers, even under his chosen construction pointed to the gap widening. It was a bit more than slippery too- it was a very deliberate attempt to mislead.

All of this began as a result of questioning on the absence of an economic plan from National to achieve their stated objective of catching up with Australia. This is a vitally important issue for the country. Concern about this is not only coming from our side of the political spectrum but also from those more closely aligned with the Nats.

Trans-Tasman, the political newsletter today devotes a significant amount of space to concern about the lack of courage in the Government’s programme noting that the obesession with a safety first approach is raising questions about the willingness to take the hard calls and saying poll driven leadership is raising questions about policy intentions.

Many months ago on this blog I described Mr Key as being ” all map and no compass”.  As they say in the House, I stand by that statement.


Brownlee bagged

Posted by Brendon Burns on July 29th, 2010

You need no further confirmation of the latest hole Brownlee has dug for himself than this blog from DPF…all credit due of course to David Parker

The wage gap

July 29th, 2010 at 11:00 am by David Farrar

Claire Trevett reports:

A war of statistical tables in Parliament left National red-faced after even its own figures showed the gap in earnings between New Zealanders and Australians had increased since it took office in November 2008.

Economic Development Minister Gerry Brownlee had said in Parliament on Tuesday that the gap was less than it was when Labour was in power  but yesterday the statistics proved him wrong no matter how they were presented.

Prime Minister John Key produced a table which he said most accurately compared average earnings because it took into account purchasing power parity.

But his own figures showed the gap had increased by $22 in the two years since National took over in 2008. Instead, he said it showed the gap was less than it was at the “maximum point” of Labour’s reign  when the gap peaked at $187.60 in 2005.

But it subsequently shrank to $137.89 by Labour’s final year in 2008 and had since increased again to $160.25 under National.

Of course the wage gap has increased. We went into recession, and Australia did not. In a recession you have little wage growth.

I am surprised that a Minister would claim the gap has not increased. Rather than try to push dodgy comparisons, they would be better to outline policies which will help reduce the gap.

Tags: ,

u know Gerry B has stuffed up big time when you see posts like this on DPF’s blog..


The Wage Gap

Posted by Chris Hipkins on July 28th, 2010

Before the last election the wage gap with Australia was John Key’s #1 issue. Key even went as far as to say that the ‘fundamental purpose’ of his government would be to narrow the gap. Listening to Gerry Brownlee and John Key in the House today and yesterday, apparently the problem has been solved already.

Yesterday Brownlee claimed that the gap ‘is certainly a lot less than it was when Labour was in office’ despite the fact that it has blown out by more than $50 a week since National took office. In the last quarter, according to official statistics, Australian wages have increased by $17 a week, compared to $3 for Kiwi workers.

Kiwi workers will fall even further behind from October when they will be paying a consumption tax (GST) that is 50 percent higher than in Australia. We have caught up with Australia in one respect though, when National took over we had a lower unemployment rate – they’ve managed to turn that around in 18 months!

So where is John Key’s plan? Smiling and waving for the cameras won’t get us there. As Annette King said in the House yesterday, “It’s time for the Government to stop kicking the tyres, put some petrol in the tank. start the engine and go somewhere!”. Couldn’t have said it better…!


Nacts are Rats

Posted by Darien Fenton on July 18th, 2010

P7180102

It wasn’t me who said it, but it sounds about right.


All workers to suffer while Key pretends to pander to Act

Posted by Trevor Mallard on July 18th, 2010

John Key has today announced a stinging attack on people who work for a living.

While it is being characterised as anti union it goes much further and is designed to suppress wages and reduce working conditions including holidays for all workers whether or not they are union members.

Remember Key’s promise to close the wage gao with Australia – this policy will do exactly to opposite. It is a sign of Key dropping the “Mr Nice Guy” approach and reverting to old form.

And don’t be taken in by John Key’s lies about this reform being radical in order to get Act party votes. Act will vote for any reform that reduces salaries and working conditions. It didn’t need to be this radical to get their vote.

I think John Key knows that and is a liar – a more generous person might just call him stupid.


Downright ungrateful

Posted by Darien Fenton on July 12th, 2010

Well, PM Key said it :  Pete Bethune is “downright ungrateful” for the support he had from NZ when he was locked up in a Japanese jail.

That’s a question that has already been hotly debated on Red Alert.  But it set me thinking, especially after a day out in the community (that’s Key’s, McCully’s, Coleman’s, Mapp’s and Lockie’s (electorate) community) about what we should be downright ungrateful for:

  • We should be downright ungrateful for having a PM that no-one challenges (much) because he smiles and waves and everyone forgets to ask the hard questions;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for having a government that is attacking ACC, but hardly anyone notices, because after all, we’re just talking about the injured, the sexually damaged and older people;
  • We should be downright ungrateful that our older people have had their home care and/or their meals on wheels cut, even although it meant they could continue to live at home, rather than costing a fortune elsewhere;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for Anne Tolley, who is the worst Education Minister ever, and who has left the early childhood education sector completely bemused about why her government thinks it’s more important to spend money on prisons than our children;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for the PM’s exhortation that we should all learn Mandarin, even although his government has cut Adult and Community Education – and there’s now no chance to learn anything, let alone Mandarin;
  • We should be downright ungrateful for the vehicle regos going up on 1 July, the increase in ACC levies and power and petrol prices on the up and up, and that’s before we factor in the GST increase coming our way;
  • And we should be really ungrateful that most middle and  lower income people won’t get tax cuts that go anywhere compensating for all of the cost increases either here or ahead of us.

I don’t want anyone to get the wrong message.  There’s a lot I am grateful for, but that’s nothing to do with John Key and his NAct government.

How about you?  Are you an ungrateful b*st*rd too?

(PS, glad Pete’s home safe).


Locked out no more

Posted by Darien Fenton on June 30th, 2010

Pleased to hear that 13 days after the Rendezvous Hotel locked its housekeeping workforce out, a settlement has been reached. 

The deal is a pay increase of up to 2% for a one-year term, with no cuts to the seven days of sick leave the workers are entitled to.

It took 11 hours of mediation, Employment Court hearings, 13 days of no pay for the workers and a tarnished reputation for the 4.5 star hotel.

I have to question whether it was worth it for the Hotel to to fight so hard over 1 day’s sick leave and an extra 0.5% pay increase, given the inevitable loss of business and standing.


BUDGET 2010: feedback so far

Posted by David Cunliffe on June 22nd, 2010

Hi RA readers – I’ve been off air a bit lately due to running around the country on the post- Budget speaking tour, and because my laptop died!

Today parliament shifted into a new stage of the Budget debate – the Appropriations Bill that legitimises the Supplmentary Estimates (amended spending lines) between Budgets 2009 and 2010.   It was remarkable for what it does not say – nothing about a plan for protecting  jobs or lifting incomes during the worst of the Great Recession.   No new ideas over there.

Quick feedback from the Budget tour: spoke to about 20 groups, a mixture of Labour-organised public meetings, community sector groups and businesses.  Hard to tote up exactly but would have seen close to 800 people face to face: groups of 160 down to about 25, plus individual business site visits.

The feedback was clear:  most Kiwis understand that by the time inflation of 5.9% next year eats away the tax swindle, and wage growth is held down, they will be worse off.   That includes increased govt charges like ACC and ECE, plus power bills, rent and higher mortgages.  The Government made the classic mistake of overpromising and under-delivering.   Kiwis hate the rise in GST.   They know the tax cuts aimed primarily at the wealthy are unjust and inefficient. 

Was it a coincidence the govt’s polling fell 5% in the week after the Budget?   

Second, businesses and commentators understand that the Budget lacks a real plan for jobs, incomes and growth.  Fiscal prudence matters, but it is no substitute for a strategy to address the yawning triple deficit around the savings gap, current account deficit and innovation deficit.  Gutting Kiwisaver, the R and D tax credits and NZSF prefunding made these worse.  The Govt’s innovation package, which represents only 39% of the value earlier striped out, has been almost universally panned.     

Third, the added debt from the unaffordable tax cuts has opended up $1.1 bn fiscal hole over 4 years, $9.2bn over 12 years, and that makes the job of turning the boat around ever harder.  National will seek to fill this “strategic deficit”  through asset sales and service cuts.  Don’t let them!

Future posts are going to broaden out somewhat to the rlated issues of monetary and fiscal settings that surround the needed economic strategy.


Bed making challenge

Posted by Darien Fenton on June 22nd, 2010


Perhaps China needs to chill?

Posted by Darien Fenton on June 20th, 2010

Predictably, there are different responses emerging to the Russel Scuffle outside parliament on Friday.

John Key says it’s “disappointing”. Murray McCully on Q & A this morning blamed Russel Norman. Others on the panel said it was “bad manners.”

Phil Goff defended the right of New Zealanders to protest at parliament saying : “We expect people to be respectful to our visitors, but we also retain the right to protest peacefully.”

Dr Jian Yang From Auckland University says Chinese security handled the incident badly and created even more publicity, which distracted from the visit itself.  He said that it was quite a typical reaction from China to protests overseas and there have been similar cases in other places.

The Chinese are saying something different. Here’s the response from a spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry who called the incident “a demonstrator’s harassment of a Chinese delegation….” :

“At the invitation of New Zealand Prime Minister John Key, Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping paid an official visit to New Zealand starting on June 17. He was warmly welcomed and well received by the government and people of New Zealand. The visit yielded positive results.

When the delegation arrived at the entrance of the parliament building in Wellington Friday noon, it was hostilely harassed by a New Zealand demonstrator within close distance.

The demonstrator’s behaviour posed a threat to the security and dignity of the delegation, and far exceeded the boundaries of the freedom of speech and freedom of assembly.

Such an attempt to spoil the atmosphere of Xi’s visit and damage the Sino-New Zealand relationship is doomed to fail. It also runs against the common wish of both Chinese people and New Zealanders to enhance bilateral friendship, he added.

New Zealand has apologised to the Chinese side for the incident.”

It is not the first time attempts have been made to shut NZ protests against China down. The most famous was in 1999, when protesters were blocked by a bus as the Chinese president arrived at an APEC summit in Christchurch.   And it’s not the first time an MP has used their parliamentary access to protest – I’m thinking here about Shane Ardern on his tractor “Myrtle” driving up parliament’s steps.

I get the argument about bad manners, particularly once you have a look at Norman’s rather pathetic “gimme back my flag” on TV.  Chris Trotter has waded into the argument, saying that while Russel Norman exercised his rights, he wasn’t sure he exercised his responsibility, given the importance of New Zealand’s relationship with China.

However, I’m far from convinced that China always needs to take such huge offence at any protest or difference of opinion it comes across in other countries.

I don’t pretend to understand the cultural differences, but there are different views about issues like Tibet and Taiwan – even among the citizens of those countries themselves. And there is a Falun Dafa group in New Zealand who are always protesting.

So when Chinese delegations visit other countries, perhaps they just need to chill a little?

Tags:
Filed under: protest, security, trade

Hospital cuts – guess who pays?

Posted by Darien Fenton on June 4th, 2010

IMG00180-20100604-1152

Lots of wonderful Pacific singing and drums on the picket line today, when Carol Beaumont, Su’a William Sio and I joined Auckland Hospital Cleaners protests today.  The Cleaners are employed by trans-national contractor, OCS  and they’ve been bargaining for nearly a year – so far, all they’ve been offered is a big fat zero.

It’s not like they’re asking for much.  The cleaners and orderlies who work for OCS at Auckland, Greenlane, Rotorua, Hawkes Bay, Wairarapa, Burwood and Christchurch Hospitals are asking for a 2% payrise backdated to 1 April 2010, which is the same as other hospital workers employed directly by the DHBs or other contractors have already agreed to.

Meanwhile the CTU is warning that health services across New Zealand face cuts of more than $100 million in the next year, as deeper analysis of the Budget reveals the full extent of the funding shortfall and the reality of ‘reprioritised savings’, inflation, and cost shifting from ACC.

Who pays?  We all do, but low-paid workers like the OCS cleaners and their families will feel it hardest.


Attitude

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 1st, 2010

T shirt

Seen today at the No Mining march in Auckland.

Filed under: humour, protest

Yours. Not mines.

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 1st, 2010

mining march

Aucklanders turned out in force at today’s march against the Government’s plan to dig up some of our most precious landscapes.  The Herald and Radio NZ estimated the crowd at 50,000. Police said 20,000. Either way it is a kick in the pants for National and ACT and the Maori Party.  Hats off to Greenpeace and Forest & Bird and the others who organised it. Robyn Malcolm spoke at the rally in Myers Park. What a treasure she is. Labour and Green MPs were there in number, and from our lot: Phil Goff, David Cunliffe, Charles Chauvel, Jacinda Ardern, Darien Fenton, Carol Beaumont, Carmel Sepuloni, David Shearer and me.  Labour’s policy of rolling back any changes to Schedule 4 and not compensating mining companies who find their operations shut down got a big cheer.  Check out Greenpeace’s pics on flickr.    Photo: Greenpeace


ECan and the Demise of Democracy

Posted by Lianne Dalziel on April 15th, 2010

An impromptu meeting took place last night on the steps of the Our City O-Tautahi building where the Green Party had called a meeting to discuss the sacking of ECan and the new process that has been  imposed on Water Conservation Orders as they apply to Canterbury’s rivers.  I arrived at 7.30pm along with nearly 100 others who couldn’t get into the meeting room as it was already full.  So we had our own meeting outside – I took on the role of MC and set the scene for the debate drawing on the issues I had raised in a perspective piece published in the Press last week.  I then handed over to the soon to be erstwhile ECan Councillor, Rik Tindall, who talked about how he had stood on a Save our Water platform and here he was being sacked on the very issue that had seen him elected.  He talked about the water interests and conservation values that are threatened by this overwhelming drive for intensive development of dairying on the Canterbury Plains. Cr Yani Johanson from the CCC then spoke about how positions were being adopted without going through the democratically elected Council first; he spoke of the closed nature of the Mayoral Forum; and he talked about his frustrations at having to obtain information under the Official Information Act – it arrived 2 hours after the announcement was made.  He was followed by the other soon to be erstwhile ECan Councillor who was elected on a platform of Save Our Water, David Sutherland, who spoke of the undemocractic actions that had occurred. 

There was a lively debate about the actions of the Mayors, especially Christchurch’s Mayor, and a motion of no confidence was carried unanimously given his role in producing the letter that sparked the Creech review.  I reminded people that not one National MP denied in Parliament that the Ministers had indirectly asked for that letter to be produced.  Yani Johanson reminded us that this was a breach of the ‘no surprises’ aspect of the Triennial Agreement signed by all the Mayors with ECan and had not been consulted with the Councils. (more…)


Jaine gets a payrise

Posted by Darien Fenton on March 23rd, 2010

Jaine Ikurere

There’s more going on in Parliament than Trevor’s canny cornering of the government today and the hilarious debate that followed.  These things keep us amused, but I was just as happy to hear that Jaine Ikurere, who cleans John Key’s office is to get a payrise. 

Thanks to the hard work of her union and the cleaners’ staunch support, Jaine’s pay will go up by 50 cents an hour to $13.10.  It’s not the $14.62 that other cleaners get in the public sector, but there is provision for that to occur, should the client fund it.

The client, in Jaine’s case, is Parliamentary Services.   That’s why Labour MPs wrote to the Speaker a few weeks ago.  He’s the Minister in charge of Parliamentary Services and we want the budget for cleaning our offices to be increased by the small amount necessary to enable the contractor to pay them more. 

We got the expected response.  Very sympathetic, but the bargaining is between the union and the employer.  The Speaker is not the employer and can’t get involved in negotiations.  Yeah, yeah, yeah.

But the government can put more money into the parliamentary services budget and ring-fence it to fund a decent pay jolt for the lowest paid – just as Labour did for Hospital service workers and School Cleaners. 

I’m pleased Jaine got a pay increase.  She did it with her workmates and her union. 

Now for the next $1.52 an hour.


Time to stand up

Posted by Phil Twyford on February 27th, 2010

Sick to death of National and ACT’s Frankenstein vision for Auckland?

Tired of their fake listening campaigns, and bogus assurances they are going to ‘put the local back into local democracy’?

Join the protest outside the select committee hearings this Tuesday lunchtime.  Let Key, Hide & Co know that Aucklanders deserve and demand better.

12 – 2pm  Tuesday 2 March   Quality Hotel Barrycourt, 20 Gladstone Road, Parnell

If you care about:
* the corporatisation of our local democracy
* the loss of local voice
* moves to make it easier to sell the Ports of Auckland and other assets
* unfair boundaries and inadequate representation
* undermining protections for the Waitakere Ranges
* tokenistic representation for Maori
* the rushed and undemocratic process the Government is using to push the super city through
…then join this lunchtime rally and show the Government Aucklanders won’t take the super city lying down.

Spread the word – send this facebook link to all your friends.

All political parties, groups, individuals welcome to attend. The rally will be peaceful and orderly.