Red Alert

Archive for the ‘Pacific issues’ Category

Pacific Economic Development Agency

Posted by Carmel Sepuloni on May 26th, 2010

I’ve been relatively quiet on this issue – preferring to step back and watch the Pacific community strongly critique the funding decision and question the motivation for the allocation.

Funnily enough I was alerted to this back in March by a Journalist.  He phoned me to tell me that he’d heard that Sam Lotu Iiga, Michael Jones, Inga Tuigamala and JR Pereira had been meeting with the Prime Minister to discuss the disestablishment of the MPIA in favour of a Private organisation that they were hoping to set up in Auckland. 

The Journalists story was completely new to me but I went away and asked a few questions of people I thought might be in the know.  Parts of the story resonated with those I spoke too but there was not enough evidence to go down the path of wild accusations.   The Journo obviously couldn’t give the story legs either, as he didn’t write about it.

I don’t know if Michael and Inga were involved in securing the ear of the PM on behalf of JR however I do find it impossible to believe that Sam Lotu-Iiga didn’t play a large part in lobbying on behalf of JR Pereira and his team (who ever this might be).  Sam and JR are tight and most people know JR Pereira as a long time National Party supporter.

Infact, a couple of members of the Pacific community have relayed to me their concerns that the PEDA may also have the underlying function of effectively acting as an electioneering group for the Nats.  I have no proof of this and am only just relaying the concerns expressed to me.  I guess what this concern does highlight, is that we open a can of worms when we head down this path of privatisation – there is no transparency on these types of decisions and back room deals to suit unhanded agendas could so easily be made. 

What I am concerned about is the fact that the Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs is being given a small sum of money to oversee this private organisation and their initiatives – does that mean that MPIA will be held responsible if PEDA fails to deliver?  Is the Govt setting MPIA to fail so that they can disestablish this Ministry (we know this is what they’d really like to do)?

For the first time, Sam Lotu Iiga has been strongly questioned by our Pacific Media – and GOOD ON THEM.  We are politicians and we do have to be able to answer the hard questions.  Check out this blog to find out what happened.

http://pacificeyewitness.com/2010/05/21/pacific-political-commentator-questions-national-mp-on-pacific-economic-development-agency/?awesm=fbshare.me_AMwqg


Time for the Audit Office to become involved?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 25th, 2010

The last time I can remember a process like that used for the Pacific Economic Development Agency it was for the Pipi Foundation. Donna Awatere ended up in prison.

Ministers shouldn’t make decisions to give their mates money. To do it for a group associated with mates who have campaigned publicly for them is foolish.

Proper accountability requires an expression of interest and/or a tender process. Preferably both. It leaves the decision to proceed with a chief executive not a politician.

For many years the National Party has accepted lower standards of accountability from Maori and Pacifica groups.

And to hear a Minister of the Crown confess on the radio this morning that they got the money because they lobbied the Prime Minister made me shudder.


Loan Sharks – time to take action

Posted by Carol Beaumont on May 19th, 2010

loan-sharks

Just over two months ago I launched my campaign to stop loan sharks. In one weeks’ time, Wednesday 26 May,  the First Reading of the Bill that is part of this campaign – The Credit Reforms (Responsible Lending) – will take place. Currently I believe I have support from five parties. Unfortunately this will not be sufficient. I need your help to urge National to vote for the Bill to go to Select Committee.

Here’s why I think you should support the Bill and work to get National to support it.

The Bill is a genuine effort to deal with aspects of a truly harmful industry, an industry that causes damage to many low income families who struggle to make ends meet. Extremely high interest rates, some in three or four figure percentages, and irresponsible lending put families at risk. At risk of a never ending cycle of high interest borrowing and much needed money going to lenders rather than on things that families actually need. The tales of human tragedy I have heard over the last two months are truly terrible. We need to do something.

I have spoken to hundreds of people including many from the agencies that deal with the people who are in terrible financial trouble because of loan sharks. Every Budgeting Service I have met with tells me the majority of people they see are hooked into high interest rate loans. One in Mangere told me that everyone they see is in this position. No-one denies the problem and everyone I have spoken to wants something done.

There is an opportunity here for Parliament to show leadership, for all parties to support this Bill to a Select Committee so it can be properly scrutinised, so that the public can make submissions and share their experiences and so that we can look at what is being done in other countries. Interest rate caps for example are widespread internationally but you would not know this if you listened to the Minister of Consumer Affairs or indeed some National MPs who assert that interest rate caps won’t work. Some are saying the Government is already working in the area of consumer credit. There is some truth in that statement as there is a Review of the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act which is proceeding at a glacial pace (sadly) There were some very good suggestions made in the Discussion Paper and in the 59 responses to it. Suggestions in the area of disclosure of loan terms and security for loans are a couple of examples. I have said to the responsible Minister, Heather Roy, that the review is weakest in the area of ‘fringe lending’ and that my Bill alongside any proposals the Government may (finally) make could be considered together at a Select Committee. Many people have made specific suggestions to me that would really add to the possible range of ways we can address this problem.

And then of course there is at least one National MP who is saying my Bill doesn’t go far enough without concrete suggestions for anything else. I have been explicit that the Bill is not the whole answer. How can it be when there are a range of issues that surround the loan shark industry eg  inadequate income levels, difficulties for some in accessing credit on a fair basis, poor enforcement of current protections and of course shocking financial literacy and understanding of consumer rights. There are a range of additional things that could and should be done. I would welcome any suggestions for strengthening my Bill or dealing with related issues.

None of these excuses that I am hearing that some National MPs are trotting out are reasons to vote against my Bill. In the community people are asking me questions like –  how could National vote against sending this to a Select Committee?  Will they do so just because you are a Labour MP?  Well let’s see next week but please try to encourage National to do the right thing, I am certainly continuing to do so.

The more I have heard in the last two months the more passionately I feel that we must regulate this industry as well as continuing to seek solutions to the wider set of issues surrounding it. I committed at the launch of the campaign that irrespective of the outcome of the vote on the Credit Reforms (Responsible Lending) this campaign will continue. The support for the campaign is wide ranging from Churches,  Community Law Centres, Budgeting Services, Pacifica and Maori organisations, Unions, Citizens Advice Bureaus, student groups, Women’s organisations, Local government politicians, lawyers and decent concerned citizens including some National Party voters and people who have personally been hurt by this industry. My resolve on this matter has only strengthened over the last two months.  If you want to help you can act now and join in with the ongoing campaign.  If you want more information go to www.stoploansharks.co.nz


Hon Vui Mark Gosche – NZLP Life Member

Posted by Darien Fenton on May 16th, 2010

32068_388188524681_706324681_4159818_1393378_nIt was a great moment at the Labour Party Region 1 Conference on Friday night when Vui Mark Gosche was honoured for his contribution to the Labour Movement with Life Membership of the Labour Party.

Mark was a leader of the Service Workers Union until 1997, and was an awesome advocate for low paid workers, particularly during the tough times of the early 1990s when National set out to destroy workers’ rights and organisation.

I know that Mark didn’t have expectations about being an MP.   He campaigned for others and worked within the CTU and the Labour Party for change.  But when he decided to put his name forward, there was great pride when he was first elected to Parliament as a list MP in 1996.  In 1999, he won the seat of Maungakiekie, and went on to hold a number of Cabinet posts, including Minister of Corrections, Minister of Housing, Minister of Transport, and Minister of Pacific Island Affairs.

Mark and his family experienced the worst of times in the coming years, with the illness of his wonderful wife Carol, after a brain haemorrhage in 2002.

In April 2007 he was bestowed with the Samoan matai title Vui at his grandmother’s village of Lano in Samoa and left parliament in 2008 to spend more time with his family.

Mark was a leader to many, not only in the union, but in the Pacific community.  He is sorely missed in the caucus, but he carries on his commitment, as he always has, outside of Parliament.

I was proud to sing “Solidarity” alongside others when he received his well earned Labour Party gold badge.

The best comment came from Mark who said that while the Honours system in NZ has gone silly, the two most important Honours for him are his Life Membership of his union, the Service & Food Workers Union and his Life Membership of his party, the NZ Labour Party.


Fairtrade and smart development in Samoa

Posted by Phil Twyford on May 9th, 2010

Getting sustainable economic development happening is the challenge in any developing country. NGOs generally do the small scale grassroots stuff like micro-credit and the challenge is how to scale up.  Governments usually focus on macro-economic reform and infrastructure but the challenge is how do you make sure the poor get the benefit of any growth.

Country Calendar have profiled an NGO in Samoa who are hitting the sweet spot. Women in Business are working with 1000 families, mostly subsistence farmers, helping them add value to their produce and find niche markets. They just delivered 400 tonnes of organic virgin coconut oil to the Bodyshop. It’s grassroots alright, but they have scaled up, working in 234 of Samoa’s 300-odd villages. And they are fast establishing a thriving organics industry.

They are finding a path for Samoa beyond the classic Pacific aid-tourism-remittances economy, and breathing new life into the country’s depressed subsistence agriculture.

It is good to see Kiwis helping out. Women in Business are supported by Oxfam NZ, the Tindall Foundation, and NZAID (at least it was NZAID until Mr McCully disestablished it).  The other NZ connection is that Women in Business have brokered  a link with Christchurch cafe C1 Espresso who are working with Samoan farmers to grow and supply an exclusive line of organic fairtrade coffee. Breakfast at C1 a couple of weeks back alerted me to this story (thanks James!).

Watch the Country Calendar item here. And by the way, it is Fairtrade Fortnight.


Are you reading this Mr Joyce?

Posted by Grant Robertson on May 8th, 2010

I hope Steven Joyce reads the feature story in the Dom Post this morning (not on-line so far as I can see). It is a story about the emerging importance of the Pasifika population in New Zealand to our future society and economy. Its an interesting read, but I was particularly taken by the story of Tristram Lupo-Samoa, a 23 year old of Niuean descent who is studying electronic engineering and computer systems at Victoria University.

He failed many of his core subjects in the first two years of a science degree. He’s now three years into a four year degree but it will take five years to complete as he had to repeat a first year paper.

This is the reality for many people, especially those from a background where there is no family history of tertiary education. Steven Joyce’s proposal to cut access to student loans (which Tristram relies on along with part-time work) if you fail more than half your course for two years is just too blunt an instrument. I am all for a merit based system, but not everyone starts from the same place. As Tristram says

Its pretty tough to be honest. I try to get help from everyone that I can. It was an unknown subject for my family, learning a whole lot of new things. It takes a lot of my time because it takes me a lot of time to understand concepts. Its hard for me but I am willing. I would rather have it hard than easy because I know it will pay off in the end.

Tristram sounds like a really sensible young man, but he says he sometimes asks himself why he is doing his study.

Because I want to achieve something, something great in my life. Something my parents and family can be proud of.

As a country we need to support and invest in Tristram, and not try to apply a one size fits policy that will deprive him and us of a great future.


McCully slams Key’s whaling plan

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 24th, 2010

Remember John Key’s secret plan to stop Japan’s whaling by allowing them to catch whales.

His plan was promoted in and adopted by an IWC  committee chaired by his representative Geoff Palmer.

The outrage was heard around the world.

McCully has finally seen which way the wind is blowing and has slammed Key’s plan.


The changing face of New Zealand

Posted by Raymond Huo on April 23rd, 2010

Some interesting projections were released by Statistics New Zealand yesterday:

In 2026:

The European or Other population will grow from 3.21 million (2006 estimate) to 3.47 million an increase of 0.4 percent.

The Maori population will grow from 620,000 (2006 estimate) to 810,000 an increase of 1.3 percent a year

The Asian population will grow from 400,000 (2006 estimate) to 790,000 an increase of 3.4 percent a year

The Pacific population will grow from 300,000 (2006 estimate) to 480,000 an increase of 2.4 percent a year

The dramatic rise in these populations is attributed to births (Maori and Pacific) and migration (Asian).

What does this mean for New Zealand? I’m interested to here some feedback on the country’s changing demographic.

Click here to view the report from Statistics New Zealand:

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1004/S00239.htm


What happened to smile and wave saving the whales

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 21st, 2010

Hearing Rudd reminded me that smile and wave had a  plan to stop Japanese whaling.

We are still waiting John. You are beginning to look silly.


Spotless Profit up 40.8% Cleaners offered min wage plus 5 cents Not fair

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 19th, 2010

Quick post coz doing electorate stuff but couldn’t resist sharing the Spotless results. These people are currently offering parliamentary cleaners a 25c wage increase that would take them to $12.80/hour despite employing cleaners (sometimes the same people) at $14.62/hour in hospitals and schools.

Their net profit after tax has increased by 40.8% to over $24 million.  Their earnings per share is up 25%.

Message to CEO Farnik – stop screwing our cleaners. Maybe you should pay $15 not $14.62/ hour. But $12.80/hour for parliamentary cleaners is just not enough.

Previous posts by Rick, Clare, and Darien.


John Key and the Pacific Community – what is he saying?

Posted by Carmel Sepuloni on February 10th, 2010

In the lead up to the last election John Key paraded around with high profile members of the Pacific Community in an attempt to capture what for many years has been labelled a safe Labour support base.

But now lets look at what reference John Key made to Pacific people in his opening statement to Parliament yesterday:

“I have said it before, and I’ll say it again today: I worry that there are signs of an emerging underclass in New Zealand.

Child abuse, family violence, poor educational results, and crime continue to characterise the the lives of too many New Zealand families, particularly amongst our Maori and Pacific communities”.

No mention, however, of any Pacific initiatives in the sections on education, health and law and order…and if Pacific people are the “underclass”, what are his solutions to these problems? Why are Pacific (and Maori) people singled out in the speech, not for extra support, but for an attack?  His message of ‘aspiration for all New Zealanders’ seems to have got lost in yesterday’s speech.

He also says…

“This year the Government will focus on increasing the number of children in our poor communities, and in our Maori and Pacific populations, who attend early childhood education.”

Well sorry John Key but increasing the participation rates of Maori and Pacific children in ECE is not a new idea – its great that you’re continuing with our vision but you’ve obviously been given a great headstart in light of the effort put in by the Labour Government (in saying that I’ll be watching the numbers with regards to Pacific participation in ECE over the next couple of years – to see if he delivers on this).

AND THAT’S IT!  Apart from a brief mention in the foreign affairs section – there is no other mention of Pacific.  You would think that if he was genuinely concerned about the issues affecting our communities but equally as importantly – if he recognised the value that our communities have brought to this country – he might actually have a little more to say.

Perhaps the fact that our unemployment has soared past 14% under his watch – has deterred him from saying too much.