Red Alert

Archive for the ‘overseas aid’ Category

Public sector reform McCully style

Posted by Phil Twyford on January 4th, 2010

Tucked away in the back of the Sunday Star-Times yesterday was a recruitment ad for a new deputy secretary development in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  This position heads up New Zealand’s half billion dollar a year taxpayer-funded overseas aid programme – the agency ‘formerly known as NZAID’. What caught my eye was the lack of NZAID branding in the ad; the latest indication that Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully is slowly and steadily dismantling NZAID’s identity as a specialist development agency. The new head of NZAID is now just another dep-sec in the MFAT structure. His or her job is to “lead the 200 person business unit within the Ministry which manages” the aid programme.

If you follow these issues you’ll remember that McCully ignored the pleas of Treasury, development experts, the NGO community, and the Oppposition in the early months of 2009 and dissolved NZAID’s semi-autonomous status.  The public debate wasn’t just about structure. NZAID’s independence was established specifically to allow it to develop specialist expertise in development, and protect the aid programme from being used as a diplomatic slush fund as an in-depth review in 2001 found that it had been. McCully on the other hand  wanted the programme brought back within his political reach, and its mandate shifted from poverty elimination to economic development.

The new regime is still in its infancy. The transition was slowed by the recruitment and settling in of the new MFAT Secretary John Allen. I don’t imagine that McCully, having bulldozed decisions through in the face of advice from officials and public opinion, will rest until he gets the changes he wants. He is hostile to the very notion of aid and development, and from what I hear he abuses and bullies his senior officials in their regular meetings.  NZAID staff are rightly proud of the innovative work the agency has done since its inception in 2002 but spend much of their time these days trying to protect it from a vindictive and nit-picking Minister who described them in a speech last year as “faceless, unelected, unaccountable, aid bureaucrats”.

The NGOs, for having had the temerity to criticise McCully’s changes to NZAID, have also received a bit of a slap from the Minister. Their umbrella group the Council for International Development has had its funding cut by 40%, and its budget discussions drawn out month after month as McCully questioned the worth of funding them. He has already signalled a zero-based negotiation for the next financial year. Woe betide the officials and sector groups that cross a Minister who has spent his career as a backroom political in-fighter.


Those bureaucrats

Posted by Phil Twyford on October 20th, 2009

Chris Finlayson answering questions for Murray McCully this afternoon in the House, revealed something about the National Party mindset. A recent hearing at Parliament convened by the Parliamentarians for Population and Development uncovered the appalling rate at which women in Papua New Guinea are dying in childbirth.

I asked the Minister: “How will the Government’s policy to re-orient New Zealand’s overseas aid to private sector economic development help reduce the rate at which  women in Papua New Guinea die in childbirth, which is 23 times the NZ rate, given that the recent ActionAid report put NZ second to last in the OECD on aid for social protection?”  Hon Chris Finlayson: “Unlike the Labour Party the Government doesn’t believe that bureaucracy equates to aid.”

The reason PNG is on a par with Afghanistan when it comes to mothers dying in pregnancy and childbirth is a shortage of midwives. So midwives are bureaucrats?  Why, because they are mostly employed by the state? Very revealing.


McCully takes revenge on aid NGOs

Posted by Phil Twyford on September 29th, 2009

Successive governments have enjoyed a good relationship with the country’s overseas aid NGOs: groups like World Vision, Oxfam, Tear Fund, Save the Children, Volunteer Service Abroad.

They have seen the aid groups as part of an NZ Inc approach: raising private donations from the public, building awareness of development issues, and often working together with the government to deliver aid in the field. As in many OECD countries this partnership between government and aid NGOs has been ramped up over the last decade, with NZAID funding the NGOs’ aid programmes to the tune of about $32 m per year.

But the partnership has just taken a hit. Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully has personally intervened to cut the funding of the NGOs’ peak body by 40%.  Last year NZAID funded the Council for International Development $900,000 to do a range of work including coordination of disaster relief efforts, capacity building and training of NGO staff, and public awareness work. That is being cut to $650,000 this year and $500,000 the next.

McCully is unlikely to admit it, and on past form he won’t leave a paper trail, but you can bet the cut is a response to the NGO community’s public criticism of his move to restructure NZAID back into the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade and change its mandate earlier this year. The NGOs were trenchant in their criticism and it wasn’t just the usual campaigners. Rotary, the Salvation Army and agencies like World Vision and Tear Fund who have traditionally been more circumspect in their public advocacy, made it clear to the Government they thought McCully’s plans ill-judged. Most of the NGOs backed a campaign called Don’t Corrupt Aid.

Mr McCully has never been a fan of NGOs. In his speech announcing the restructuring of NZAID he referred to

self-interested individuals from within the aid community [who think] that New Zealand’s aid budget is some kind of sacred cow that should be placed above and beyond the stewardship of the government of the day, and subject only to the attentions of so- called “development experts” who might bring their superior intellects and sensibilities to this task.

And it was hard to know if he was referring to the NGOs or NZAID when he referred to “faceless, unelected, unaccountable, aid bureaucrats”.

It is worrying Mr McCully is willing to cut funding in such a vengeful way. It is bullying from a Government that can’t take public criticism.

It is even more disturbing he is willing to to cut funding that is an investment in building the capacity of NGOs to be accountable and effective partners in the delivery of taxpayer funded overseas aid. But then this is the same Minister who ignored Treasury advice that his restructuring of NZAID would make it less accountable for the spending of taxpayer dollars.


McCully policy does little for women dying in PNG

Posted by Phil Twyford on September 21st, 2009

Women in Papua New Guinea  are dying in childbirth at 23 times the New Zealand rate. That is 1500 women dying preventable deaths every year, and 30% of them are teenagers.

It is one of the most shocking indicators of a country in crisis.  The maternal death rate  in PNG, one of our closest neighbours, is on a par with Afghanistan. And there is no sign of improvement.

PNG has its share of problems: poverty, HIV/AIDS epidemic, corruption, and appalling governance. It’s the last on that list that is the big driver. The failure of the state to provide basic health services to its citizens is what has caused the skyrocketing rates of women dying in childbirth.

PNG health workers at a parliamentary hearing today on maternal health in the Pacific testified the key factors behind the figures are the collapse of rural health services, and now a dire shortage of trained midwives.

Foreign Minister Murray McCully likes to rail against aid to Pacific nations’ public sectors but the failure of the PNG public service to train midwives over the last decade has directly caused the preventable deaths of thousands of women in childbirth and heaven knows how many children.  Submitters at today’s hearing told how the PNG government decided in 2001 to shift all midwife training into universities but failed to put a curriculum in place. Since then no midwives have been registered.

(more…)