Red Alert

Archive for the ‘M?ori’ Category

Asset Sales:Treaty Clause to be ditched, what else will go?

Posted by Grant Robertson on January 31st, 2012

Wira Gardiner has taken on a lot of difficult jobs for governments of all hues, but I think hitting the road to sell ditching the Treaty of Waitangi clause from any new legislation for assets to be sold is going to be his most difficult task.

It seems the government regard the Treaty clause as it is currently contained in the State Owned Enterprises Act that covers the companies on the block will be an impediment to sale. Pesky Treaty getting in the way of National’s plan to sell off our future! The easy response from the government of course is to just get rid of it.

This is going to cause major ructions among Maori, and rightly so. Another question for the government to answer is what will happen to the “social responsibility” clause that also governs SOEs?

an organisation that exhibits a sense of social responsibility by having regard to the interests of the community in which it operates and by endeavouring to accommodate or encourage these when able to do so

Will it survive in the new legislation for the assets that are being sold?

If it goes its clearer than ever that these sales are in fact privatisation. The rhetoric about the government keeping control of the assets is empty if the legislation that will govern them removes the protections that give all New Zealanders confidence that the assets are working in the best interests of the country. These will simply be private companies acting without reference to providing a social good for all of us.

These hui will be fascinating. Morgan Godfrey has already noted that support seems to be dwindling among iwi. I know for sure we will be putting pressure on National in Parliament and in the community to stop the sales. Interesting times indeed.


Sir Michael Marmot- Health Equity

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 13th, 2011

Today I am attending a symposium organised by the NZMA on health inequities to coincide with the visit of Sir Michael Marmot from the UK. I have blogged before about the influence of Sir Michael on the excellent NZMA statement on health equity.

Its occasions like this that highlight just how ridiculous are the assertions of Maori privilege made by Don Brash. Just a couple of examples have been highlighted by Tony Blakely from Otago University and Don Simmers and Norman Sharpe from the NZMA.

- despite improvements in the first decade of this century Maori life expectancy is 7-8 years short of non-Maori.
- mortaility rates for Maori in middle age are 2-3 tomes higher than non-Maori including all causes such as heart disease.
- Maori babies are 5 times more likely to die of sudden infant death syndrome than non-Maori
- diabetes rates, suicide rates and infectious disease rates and mortality are all higher for Maori than non-Maori

Health inequities are certainly relate to economic depravation,and it was a good achievement that income inequality in New Zealand did reduce slightly in the 2000s under Labour, but there is much more to do. It is also clear that there is an ethnic component above and beyond that. Addressing this is not privileging a group, it is in fact correcting a systemic disadvantage. Doing so, with early intervention, will benefit us all in promoting social inclusion and reducing the cost of expensive health interventions at a later stage.


Te Tai Tokerau

Posted by Trevor Mallard on June 27th, 2011

My take is that Hone will have to make a choice on whether he stays at home until November to defend his seat or working hard around the country effectively helping Labour take back the other four Maori seats.

In either case there is a very real possibility of Labour winning all seven in November – especially given the way Pita Sharples rejected Hone’s overtures this morning.

And it is the end of any thinking person of the left supporting Mana because there is no guarantee of Hone winning and a very real chance of party votes for Mana being wasted. If Sue Bradford had still been a Green they would have been in the box seat.


Poll warning Te Tai Tokerau

Posted by Trevor Mallard on June 13th, 2011

Poll warning again. Native Affairs poll has Hone and Kelvin within 1%.

Sample only 500, done by landline. Maori electorates notoriously difficult to poll.

It is clear that the race is close and the Maori Party is collapsing (actually nationally as well as up north).

But as Kelvin pointed out it is who gets more votes not who answers their phone that counts and therefore organisation will be vital.

Fairly soon the Maori Party will informally throw in the towel because they want Hone to lose more than they hate Labour winning.


Who is the real taniwha here?

Posted by Phil Twyford on June 9th, 2011

The great taniwha stops transport project story has popped up again, this time after a member of the Auckland Council’s Maori statutory board asked whether the Council had considered the impact of the rail tunnel on the taniwha Horotiu who lived in an ancient creek running past the Town Hall and down Queen St.

The modern taniwha has carved out an interesting role where modern infrastructure projects meet politics.  The Herald reports taniwha sparked public debate in 2002 when the presence of a one-eyed taniwha called Karu Tahi stopped work on the Waikato Expressway. Taniwha inspired an on-site protest during construction of the Ngawha Prison, near Kaikohe.

The taniwha story provokes very different responses on each side of the Maori-Pakeha divide. For Maori I suspect it is a part of the ongoing struggle to get authorities to engage and listen to iwi and their concerns. For most Pakeha the growing influence of taniwha is probably seen as political correctness gone mad.

But neither of those should distract from the main game here. The real threat to Auckland’s long-awaited rail link is not the Queen St taniwha. It is a roads-mad Transport Minister determined to sink the plan for a modern rapid transit system in our biggest city.

If there is a taniwha threatening the rail link its name is Steven Joyce.


Just who is funding the “Tupperwaka”?

Posted by Grant Robertson on June 7th, 2011

Sometimes when you ask a question in Parliament it does not go exactly according to plan. Today I was asking a question based on this story in the New Zealand Herald which said that the PM was stumping up $300,000 for the running costs of the so-called “tupperwaka.”

Yesterday, a spokeswoman for Mr Key said it was not unusual for the Prime Minister to fund new projects he personally believed had merit. “In this instance the money was appropriated via the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,” the spokeswoman said.

It is in fact very unusual for DPMC to fund anything like this, hence my question. Sadly for me, the Prime Minister got up in Question Time today and said that the spokeswoman was incorrect because they had received incorrect advice and that the money in fact came from contingency funding in the 2010 Budget that was given to Te Puni Kokiri.

But how could a mistake like this be made? Well, a look at the Cabinet papers authorising the spending on the plastic waka provide a clue. Recommendation 9 of the paper CAB (11) 50 says the following

note that the Prime Minister and the Ministry of Culture and Heritage have confirmed contributions of up to $0.300 million and up to $0.800 million respectively to underwrite the showcasing and festival programmes to be staged within and around Te Waka.

Hmmm, that sure sounds like the PM was going to fund it. Interestingly, and somewhat conveniently, by the time the funding was finalised it was described as being from the Emerging Priorities Fund, and today we learn this appears to have been through TPK.

Whatever, the whole process around approving funding for the plastic waka is murky, with little in the way of transparency. In tight fiscal times it does not seem to be a priority or an “emerging priority” for that matter.


Have the Maori Party conceded in Te Tai Tokerau

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 26th, 2011

It has become clear over the last couple of weeks that only Kelvin Davis can beat Hone Harawira. The Maori Party want him out of parliament even more than we do. That might explain their choice of a low profile candidate yesterday. As the Herald said :-

…. old party launched Solomon Tipene’s bid to win the Te Tai Tokerau byelection.

The great-grandfather was the surprise pick for the Maori Party, which also interviewed lawyer Mere Mangu and actor Waihoroi Shortland, tipped by many in the north as the frontrunner.

the Hone shotgun scenario on lets-not.co.nz is creating lots of interest including some criticism.


Why the Maori Party is third in Te Tai Tokerau

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 17th, 2011

Maui Street is a great blog. Don’t always agree but Morgan has his finger on the pulse.

Here he outlines the Maori Party’s problems.


Kelvin – why are Maori good for waiting staff and singing but not Real New Zealand showcase?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 10th, 2011

For those without broadband, the Hansard is below: (more…)


Fallout from Nats involvement in Brash coup continues

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 7th, 2011

I’ve always liked Georgina. I’ve had long family links to Manunui and respect the way she has tried to bring a Maori perspective to the National Party.

I’m not surprised that she has chosen to go. There is a limit to what one reasonable person can put up with:-

A senior National MP is tipped to announce her retirement at the next election.

Georgina te Heuheu, the courts and disarmament minister, has held a ministerial portfolio in successive National administrations and was the first Maori woman to gain election to Parliament for National after being wooed by former prime minister Jim Bolger because of her influence within Maoridom and links to powerful iwi organisations.

She played a vital role in National stitching up its historic accord with the Maori Party after the 2008 election and courted controversy under former leader Don Brash because of her staunch opposition to his Orewa “nationhood” speech, which rejected the notion that Maori held a special place in New Zealand.


Fiasco

Posted by Phil Twyford on February 17th, 2011

Fiasco

Maori representation on the Auckland Council has all the elements of a fiasco:  it started out as an ambitious undertaking but has ended in ludicrous and humiliating failure.

Aucklanders have been saddled with an unelected Maori board that has the power to appoint members to Council committees with full voting rights, after the Government rejected a perfectly good option of Maori councillors democratically elected off the Maori roll.  And the poor old Auckland ratepayer is going to be stung with $1.9 million a year, or more, to pay for this, depending on what the High Court decides.

So who is responsible? Not Local Government Minister Rodney Hide who says he opposed the provision but had it forced on him by the National and Maori Parties.  In Question Time yesterday the Prime Minister denied Hide had breached rules on cabinet responsibility because Hide had been speaking in his role as leader of ACT.  Ironically the PM criticised Pita Sharples who called on Hide to resign if he could not accept the Maori board, saying he should not have made those comments under his ministerial letterhead.

So who is responsible if the responsible Minister is not responsible?

The affair is another blow to Hide’s chances of surviving the election. First there was his spectacular fall from grace as the perkbuster and then his role in concealing his law and order spokesperson’s identity theft. Now the self-styled Minister of Ratepayers and one time champion of ‘one law for all’ has presided over a shonky and undemocratic Maori board at some cost to the Auckland ratepayer.

He is desperate to present the Auckland amalgamation as a success in election year but this has well and truly knocked the gloss off it.

It is also a failure of leadership by John Key. First he buckled to Hide’s threat to resign. Then to make good with the Maori Party he inserts a dodgy compromise option into the law without making any public statement.  The responsible Minister (Hide) openly slags the law he himself introduced to Parliament. Another Minister (Sharples) calls on the responsible Minister to resign over it. Key sees no problem with it all. The Auckland ratepayer is left to pick up the tab.


iPredict this week – Hone fallout hitting Maori Party expectations

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 9th, 2011

Hooton’s analysis this week :- 

John Key would be able to continue as Prime Minister after this year’s General Election with the support of one of the Act, UnitedFuture or Maori parties, this week’s snapshot from New Zealand’s prediction market, iPredict, again suggests.

The snapshot also indicates that the Maori Party would be down to three MPs, with Hone Harawira expected to win Te Tai Tokerau as an independent or representing a party other than the Maori Party, while Labour’s Rino Tirikatene is now marginally favoured over the Maori Party’s Rahui Katene in Te Tai Tonga.
(more…)

Filed under: M?ori, ipredict

Hone case prejudged ?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on February 8th, 2011

Hone has been given the boot from his office and is shifting over to the main buidling.

Thought it might have been polite to wait until their disciplinary process had finished.

Farce ?

Tags:
Filed under: M?ori

Koha charge an embarrassment

Posted by Kelvin Davis on February 3rd, 2011

I have to admit to being embarrassed by this $1000 “koha” being asked of media outlets to attend the celebrations on the lower marae at Waitangi.

My reasons:
1. It’s not tikanga Maori (Maori custom) to either ASK for a koha or exclude anyone from a marae. In my last blog I was defending Maori tikanga that was broken by a group of pakeha. Now we have a group of Maori who are breaking Maori tikanga themselves. When we (Maori) trample on our own customs, then it’s a bit rich to expect non-Maori to adhere to them. We create create confusion and double standards. It’s called hypocrisy. It makes it bloody hard as a Maori politician to go out and defend the “Maori way”, when the Maori way these days chops and changes.

The base word of “tikanga” is “tika” meaning “correct” or “right”. Maori should be doing the correct or right thing. In this case they aren’t and in my mind are breaking tikanga and deserve condemnation. Their actions unfortunately reflect on all Maori, and I’m embarrassed. They will find every reason to justify their ‘koha’ charge, but there is only one reason why they shouldn’t charge it – it’s wrong.

If I was the media, I would boycott the lower marae celebrations and focus on all the positive festivities that are happening around Waitangi.

2. Waitangi Day is a day for all New Zealanders to share. Media outlets allow many Maori and non-Maori who would like to be at Waitangi, but can’t be there, to share in the day. Many New Zealanders are already alienated from Waitangi Day, this sort of un-Maori behaviour simply drives people further away.

In my blog ‘Denis responds’ Denis said, “But we must learn to understand and respect each other better and also to live together in harmony.” These people asking for the ‘koha’ make it damn hard for non-Maori to understand and respect Maori and for us all to live in harmony.

Maybe they aren’t interested in harmony.


Denis responds

Posted by Kelvin Davis on February 2nd, 2011

So I was rude, abrupt and dismissive of Denis’ opinion. Guilty on all accounts. But he had to be challenged. If he was looking for a sympathetic ear to reinforce his perspective, he emailed the wrong person. However, I believed he did what I hoped he’d do and had a look at the issue from another perspective.

Here’s his response, which I didn’t include in the original “Our nation is becoming unhinged – an email exchange” blog so as not to cloud the debate.

Denis said:

Thank you Kelvin – I appreciate this information and will think it through carefully.

It seems to me Maori and Europeans need to learn more about how each group works and thinks… and learn to respect the important stuff. Perhaps newspaper articles on different aspects of culture?

I think it must work both ways … and how do we solve the problem about people not being able to do things like: walk on top of the mountain if you are a mountain climber and this is something that they normally want to do and other stuff like that?
There must be a way that would be mutually satisfactory. But we must learn to understand and respect each other better and also to live together in harmony … don’t you agree?
It seems you are in a very good position to initiate some new ideas in this direction. That would be fantastic. Again, I appreciate your excellent reply.
Go for it and all the best — Denis


Ratana and Labour

Posted by Grant Robertson on January 25th, 2011

Yesterday was my fourth, and wettest, trip to Ratana Pa for the celebrations of Tahupotiki Wiremu Ratana’s birthday (which is actually today). It was, as has been reported, a very warm reception for the Labour team, summed up by the Ratana Spokesperson’s comments

What you saw on the marae today was a strengthening of that relationship of Ratana and the Labour Party.

I have been asked often what is the reason for the relationship between Ratana and Labour. The Ratana Church came about in the 1920s as people flocked to follow T.W. Ratana who became regarded as a prophet and mangai (mouthpiece) of the Holy Spirit. The Church itself became a political force as well through the 1920s and 30s, with T.W. Ratana outspoken on the subject of the Treaty of Waitangi and land confiscation.

Labour had already worked closely with Ratana in the early 1930s on policy, and the first Ratana MP (and grandfather of current Labour Te Tai Tonga candidate Rino Tirikatene) Eruera Tirikatene was aligned with the Labour Party. But the relationship was solidified in 1936 by a famous meeting between T.W. Ratana and then PM Michael Joseph Savage. It is described on NZ History On-Line in this way

At the 1936 meeting Ratana presented Savage with four symbolic gifts. Three huia feathers, representing Maori, protruded from a potato, which symbolised the land taken from Maori, leaving them unable to grow the staple crop. A pounamu hei tiki represented Maori mana, which had also been lost. A broken gold watch handed down to Ratana by his grandfather represented the broken promises of the Crown. A pin with a star and crescent moon was the symbol of the Ratana church, Tahu o te Maramatanga. It is said that these items had a profound impact on Savage to the extent that when he died in 1940 they were buried with him.

Labour’s partnership with Ratana was based on a commitment to work together to return land, restore mana and lift the success of Maori. There have of course been ups and downs in the relationship, and there are a wide range of political views held by Ratana followers now, but as I sat and listened to the speeches, and talked with the morehu (followers) yesterday it was clear those strong bonds are not forgotten. They responded particularly well to Phil’s messages yesterday about coming together to address inequality and to focus on the education and health and well being of children.

Its become the case that all major political parties now head to Ratana to pay their respects. That’s a good thing, but from a Labour point of view the annual visit is an opportunity to re-affirm a relationship that is grounded in the early days of both of our histories.


Hone has the right to criticise his leadership

Posted by Trevor Mallard on January 23rd, 2011

Not often that I find my self agreeing with Matt McCarten and Fran O’Sullivan at the same time. They have written from different perspectives but come to the same conclusion :- Hone Harawira has a right and possibly even a responsibility to criticise the leadership of the Maori Party for the direction they are taking.

McCarten :-

Political maturity means accepting MPs will have different opinions.

A party having a considered discussion about itself is democratic and can make it more popular.

Trying to crush alternative perspectives will have the opposite effect.

O’Sullivan :-

Backbench MPs are not subject to Cabinet collective responsibility. They should be able to articulate their views on major issues and challenge the powers that be. Trouble is, far too many of today’s crop leave any pretence to owning an independent brain outside the door when they enter Parliament.

and

Harawira is made of sterner stuff. But there has also been a sea change, which I put down to the journalistic tendency to quickly put any backbench MP on to the “must be dumped from caucus’ slipway” when they call their own party to account.

Instead of greasing the ramp, why don’t journalists simply challenge the leadership to respond to the valid points Harawira has made?

Publicly opposing the leadership of your party is never easy. But there are plenty of precedents, more from Westminster than here but can and should still be done.

The process is pretty clear. One resigns from portfolios and shifts to the backbench. One talks it through with the leader and then caucus. And one is honest and straightforward – not the Carter approach.

We don’t have a real tradition of this sort of approach – Muldoon, Minogue, Waring, Anderton, Upton, Lee. Being a small Parliament doesn’t help. And the increased power that has gone to the party and the leadership with MMP hasn’t helped either.

But I do agree with McCarten and O’Sullivan that it is an important part of a democracy that, in the end, MPs have the right to go public with their concerns.

Lots of colleagues disagree. I refer readers to the box at the top right.

And to make it clear to trolls again – I believe Phil Goff is the only person in our caucus who can lead a government this year – and that this post is about MPs right to express their views – nothing wider.


100 years of Maori rugby

Posted by Clare Curran on October 2nd, 2010

Maori rugby

Went to Carisbrook today. Am worried there wont be many more opportunities left to do that, though I’ll bloody well try to make sure there are.

Anyway, the curtain raiser to the Otago vs Canterbury game was more significant than the game itself. Even if it was under 9s teams playing.

They were marking the occasion of 100 years of Maori rugby. Otago has contributed a lot to Maori rugby, from Wiremu Teihoka (Ned) Parata born at Puketeraki, Karitane, who is widely regarded as the “father” of Maori rugby, and Tamati Rangiwahia (Tom) Ellison, born at Otakou (Otago) Peninsula, who, I am told, gave to New Zealand Rugby its iconic black jersey with the silver fern.

These men started an Otago legacy with the NZ Maori rugby team, which has seen 39 players since 1910 go on to represent their people.

As was said to me today, the under 9s players who took to the field today are not only helping celebrate the last 100 years of Maori rugby but are heralding in the next century. Hope they get to continue to play on Carisbrook.

Pictured (with me in the middle) are Ned Parata’s grandaughters; Marama Preedy (on the left) and Hirene Buchanan (on the right).

Tags: ,
Filed under: M?ori, sport

Mänu körero in Dunedin

Posted by Clare Curran on September 22nd, 2010

Talia at Youth parliament

The National Mänu körero Maori Speech competitions are being held in Dunedin this week and I am very proud that my Dunedin South Youth MP Talia Ellison is representing the Otepoti / Murihiku (Otago / Southland) region in the Senior English Section.

At the same time as she was preparing to represent Dunedin South at Youth Parliament Talia was also preparing for first the regional competition in June and then for Nationals this week. She has also been busy with other responsibilities in hosting the expected 56 competitors, and their supporters and whanau who are in Dunedin for the competition.

The three-day competition aims to encourage fluency in English and te reo Maori and it is an honour for Dunedin to host the annual event for the first time in its 45 year history. I am disappointed I’m not there but I’m very proud of Talia and also congratulate Paulette Tamati-Elliffe and the local organising committee for what I’m sure will be an awesome 3 days of competition and celebration.

More than 1000 people, including teachers, schools, whanau and kaumatua, have registered for the competition and hundreds more are expected to attend the event. Pupils are asked to speak on a range of topics, including “The Gift of Language”, and “Facebook – social networking for the 21st century”.

The competition has helped revive the Maori language.


Pukeatua kohanga reopens in Wainuiomata

Posted by Trevor Mallard on September 10th, 2010

I thought Nanny Jean Puketapu was old when she was the driving force behind the first kohanga over 30 years ago. She played a leading role in the reopening of the massive, flash new replacement kohanga on the old Wainuiomata Intermediate site. Some peoples’ contribution just can’t be measured.

Neville Baker, Kara Puketapu (my fathers schoolmate) and many leaders in Atiawa were there. Some were not.

Parekura was the guy who engineered the grant for the refurbishment. I suppose his experience and contacts have been developed through his public service as well as his political career – but he is a leader who backs people who get results.

I got a hard time for wearing my red socks (old Am Cup) – told to wear politics on sleeve not feet.

My talk praised those involved and put it back onto parents and grandparents to ensure that no Wainui child start school without quality early childhood education and consistent health care.