Red Alert

Archive for the ‘labour’ Category

Fairness at work demanded

Posted by Carol Beaumont on October 20th, 2010

DSC02890 (4) (2)Along with Green MP Keith Locke I attended the CTU rally in Auckland today.  7,000 wage and salary earners gathered in Manukau to express their anger and concern at the actions of this National government.  They were part of actions in 30 locations throughout New Zealand with 22,000 people participating.

The Auckland rally was a very powerful gathering. Strong statements were made against the removal of rights – the right to challenge unfair dismissals, the right to see your union representative on site, the right to rest and meal breaks, the right to have holidays.

At the end I was asked by a journalist whether I thought the Government would listen.   I responded that while they should listen I expected that they would not.  This Government is going to force through this backward looking suite of attacks on working people.  These changes will not lift workplace productivity, lift wages or close the wage gap with Australia – quite the contrary!  We will all be worse off as a consequence.

The speakers today reflected concerns that I am hearing throughout the community.   These attacks are not well received in the community and for many this is further evidence of a Government out of touch with the views and reality of many New Zealanders.


Labour supports wage and salary earners

Posted by Trevor Mallard on October 20th, 2010

IMG00006-20101020-1311

About 4,000 wage and salary earners turned out today in Wellington (and more than 20,000 nationwide) to show the Key government that they oppose their proposals designed to cut wages in a direct contradiction to their promise to bring our wage level up to Australia’s.

Labour has made it clear we will reverse the laws that allowed people to be fired for no reason in their forst 90 days, that prevent someone asking their union rep to look at a dangerous machine and that requires people to give a medical certificate for one days absence.

More than that we will have labour relations legislation which means individuals will have an ability to join a collective agreement even when they are in a small firm.


The Values of Everything – how to turn around failing progressive causes

Posted by Trevor Mallard on October 14th, 2010

George Monbiot in the Guardian, worth a read :-

So here we are, forming an orderly queue at the slaughterhouse gate. The punishment of the poor for the errors of the rich, the abandonment of universalism, the dismantling of the shelter the state provides: apart from a few small protests, none of this has yet brought us out fighting.

The acceptance of policies which counteract our interests is the pervasive mystery of the 21st Century. In the United States, blue-collar workers angrily demand that they be left without healthcare, and insist that millionaires should pay less tax. In the UK we appear ready to abandon the social progress for which our ancestors risked their lives with barely a mutter of protest. What has happened to us?

(more…)


Confirmation as Labour nomination for Christchurch East

Posted by Lianne Dalziel on October 10th, 2010

I have been privileged to be re-selected to stand for Christchurch East in the 2011 election for Labour


Will submissions change the government’s mind?

Posted by Darien Fenton on September 15th, 2010

According to the CTU, an estimated 6000 submissions have been forwarded on the government’s antiquated Employment Relations Amendment Bill (No 2) to the Transport & Industrial Relations Select Committee.

This is the bill that :

• Extends the 90 day no rights trial period to all workplaces

• Restricts the right of workers to have access to their unions at work

• Weakens fair processes where workers actually manage to get a grievance hearing

among other things.

Submissions hearings begin tomorrow in Wellington, and are likely to take up a lot of time in the next few weeks.  The Select Committee will travel to other places (to be determined) and also meet during House Sitting time to get through the very tight timeframe of reporting back the bill by 7 November.

I’ve read some of the submissions so far and the arguments are comprehensive and convincing.  With unions planning a national day of action in October, it will be interesting to see if the National Government members, who have the majority on the committee, are prepared to listen – and if necessary convince their Minister to change her mind.

We’ll see – but not holding my breath.

These are public hearings, so come along if you can.


Strike One, Strike Two….

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 30th, 2010

The news that secondary teachers are set to strike within the next two weeks sets up an interesting situation. The Ministry of Education do the negotiating on behalf of the government with teachers. My sources tell me that industrial action is looming in the Ministry of Education itself, with pay talks stalled and the mood souring.

Will Anne Tolley soon have on her hands not only the teachers on strike, but her Ministry staff out as well? And will the negotiators for the Ministry of Education be able to come back to the table if there is movement from the teachers, or will they be on strike as well?


Have your say at Select Committee – just kidding!

Posted by Darien Fenton on August 27th, 2010

The most significant changes to workers’ rights in two decades are coming our way via the Employment Relations Amendment Bill (No 2), and the Holidays Amendment Bill, which had their first readings in parliament in the last few days.

So, you would think that the government would want New Zealanders (both for and against) to have their say.

Not so, it seems.

The two bills have been referred to the Transport & Industrial Relations Select Committee, who had, according to the Chair David Bennett, decided “informally” to call for submissions, even prior to the conclusion of the first readings in parliament.

(Disclosure :  I am a member of this Select Committee, where Labour and the Greens are in the minority, so I know what really happened, but I can’t say so publicly).

The timeframe for the submissions for these two bills is at best three weeks, with closing dates on the 13 September and 17 September respectively.

I would have thought the government would be keen to ensure all of support they claim to have had around the 90 day fire at will extension, the sickies get-to-the-doctor-or-else provision and the selling of holidays were able0 to be presented at Select Committee.

Or should I be more cynical?  Is the short timeframe really designed to make sure that unions and workers have as little time as possible to have their say?

If the government really believes there is support for these changes, they would have given more time for submissions.

But then there’s ACT calling the shots and National meekly following on behind.  I forgot that Minister Kate Wilkinson got rolled at Cabinet (again) over her recommendations.


Karoshi – could it happen in NZ?

Posted by Darien Fenton on August 25th, 2010

When it comes to working hours, New Zealand is among the least regulated countries in the OECD. Once, we had a 40 hour week, 8 hour day, but not these days.  New Zealand workers work longer hours than any other country in the OECD, other than Japan. Bizarre as it sounds with our level of unemployment and under-employment, the only working hours regulation NZ has is in regard to meal and rest breaks, which is currently under attack from the NACts.

But working harder and more hours for less money during the recession is starting to take its toll. Job satisfaction is declining, with many workers — including top performers — saying it’s time to find a new job.

Of particular interest is the description of death by overwork in Japan – called “karoshi” and in China “guolaosi” which has become such an extreme problem that those countries have introduced legislation that allows surviving family members to sue companies involved.

In Japan, a typical karoshi victim is that of a businessman who dies at his desk after too many 80-hour workweeks. But several international studies (in Finland, Israel, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States) have shown both men and women are at high risk for “overwork” consequences — heart disease, obesity, insomnia and persistent fatigue, but women are far more likely to suffer mental health consequences, especially when they do not take holidays.

A  recent US survey found that 40% of  professionals are thinking about quitting their jobs. They’re tired of not being promoted, bosses that don’t share company goals, being overworked and having bonuses slashed.

And surveys in NZ ths week show that NZ employers made who deep cuts into their skilled workforce during the recession are now regretting it, because finding replacement workers is much tougher than they thought.

NZ employers are getting to the point where they have maxed out workloads for existing staff, with rising work hours for those who still have jobs.

The result?  Too much hard work – whether unpaid or paid overtime — really does hurt (and kill) people. Workers’ lives have gone from bad to better to bad all over again. So, is it time to to ensure (again) that we don’t have to feel guilty (or fearful about losing our jobs) for taking time off?

With the National Government intent on selling the fourth weeks leave of annual leave and weakening the regulations around meals and rest breaks, I suggest that we are heading backwards, and perhaps toward a NZ version of karoshi.


Massey Uni Cleaners deserve a fair go

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 24th, 2010

DSCF0030

Yesterday I visited a group of cleaners at Massey University’s Wellington campus. (apologies for poor photo quality). Along with their colleagues on the campuses in Palmerston North and Albany they are employed by OCS Limited to do the cleaning. OCS took over the contract for cleaning a couple of months ago and are pushing through changes to their employment conditions that are just shocking.

OCS have decided to move the workers from largely full time jobs to new jobs that will guarantee them only 25 hours a week for the 31 weeks of peak university time, and no guarantee of hours for the remaining 21 weeks of the year. The way they are doing this is by making the workers redundant and offering them new contracts with the reduced hours.

This is unfair and unjust. It will equate to a 35% drop in wages. These people are not well paid. They get just above the minimum wage. Many of them travel from Porirua to Wellington to work. While OCS as the contractor has the responsibility for the contracts it is concerning that this is happening on a publicly funded university campus. I have written to Steve Maharey as Vice-Chancellor expressing my concern.

The Service and Food Workers Union are taking the redundancy proposal to court on Thursday, as OCS are offering no redundancy pay. Anyone interested in supporting the workers I understand that some of them hope to be at the High Court in Wellington tomorrow from 9am onwards.


Another worker’s story

Posted by Darien Fenton on August 16th, 2010

Heather is another worker who has come forward to the CTU about being unfairly sacked under the 90 day trial period law. Here’s her story. Now watch the righties go hunting for a conspiracy.


Back then…..

Posted by Darien Fenton on August 12th, 2010

One of our caucus visits in Whangarei this week involved a trip to the Marsden Point refinery. While it was Interesting to get a modern day perspective and to tour the site, for me, it was a trip back in personal history to a time when Marsden Point was not only a job, but a lesson in politics.

It’s not hard to find people who worked on the expansion in the 1980’s, because there were 5,000 workers who built that site, along with the thousands of contractors who came and went.

I reckon around 10,000 New Zealanders were involved in the Marsden Point Refinery Expansion Project, including (apparently) Phil Heatley – and me.

It was one of Muldoon’s Think Big Projects, arising from the oil shocks from the previous decade.  My partner and I were young, with a new baby, looking for a way to make a better living. We moved to the nearby farming village of Maungakaramea and my brother and many other people came to join what was then a very well paid, if often dangerous job.

It was a highly unionised site, with a reputation for militancy. We all thought the strikes were justified, particularly around health and safety. We saw friends die on that worksite. Whenever I heard the emergency whistle blow, which could be heard all over Whangarei, I knew that someone I knew or loved had been hurt or killed.

The workers also wanted to protect New Zealand jobs because we thought New Zealanders should be doing the work, not imported workers. One time, we were on strike for six weeks, which created huge hardship.  We were fed by the collective – who gathered up vegetables and meat and distributed them to families through that time.

But the strikes became highly political too. Muldoon was in power and the Minister of Labour was Jim Bolger. The Nats decided a good election platform was to be tough with the unions, and got the opportunity when eight scaffolders went back to work in defiance of the strikes.

Muldoon brought in the the Refinery Expansion Projects Dispute Act to force striking workers back to work. No worker was allowed back on the site unless they signed a paper saying they were prepared to work with the eight strikebreakers – who were named in the legislation. One of them had been a close friend.

My brother wrote about those events ;

Now when I think about Marsden Point I can hear the sound of boots marching in the fog as a riot squad escorted a van full of scabs towards our picket line, and when I remember I am reminded how a death on a construction site shames us all…”

Those times made a big impression on me. I learned that while workers can have power, governments have even more. I remember saying that if Jim Bolger ever became Prime Minister, I would leave New Zealand.

Well he did  (eventually) – and we left New Zealand and worked overseas after Labour was elected in 1984, and we were all made redundant in 1986. But when we came home just before 1990, the National Party was about to regain power and impose the most unimaginable harm to working families.

That was another lesson in politics.


Trade Me Jobs for 90 days

Posted by Darien Fenton on August 5th, 2010

job-ad-90-day

After a quick trawl through the Trade Me and Seek sites, we found six advertisements for web developers and designers, pet groomers, sales staff and a structural engineer, all of which say “the 90 day trial period will apply” (emphasis added in sample image above – click for a larger view).

Funny that.  John Key and his Minister of Labour, Kate Wilkinson have been insisting that 90 day trial periods are subject to discussion, good faith negotiation and agreement between employers and prospective employees.

These advertisements show that employers are already breaking the existing 90 day trial legislation by making a 90 day trial a pre-condition of employment.

This will spread if National goes ahead with its plan to extend the 90 day trial period to all employers and employees.

The government keeps insisting that employees can’t be forced into trial periods – but these advertisements plainly break the law.  The only answer the Minister could come up with at question time today was that employees “don’t have to apply for these jobs”.

Weak, Minister.


Ethical Investment Bill goes down

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 4th, 2010

Well, my first private members Bill is over. The Ethical Investment (Crown Financial Institutions) Bill was voted down 63-58 tonight. Supporting it were Labour, Progressives, Greens, Maori and United, against National and ACT. Check out the debate here if you are interested.

It was not a great surprise that National and ACT opposed the bill, but disappointing all the same. The Bill sought to have clear and consistent criteria for ethical investment in the legislation that govern our major investment funds such as the Super Fund and ACC. The criteria are based on international norms and treaties and emphasise the importance of investing in organisations that have good governance, treat their stakeholders fairly and uphold human rights and good labour standards. From an environmental standpoint the organisations that are invested in should be conscious of their ecological footprint and should not be harmful to resources such as air, water and land.

The opposition was based on the fact that some good progress has been made in ethical investment policies and that “the market” would deal with the issues. I thought this was an opportunity to move from a passive approach to ethical and sustainable investment to a positive one that could re-inforce our image as an environmentally and socially conscious country on the world stage.

Anyway it was an interesting process to go through, and I am the wiser for it. Pleased to extend the support for the Bill across the House, and have agreed with other parties to keep working on the issue.


A breach of trust

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 28th, 2010

I have known Helen Kelly, the President of the CTU for quite a long time now. I admire her greatly. She has been, and is, an exceptional and passionate advocate for workers in New Zealand, and indeed internationally. I can appreciate the position she was in when National was elected and called on the union movement to be part of their Jobs Summit. I was a bit surprised when the CTU had John Key speak at their conference, but they felt this was a PM and the government that they should, and could, work with.

Just how let down Helen, and the workers she represents, are now feeling is clear from the letter that Helen has sent to the PM.

It is easy to feel the sense of betrayal in her words

She said he had breached his undertaking to consult her if the Government was going to move on union access and non-union collective bargaining.

“You also said you wanted to work with the unions,” she wrote. “And you portrayed yourself as a moderating influence in employment law matters. That has changed.”

I saw Helen at a function last night and I can report in person she is every bit as aggreived.

While the on-going debate will be and should be about the substance of the changes to workers rights and conditions, the role and the approach of the PM should not forgotten here. He led the union movement to believe he was their friend, but as soon as his perception of the political environment dictated a change, he moved swiftly to go against his word. That is a serious breach of trust, and one that I think the PM will live to regret.


Same job, same uniform, different pay

Posted by Darien Fenton on July 28th, 2010

Qantas has been paying its New Zealand pilots up to 40% less than its Australian pilots, even although they wear the same uniform and fly the same routes.

Positions previously held by Qantas pilots are being lost to Jetconnect pilots as Qantas pay and conditions are much inferior here.

Despite being set up to undertake domestic flights within New Zealand, Jetconnect now operates 154 flights between Australia and New Zealand every week and is effectively an operating division of Qantas, says the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU).

Its New Zealand pilots wear Qantas uniforms, have Qantas staff numbers, and fly Qantas aircraft with travel routes determined by Qantas.

The ACTU says that where workers are doing the same job as Australian workers and in actual fact replacing Australian workers, Australian work legislation should apply to them.

The gap between Australian and New Zealand wages has grown by more than $50 a week since November 2008.  The government has no ideas or plan about how to address this gap, other than to further reduce workers rights.

New Zealand has become a desirable destination for Australian companies who want to pay workers less.


Is the middle class disappearing in the US?

Posted by Clare Curran on July 27th, 2010

This is one article. No doubt there’s more. But the stats tell a story. Which indicates that a lack of attention to local industry and skills retention has a cost.

The issue for us, being that NZ, as any developed country, simply can’t compete on labour costs with the developing world. What’s the outcome?

Protectionism is not the answer. But neither is globalism.

This piece argues that the middle class in America is systemically being wiped out.

The reality is that no matter how smart, how strong, how educated or how hard working American workers are, they just cannot compete with people who are desperate to put in 10 to 12 hour days at less than a dollar an hour on the other side of the world. After all, what corporation in their right mind is going to pay an American worker 10 times more (plus benefits) to do the same job? The world is fundamentally changing. Wealth and power are rapidly becoming concentrated at the top and the big global corporations are making massive amounts of money. Meanwhile, the American middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence as U.S. workers are slowly being merged into the new “global” labor pool.

Tags:
Filed under: Skills, economy, jobs, labour

Holiday entitlements restored

Posted by Grant Robertson on July 26th, 2010

Interesting, and good, to note that the EPMU have negotiated in their Metals MECA to make up one of the two holidays lost next year for workers, this being the one with ANZAC Day and Easter Monday falling on the same day next year.

As previously discussed here I think that something needs to be done to ensure that we protect the integrity of ANZAC Day and Waitangi Day, but also give workers the holidays that they should be entitled too. I am still working through the best legislative approach that takes account of those who do not already work Mondays. But as Andrew Little says in the story linked above if the provisions to make up for lost holiday entitlements appear in enough agreements this will increase the impetus for a law change. Well done to the EPMU.


Good managers don’t need an unfair law

Posted by Clare Curran on July 25th, 2010

Methodist Mission Dunedin has called on Otago’s biggest employers to make a decision not to put new workers on a 90 day trial.

The Mission wants the University of Otago, Southern District Health Board (merger of Otago and Southland) and the Dunedin City Council not to adopt the extension of  the 90-day trial period to all workplaces if it makes it through into law.

Between them they employ the majority of the Dunedin workforce.

The Mission has decided tnot to adopt the trial and the Mission’s Executive Director Laura Black said these bigger workpalces should be well enough managed to choose the right people for the right job.

The DHB CEO has said he couldn’t absolutely commit to making that decision, but he also couldn’t see the trial period being relevant to the baord.

The University said it would consider its response and the DCC said it was too early to comment.

Good on the Methodist Mission. They are calling on all large tax-payer funded organisations, many of whom work with the disadvantaged to demonstrate the quality of their management by refusing to take up this retrenchment of basic human rights.

The Methodist Mission is setting a good example for the rest of the country to follow. There’s no evidence to demand such laws. They are unfair and good managers should reject them.


Plain old fairness

Posted by Clare Curran on July 25th, 2010

I’ve been thinking a lot about the Government’s proposed new Labour laws. And why they are being introduced. There’s no evidence, other than anectodal, from employers to change the way sick days are handled. There’s no evidence of more jobs being created through the 90 day law, there’s no evidence that making it harder for unions to enter workplaces and talk to members will make workplaces more productive.

There’s no evidence that suppressing wages and working conditions for all New Zealanders who work will make New Zealand a more productive country.

In fact, there’s more evidence that shows it will make us less productive, more fearful and inhibited and less innovative.

And leaving aside the fact that it makes a complete mockery out of the “aspirational” goal to close the wages gap between NZ and Australia.

It’s basically about fairness. Lack of fairness. That’s what’s touched a cord with people. And that’s why Labour has to fight.  A strong sense of what’s fair, what’s right and decent lies at the heart of what it means to be a New Zealander. Everyone gets that.

Why then is this government making working people feel as if they’re a bunch of slackers who are taking advantage of their employers?

Why, are they deliberately changing the dynamic between employer and employee to give employers a lot more power, particularly when a worker is at their most vulnerable; starting a new job.  Why would this government be promoting insecurity and fear within our nation?

What possible benefit will this bring?


In defence of sick leave

Posted by Chris Hipkins on July 24th, 2010

This week a few wags (on both sides of the House) had a laugh at my expense as I struggled through a couple of speeches and an oral question with a pretty bad cold. Fair call, I probably would have been better to stay at home in bed rather than solider on and spread my germs around the place. But that’s the Kiwi way, isn’t it? Stay at home to recover and you’re ’soft’ and need to ‘toughen up’. If it’s good enough for Colin Meads to play on with a broken arm, surely we can put up with a bit of cold and flu?

Well actually, that’s a pretty crap attitude. Most of the time we’d be better to spend a day or two in bed, get rid of our germs, and then head back to work. That way we’d avoid spreading our bug and probably be back to full health a lot quicker. If we went to work while crook we’re probably not that productive anyway.

So why on earth does the National government feel the need to perpetuate the idea that anyone who takes a day off to get better is shirking? John Key’s suggestion that someone taking a single day of sick leave could be forced to go to their GP to get a ‘note’ is just stupid. Here in Upper Hutt it’s almost impossible to get an appointment with a GP anyway. Not content with loading them up with the burden of dishing out cold and flu pills, now John ‘the Nanny’ Key wants them to sign-off every sore throat, runny nose, or headache…