Red Alert

Archive for the ‘jobs’ Category

Upbeat about #ownourfuture

Posted by A Guest Poster on September 3rd, 2011

Jordan Carter is a Wellington-based candidate on the Labour list.

This week we announced two policies I really like: a sound position on digital copyright, and some real changes to the policies that affect young people on the way from school to work.

The youth employment announcement was the more important (I’ll leave you to wonder why it got no coverage at all in the Dominion Post or the Herald on Friday…), and is part of what we are funding through the tax policy package we announced in July. It will make a real difference for teenagers stuck without work/training or education.

I haven’t seen anyone arguing that the youth skills and employment stuff is a bad idea — praise is pretty universal, other than the odd angry Tory who has frothed that Labour is somehow stealing their policies.  Why a governing party would think an opposition was stealing its policy when said government doesn’t have any policy (just rhetoric) is beyond me, but we’ll let that rest for now too.

These join earlier policy announcements on the cost of living (tax free zone and GST off fresh fruit and veg) and the land sales initiatives we announced last year, to start to give a flavour of where Labour is heading with policy in this year’s election:
•    focusing on the issues that will make a real difference to people in building their futures here
•    tackling really hard and big choices in the interests of New Zealand’s development
•    arguing that in tough economic times, we have to respond by investing in the things that will leave us ready to grow when times improve

They’re summed up with the theme that Phil Goff launched our tax policy with: Own Our Future.

That isn’t a slogan plucked from the air. It is a simple distillation about what many of us Kiwis want to see for the country: a place where we control our own destiny, and where the big picture of economic and social development is happening in our interests, not in the interests of landlords who live somewhere else and to whom we are all mere economic units.

That sense of ownership, of control, of self-determination, is critical to our sense of dignity and self-worth, actually, and it tugs deep at the heartstrings of most New Zealanders.  People know that we’re on the edge a bit, and that carrying on down the track of not saving enough, of selling ourselves out to the highest bidder, isn’t the way to build a future here.

I can’t remember if I have quoted him before, but there’s a snippet from Allen Curnow (a Kiwi poet, for those who don’t know) from his 1943 sonnet “The Skeleton of the Great Moa in the Canterbury Museum, Christchurch” that sums this feeling up:

Not I, some child, born in a marvellous year
Will learn the trick of standing upright here.

Curnow was lamenting the Moa’s inability to adapt to the arrival of people on these islands of ours.

I’m not lamenting anything: I’m demanding something — that we make that dream of standing on our own two feet in the world something real, something tangible.  That we have a government that believes in it, rather than one which believes it is impossible.


Let’s back jobs for young Kiwis

Posted by Chris Hipkins on September 2nd, 2011

Yesterday Labour launched our Youth Skills policy. Jacinda did an excellent post on the details just after it went public. If you live in Wellington and missed it in the DomPost this morning, look again. You’ll see all the salient details comprehensively covered in the news brief below and to the left of the quarter page article and photo espousing John Key’s babysitting and travel companion potential.

There is a certain symmetry to Labour launching a policy to get young Kiwis into work on the same day the National government signed off on a deal to buy a bunch of new electric trains for Auckland from overseas, rather than build them locally here in New Zealand. I think it’s great that Auckland are getting much needed investment in their public transport infrastructure, but why aren’t we cashing in the potential to create somewhere around 1,000 new jobs and add up to $250 million to our GDP?

The link between these two announcements actually runs a lot deeper than highlighting the contrast between Labour, who want to create local jobs, and National, who want to export them overseas. When I speak to a lot of the tradespeople in my electorate, I’m reminded just how many of them did their apprenticeships at the railway workshops, the post office, the car assembly plants, or the freezing works. With the exception of the railway workshops, that now employs a fraction of the staff it once did, all of those big employers are gone.

Those tradespeople are now sole traders or work largely in firms that employ fewer than 10 people. Taking on an apprentice is something they’re more than happy to do. They learned their trade on the job and they’re more than happy to give future generations the same chance. But it’s a huge commitment financially and a lot to ask of such small businesses. That’s why I know they’ll welcome Labour’s plan to convert the dole into apprenticeships subsidies.

A lot of people have remarked to me in the past how crazy it is we pay a young person to sit at home on the dole but we won’t provide some financial support to those willing to take them on and train them up. Well Labour is going to do something about that. Our Youth Skills policy is one that I’m very proud to campaign on. Our plan to get thousands of young Kiwis into work, education and training is in marked contrast to National’s plan to give a couple of hundred young beneficiaries a pre-pay purchase card.

So while baby-sitter John devotes his time to worrying about how young people spend their pocket money, Labour is focused on providing them with a meaningful vocation and hope for the future. Oh, what was that about nanny state again…?


National Putting Kiwis out of Work

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 27th, 2011

When MAF made the announcement of the loss of 241 positions, that will end up putting 144 people out of work, it was a continuation of this government’s policy of putting more than 1500 people out of work in the public service. In my media release I made the point that those put out of work are real people with families and themselves to look out for.

That hit home to me yesterday when the daughter of one of the women who found out she was losing her job visited me in my electorate office yesterday. She was upset. Her mother is in her early 60s, and faces the prospect of trying to find work in an environment where jobs are few and far between especially for someone of her age. She has written a letter to John Key. She asked me if I thought he would actually get to read it. I said I didn’t know, but I want to make sure people get to know the real impact of losing jobs. Here are some extracts from the letter.

My mother who raised her children on her own and started work part time when my younger brother started school has worked her guts out for her family and paid tax to a government that has basically shitted on her.

She also lives on her own in a small privately rented one bedroom flat. Now faced with unemployment and the prospect of having to move out of the flat that she will no longer be able to afford and go on the unemployment benefit and move into a state flat.

The reality is employers are not looking for workers of her age the the prospect of her getting a decent paying job is very slim. This has terrified her and she is in turmoil and worry about her future something that a woman of her age does not need in her life. My mother is a loving and vibrant woman who now seems depressed and anxious.

I know from talking with other people facing the same issues that she is not alone. People in this country continue to struggle to buy food and clothe their children or themselves.

Cutting the public service is not the answer. People’s livelihoods depend on their jobs and the retail sector depends on people spending their money. This government should be creating jobs which I do not see them doing. When cutting budgets and jobs is the only method a government has to reduce debt that government will not survive in an election.

She goes on in the letter to talk about some of her personal circumstances which I won’t put in the public arena. But the reason she wrote was not for herself, but for her mother. Its a real story about the real impact of unemployment, and I think it deserves to be heard.


Benefit Card- Priceless

Posted by Grant Robertson on August 27th, 2011

Short, to the point, worth a watch. “Some governments actually set out to reduce unemployment, for everything else, there’s Benefit Card”.


Today

Posted by Clare Curran on August 22nd, 2011

A man came to see me. He was laid off a few weeks ago. He’s a mechanical engineer. Highly skilled. He has five children.

His wife has  cancer. Inoperable cancer.

He was chosen for redundancy. Involuntary. Along with others. He thinks probably because of his outspokenness.

He can’t pay his power bill this month.

There are no jobs. He needs to stay in Dunedin for his wife’s treatment. Meanwhile, she has been forced to work part time to keep food on the table.

This man was a valuable contributing member of our society. He paid taxes. His skills were worth something to our economy.

As a direct result of this government’s policies, he, and others like him, do not have jobs.

What are his options?

Yes I’m angry, because this is the reality that more people are facing each day.

And I heard today that the foodbanks in Dunedin are empty.

Dunedin is just one place where there is rampant poverty and need. But it’s where I live and these are the people I represent.


The importance of being Labour

Posted by Clare Curran on August 22nd, 2011

Have had a gutsful of the white-anting of Labour from both the right and the left of politics.

White-anting is an Australian expression. It means undermining. I lived there for 14 years, worked for the trade union movement and as a public relations professional. Proud of my time there, the work I did and the people I worked with.

I have strong enduring relationships with people across the right and left of the Labour spectrum.  In the last few days there’s been some very strong messages delivered about the importance of core Labour values. The compelling reasons for unions. And why there is a need for a strong Labour Party. And why Australia (like NZ) needs a strong manufacturing base.

All completely relevant here.

Paul Howes is the National Secretary of the Australian Workers Union. Over the weekend he sounded a strong warning that the high Australian dollar spells  the death sentence for Australia’s manufacturing export markets and for other sectors of the economy such as in-bound tourism and that diplomatic pressure should be put on on China to float the Yuan.

Today we see what he was referring to with the announcement of  1400 manufacturing jobs from BlueScope Steel in Port Kembla, south of Sydney. This is devastating.

THE loss of more than 1000 jobs at BlueScope Steel is a devastating blow for the retrenched workers and the manufacturing industry, the Australian Workers Union (AWU) says.

BlueScope confirmed today that it will shut down its number six blast furnace at Port Kembla, south of Sydney, and close its Western Port hot strip mill, east of Melbourne.

“Today’s announcement is devastating for the families of more than 1400 workers who will be feeling the trauma and distress that comes with the loss of a secure income,” AWU national secretary Paul Howes said in a statement.

It further strengthened the union’s call for action on the Chinese yuan, a robust anti-dumping system and strong local procurement policies for the resources sector, Mr Howes said.

The BlueScope closures sent a clear signal that Australian manufacturing was facing its worst crisis since the Great Depression, he said.

The Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) said Australian manufacturing was under extraordinary pressure from the booming dollar, record high terms of trade and unfair competition from illegal foreign dumping.

“Local industry is not being given a fair go to work on the mining and resource projects which are driving the dollar sky-high, AMWU national secretary Dave Oliver said in the joint statement with Mr Howes.

Australia could not just rely on mining, Mr Oliver said.

Our economies are too important for the juggernauts of China and other bigger nations to turn us into service economies.

Strong Labour policies focussing on our economic sovereignty; owning our own future are what this country needs.


Woburn. Questions

Posted by Clare Curran on August 19th, 2011

Parliament photo 2

This week Trevor Mallard and I went to visit the Woburn rail workshops in Lower Hutt.

This was after the news that there will NOT be redundancies at Woburn, despite Kiwirail announcing in June that around 20 jobs would go from the Hutt workshops. Around 10 jobs are still expected to be lost from the design team.

Meanwhile 44 jobs have gone from the Hillside Workshops in Dunedin. Skilled jobs. Jobs that shouldn’t have been cut, but have, because the government prefers to spend taxpayers money overseas purchasing rolling stock, than use Kiwi skills to build them here.

It’s good news about Woburn.

But I came away with a few unanswered questions. How come Kiwirail announced impending redundancies and then changed its mind? Because there’s too much work at Woburn and they can’t afford to lose any staff. Why is there so much work?

That’s a good question. Especially since there’s supposedly a bunch of new Chinese locos being commissioned.

Why is it taking so long to commission the new DL Chinese locos? That’s another good question. I’ve got a few more.

I’ll be asking Kiwirail for the answers.


Young people need jobs, not welfare reform

Posted by Jacinda Ardern on August 14th, 2011

This afternoon John Key delivered the closing address at the National Party conference.  Perhaps my expectations were a little too high- but after calls from across the spectrum (including the business community) for Key to present the country with his plan for economic growth, I didn’t expect a speech as narrowly and as poorly focused as this.

First a little context. Currently youth unemployment for 15 to 19 year olds is the highest on record and we have one of the highest proportions of youth to adult unemployment in the OECD.  None of this is new, in fact this is the Government’s third attempt at a youth unemployment package. But surely, when you have 58,000 young people not in employment, training or education, you start looking at a comprehensive education, transition, skills training and job creation package. Surely? Apparently not when there are a small group of young people on a benefit that can be targeted instead.

While John Key has finally acknowledged the youth transition issues we have been raising, this element has been lost amongst his much bigger announcement that the roughly 1600 young people on the independent youth benefit will face new restrictions on how their benefit is managed. Key put it like this:

“We are not going to simply hand over benefit money every fortnight. Instead, we will have a much more managed system of payments… We envisage that:  some essential costs, like rent and power, will be paid directly on the young person’s behalf; money for basic living costs like food and groceries will be loaded onto a payment card that can only be used to buy certain types of goods and cannot be used to buy things like alcohol or cigarettes; and that a certain, limited amount will be available for the young person to spend at their own discretion……Most importantly, each of these young people will have to be in education, training or work-based learning.”

A couple of points need to be made in response. First, the threshold for this benefit is extremely high. You have to demonstrate a breakdown in your home environment, and you have to be in education or be actively seeking work or a place in training.  Secondly, it’s already illegal to buy alcohol and cigarettes if you are on the independent youth benefit simply by virtue of your age. And finally, if the biggest issue is that these kids are vulnerable, and that they need to be in training, education or need help finding work- how does cracking down on how they spend their $167.83 per week achieve any of that?

The way I see it, this is the crux of the issue- young people want to work, but the jobs aren’t there. In fact when National came into Government, there were roughly 220 young people who had been trying to find work and had been on an unemployment for more than a year. Now that number is 8 times higher. If we want to make a real difference, we need to respond with a decent plan, not food stamps.


The fight to keep Kiwi rail workshops alive

Posted by Clare Curran on August 9th, 2011

Hillside petition 9

Hillside petition 5

Today nearly 14,000 signatures were presented to me at parliament  in a petition calling on the government to retain the Hillside and Woburn rail Workshops.

They represent more than a quarter of Dunedin’s households. The petition was put together in a pretty short time frame. The loss of jobs at Hillside and Woburn cuts deep into our Kiwi ethos. The rail workshops are an important manufacturing base for our country.

This government doesn’t care about that and would rather spend taxpayers money overseas purchasing rolling stock, than use Kiwi skills to build them here.

This government will not do an analysis of the economic benefits of spending our money inside our economy, because they know they’ll be proven wrong. So they keep the real figures secret and make them up.

I challenge Steven Joyce to release the bid costings on the rail wagons contract bids. Was Kiwirail 3rd our of 9 bids? If so what was the cost differential and how was it measured.  And why can they not factor in the economic benefits to our economy.

Our trading partners do.

Now if the time to be investing in our economy. In our skills. Losing this industry is a tragedy for our country.

Labour will fight. And our policy will use major government contracts to back New Zealand firms instead of exporting jobs offshore.

Here’s what the union representing these workers said today.

13,854 Kiwis want to save Hillside and Hutt rail workshops

Lower Hutt rail workers whose jobs are at risk say the government needs to listen to the 12,000 people have signed a petition calling for trains to be made at home.

The workers’ petition was presented to Dunedin South MP Clare Curran at Parliament a short time ago by workers from Hillside and Hutt rail Workshops. Clare Curran was flanked at Parliament by Green Party Transport Spokesperson Gareth Hughes

“Up to 30 positions at Lower Hutt’s workshop are now at risk.  This follows the redundancies of 44 Dunedin workers last month, both a result of KiwiRail purchasing rail rolling stock and electric units overseas” said Wayne Butson.

“This was despite a comprehensive BERL report for Chambers of Commerce, unions and local government, proving the case for a local build,” he said.

“This followed 40 Diesel Locomotives for the North Island being ordered and built in China, and making matters worse, the job for 600 new container flat top wagons also went to an overseas firm.”

(more…)


Tell it to the Hillside workers

Posted by Clare Curran on July 31st, 2011

A extraordinary story in today’s Sunday Star Times said that despite the ongoing job losses being faced by so many New Zealanders;

the nation remains positive and laid-off Kiwis don’t blame government, with National seen as coping in tough times.

Rising unemployment has not hurt Prime Minister John Key in the polls, and even those sent to the dole queue are unwilling to blame the National government for their woes.

I think if the SST had made it as far as Dunedin, they would have found a different set of views.

The 44 Hillside workers made redundant 10 days ago know whose policies have left them on the dole. Left Dunedin without skilled labour. Is destroying a valuable industry.

And I reckon if the SST had dug a bit deeper they’d find plenty of people throughout New Zealand who are pretty clear that it’s the National Government’s policies that have left them without jobs, without the ability to put food on the table.

Without a future.

Labour wouldn’t let that happen.


CYF frontline cuts widen

Posted by A Guest Poster on July 27th, 2011
 
Dr David Clark is the Labour candidate for Dunedin North
 
 I have received further detail of significant cuts to Child, Youth and Family services across Otago and Southland.

The information corroborates my original sources and confirms that cuts are occurring to child care and protection services in more South Island communities than previously thought.

New sources tell me that in Dunedin one frontline supervisor position has been halved and two social worker positions have been cut, plus one family group conference co-ordinator, one administrator and one social work resource assistant position.

That is a total of five and half positions in Dunedin alone delivering or supporting frontline services in our region.

In Otago, two social worker positions and one supervisor position have been cut affecting services in Oamaru, Alexandra, Gore and Balclutha. In Invercargill, at least two social workers and one supervisor position have been cut.

These are reductions in essential services. Services that provide the opportunity for a young person to turn their life around, for a family in distress to get the support they need, for a child in harm’s way to get the care and protection they deserve.

These cuts clearly indicate that frontline social work in Otago and Southland is being hollowed out while National repeatedly claims to be improving public services and moving resources to the frontline.

Is the Minister for Social Development aware that, contrary to the Government’s stated commitment to putting more workers on the frontline, the reverse is happening, that frontline staff are being cut at Child, Youth and Family?

Is the Minister aware that Child, Youth and Family’s head office is claiming: ‘There are no staffing cuts to the organisation. No cuts are being made. No staff member is losing their job’*?

In light of the new detail on reductions in Otago and Southland services, I have lodged a further Official Information Request to get past the smokescreen from head office to the truth of the situation – that deep cuts are being made to already stretched services in the South.

I would be the first to congratulate the Minister if the staffing cuts reflected a significant reduction in the number of children and families needing protection and support. Regrettably, that would be a naive assumption.

Child, Youth and Family is that vital line between hope and despair, between giving a child refuge from neglect and abuse and turning our back on the plight of the defenceless. 

 * Source: CYF manager of public affairs Bernadine MacKenzie, quoted in Otago Daily Times on 21 July 2011.


Dunedin cuts – CYF spindoctors stretch truth

Posted by A Guest Poster on July 26th, 2011

Dr David Clark is the Labour candidate for Dunedin North

My previous posts about the cuts to frontline child protection services in Dunedin have attracted a response.  Unfortunately the response is clearly the work of CYF’s spindoctors.

I am saddened to see CYF dodge questions regarding front line job-cuts in Dunedin.  The CYF spokesperson describes Otago and Southland as having “more social workers per caseload” than other areas, and talks about deciding whether vacated positions will be filled – according to workload in the region.

This is classic doublespeak.  As positions are vacated in Otago and Southland, they are not being replaced; a straight shooter would call this job-cuts.  Frontline positions are being axed. Vulnerable children are at risk.

Tragically, need for CYF services is in high demand.  Our stagnant economy has put increased pressure on Dunedin families.  Can CYF confirm they have as many front line staff in Dunedin now as they had a year ago?  Or better still, provide credible evidence that our most vulnerable children are no longer at risk?  Of course they can’t.  This makes me angry.  Under National’s direction, CYF are spending money on spindoctors.  That money should be spent on staff at the coal-face.


Kiwi jobs, Kiwi skills, Kiwi industries: Labour invests

Posted by Clare Curran on July 21st, 2011

A Labour Government will use major government contracts to back NZ firms instead of exporting jobs offshore.

We want people to stay in New Zealand and develop and use their skills. We want industries that are productive. And a Labour Government will invest in that.

Phil Goff announced Labour’s new procurement policy in Dunedin last night coinciding with the grim news of 18 forced redundancies at Hillside Rail. Skilled jobs. Tradespeople.

44 jobs in all have been lost at Hillside. That’s a quarter of the workforce.  Possibly up to $5 million a year in lost wages, and flow on spending into the local economy.

44 families potentially on the unemployment benefit. And an industry in decline, rather than in growth. All because of a stupid government policy that doesn’t match the policies of almost every other developed economy. The US, Japan, Australia to name a few. And developing ones.

Labour’s new policy will require companies like Kiwirail to consider wider economic benefits when making decisions about contracts, rather than a narrow accounting approach.

Kiwi firms deserve the right to bid for large govt contracts without being locked out on the basis of lowest price.

Government departments and agencies will be required to undertake a wider (economic) analysis of the impact of its preferred provider on the domestic economy, rather than a narrower (financial) analysis when making procurement decisions.

And have an apprenticeship/internship programme in place for NZ workers.

That’s for starters. For the whole policy see here

And for what other countries are doing see here

If New Zealand is to achieve its goal of closing the gap in wages and economic growth with Australia, we need policies that demonstrate a commitment to our economic development. Traditional manufacturing and “making” industries.

New industries. New technology. High tech. Not much commitment to that right now. This government isn’t even sure if it has a procurement policy.

Well Labour does. It’s not rocket science. It makes sense.

It’s about Kiwi jobs, Kiwi skills and Kiwi industries. It’s about our future. Owning our future.


Says it all really

Posted by Clare Curran on July 20th, 2011

Awards_copy3

Source: ODT Saturday 16 July 2011  Tremain


John Key and Steven Joyce: Are you blind or something?

Posted by Clare Curran on July 20th, 2011

Two new developments in countries which are committed to investing in their own local rail industries. Read these extracts carefully, because it shows governments that understand the importance of the local industry. Why doesn’t ours?

In Australia last week:

The rail industry is gearing up for a richer, fairer and greener future, driven by strategies that will be informed by a recent report into the industry’s current state of play.

Launching the report Railway Manufacturing Industry – A Profile of the Rail Manufacturing Industry in Australia, Innovation Minister Senator Kim Carr said understanding the size, scale and structure of the rail industry was essential if the Government was to develop successful strategies to secure the industry’s future.

“The report, prepared by ACIL Tasman, shows that in 2008-09, the rail manufacturing industry comprised more than 330 firms, employed more than 15,000 Australians, generated $4.2 billion annual revenue and added $1.6 billion to the Australian economy annually,” Senator Carr said.

“This demonstrates just how substantial the national contribution of the Australian railway manufacturing industry is in terms of investment, jobs, skills and innovation. It is a diverse sector, with a wide-range of skill sets across Australia, particularly in regional areas.

In South Africa in April:

Addressing a well-attended meeting in Gauteng on 5 April, transport minister Sibusiso Ndebele announced an impressive programme to procure new rolling stock for the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa). To be rolled out over 18 years, the declared aim is to reposition rail as the “backbone” of public transport.

A feasibility study is in hand; the results are to be submitted for cabinet approval as soon as it is complete.

Prasa CEO Tshepo Lucky Montana emphasised that the R25 billion provided by the state in recent years merely “stabilised” the business – in decline due to years of under-investment and neglect. But Ndebele stressed that the government does not have the sort of money needed – in excess of R90 billion: “Therefore, a significant and sustained commitment from local and international financiers will be required to complete the rolling stock renewal programme.”

The proposed upgrade cannot be postponed, Montana warned. Without it, the railway could “collapse” in less than 10 years.

According to the minister, the government is committed to striking a “delicate balance” between the trains it needs and
the commercial interests of financiers and rolling stock manufacturers. The procurement process is seen as hinging on the injection of private finance ahead of March 2012, when work is to begin on selecting a preferred bidder – to be announced by August and confirmed in September. This is in the hands of an interdepartmental task team drawn from the Departments of Transport, Trade and Industry and Public Enterprises, as well as the National Treasury,

The meeting on 5 April was set up to gauge the interest of local and foreign manufacturers and financiers in the proposed rolling stock acquisition plans.

According to Prasa’s Piet Sobola, it is hoped to have the first of 6,600 new coaches to be in use during 2015, followed by deliveries continuing until 2030. Of these, 4,600 will comprise commuter rolling stock for Metrorail. The remaining 2,000 will be for Shosholoza Meyl’s intercity fleet.

A 65% minimum level of local content is to be a precondition. The market engagement process will seek to gauge the technology and financing options available “within South African ownership and infrastructure constraints”.

The NZ Rail Maritime Transport Union’s Wayne Butson said that the successful tender for Auckland’s Electric Multiple Units is due to be announced within weeks, and the RMTU would be watching very closely to see whether KiwiRail honoured the local involvement pledge it made during the tender process.

I have an inkling there will be a few crumbs tossed towards local NZ  procurement to shut us all up.

I doubt it’ll be targeted at Dunedin’s rail workshops though. And I doubt it will show a serious commitment to the local rail industry

Hat tip: RMTU


Cuts make lie of National’s promise not to cut front line services.

Posted by A Guest Poster on July 20th, 2011

Apologies to David Clark, labour’s candidate for Dunedin North. I accidently posted this under my name not his. Clare

Cuts of up to 30 front line staff at Child, Youth and Family make a lie of National’s promise not to cut front line services.

Our community, our children deserve better. We cannot stand by and let these cuts occur.

In April, Bill English said National was ‘committed to moving resources from the back office to the frontline so we can deliver improved public services to taxpayers with little or no new money over the next few years’. *

Questions:

  • How is reducing the number of frontline social workers in Dunedin “moving resources to the frontline”?
  • How is making highly trained social workers redundant who support and protect our most vulnerable children going to “deliver improved public services to taxpayers”?

The Government needs to honour its promise to retain front line services. All New Zealanders should demand that the Government reverse this appalling decision.

* [Source: Minister of Finance press release, “Room for savings in state sector back office” dated 13 April 2011]


Children at risk as Government axes frontline CYF staff

Posted by A Guest Poster on July 20th, 2011

David Clark is the Labour candidate for Dunedin North

National is about to axe front line staff at Child, Youth and Family. Up to 30 front line jobs are to be cut from Child, Youth and Family services nationwide.

Dunedin is losing four of those positions, two frontline social workers and two front line supervisors. Cuts are also being made to Child, Youth and Family in Invercargill and on the West Coast.

Child, Youth and Family do remarkable work on behalf of the whole community to prevent child abuse and neglect, and to give families the support they need to care for their children. They provide safe, loving homes for children who need that care and they work with young people to turn their lives around.

The timing of these cuts could not be worse, as the cost of living and unemployment increases. There is growing pressure on families. These cuts are an abdication of our collective responsibility to care and protect our most vulnerable citizens, to help those who cannot speak for themselves.

The Government must reverse this appalling decision.


A compelling case for local investment

Posted by Clare Curran on July 17th, 2011

“…it is completely inappropriate for the New Zealand Government to prefer New Zealand companies over international companies. If we did, we would be a very, very small trading nation, because countries would not want to trade with us.”

So says Steven Joyce (on behalf of the Prime Minister) in response to a question by Annette King on 23 June about why the govt would not consider seriously the economic flow on effects of building railway wagons at Hillside workshops in Dunedin and Hutt workshops in Lower Hutt.

Let’s have a look at what other countries do. Many of these we trade with. And unpick the lies that Joyce and his government have been telling NZ about why they can’t possibly support Kiwi industry and Kiwi jobs when it comes to procuring big contracts.

China’s Government Procurement Law (GPL) issued in 2002 states that government agencies and entities must purchase domestic goods, works and services except in rare circumstances when:

the required items cannot be obtained within China under “reasonable commercial terms” defined as 20 per cent more expensive than foreign products.

Though the GPL provides for a wide variery of ways to procure goods and services – open and selective tendering, competitive negotiation, single-source procurement, and request for quotation – few foreign enterprises have been able to compete successfully in China’s public procurement market. For more see here

The Buy American provision in the stimulus package became law in 2009. Section 1605 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) requires that all of the iron and steel and manufactured goods used in ARRA funded projects for construction, alteration, maintenance and repair of a public building or public works be produced in the United States. For more see here

This provision can be waived under certain circumstances, only when buying American would increase by 25%, not merely for the cost for the specific input, but the cost of the total project. The differential is considered so large, that in practical terms it is unlikely that the exception would be invoked.

The Indian government allows a price preference for local suppliers in government contracts and generally discriminates against foreign suppliers. In international purchases and competitive bids, domestic companies get a price preference in govt contracts and purchases.

Although over 20 countries have signed onto the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) Agreement on General Procurement (China has not) it is scarely followed at all. This article is worth a read

Norway: the most recent statistics are from 2005. Of the USD 1.215 million procured, only 1.3% of supply, 6.9% of services and 1.3% of works contracts went to foreign companies

Japan: 98% was procured domestically in 2008.

South Korea: In 2004 (most recent data) procurement contracts were valued at USD 25 billion. Less than 1% wnt to foreign-based firms.

Australia. In June 2009 the NSW Govt released its revised govt procurement plan setting out its intention for procurement to be used to develop local industry capability and support local economic activity while achieving value for money.

It says substantial economic benefits are said to “flow from buying Australian or NZ goods and services and maximising opportunities for local service providers to compete for Govt business on the basis of value for money.”

It said value for money is about broader economic benefits and not just lowest price.

Couldn’t have put it better myself. What the hell is wrong with this National-Act government and what game are they playing with our local productive economy?


Kiwi jobs. Kiwi skills. Too important to sell overseas

Posted by Clare Curran on July 9th, 2011

Hillsiderally2

Hillsiderally1

Hillsiderally3

Some photos from today’s rally for Hillside jobs in Dunedin. (Not quite sure what I was laughing about, or what on earth Pete is doing in the second pic).

More than a thousand people turned out on a bitterly cold Saturday to voice their disgust at the government and Kiwirail’s actions and attitudes in procuring lower quality, cheaper rolling stock from overseas, rather than having it made at home. Keeping skilled workers employed, and an important manufacturing industry sustainable.

The city is united on this issue. The Mayor, the Chamber of Commerce chair, three MPs, the union, Greenpeace and a Green candidate spoke.

My message was essentially that we have to fight for our city. For Dunedin’s future. Because this government won’t. We need these jobs, we needs these skills, we need this industry and it’s economic good sense. I also read out a strong message from Phil Goff.

The government and Kiwirail are telling lies about the cost of Kiwi trains. It’s time they were unmasked.

Our country is not a corporation. And this government can’t decide that parts of our country aren’t worth bothering about because our population base is lower than other parts, and because it’s a Labour town. Dunedin will fight back.


What a week

Posted by Darien Fenton on June 24th, 2011

It’s been a full-on week.  So much happening and so many issues : Ministers in Select Committees, long debates in the House on the Telco Bill, announcements in Christchurch, the Te Tai Tokerau by-election and of course dear Alasdair. Here’s a few extra snippets from question time this week that you may not have picked up.

John Key ruled out implementing the Queensland regulatory standards for mine safety as an interim measure despite mouthing off to an Australian newspaper about Pike River and  family members of Pike River miners calling for increased mine inspection.

Paula Bennett repeated that she thinks any job is a good job, citing the example of ayoung woman, who at 52 years of age was proud to be a checkout chick”, while at the same time revealing she’s up to her neck in the government’s revisiting of youth rates.

Annette King asked the PM why he was prepared to wine, dine, chauffeur, change the law and suck up to Warner Bros to save jobs in the movie industry and now the gambling industry, but but has turned his back on hard-working railway workers who can build wagons and carriages in New Zealand and keep their jobs?  Guess what, no answer.

Kate Wilkinson told Jacinda Ardern that the government has a cogent plan, which when probed, said it was basically about building a stronger economy.  Doh.

Nick Smith told us that training workplace health and safety representatives was a “touchy feely notion”, despite his government expressing concerns about NZ’s high workplace deaths and injuries and saying employee participation in health and safety is critical.

Kate Wilkinson said she was aware that for “those people on the minimum wage we are aware budgeting is tight”, but ruled out increasing the minimum wage calling $15 an hour  ”a high minimum wage”.

David Cunliffe asked if the PM thought the public would be pleased to learn that without any mandate, his government has budgeted $6 million to spend before the election on preparing to sell assets.

Oh and I was at a dinner on Monday night where a certain Alasdair Thompson had been invited.  But that’s another story.