Red Alert

Archive for the ‘coalition management’ Category

No Country for Old Men

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 1st, 2011

no-country-for-old-men

The good thing about this weeks farce is that National’s only guaranteed coalition prospect suddenly became clearly defined in a policy sense. And National has been tied to the failed policies of the Douglas Richardson era. The policies that drove unemployment up, gutted productive industries and encouraged both ideas and people with them to leave New Zealand.

And it is exciting to watch Key, who ruled Douglas out of any Ministerial post three years ago, leave open the possibility of Bill English being fired from both of this roles and them being gifted to Brash. Double Dipton should of course be fired but for a different set of reasons. 92% of punters hate the thought.

Keep those posters flowing in.


A Brash reminder- on asset sales

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 1st, 2011

Brash on Asset Sales


A Brash Reminder- Iraq

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 30th, 2011

Brash on Iraq War


Don Brash and Peter Dunne- Lest We Forget

Posted by Grant Robertson on April 29th, 2011

NZH
Its been fascinating to hear Peter Dunne’s strident condemnation of a Don Brash led ACT Party in the last few days.

“Don Brash is a rigid right-wing ideologue – give him influence and a hand on power and watch the New Zealand we know become a harsher, more brutal place,” Mr Dunne said.

I could not agree more. But could this be the same Peter Dunne who in 2005 was part of a slightly odd photo opportunity (pictured above), that “cleared the way” for a coalition between Mr Dunne’s United Future Party and the Dr Brash led National Party. Surely not.

Alas yes. Peter Dunne really is the Groucho Marx of NZ Politics. ” Those are my principles, and if you don’t like them, well, I have others.”

PS If you want to see the coffee date in action, it is in part four of the Hollow Men documentary, which you can find here


Hone has the right to criticise his leadership

Posted by Trevor Mallard on January 23rd, 2011

Not often that I find my self agreeing with Matt McCarten and Fran O’Sullivan at the same time. They have written from different perspectives but come to the same conclusion :- Hone Harawira has a right and possibly even a responsibility to criticise the leadership of the Maori Party for the direction they are taking.

McCarten :-

Political maturity means accepting MPs will have different opinions.

A party having a considered discussion about itself is democratic and can make it more popular.

Trying to crush alternative perspectives will have the opposite effect.

O’Sullivan :-

Backbench MPs are not subject to Cabinet collective responsibility. They should be able to articulate their views on major issues and challenge the powers that be. Trouble is, far too many of today’s crop leave any pretence to owning an independent brain outside the door when they enter Parliament.

and

Harawira is made of sterner stuff. But there has also been a sea change, which I put down to the journalistic tendency to quickly put any backbench MP on to the “must be dumped from caucus’ slipway” when they call their own party to account.

Instead of greasing the ramp, why don’t journalists simply challenge the leadership to respond to the valid points Harawira has made?

Publicly opposing the leadership of your party is never easy. But there are plenty of precedents, more from Westminster than here but can and should still be done.

The process is pretty clear. One resigns from portfolios and shifts to the backbench. One talks it through with the leader and then caucus. And one is honest and straightforward – not the Carter approach.

We don’t have a real tradition of this sort of approach – Muldoon, Minogue, Waring, Anderton, Upton, Lee. Being a small Parliament doesn’t help. And the increased power that has gone to the party and the leadership with MMP hasn’t helped either.

But I do agree with McCarten and O’Sullivan that it is an important part of a democracy that, in the end, MPs have the right to go public with their concerns.

Lots of colleagues disagree. I refer readers to the box at the top right.

And to make it clear to trolls again – I believe Phil Goff is the only person in our caucus who can lead a government this year – and that this post is about MPs right to express their views – nothing wider.


Key forgets about US FTA as he reduces worker protection for Warner Bros.

Posted by Trevor Mallard on October 31st, 2010

When I was Minister of Labour we signed up to two big trade deals China and P4 (NZ, Chile, Singapore and Brunei.

Both pretty big deals – the associated memoranda were designed to protect us from undercutting – the competitive race to the bottom of the wage/skills spectrum. CTU and Business NZ both played a positive role because they saw our future heading up that spectrum.

Since then both organisations have been supportive of the work both governments have been doing on a NZ/US FTA. The CTU have worked with the AFLCIO whose support will be vital especially but not only for Democrat members of the house who must approve any agreement or at least give the President permission to negotiate with particular conditions. And Democrats and US unions don’t naturally support free trade. Nor for that matter do a significant proportion of Republicans.

The Memorandum of Understanding between China and New Zealand is very clear :-

4. The Parties recognise that it is inappropriate to encourage trade or investment by weakening or reducing the protections afforded in domestic labour laws, regulations, policies and practices.

As is the P4 Memorandum of Understanding

5. The Parties recognise that it is inappropriate to set or use their labour laws, regulations, policies and practices for trade protectionist purposes.

6. The Parties recognise that it is inappropriate to encourage trade or investment by weakening or reducing the protections afforded in domestic labour laws.

The important point for this blog is that it is inappropriate to reduce protections to encourage investment.

Which is exactly what the government did in order to secure the Warners Hobbit investment.

I don’t think it is likely that anyone will take a case against us – but one thing is for certain, any plans we had to work with the AFLCIO towards a US free trade deal died when Key gave Warners the pen on our industrial relations legislation.


John Key is just another politician

Posted by David Parker on September 18th, 2010

So, as others have noted, our Prime Minister John Key has said he thinks Rodney Hide has handled the David Garrett fiasco well. The Herald reports John Key said Hide “has shown very good judgment” and has his full support.

No-one else believes that, so what is going on?

In my opinion, it shows John Key to be just another politician.

It pains me to use that phrase, because it demeans all politicians and our parliamentary democracy.

Sometimes the mistakes made by MPs in any party reflect so poorly on the institution of parliament and MPs that most New Zealanders think less of us as a group and have less confidence in our democracy. Most MPs feel a degree of shame when this happens.   This week’s events are a case in point. It is not so much what David Garrett did many years ago, as the deception and hypocrisy by ACT since.  The public are right to feel misled and distrustful.

So when John Key says he stands by Rodney Hide and ACT’s handling of this, I feel let down by my Prime Minister. I do expect him to uphold the integrity of Parliament. He has not.

Rodney Hide has lost any shred of the moral authority that a Minister needs to maintain the confidence of a Prime Minister.

Now, I am not calling John Key dishonest or corrupt. But he trades on being different. On not being like other politicians. Yet, he so plainly is. The litany of bad mistakes he has tolerated in order to maintain his hold on power is long enough to make the conclusion that he is no higher being.  I won’t list them all but they include:

  • Allowing Hide to criticise National as being weak, lazy and easy to manipulate
  • Giving Hide more rope when the perk buster was busted on his ministerial perks
  • Letting Hide choose Boscawen (an MP with less than 2 years experience) to take over Roy’s portfolio in his Government when Hide and Key both said she had performed well as a Minister and it was clear what was going down was an internal implosion caused in no small part by Rodney Hide’s bullying and other mistakes
  • Allowing  Bill English to stay on as Deputy PM and Minister of Finance after changing accommodation expense rules to profit himself (or his family trust)
  • Brushing over Phil Heatley’s abuses of his Ministerial privileges

Add to that the latest errors of judgment by Hide and ACT, which have exposed ACT to ridicule and irrefutable allegations of hypocrisy and poor judgment.  John Key’s response, to back Rodney Hide and express confidence in him, shows he is in no special category of politician.

What should the leader of our country have done, you ask?  Well, Phil Goff called it correctly.  John Key should have stripped ACT of all its ministerial warrants. They are scandal ridden and unworthy.

After less than two years into its first, and I hope only,  term John Key’s government is tainted by disrepute.  John Key is the leader of that government. The Prime Minister’s own brand is tarnished.

John Key has stopped walking alongside New Zealanders. They know Key is wrong to support Hide and ACT. He is just another politician.


Key Backs Hide, But Not Even Hide is Backing Hide

Posted by Grant Robertson on September 18th, 2010

Key Backs Hide is the headline of the story on the NZ Herald website.

Prime Minister John Key says ACT leader Rodney Hide has shown good judgment and has his full support following the resignation of disgraced MP David Garrett from the party.

The ridiculous thing about that statement is that not even Rodney Hide thinks he has shown good judgement here. He said as much at his press conference. The reality is that Rodney is the person who decided that it was ok for Garrett to be the Sensible Sentencing Trust’s person in the ACT Caucus despite knowing of his conviction and his bizarre and creepy plot. Rodney was the one who was happy for it not to become public. Rodney was the one who made him law and order spokesperson. Good judgement is in short supply in this case.

Rodney Hide and ACT’s days are numbered. John Key knows that, but he needs Hide to keep his government going. Its a messy place to be.


Hide wins Act loses – perfect result for centre left?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 21st, 2010

There will be lots of analysis over the weekend of  Act’s week.

Yet to see any acknowledement  in mainstream media (or whaleoil, penguin press or the standard) for Red Alert being the first media to foreshadow Roy’s demise. Maybe they don’t like admitting being off the pace.

The Herald has three stories. I think John Armstrong’s column is pretty good.

So Rodney Hide ends the most calamitous week in his party’s history having won (at least for the time being) the debilitating power struggle that has been consuming the Act caucus and the wider party for months.

But at dreadful cost. This is the most pyrrhic of victories – a variant on the old Vietnam war adage of having to destroy the village in order to save it.

In conspiring to oust Heather Roy from the deputy leadership, Hide may well have destroyed Act not only as a parliamentary force, but also wrecked its capacity to resurrect itself

and :-

For many members, the attraction of Act has been as the party of ideas and ideals, not personality. Or the kind of pragmatism that many members see as compromising too much in National’s favour.

At the party’s annual conference this year, both Roy and Douglas argued strongly for Act to get out of the shadow cast by National.

Hide – still weakened at the time over his scandalous use of ministerial perks – appeared to listen.

He delivered stinging criticism of National’s emissions trading scheme, National’s endorsement of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Waikato River treaty settlement.

Then he stopped

There are small stories on Act minor players. Peter Tashkoff who is 2 off being an MP confirms Hide is not a worthy leader and there is the familiar tactic of blame the staff being used to finger Roy’s advisor Simon Ewing-Jarvie.

The Dompost has a similar take. Martin Kay describes the results as toxic for Act.

The chaotic and at times bizarre handling of Mrs Roy’s dumping as ACT deputy this week was “not very tidy” in the same way the disintegration of the Alliance in 2002 could be described as “a bit messy”.

Even as the fallout over her sacking reached its most toxic, with the leaking on Wednesday of her claims of Mr Hide’s shouted abuse and stormy corridor rows

Act will now have no choice but to focus on winning Epsom – the Nats are already publicly moving to the right making it easier for Labour to win back the centre ground.

Still a way to go but thanks for your help Rodney.


Red Alert first to break the news – lamington boscawen replaces roy

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 17th, 2010

2442650

At 6.29pm yesterday Red Alert was the first medium to report the impending Act firing. Loose National lips. But a good example of the new media being way ahead of the rat pack.

Boscawen’s most memorable act was to keep on talking with a lamington on his head during his pathetic Mt Albert race – look at TV3’s footage


Wednesday poll – do only boorish rednecks think Hone is racist ?

Posted by Trevor Mallard on August 12th, 2010

Harawira is at it again. The Herald reports that he has written a column repeating his view that inter-racial relationships are not desirable.

In his regular column in the Northland Age this week, Mr Harawira says it seems “some boorish redneck wants to shove his boot right down my throat” every time he speaks.

“And so it was again last week when I made a comment about how I wouldn’t feel comfortable if one of my kids came home with a Pakeha for a date. But what was wrong with that?

Hone Harawira thinks Maori girls shouldn't go out with Pakeha boys

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Key’s lie puts free trade deal down US agenda

Posted by Trevor Mallard on July 31st, 2010

I don’t agree with her emphasis but Fran O’Sullivan has highlighted a less obvious outcome of John Key’s employment relations reform.

Helen Kelly last year initiated contact between Tim Groser, the Nact Trade Minister, and Richard Trumka, President of the AFL-CIO, in an attempt (and in itself a risk on Kelly’s part) to get the US union support necessary for a free trade deal through congress and to push it up the Obama agenda.

Trumka, who is not a natural supporter of free trade, agreed to visit NZ and talk with unionists as well as politicians.

Kelly’s intervention was based on a fairly co-operative arrangement with the Key government, involving a large degree of trust. It resulted from some undertakings – especially relating to consultation.

Key broke his word, co-operation finished and Trumka was told that the positive working relationship no longer existed and he pulled the pin on the visit.

Nice one John.  Just to be seen to give wage and salary earners a bit of a kicking at your party conference.


Wayne Mapp Red Alert fan

Posted by Trevor Mallard on June 2nd, 2010

Quick post from Select Committee.

I have long suspected that Ministers are helping drive up Red Alert page views.  A couple have told me that they have got better information on some issues involving colleagues from this site than from the colleagues concerned.

Wayne Mapp in his primary statement to the Education and Science Committee Estimates hearing today refered to Red Alert as a source document that informed him.

Onya Wayne.


Good on you Hone

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 20th, 2010

I’ve known Hone Harawira for about a decade. Classic case of where one should judge an individual and not the family.

He did great work with a kura in his home patch. Chaired the board. They had some financial issues and there were some honest but unusual approaches. Always done in the interest of kids but sometimes caused trouble with the Ministry.

I always knew where he stood.

Still the case. Don’t always agree with him but never in doubt as to his views. That is one of the things about being an MP, you are elected exresssing opinions and while it is good to develop and learn it is also important not to pretend that you agree with things when they are rubbish.

Hone made it clear last night that he agrees with the Labour Party that putting up GST is an attack on the poor.

It is happenning so John Key and people of similar wealth and income can get a tax cut of over $1,000 a week.

Some loopholes in property taxation law are being closed to neutralise the effects and finance some softening for low income earners.

But the real benefits are not going to the core National supporters who earn $70 – $120k  – but to Key’s very high income mates.

I think the Nats will regret changing the top rate rather than doing a big increase to the threshold.

Because as Hone says it is poor people Maori and Pakeha who will finance the tax cuts for the rich. And thats not the Kiwi way.


What caused John to stop smiling and wave one finger at Tuhoe

Posted by Trevor Mallard on May 12th, 2010

Helen Clark and Michael Cullen were sometimes criticised for taking a bit of time to make big decisions. They sometimes resorted to seeking more advice, getting more reports, asking for further options.

Some people got frustrated with them – but most were ok because they knew that once either of them gave their word they would stick to it.

John Key may learn from the Tuhoe experience that you can’t just say yes to everybody.

Being the nice guy might work for a while but letting some grumpy national party delegates or a focus group turn you into a liar doesn’t do much for your integrity John.


Student association abolition bill

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 28th, 2010

Spent part of the morning hearing submissions on Roger Douglas’ bill.

Brief comment from Sir Roger – written not that coherant. coherent.

Then brilliant submission with high quality supporting material from NZUSA. Legal opinions on Bill of Rights issues and a PWC report which makes it clear that university fees will have to go up by much more than the student association fees mainly because of the large voluntary input in associations.

Good supporting submission from VUWSA – challenged by a couple of nats on committee but they ended up looking like they wished they had read the submission before they asked questions.

Dr Ian Murphy talked about the role of University Sport NZ and how it would be fatally wounded by the inevitable withdrawal of association funding. A significant proportion of our high performance sportspeople are students and international university games are part of their pathways.

This bill is a clear case of an old failed ideology coming up against facts and a pragmatic approach.

Unfortunately I think some of the committee members closed their minds before they entered the room.

Off to electorate engagement so Grant gets to listen to the right wing submissions.


Spot the irony

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 22nd, 2010

In two weeks the Maori Party will vote for a very silly bill to take GST off “Healthy Food”

Just imagine trying to define that. And how much of each we are allowed each hour/day/week before GST kicks in. And the army of inspectors to check the food. And the increase in GST or other tax to cover the diff.

And then two weeks after that the Maori Party will vote to increase GST on healthy foods to 15%.

Hypocrites.

Update Link to press statment which makes it clear that white bread, all cheese and fruit in sugar syrup are all healthy foods according to the Maori Party. Thanks prickles

Update II Deep fried potatos and kumera both defined as healthy (all vegetables)

Update III  Deep fried chicken also a healthy food according to the Maori Party


Weird Night

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 21st, 2010

Voted twice with National Party on Labour Relations members’ bills.

First to support Tau Henare’s bill to require secret ballots for strikes. Already part of the rules for the vast majority of unions. And a good opportunity to set up a system for ensuring proper process before employers lock workers out.

Secondly to oppose the Act bill to cut wages for young people.

Some very good speeches, Tau Henare on his bill, Jacinda Ardern on youth rates were the highlights for me.


The standard exposes nact on three strikes

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 20th, 2010

The official advice on the three strikes legislation indicated it could lead to an increase in homicides.

Good work The Standard.


John smiles and waves – he is off – whanau ora is on.

Posted by Trevor Mallard on April 8th, 2010

Anyone who thinks  Key leaving the country for the whanau ora announcement is a co-incidence can’t spell Crosby Textor.

Having pay the Bill English sit by Tariana to announce it must be part of the deal for not paying back the cash he got from pretending Dipton is his primary place of  residence.

While I’m sure we can do better in involving community organisations in service delivery, it is no secret that I am more cynical than many about Tariana’s understanding of the role of a Minister, the limits and the ethics involved. There were some public and some not public examples of her going well over the line of what is acceptable when she was a Labour Minister. Poor Steve Maharey had to watch her very carefully and I got called in to prevent a couple of messes she was trying to set up. More like whanau tahi – her whanau tahi – in those days.

The Standard has an analysis of the report – I haven’t read it.

Not sure if JT helped the cause much with his admission in the Herald this morning he had spent $20m supposedly held in trust in anticipation of getting a cut of  Aunty Tari’s $1 b.  And he is complaining because officials are following proper processes.

And the timing wasn’t flash in Wellington with a battle royale going on around allegations of missing health funding from a runanga contracting to the DHB.

But the big lesson about not mixing contracting and political favours in NZ’s recent history is the way Bill Birch and Tau Henare set up the contract for Donna Awatere’s Pipi Foundation. She ended up in jail. They made decisions politicians shouldn’t have.

So will Tariana.  And while there will some waving there won’t be much smiling.