Red Alert

Author Archive

In case you haven’t been to Nelson recently

Posted by Maryan Street on December 1st, 2010

Like Trevor, I love being in the electorate (yes, List MPs do take constituency responsibilities seriously) in recess. Monday and Tuesday were great days with the following as examples -

  • Victory Village celebration of Families Commission report showing what a success they are
  • Speak Out Nelson Tasman launch – new system encouraging people to speak out about racist treatment they receive at the hands of the benighted
  • Meeting with Te Korowai Trust about Whanau Ora delivery – great work for those in greatest need
  • Gifting of a wonderful Goldie portrait of a local iwi ancestor to the Nelson Museum
  • Meeting with the Nelson Environment Centre – the most enduring one in the country, now 30 years old
  • An Early Learning Centre – scared they won’t get CPI adjustments next year from this wretched government which sees the cost of everything and the value of nothing
  • Nelson Tasman Chamber of Commerce Women’s network meeting – we make more noise than the blokes!

It’s all on in Nelson!

And just in case you haven’t been to Nelson recently and have the impression it is a quiet, sunny retirement village at the top of the South Island, have a look at this pic taken by the wonderful Martin de Ruyter of the Nelson Mail at the celebration of Victory Village’s success as noted by a recently released Families Commission research paper. This is the face of Nelson now and in the future:

 

Double thumbs up from kids (and the odd teacher) at Victory School, Nelson - photo kindly supplied by ace photographer Martin de Ruyter of the Nelson Mail

Double thumbs up from kids (and the odd teacher) at Victory School, Nelson - photo kindly supplied by ace photographer Martin de Ruyter of the Nelson Mail

Isn’t it great! Love that change……..

Tags:
Filed under: education, events

What Aung San Suu Kyi’s release means

Posted by Maryan Street on November 14th, 2010

This is what the release of Aung San Suu Kyi means to people who live in Nelson. These people are all refugees who are working hard at establishing themselves in a new country with a new language and culture. They are very politically aware and are already planning the next steps for their work in exile at bringing democracy to Burma.

 

Kyi Win Thain with family and friends at home in Nelson

Kyi Win Htain with family and friends at home in Nelson

 I had to flag a school gala today to go and visit Kyi Win and his family and friends – somehow that was the right place to be on this special day. Kyi Win Htain is a respected elder in the Burmese communities in Nelson (there is more than one Burmese community).  He is the one on the right in the front. His son is beside him and immediately behind him are his wife and daughter. Others are close friends and political comrades. They were more than happy for me to take their photo and post it. Look at those smiles!

This is the personal, deeply felt impact of Aung San Suu Kyi’s release.

And if you want to know what the Washington Post said so eloquently today in its editorial, as they do, read this.


Aung San Suu Kyi – Burma’s future

Posted by Maryan Street on November 14th, 2010

A few hours ago, Aung San Suu Kyi was released from house arrest – for the third time. Grant’s blog refers but here is the BBC feed  fyi. You can also read Release_of_Aung_San_Suu_Kyi_-_Street_-_14_Nov_2010[1] which I put out a few hours ago.

This is a moment for celebration, a rare moment for Burmese people as they struggle for survival under the repressive and harsh military junta. The military seized power 22 years ago and after an election in 1990, which Aung San Suu Kyi’s party, the National League for Democracy (NLD) won overwhelmingly, they refused to hand over that power to her and the NLD.

Aung San Suu Kyi is an extraordinary person who took on the mantle of her assassinated father all those years ago. There is no doubt that she has become an international symbol of democracy and freedom, in the same way as Nelson Mandela was and remains.  She is much loved by her people.

She is the one to lead any reconciliation and movement towards democracy in Burma. Here is a really good example of the need to have a woman at the peace negotiation table (you might recall I blogged on this the other week in the wake of Hillary Clinton’s visit).  The question will be whether the junta will tolerate the increased pressure that her release is bound to elicit from the international community, or revert to its usual method of re-imprisoning her to defuse public gatherings and political association in Burma.

Today is one moment for celebration however. At least the world is now more attuned to some of what is happening in Burma. Whatever happens next, Burma’s future is inextricably linked to this remarkable woman.


Farewell to Hillary – what now?

Posted by Maryan Street on November 7th, 2010

Well, Hillary Rodham Clinton has gone now and we are left with the analysis and debriefing apparent in both The Nation and Q&A today on television. Those who got interviews are crowing and those who shook her hand (like me) are revelling in the moment.

John Key, I presume, is right now reading his Cabinet papers for tomorrow’s Cabinet meeting. The Cabinet will, I presume, do its own stocktake of Secretary Clinton’s visit and Murray McCully will lead the discussion on the list of initiatives to pursue, in priority order.  Is John Key reading his papers? Will the Cabinet have anything to discuss except who got their photo taken with her?

I despair of John Key’s leadership skills – he seemed overawed and intimidated by Clinton; I didn’t hear him make one utterance which sounded like it was informed by a briefing paper or was based on any recognisable principle for NZ’s relationship with the US; did he even learn any lines MFAT gave him? I worry that we have just witnessed this country’s biggest lost opportunity in recent times.

Fortunately, we have capable diplomats and officials who can turn it into a success for which Key can later take the credit.

I am keen to pursue a list of projects in order of priority, on which the US and NZ can work jointly to great effect.  That can be done from Opposition, believe me. Oh, and here is my own pic for the scrapbook – I think she still had a hand after I had finished squishing it!

Hillary Clinton meets the Opposition - 4 Nov 10


Sometimes, the planets align…..

Posted by Maryan Street on November 4th, 2010

I met Hillary Rodham Clinton today. Two weeks ago, in Washington, I met  Melanne Verveer, Hillary Clinton’s appointee to a new position reporting to her: Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues. I was attending a conference, or seminar really – there were only a dozen of us  from nine different countries – to look at some of those irritating issues of no significance compared with guns and bombs and things, like human trafficking, women’s rights as human rights, getting women to participate in peace talks in the world’s hotspots, maternal and child health, the disproportionate effect of climate change on women, etc  etc.

Then I went to New York. There the UN Security Council was discussing Resolution 1325. I can see your eyes glazing over already! That is a ten year old resolution of the UN calling for action on women’s engagement with security and peace. Like having women at peace negotiating tables in the world’s hotspots.

I mean, how can you negotiate peace in the Congo or Afghanistan or Burma without having some of the victims of rape as a weapon of war being engaged in reconciliation processes? Hillary Clinton made a statement with Ban Ki-Moon (UN Sec Gen) about Resolution 1325 and then went on to make a joint statement a few days later with the Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs on the same theme before they headed off to a conference on it in Denmark.

So I knew what I wanted to talk to SOS Clinton about: how NZ could work more efficiently and effectively with the US in the Pacific on issues like encouraging women to participate in decision-making, elected or otherwise, how to improve maternal and child health, how we could combat HIV and AIDS which are epidemic in the Pacific, how we could build an enduring peace in our difficult areas. So I did.

You know what she said? “This is music to my ears.” I knew it would be.


PS to Where’s the Beef?

Posted by Maryan Street on October 31st, 2010

Quiz question – In which Leonard Cohen song do the words “where’s the beef?” appear?

First correct answer gets a small but perfectly formed reward ;-)


Where’s the beef?

Posted by Maryan Street on October 31st, 2010

I got back from a trip to Washington today to hear our media outlets trying hard to say something of substance  about John Key’s visit to the East Asia Summit in Ha Noi. So, I might be a bit imbued with things American after a a few days there, but I am reminded of an old American advertising slogan  which Wendy’s ran in the 80s against a fictitious rival. Their (imaginary) hamburger was all fluffy bun and a tiny meat pattie, so Wendy’s slogan became “Where’s the beef?” It was taken up by Walter Mondale against Gary Hart in the Democrat Presidential primaries in 1984 when he said that every time Gary Hart said “new ideas” he was reminded of the ad which said “where’s the beef?”

And so it is with John Key and the East Asia Summit. Our PM,  aka Mr Smile-and-Wave, sat next to Gen Thein Sein from Burma for dinner because Myanmar comes just before NZ in the alphabetical seating arrangements. According to one media report (NZPA), Key told him “that NZ had some concerns and wanted a proper democratic election” – as opposed to the pre-ordained elections due to occur on 7 November. Say what? The whole NZ Parliament passed a resolution unanimously a few weeks ago, calling on the Burmese junta to release all political prisoners, including Aung San Suu Kyi, allowing them and her to participate in the elections, and calling for the junta to allow the 3 freedoms – association, speech and assembly. Don’t you think he could have “beefed” it up a bit?

Then according to Newstalk ZB, he said he had “a feeling” (!) that Japan was interested in joining the Trans Pacific Partnership, this really complicated trade deal amongst some Pacific-rim countries, including us and America. Where’s the beef PM? Or the seafood, or the value-added timber products, or the technology and IP? Did he talk to them about their position on agricultural subsidies?

Then, poor old Jessica Mutch was reduced to telling us how they had to go through scanners in Ha Noi, in a brave attempt to give the meeting some gravitas. That’s only because there was no substance to report. Where’s the beef PM?

What about the comment on Russia – “they’re a really interesting market”?!! Can he see it from his kitchen window too?

Then there is John Key’s exchange with Hillary Clinton. It was “relatively brief” he said because he is going to meet her this week in NZ. This is arguably our most important US exchange in his term so far.  A few days ago, Jonathan Milne in the Herald was “beefing” up expectations around this. Let’s see if John Key can deliver some beef this time, not just a fluffy bun.


After a time of wonder……

Posted by Maryan Street on August 28th, 2010

I’ve had a bit of a break from Red Alert recently but am keen to get back into it. Have just got home from being at the OpenLabourNZ do in Wellington this afternoon. Big ups to Clare Curran for pushing us along this path. Excellent conversation.

I have always been a fan of greater democracy and openness and the improved ability of more people to participate in decisions which affect them. Sometimes I’ve been made to feel like like Ms Naive when raising these issues in the Labour Party.  Like I don’t really know how politics works…..But I am still wedded to the principles of transparency and openness and accountability.  They are the principles on which we need to base our democracy. People won’t engage if they can’t.

Technology (as well as Clare Curran) is compelling us along this path and I welcome it. I’m pleased David Farrar was there – he has intelligent things to say about processes and access to information. I’m sorry he will be treated by a leper by his erstwhile right wing cobbers but there you go.  His choice. If the Labour Party can’t get with the democratising programme, we deserve to be left behind.

I like that we have an Official Information Act – how else would we have known that the Nats acted against official advice when they chose to extend the fire at will legislation to ALL NZ workplaces? So now we know that they chose that option a) out of  ideology (as good a reason as any); b) to make the imploding ACT party feel better; or c) to please their wealthy mates. We can now choose which of those options we believe and vote accordingly.

Bring on more of it.


Oh well, who needs tertiary education anyway?

Posted by Maryan Street on May 23rd, 2010

The news for tertiary education and students was all bad in the budget. I will do a specific post on the impact on students later, but I just wanted to address some of the headline effects of the budget on tertiary ed to start with.

There is about $99 million LESS going into the sector this year than last year. Say what?  How is the economy going to get a “step change”, let alone the quantum leap we actually need, without investing in knowledge and skills?

The government will make much of the 1735 extra students they are funding in universities and the 3173 they are funding in polytechs. But these are not new students – they are simply funding the students already there whom the institutions are currently carrying as unfunded students. Steven Joyce says there will be 765 new students at universities. Divide that across 8 universities and you get fewer than 100 new students per university.  Take the 455 new polytech students and divide them across the 20 polys – and you get 23 new students per polytech.

This simply won’t cut it. The government wants a step change to occur through science – who grows scientists? Universities and some polytechs, that’s who.

And don’t get me started on the cuts of $3.4 million to Adult and Community Education delivered through high schools. They only had about $3.3 million left last year………


More Brave Young Nelsonians

Posted by Maryan Street on April 16th, 2010

And here they are again, these bright young things from Nelson. Today I opened and spoke at the SAVE Conference in Nelson. That means Students Against Violence Everywhere. Started by Johny O’Donnell and some mates from Nelson College (that’s the Boys’ College – but it’s never called that in Nelson. Just Nelson College. The Girls’ College is called the Girls’ College.)

They had organised a national event and attracted school students from all over to a one day hui to listen to speakers and participate in workshops. About 60 people there I think. And assorted teachers.

They care. They want to make a difference. They want to change the world. Just one shot of that keeps me going for weeks. Johnny had asked me to talk about CAVE. Now this might jog some old grey cells. Campaign Against Violence in Education – the anti-corporal punishment campaign which I participated in as a young teacher at the end of the 70s-early 80s.

I described how things used to be like. Punishment consisting of an outstretched hand and a doubled up wide leather strop brought down on it with force by someone twice the size of the person with the hand. And that was in primary schools! You could hear the collective intake of breath.

Things got more sophisticated at secondary schools though. I was spared caning because I was a girl, but it involved a thin whippy sort of cane which I believe could leave fine welts. On the hand, or if the teachers really wanted to humiliate, on the backside. And not just once – that was just a tickle. No, 6 times. 6 of the best. Say what? what does that mean? 6 of the best what?? You could see these young people just not getting it.

So we campaigned. So we got the abolition of corporal punishment into the 1984 Labour Party Manifesto. So we won in1984 and Russell Marshall, Minister 0f Education, outlawed it. (His son, Tim, was in the audience, there to support students from Gisborne.) These young people got it now. Movements make laws. Laws change behaviour and eventually, attitudes. We have changed the law to prevent parental control being a defence for beating a child.

These young people today will be the ones who take society on to the next step. They want a violence-free society. All strength to them I say.


Brave young Nelsonians

Posted by Maryan Street on April 11th, 2010

Nelsonians is what Nelsonians call people from Nelson…..! I have lived here for a couple of years now but don’t think I have been admitted to the “Nelsonian” club yet. I think you had to come on a particular ship or waka and I just came over on the Interislander.

But since I have been here, I have become very involved with a group of young people called Q-Youth (short for Queer Youth). I have become their patron(ess?) and chair their Board. It all came out of the now famous Nayland Alliance of Gays and Straights (NAGS) at Nayland College, which some years ago made a conscious effort to support its uncertain, enquiring and definitely gay young people. Having taught a boy once in the 1980s who was clearly gay but who left school and within 2 years had committed suicide, I resolved, on hearing of his death, always to support young people wrestling with their sexuality. These young people in Nelson have gathered lots of supportive straights around them (school counsellors, parents, youth workers, etc) to broaden the support base available to them.

Anyway, the brave bit. I recently hung out with these kids as we dragged ourselves around the Saxton Sports Ground as part of the Relay for Life cancer fundraiser. They had decided to do it as a group. 2 of the young men turned up in drag. They got blisters from walking around and around the track in high heels. But that’s not the brave bit. The brave bit was turning up in drag. These boys will probably end up being trannies of one sort or another but I hope they will be able to be themselves, whatever that turns out to be – and be themselves safely, with dignity and self-respect. They turned heads, words were muttered behind hands, looks cast and even some photos taken. The courage it took for me to walk alongside them was nothing compared with their bravery in insisting on being themselves.


Another case of pulling up the ladder?

Posted by Maryan Street on March 20th, 2010

Steven Joyce, new Tertiary Education Minister, has floated the idea that a portion of universities’ funding should be pegged to pass rates or course completion rates. That way, taxpayers are meant to know that they are getting value for the heaps of money they are pouring into students by way of allowances and loans.

But hang on a minute – just look at his own tertiary education record. By his own admission in a recent interview, he enrolled in vet science at Massey, failed everything (or “didn’t make the cut”) in his first year, enrolled in Chemistry for two weeks and decided he didn’t like that either, then  enrolled in Zoology, which he eventually did go on to complete some years later. By current standards, he would probably go down as THREE ‘did not completes’. How would Massey feel about enrolling him for another chance if 10% of their funding were to be dependent on students passing??

But he went on to be a valuable contributing member of society – and make a lot of money as well. So why is he looking at pulling up the ladder and not allowing other people to do the same as him? People’s lives, like his, do not always follow a linear path but often unfold with age in a series of ever widening circles. Reminds me of Paula Bennet, the gutsy solo mum who pursued tertiary education successfully with the help of the state, axing the Tertiary Incentive Allowance for those solo mums wanting to do degrees like her.

So ladders are OK when you’re climbing them right? But there’s no use for them once you have got to the top?


ACE vs ACC – they win, we all lose

Posted by Maryan Street on February 23rd, 2010

Tomorrow (Wednesday) the Education and Science Select Committee was meant to be hearing my submission on the 51,000+ signature petitions opposing the cuts to Adult and Community Education (ACE). But the government decided to go into urgency to pass wretched Nick Smith’s wretched ACC legislation – you know the one, where we pay more and get less in the way of supportive entitlements to get us working and playing again after an injury. More on that in another post.

You might have seen this already elsewhere, but it deserves to go up here as well, as a great characterisation of what Anne Tolley has done to ACE in our local communities. It’s PPTA’s clever cartoon:

It’s an amusing antidote to being depressed by the systematic destruction of our ACC system causing heated debate in the House. But whatever it was going to be tomorrow – ACE or ACC – we are all losing. It’s either our easy to access, community-based, second chance education, or our world-class compensation scheme. And people said they wanted a change. :-(


Anti-mining petition

Posted by Maryan Street on February 19th, 2010

Later today at the Nelson Environment Centre I will be launching a petition to oppose mining in our national parks.

People in the Nelson region are profoundly disturbed by the possibility of mining in our wonderful national parks. We are fortunate to be on the doorstep of some of the most beautiful protected parts of the country. To propose bringing bulldozers and drills into the Kahurangi national park, for example, flies in the face of everything people in this region enjoy and hold dear.

This petition aims to bring to the attention of Parliament the very strong opposition in this area to such proposals.

Nick Smith can’t keep trying to make soothing noises about this only being an idea under consideration and not doing harm, while his colleague Gerry Brownlee is enthusiastically warming up the engines to roll over the protected areas of our beautiful country. They are protected for a reason.

This is an argument about the future of our countryside and our children’s heritage. The government’s values are all wrong and they need to acknowledge that they are out of step with the majority of New Zealanders on this issue. I encourage people across the region and beyond to sign my petition and let the government know how they feel.

You can download a copy of my petition here


Education, education, we have lost our education

Posted by Maryan Street on December 9th, 2009

Prizes for those who recognise the Shakespearean derivation of the title of this blog – play, plus Act, Scene and line number would be really impressive!

The Education and Science Select Committee is going to hear my submission on the 53,000+ petitions seeking reinstatement of funding to Adult and Community Education delivered through high schools, aka night classes. That will happen next year now, probably in February, but certainly early on in the year. It is the biggest petition tabled in Parliament so far this term.

People shouldn’t give up on this issue. This is the moment right now when Ministers are haggling with the Minister of Finance about their budget bids for next year. Or they should be by now anyway. I’d be worried if they’re not. So here is an opportunity for people to urge Anne Tolley to reconsider her decision from last year and reinstate this comparatively squitty amount of money ($13 million) and save herself another year of protests, irritating questions in the House and bad press in every national, provincial and local newspaper in the country.

If you want some help in writing to her about this issue, click here. It ain’t over yet!


Polytechs under attack

Posted by Maryan Street on November 20th, 2009

Now I can talk about it – the Education and Science Select Committee today released its report on the Education (Polytechnics) Amendment Bill. What a crock. It was bad before and it’s even worse now. What are those Nats on?

The original bill cut Polytech Councils down from their current 14-20 membership (most have 14-15) to 8, with 4 appointed by the Minister, 1 student rep elected by the student body, the CEO, an academic rep and 1 poor sod community rep. Big control for the Minister.

NOW – they have come back with 4 appointed by the Minister and the remaining 4 appointed by the Polytechs’ own statutes – ie: anybody they like. So now we don’t even have a guaranteed student rep. Imagine how the Students’ Associations are feeling about that!!

Nobody – but  NOBODY – amongst all the submitters asked for that!  They all asked for more places to get more community reps, especially where the polytech covers quite differing regions such as UColl (covering Palmerston North, Whanganui with an h, and the Wairarapa). And they wanted Maori representation.

Sure, their own statutes can require Maori representation but if there are Polys which don’t feel like doing it (or the 4 Ministerial appointments don’t feel like doing it), that’s it. This is a dumb educational position.  Look at the people who take up second chance opportunities at polytechs, including trades training, nursing studies – all the things we will go on needing in spades into the future.  It is dumb preparation for the skills needs of the labour force in the future who are increasingly going to be  Maori and Pasifika. And it is dumb politics. This is Auckland SuperCity slap-in-the-face stuff. Tolley has no idea what she will unleash, just like the night class cuts. Somebody tell her, if you want this government to survive. On second thoughts……..


Free Trade AND Human Rights

Posted by Maryan Street on November 1st, 2009

Last week I was in Kuala Lumpur for the signing of the Malaysia-NZ Free Trade Agreement (see previous blog on that subject). I had arranged before I left NZ to use some of my time there to visit the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) compound in KL. I had been there once before and wanted to know how things had improved – or not. Malaysia had had an appalling record of dumping people, especially Burmese refugees whom it didn’t want, into the arms of traffickers, until an enquiry by the US Senate’s Foreign Affairs Committee exposed it and got the Malaysians to improve their practices. I met with a senior staffer in the office of Senator Dick Luger who worked on this committee recently in Washington and got an update on Malaysia from him. 

The UNHCR Rep in KL is Alan Vernon. He told me that things have improved in Malaysia and the UNHCR is no longer getting the reports they had been getting of the trafficking on the Thai-Malaysia border. Burmese refugees used to be rounded up by the Malaysian police and deposited on the Thai border where traffickers would take the women and children for prostitution and domestic service, and the men for labouring work who knows where. They are only hearing of about 100 such cases a year now, compared with 1000-2000 a year previously.

91% of the 300-400 people being processed per day at the compound are Burmese refugees. They end up in the US, the UK, Canada, Australia and NZ, among other countries. Some of them end up in my town, Nelson, as well as Auckland, Palmerston North, Hamilton and Wellington. These are people with desperate stories of human suffering inflicted by the most evil regime on the planet. Some have become good friends now and they appreciate everything NZ has given them, while they are not blind to our faults. They retain their ardent politics and live for the day Burma returns to democratic rule, preferably under Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, their most recently democractically-elected leader (1990), who has been living under house arrest for 14 of the last 19 years.

In Malaysia, there are no laws protecting refugees. Children of refugees are not allowed to go to school; refugees are arrested and detained without charge for prolonged periods of time; they are harassed in their workplace by police. They have exchanged one kind of fear in Burma for another kind of fear in Malaysia.

The day I visited the UNHCR compound, I met families and individuals who were trying to get in to the US.  They are processed in the UNHCR facility, treated well by interpreters, medical staff and teams of interviewers from the soon-to-be host country. They want to be somewhere else. They want to be someone else. They want their children to be educated and have a greater chance of a full and rewarding life than they had.

Win Myin Htut - Chin Burmese refugee at UNHCR compound, KL

Win Myin Htut - Chin Burmese refugee at UNHCR compound, KL

People wait all day in the heat for their chance at freedom.

These people are in the final stages of processing. Next stop - the US!

These people are in the final stages of processing. Next stop - the US!

People present at the compound with a range of health problems – most frequently anxiety disorders, as well as the illnesses of poverty, malnutrition, some with HIV/AIDS. Parents must go crazy with worry for their children. Here is a family who have been in Malaysia for 4 years and who are hoping to move on soon. He is a farmer – although the difference in the meaning of that word in Burma and the US is striking.

Chin family at UNHCR in KL - UN interpreter front left

Chin family at UNHCR in KL - UN interpreter front left

Malaysia has a Human Rights Commission and I met one of its Commissioners. But they are kept on a tight leash and their Annual Report has never been presented to, or debated in, Parliament. The national Human Rights Day is boycotted by the human rights NGOs. Sometimes people say “how can we trade with countries which have such appalling human rights records?” The truth is, trade happens. We can make some gains through the labour clauses we negotiate alongside the FTAs. But even more importantly, a country gets opened up by trade and exposed to other ways of doing things. Trade becomes the vehicle for other conversations.

I hope John Key is having those other conversations, as Helen Clark used to do on a regular basis in the context of free trade negotiations and settlements.


NZ-Malaysia FTA signed

Posted by Maryan Street on October 27th, 2009

Last night (Malaysian time), Hon Tim Groser, our Trade Minister, and his Malaysian counterpart, Y.B. Dato’ Mustapa Mohamed, signed the NZ-Malaysia Free Trade Agreement. PMs John Key and Y.A.B. Dato’ Sri Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak were in attendance.

This essentially is the culmination of bilateral talks which were kicked off by Helen Clark in 2005, which is why Labour developed, and the Nats are continuing, the bilateral approach to trade – they often take longer to nail down than one (or more) electoral cycle(s). As you can see by various news stories logged by the journos present, Fran O’Sullivan for the Herald, Colin Espiner for the Press and Ian Llewellyn for NZPA and from Radio NZ today, it is like the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement except better and faster.

95.1% of tariffs will be eliminated immediately the FTA comes into force in 2010, and then it moves quite rapidly, in trade terms, to 99.5% tariff elimination by 2016. That’s in 7 years, quite a lot faster than the 12 years it will take to get to the same point under the AANZFTA (ASEAN one). This is good news for our exporters, especially kiwifruit growers who will see a 15% tariff disappear immediately upon implementation. That’s a lot more profit to be kept in NZ. Good on them. It’s also a fillup to Fonterra which has invested megabucks in new plant in Malaysia recently.

In case you were wondering, the remaining .5% tariffs apply to things like wine and pork products which have their own religious and cultural barriers here. Fair enough.

The labour and environment side clauses are there too. It’s going to be important however to ensure that they are honoured at every point. Our CTU will watch with care to make sure that the clauses signed off by Kate Wilkinson a few weeks ago in NZ mean what they say. We were told yesterday by one of the presenters at a very good seminar organised by NZTE that Malaysian employment law tends to be “employee friendly”. That may be news to some of the unions here.

There was a formal dinner last night attended by both the PMs. I had the pleasure of sitting next to Dato’ Dr Michael Yeoh, CEO of the Asian Strategic Leadership Institute – and also a Commissioner on the Malaysian Human Rights Commission. Now THAT was an interesting conversation………for another blog.


Another day, another FTA

Posted by Maryan Street on October 24th, 2009

I don’t travel overseas for most of the year, and then I have 2 trips in the space of a few weeks.

Am off right now to Kuala Lumpur to witness the signing of the NZ-Malaysia Free Trade Agreement. This is in keeping with the Labour, and now National, tradition of the Minister of Trade inviting the Opposition Trade Spokesperson along to such events. This isn’t just good politics – it’s good business. 

Our business leaders need the security of knowing the policy rug isn’t going to be pulled out from under them at the end of a short electoral cycle. This is about NZ Inc and both Labour and National get that.

This is a good FTA – it builds on the ASEAN-Australia-NZ FTA signed in February of this year.  So it’s kind of AANZFTA+ as they say in the bowels of MFAT.  I’ll post with more details when it’s all public.

Oh – in the interests of disclosure – the Minister (MinServe/MFAT) is paying for me (when I produce receipts) because it is an official government invitation. Unlike the Washington Partnership Forum trip, all of which I footed myself, apart from my 25% discount on the Auckland-San Francisco leg.

Back on Wednesday.


53,000 signatures in support of lifelong learning

Posted by Maryan Street on October 20th, 2009

Today I received, along with numerous Labour colleagues and a Green one, petitions with over 53,000 signatures on them, all asking Anne Tolley to reverse her benighted decision to cut $13.2 million from the Adult and Community Education budget.

Maryke Fordyce from CLASS presents petition to Phil Goff, Damien O'Connor and me

Maryke Fordyce from CLASS presents petitions to Phil Goff, Damien O'Connor and me

Anne Tolley’s constant repetition in the House at Question Time of irrelevant information (”we are giving $124m to ACE over 4 years” – that’s not night classes) completely ignores the decimating effect that the lack of night classes will have on many communities which can not afford to self-fund them.  In fact, her effort to drum up laughs from her abashed National colleagues with the return to her myths about Moroccan cooking and – wait for it – ukelele classes for Maori (what deep recess did that come from Mrs Tolley?), fell flat as they all studied a newly discovered paper of importance.
She was left looking not only like a dork, but also as someone not fit to hold the Education portfolio. Education is the opportunity to lift the poorest out of poverty, the most disadvantaged out of the trap of intergenerational repetition. It is a precious portfolio which should be held with respect and care. Today Anne Tolley showed neither quality. She was disgraceful.