Red Alert

Author Archive

‘Beautiful’ petition gets warm welcome

Posted by on May 2nd, 2012

Petitioners who marched on Parliament today to support turning the Avon River Red Zone into a reserve and river park can take heart in the cross-party welcome they received.

The Avon-Otakaro River Park petition signed by over 18,000 people was greeted by Labour, Green and National MPs at lunchtime today, a rare and symbolic sight.

The petition asks Parliament “to work with the people and local authorities of Christchurch to turn the Avon River red zone into a reserve and river park when the home owners have to leave the area”.

I want to congratulate the organisers for the inspiring journey the petition has taken up the Avon River and all the way to Wellington. The Table office at Parliament said that the petition was the most beautifully presented petition (two hand bound books) they had received.

I was very pleased to be able to sign the petition today – not as a petitioner, but as the MP sponsoring the bill.

The petition represented a vision for the future and that this would help people in the red zones move on.

There have been rumours about government intentions to sell the land to developers who will rebuild exclusive riverside homes. I am hoping that the government will commit to the Avon-Otakaro River Park – essentially gifting our personal interest in the land to Christchurch’s recovery.

This looked promising in Parliament today with Assistant Recovery Minister Amy Adams assured petitioners that it will be given ‘full consideration’. The petition has been referred to the Local Government and Environment Select Committee.

Today was another important step in the journey to recovery and I was pleased to be joined by so many of my colleagues to welcome this progress.


Red Letter day

Posted by on June 30th, 2011

I spoke to what was probably the penultimate AGM of the Bexley Residents Association last night.  I was there as a member of the association as a local resident and as their local MP. I will just let you read what I said.


Parents Rely on Watershed

Posted by on May 9th, 2011

The BSA appeared in front of the Commerce Select Committee last week for their annual financial review.  They had undertaken a survey during the year called Watching the Watchers that indicated, amongst other things, that parents relied on the watershed of 8.30pm to know when the content shifted to adult themes.  I asked them what they were doing to respond to this in light of the adult content of many of the soaps – including Coronation Street – which screened before the watershed.  They said they could only act on complaints.  I asked them who was responsible for setting the watershed time – they said it was negotiated between them and the broadcasters – they didn’t think the broadcasters would want to change it. I wasn’t the only MP who thought that this was a concern.  The reporting of this has been interesting.  For the record I didn’t complain about the content of Coronation Street - I used to watch it many years ago – I stated that its content was no longer suitable for children.  And for that I have received overwhelming support from teachers & family counsellors, but most importantly from the parents of children, about the wider issue of what children are exposed to. Everyone agrees that it is up to the parents to screen what their children watch, but I keep coming back to the fact that the BSA survey has highlighted that parents rely on the threshold and it is unreliable when you look at the adult themes these popular soaps deal with today.  The Select Committee will report back to Parliament in the next week or so – I am sure we will be commenting on what is a highly complex issue.


Urgency – when is its use a constitutional outrage? Part 2

Posted by on April 17th, 2011

Now that I have the lack of constitutional outrage off my chest in Part 1, I want to turn to the real constitutional outrage that occurred with the passage of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Bill through all stages under urgency. The only unusual aspect was the deal brokered by Trevor Mallard in his capacity as the Shadow Leader of the House to allow a select committee to hear submissions in Christchurch (arranged with one day’s notice) from selected submitters – (still gobsmacked that the Mayor and Chief Executive of the Christchurch City Council didn’t adjust their busy schedules to come, but that’s another post). 

The constitutional outrage actually began some weeks before the introduction of the Bill when Gerry “I know best” Brownlee persuaded his cabinet colleagues that a government department was required and CERA was created by Order in Council under the State Services Act. The Bill we were debating did not create CERA; it gave it powers.

Some people have been expressing concern that we voted for the legislation even though we have major reservations about it. I have made my views very clear, but the fundamental flaw lies in the structure. Allowing a politician to lead the recovery is a huge mistake and politicises all critical analysis of what is decided. Please read my contribution to the first reading.

I have studied recovery since the beginning of the year as a result of the failure of the government and the Christchurch City Council to step up to the plate post the first earthquake. The legislation and the structure prove the government have read none of the local or international literature on recovery.  Even our own Civil Defence & Emergency Management website references international best practice.

But the fact that the structure is flawed does not absolve me of my responsibility to represent and work for my constituents living in their damaged homes, in damaged streets, with fragile infrastructure (water, electricity, sewerage) and facing uncertain futures. They don’t care about structures – they just want to know when things will happen. And that’s why I felt that placing our position on the record through the debate was more important than the vote, which would have been misrepresented by the government to the people who rely on me to be their voice. I’d rather spend my time advocating for them than explaining to them why I voted against something that sounds like it has the authority to lead the recovery effort - as Brendon Burns said que cera CERA.


Urgency – when is its use a constitutional outrage? Part 1

Posted by on April 17th, 2011

I have been observing commentary about the passage of legislation under urgency as if any use of urgency is a constitutional outrage.  Admittedly we politicians have only got ourselves to blame for this.  I mean how many times have we railed against the government for pushing legislation through in the dead of night? I am as guilty of that as the next MP.  However there is only one use of urgency that truly meets the constitutional outrage test and that was evidenced last week by the introduction and passage of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Bill through all its stages.  What it doesn’t include is the passage of the remaining stages of bills that have been introduced, referred to select committee, changed to meet some concerns of submitters and referred back to the House.

This was the case of the Copyright amendment.  A bill was introduced; it was referred to the Commerce Committee; we heard extensive submissions; we talked to the Minister; we compromised; we referred back a better bill than the one that was introduced.  Once it was back in the House it was required to sit on the table for three days, which was when it could have the Second Reading.  The Committee Stages take place on the next sitting day.  And the Third Reading takes place on the next sitting day after that.  Passing legislation through these stages under the terms of an urgency motion is no more a constitutional outrage than agreeing to lift the House early because we have completed the business of the day at 9.50pm.  I have argued that the Standing Orders committee should change the use of the word Urgency in these circumstances to an “Extended Sitting Hours” motion.  An Urgency motion would then remain for the disturbing example that the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Bill represents.  I will address that Bill in my next post.

I want to comment on those who have attacked Labour for its position on the Copyright legislation.  I am mindful of the fact that Labour introduced the original s92A that required termination to be the end point of a negotiated protocol between the ISPs and the rights holders.  The agreement wasn’t reached and the incoming National government put the provision on hold while debate was had about how they would address it.  They came to the conclusion that termination would remain the end point.  Labour came to a different conclusion after listening to the submissions. 

I am floored by the attitude of those who have completely ignored the reality that we have listened and altered our position.  In opposition we are not the decision-makers, but we have influence, as is proved by the change to the legislation we achieved – and I take my hat off to Clare Curran, a first term MP, who stared down her own Party’s previous position and the government’s position to boot. 

There are those who don’t agree with the legislation that was passed.  Fine.  Use the time between now and the election to use your influence as Party members or as voters to persuade political parties to re-visit their position.  But don’t blame Labour for voting for an agreed compromise rather than letting the bill remain in the form it was in when introduced.  And don’t use the fact that the remaining stages were passed under an urgency motion when it meant nothing more than extended siting hours.


Government fails Communication 101

Posted by on February 13th, 2011

I stopped posting on the effect of the Canterbury Earthquake on my electorate, because it seemed that some people felt that I was making political capital out of a tragedy, when in fact I was simply reflecting the concerns that my constituents were expressing to me.  The chickens are now coming home to roost and the consequences of ignoring the advice of the electorate MPs means that we have a real pressure cooker effect happening in the particularly damaged suburbs – my electorate has five of them Bexley (where I live), Burwood/Horseshoe Lake, Avondale, Dallington & Brooklands/Spencerville.  The Minister for Earthquake Recovery (Hon Gerry Brownlee) held briefing sessions for local MPs last year and the importance of communication was raised at each and every one of them.  Our spokesperson Clayton Cosgrove advocated for a single communication channel where central government agencies, local authorities and social agencies outside the government could funnel all information and releases so that messages were accurate and consistent – and so that the left hand would know what the right hand was doing.  I wrote to the Council the week before last and made this point:

“I am aware that some members of the Council believe that my advocacy for my constituents is ‘politicising’ the issues.  My constituents who have relied on my regular updates for their sole source of reliable information (which is how many have described the updates to me) would reject that statement, as do I.  I was elected to serve the people of Christchurch East and I am doing that in the best way I know how.  My experience is that if you provide timely and frank advice to people so that they are fully engaged in the process, they will accept the setbacks that will inevitably occur in recovering from a disaster of this scale.  People will tolerate just about anything except being kept in the dark.”

This was all avoidable.  And for anyone who still thinks I am politicising the issues, then read what I wrote to the Minister on the 28th September – less than 4 weeks after the earthquake – and his response, and ask yourself why the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Commission (which has no decision-making powers and has led to the abandonment of the usual Civil Defence & Emergency Management processes, which were fully implemented within 48 hours of the earthquake) has just announced the hiring of a PR firm in response to the clamour for co-ordinated information!  The government has failed this most basic of tests as the SST has reported.

(more…)


The Financial Elite have Gambled away our Future

Posted by on January 29th, 2011

Yesterday’s Press Editorial welcomed the PM’s announcement on the beginning of National’s privitisation programme for our country’s assets with the words “John Key was able to demonstrate…the value of his background in the financial industry”.  Excuse me?  Did the Press miss the Global Financial Crisis, where “the over-paid heroes of Wall Street and the City worshipped the gods of globalisation, financialisation and speculation”?   The quote is a teaser for the best of the five books I read over the summer break: “The Gods that Failed: How the Financial Elite Have Gambled Away our Futures” by Larry Elliott and Dan Atkinson.  The first edition of the book was subtitled: “How Blind Faith in Markets Has Cost us our Future”.  The second edition (published in 2009) has an extra chapter, which as one reviewer said could have been titled: We Told You So.  The authors of this book are economics editors, Elliott with the Guardian and Atkinson, the Mail on Sunday.

The metaphor that drives the narrative is inspired by the twelve gods of ancient Greece that lived on Mount Olympus.  Elliott & Atkinson have styled the super-financiers and the international organisations, (central banks, IMF, World Bank, WTO), the “New Olympians” and the twelve gods of the modern Mount Olympus: globalisation, communication, liberalisation, privatisation, competition, financialisation, speculation, recklessness, greed, arrogance, oligarchy & excess. 

“Greek mythology provides plenty of raw material for a book about the failings of modern financial markets.  There is the story of King Midas, who found the ability to turn all he touched into gold a curse. The tendency of markets to veer between the wild optimism of booms and the manic depression busts is akin to the life led by poor Persephone, condemned to live every six months of every year in Hades. But Pandora – a gift from the gods whose beauty belied her baleful influence on the lives of mortals – makes the best metaphor.”

As they said August 9 2007 was the moment the lid came off the modern version of Pandora’s box.  And the rest is history, which is why I believe this book must be read, because unless we learn the lessons of history, we condemn ourselves to repeating it.

This book is well-researched and easy to read.  It contains a chapter called ‘Last Tango on Wall Street” which has a very simple explanation of how the New Olympians (our Prime Minister’s background the Press values so highly) found ways to make money out of nothing – creating securitised financial products like “collateralised debt obligations” out of the subprime market and then hiding the risks behind AAA rated institutions.  The New Olympians made personal fortunes with bonuses they never had to repay when it all turned to custard.  And they were happy to see the taxpayers pick up the tab for their trillion dollar insanity. 

I conclude with this quote: ‘Speculators may do no harm as bubbles on a steady stream of enterprise.  But the position is serious when enterprise becomes the bubble on a whirlpool of speculation’.  That was John Maynard Keynes in 1936.  When will we ever learn?


Alcohol Law Reform Bill First Reading

Posted by on November 11th, 2010

I will post some more detail on the Alcohol Reform Bill over coming weeks as there is a lot to be considered.  To get the debate started I think it is important that we look at the Law Commission’s report on Alcohol: Curbing the Harm and ask whether this Bill will be effective in doing that – curbing the harm.  My view is that it doesn’t go far enough and in a way it’s prioritised the wrong issues.  The Minister cited age as the most important measure in the Bill, when that is one of the many diversionary tactics they are using to avoid being held accountable for what is missing from the Bill. And to cap it all off the government has managed to trample on Bill of Rights Act obligations – I predict the offending clauses will not survive the select committee process in their current form.  In my press release I said National had squandered a once-in-a-generation opportunity to curb the alcohol-related harm evidenced by the Law Commission’s report into alcohol. Only people power through submissions to the committee and demanding answers from MPs will get that turned around. I spoke in Parliament on the First Reading - unfortunately the tape ends before my final comments which were that we the politicians have lacked courage and that hopefully the Bill will be strengthened by the Select Committee process and that we will have the courage to make a difference. I have attached the notes I took to the House.  Let the debate begin!


Confirmation as Labour nomination for Christchurch East

Posted by on October 10th, 2010

I have been privileged to be re-selected to stand for Christchurch East in the 2011 election for Labour


Who researches the CV’s of the MPs?

Posted by on October 7th, 2010

This is really weird, given all the focus on “enhanced” cv claims over recent years, but who does look at the CVs that MPs post about themselves? I was told by a former National Party supporter that my failed Nat opponent at the last election who squeaked in on the list had exaggerated his “brilliant career”.  I didn’t pay any attention to this until yesterday when I heard that Aaron Gilmore had told one of my colleagues that I should essentially pull my head in because I have been advocating for my constituents over their need to know what’s happening with their future post the earthquake – apparently I have been expressing these views a little bit too publicly for his liking.  I will not apologise to anyone for doing my job.  I have constituents demanding answers and I am entitled to seek those answers on their behalf.  I am not asking for anything for myself – it is for the people I have been elected to serve. I remember how viciously I was attacked on an earlier post for daring to suggest that frustration was growing while Christchurch East waited, despite my best efforts to get answers through official channels. The truth is that MPs were not given a dedicated 0800 number to call until 10 days after the earthquake.   I will explain at a future time how it was the government that was playing politics with the earthquake – including enabling Aaron to leave a Ministerial briefing on the earthquake to join with the Deputy Prime Minister in my electorate as EQC started doing exactly what I had asked to be done three days before.  

This was why I thought I would look at Aaron’s cv and play with the internet – just to see if the story I had been told was worth investigating further:

  • Senior Associate, Australasian Financial Services Association – No such organisation that I could find
  • Member, Chartered Financial Analyst Institute   – Website does not show him as a current member
  • Member, Associate Chartered Accounting College   - No such organisation that I could find

These anomolies need to be addressed.  The following two are not really examples of inaccuracies in his cv but they gild the lily so to speak.  He says on his cv under qualifications: Postgraduate Diploma (Accounting), Massey University (75% complete) – I don’t know about you, but I don’t think you can include something under the definition of a qualification if it is not completed – but I suppose it proves he is an optimist – “75% done” sounds better than ”25% shy of the qualification”.   And under Awards he has included Finalist, 2007 South Island NZIM Young Executive of the Year – there were 7 finalists that year – only one woman, and she was the one who won the award.  But good on him for getting that far.

So my quick scan produced a little interest – personally I don’t want to waste too much time on this guy, who spends time criticising me for nothing more than advocating on behalf of my constituents and seeks to undermine me by making up stories about me – e.g. moving out of the electorate (untrue) or applying for jobs overseas (untrue) - sigh!   But I am sure I can find someone who will do a more complete analysis on Aaron’s CV and his register of pecuniary interests, because my contact says there is much more.  Although I will say one of those disclosures of pecuniary interests did catch my eye – Property Ventures Ltd. I already knew that name from when I was researching the interests behind the Council bailout of David Henderson’s properties - what a surprise!  You would be gob-smacked to find out who Aaron is backing for Mayor; setting aside all personal interests of course.


I’ve been waiting for Trevor to post this, but I guess he just must have a thing for Amy

Posted by on September 18th, 2010

Here’s my brief reflection on Sept 4.  I ran out of time to say everything I wanted to say (as is often the case in the general debate), but let me say thank you to the volunteers, the engineers and loss adjusters from EQC, the people who worked (and are still working) on the lines, pipes, drains and sewers, the people who staffed the call centres…the list goes on.

MPs and other elected representatives, along with a range of community leaders, do not have a defined role in an emergency and that is something we need to learn from this disaster. We are all people who have local knowledge and networks that could be used in a much more effective way.

I am in awe of the expertise we have in EQC and contracted through Tonkin & Taylor Environmental & Engineering Consultants. The idea of making that expertise available to the community through community meetings organised by the local MPs (and in my case in conjunction with Cr Chrissie Williams, who has worked day after day to get the answers and the services to our constituents) was inspired and I credit EQC and the government for allowing it to happen. I have four of the most damaged areas in my electorate and despite that, I am optimistic that we can rebuild each and every one of our communities. My perspective on a lot of things has changed as a result of the impact of a single minute on the 4th September, but my resolve to be part of that rebuilding effort will never be shaken.  Because that is what is more important than anything else.


Frustration builds for those who wait in Christchurch East

Posted by on September 8th, 2010

I came home from work yesterday utterly exhausted and still without the answers to the questions I am being asked.  I have visited so many people, whose lives are now in such a state of limbo – and I have done a lot of hugging of people who just don’t know what the future holds.  I went back to Pacific Park, Bexley, yesterday morning - only 5-6 streets from where I live – just to see how everyone was.  Orion got their power on after I called them the night before, so at least the ones who were still there had some warmth and light, and the water was on as well.   

The problem for these people and many others where there are pockets of major damage is that they don’t know what’s going on.  And I have found it difficult to get information.  As local MPs we have not been given direct access to someone who can find answers to our constituent’s questions.  This is a flaw in our civil defence processes that I would like to see addressed – I am not saying that MPs should get special treatment – I just think people who represent others need to be able to get answers.  I have been trying to get priority EQC assessments for Pacific Park, Brooklands and the ones off Kingsford Street – so that they can make decisions.  The news release from civil defence this morning suggests this may be happening, but I don’t know if I can rely on it.

Civil Defence have over-ridden a press release put out by the Minister of Education at 3.30pm yesterday.  This actually isn’t good enough.  The public is reliant on news reports and when they hear mixed messages they don’t know what the answer is.  It’s an important issue – the Ministry says schools are out until Monday – Civil Defence says they are out today and beyond that, it is case by case for each Board of Trustees.  Parents do not need this level of uncertainty and I know people are very busy, but the problem has been created in Wellington.  I have contacted both Minister’s offices and Civil Defence says theirs is the correct position and the Minister of Education’s office hasn’t rung me back – even though I called an hour ago.  So my message to Wellington is “get your act together” and let us know what’s going on!


Update from Christchurch East

Posted by on September 6th, 2010

I managed to sleep in my bed last night, as opposed to the couch downstairs, but it wasn’t a solid night’s sleep.  I had a full day yesterday – picked up Phil Goff & Carmel Sepuloni from the airport and took them into the central city, to join Ruth Dyson & Brendon Burns for the Civil Defence briefing.  Brendon has already reported on our walk around the city centre and I have logged photos on Facebook.  

On their way to Kaiapoi, Brendon, Phil & Carmel stopped at a petrol station and encountered an irate taxi driver, living in Kingsford Street in my electorate, who gave Brendon an earful about having seen no-one – they had no power, no water and no information about anything.  Brendon let me know and I headed down there – it looked like a war zone – silt piled up on the streets as people worked tirelessly with shovels and wheelbarrows. I spoke to some residents on one of the side streets and it was exactly as Brendon said – no-one knew anything and they felt completely forgotten.  I contacted Orion and to their credit the power was restored that night.  Their system had failed to record the number of households affected by the outage, so it hadn’t looked like the problem it was.  

If there was one lines company I would choose to see me through a crisis, it would be Orion.  They are a committed team that has retained the institutional knowledge needed at such times – big ups to Roger Sutton and the whole team!  

One of my constituent couples let me take photos of the damage that had been done to their house.  It was heartbreaking, captured poignantly in this photo of the crack on their bedroom wall, which was a result of the major shunt and drop of their house during the quake.  I have put the series on Facebook so people can get an idea of the extent of the damage – not just to the old, as we have seen on TV, but to the new – these homes are only 4-5 years old and are ruined.

Today the electorate office was up and running and we started calling around constituents we had assisted through the home help cuts, ACC problems and disability issues; and we contacted local party members, particularly those we knew would be alone.  We discovered that the Ministry of Social Development was calling superannuitants they knew were living alone – big ups to MSD!

When Kath & I left the office late this aftenoon, we were planning to do a quick scan around Bexley (where we both live) after a visit to South New Brighton, when we heard that there had been a news item saying there was an evacuation happening in the Pacific Park subdivision of Bexley.  We headed over there and were stopped by members of the local volunteer fire brigade to tell us that the residents of Seabreeze Close didn’t know what was happening at all.  I checked on the Stuff website and although the story was accurate about several residents shifting out – the headline was “Evacuation” – it created the impression that people were being required to move, which wasn’t the case.  By the time I got through to the Council and Civil Defence the headline had been changed to “Moving Out” – but the damage had been done.  The media do need to exercise caution when reporting such matters. To their credit TV3, who were on the spot, changed their story to focus on the confusion and distress that had arisen as a result of the reporting of an evacuation.

I am glad I went there because I found out that people essentially living in the same suburb as me still had no power.  Another phone call to Orion and it was restored shortly after 7pm tonight. 

When I got home, I discovered that my water was back on and I am able to look forward to a hot shower in the morning – the first since Friday.  So another busy day is over but it won’t let up for a while.  I am grateful that our party whips have given the Christchurch MPs leave for the week so we can stay in our electorates.  And although I am very aware of how much worse it is for so many of my constituents, the enormity of what occured really struck me this afternoon when one of the bigger after-shocks made me feel physically sick – reminding me that the psychological effects of that single minute on 4 Sept will stay with us all for quite some time.

Heartbroken


Earthquake Update from Christchurch East

Posted by on September 5th, 2010

I have never experienced anything like yesterday’s earthquake in my life.  People who know me well, know that earthquakes are one of my most pervasive fears – but that fear is preserved for Wellington.  At 4.35am yesterday, the strength and violence of the quake was such that I didn’t have time to feel the fear as Robbie and I leapt out of bed and ran down the stairs.  Running isn’t quite accurate, because it only describes what we tried to do – we were literally tossed from side to side as we stumbled down the stairs; the electricity went off and all I could hear was glass breaking and things crashing to the floor.  As we made it to the front door of the house, it stopped.  I still couldn’t tell you how long it lasted.  It obviously seemed longer than it was.  It was then that I felt the first shock of what had just happened.

Unbelievably the only things that broke were a wine glass and a sugar bowl lid.  Although I think there could be a bit of structural stuff - my neighbour over the road tells me she can’t see our bedroom balcony from her room anymore – and there are cracks in the drive, it looks as if we have got off comparatively lightly.  

Robbie and I set off relatively early to see how the electorate was doing - we went through Bexley, where we live (lots of flooding), Tumara Park, Parklands and then to Brooklands.  The volunteer fire brigade at Brooklands gave me my first coffee of the day and it was great (it was instant coffee and I didn’t care).   I attended their Civil Defence meeting at 9am but there wasn’t much to be reported at that time.  It really highlighted to me how important volunteer networks are – especially in areas like Brooklands, which doesn’t have the same access to core infrastructure as the inner-city suburbs. 

Robbie and I then parted ways and I visited friends in Aranui to see how they had coped.  This visit showed how random the effect was – they had lost precious crockery and glasses and their dining room looked like a bomb had hit it.  Then I went to Dallington and it had sustained serious damage, but what I saw at St Pauls broke my heart – I only visited the school last week and the parish had only buried Fr Miles O’Malley the week before. 

I came home exhausted and slept on the couch downstairs – tomorrow was another day!


Victims of Crime

Posted by on August 30th, 2010

A very interesting perspective piece in the Herald this morning on the recent debate surrounding meeting the real needs of victims of crime.  I am keen for feedback as I have been doing some serious thinking about this since I posted on the Chief Justice’s speech which raised this very issue.


Migrant Workers & Economic Recession

Posted by on August 22nd, 2010

I attended a session at the NZ Diversity Forum in Christchurch today and am a panellist at one of the sessions tomorrow.  Today’s session was organised by Migrante Aotearoa and was called “Migrant Workers & The Recession – the South Island Experience.  There were a number of excellent speakers and they raised some very important issues.  These issues are not new to Christchurch MPs as we have been very well-briefed about the impacts of the recession on skilled migrants who were still in the process of working their way to residence when the recession hit.  Jim Anderton & I wrote to Minister Jonathan Coleman requesting a meeting to discuss the situation and he refused to meet, because he knows everything.  The result of the government’s policies is that skilled migrants are not having their permits renewed (having been subjected to a fresh labour market test) and are being forced to leave New Zealand even though they have a job and are on a pathway to residence.  This means we are losing these people, despite the fact that we know we will need them again.

The session included Mike Bell from Move2NZ, giving an overview of the problems that occur when policies change after people are already in NZ. He made very good points about the link between residence and work permit policies and how changes in one impacts on the other and it is simply unfair to do that when people have quit their job and sold their house to come here. I totally agree.   I think the Minister is wrong to think that his department doesn’t encourage people to come on visitor visas, so they can look for the job that will support their skilled migrant application for residence.  It is sophistry to argue that they couldn’t expect their work visa to be automatically renewed as it is only a temporary visa.  Mike made the point that close to 40% of permanent residents were on a temporary visa in New Zealand when they applied for residence.  It’s not good enough to ignore the reality of the situation and treat them as temporary visa holders when the government knows they were planning to get residence.

We also heard from a dairy worker, Roberto Bolanos, who described the difficulties Fillipino workers faced and some of the barriers that are put in their way by Immigration requirements that they cannot easily address from Ashburton.  He also spoke about the discrimination at work – some subtle, some not so subtle, including having to speak in English with each other even on their breaks. I actually couldn’t believe this was still happening – it happened in the hospital kitchen 30 years ago where the kitchen staff were told they had to speak English – probably because the supervisors (who only spoke English) were worried that the Samoan cooks were talking about them behind their backs.  I took the case up as the union delegate and made the point that they most definitely had much more interesting things to talk about.  I also said that I would go to The Truth newspaper (that used to be useful in those days) if they didn’t take the notice off the wall – it was gone the next day!  

The session included two EEO advisers from the Human Rights Commission who talked about the migrant issues that arose in the National Conversation on Work.  This is well worth looking at as it debunks some of the myths around work, as well as identifying the issues that need addressing.  And finally we had Bill Rosenberg, an economist from the CTU, who gave an excellent overview of the current economic situation and how that impacted on the prospects & challenges for migrants – locally and globally. I have linked to the CTU’s Economic Bulletins.

I am glad that these issues are being debated, because we will always need skilled migrants, and we cannot afford to see NZ’s reputation for having a well-balanced immigration programme undermined just because we are in recession and expectations have changed.  These changed expectations should be managed from the front end – not at the point of no return for those who had a legitimate expectation they were working their way to residence.  It isn’t fair and it’s damaging to our future.


Why won’t Paula Bennett take responsibility for her hypocrisy?

Posted by on June 21st, 2010

When I spoke to a group of women on Saturday I was forced to recall the appalling hypocrisy that has defined Paula Bennett’s role as a Minister.  I had been feeling sorry for myself that morning but was reminded that my concerns paled into insignificance against what Paula Bennett had done to two women in particular and to people on benefits in general.  Here’s what I said.


JK Rowling speaks from the heart at Harvard

Posted by on May 19th, 2010

I was so heartened by the debate engendered by my post “JK Rowling telling it like it is to the Tories” that I now share the amazing speech she gave to Harvard Students in 2008. It’s about 20 minutes long – enjoy.


JK Rowling tells it like it is to the Tories

Posted by on May 19th, 2010

I found this article and it summed up what it was like to have Tory politicians who don’t know what its really like for those who are struggling, or who pull up the ladder behind them.  I wonder who that sounds like here?


PM Off-Key with Tiananmen Square comments

Posted by on April 18th, 2010

I have a brother who lives in Tokyo and I was able to catch up with him when I visited there last year when I attended a Japan-New Zealand Partnership Forum, on behalf of Maryann Street our trade spokesperson.  It is a real positive in terms of international trade that the opposition is able to send our counter-part to such events – regardless of who is in government.  I think it enables trade ministers-in-waiting to have a good overview of the role, which is important because you do need to be able to hit the ground running straight after the election result is declared and the portfolios allocated.

One of the events I attended was a breakfast in the fabulous Rugby Ball that showcases New Zealand in a spectacular way.  When it comes back to New Zealand for the World Cup, it is a ‘must see’. 

I called my brother recently to wish him a happy birthday and we chatted about the occasion.  He said ‘what was it the PM said that stopped us in our tracks?’    I hadn’t forgotten what he said. In fact I remember looking at my brother at the time and saying ’did he say what I just thought I heard him say?’ and he nodded. We were gobsmacked.  I reminded him what it was.  After the call I googled the NZ journalist who was there that morning and I found nothing.  So here’s what happend:

John Key was talking about how easy it is to travel round big cities like Tokyo when you are a Prime Minister – indicating he was getting used to the cavalcades – no problem.  But then he sidetracked to tell one of his kid stories, which he usually does – there is a John Key formula to these off the cuff speeches.  This story was about how, when he and his daughter were in Beijing, she had indicated how she would like to go to Tiananmen Square.  So this was arranged and they were taken down there.  When they got there his daughter asked him why there were no people in the Square – he looked around and then – as he told the assembled crowd of expats and Japanese guests - he thought to himself that he almost expected to see a tank – oops – and then said he realised that the Square had been cleared so he and his daughter could visit – laughter.

I assumed this would be reported, because it is the sort of casual remark that could cause offence and, even though he had only been in the job for a year, no Prime Minister should take that risk.  But as I said nothing was reported…maybe the journalist didn’t hear him…maybe she did…maybe she didn’t think the public of NZ are entitled to know the sort of gaffes that inexperience allows…maybe she thought it was ok because he had only been in the job a year.  Unless she owns up, we will never know why she let him off the hook. Personally I don’t think she should have done so. 

It’s the one thing we never had to worry about with Helen, because she never let us down on the international stage.  Tragically this is only one example which could well become the norm with someone who knows nothing more than to smile and wave when they are out of their depth.