Red Alert

Labour’s plan for lifting wages

Posted by on October 18th, 2011

There’s been a lot of debate and hard thinking in the Labour Party about the current Employment Relations framework and how it could be part of a cohesive whole in building a high wage, high skill, high productivity, high value economy. The Global Finance Crisis has provided, if nothing else, a chance to rethink the last 20 years of our Employment Relations system, which if we are honest, is still pretty deregulated in New Zealand. The IMF, the OECD and a myriad of economists both here and abroad have, in recent times, pointed to low rates of collective bargaining in first world countries, including New Zealand, as a contributor to the global financial crisis and the high ratios of household debt to income.

Despite Labour’s changes to the Employment Relations Act in 2000 (which were pitched as being “extreme” by some in business at the time), only 9% of New Zealand’s workforce in the private sector are covered by collective agreements. Our government, the Minister of Labour and Labour Department officials go merrily off to the International Labour Organisation every year, confidently asserting that New Zealand’s labour laws provide for the freedom to join unions and collective bargaining rights, yet they know that that reality for the vast majority of workers, accessing these rights is high risk and for many, simply not realistic. So, while the Employment Relations Act theoretically provides for collective bargaining as a means of recognising the inequality of bargaining power, the truth is that most workers’ wages and conditions are still set unilaterally by their employer.

Labour’s wages policy reasserts our founding values of fairness at work as fundamental to a fair society. We aim to help lift wages in New Zealand across the board and to help stem the drift to Australia of our workforce. New Zealand’s economy must be lifted from a reliance on low wages and longer hours to an investment in more productive workplaces where high trust, high skill and high wages are the success indicators of New Zealand business and jobs. And we cannot truthfully talk about social policy and tackling poverty unless we talk about low wages and how to deal with them.

A critical first step, and one which will help the lowest-paid workers directly, is an increase in the minimum wage to $15 an hour, which Labour has long signalled.

But it will take more than improvements to the minimum wage to deliver decent wages for all New Zealand workers. The experience of the past twenty years shows that New Zealand’s current labour market arrangements have led to lower pay for New Zealand workers. Lower pay means New Zealand businesses face fewer incentives to lift productivity and lift investment in workplace, or in workers’ skills and education. It’s a vicious cycle: low wages and low productivity, with New Zealand families bearing the consequences.

Labour’s plan will tackle this long-standing problem. We will amend the Employment Relations Act 2000 to implement a new framework where better pay and standards can be extended through Industry Standard Agreements –  a new form of agreement under the Employment Relations Act (ERA) – that builds on the the existing individual, collective and multi-employer collective agreements that the ERA currently provides for.

An industry union or employer will be able to apply to a Workplace Commission for an Industry Standard Agreement. The Commission would determine the “norm” of the standards already applying in collective agreements in the industry and “extend” those to all those workplaces in the industry where there is no collective agreement.

Employers and unions will still be able to negotiate collective agreements for their enterprise as an alternative to the Industry Standard Agreement. Individual Agreements can still apply, but cannot be less than the Industry Standard. Workers will not have to join unions to be part of an Industry Standard Agreement, but unions will have access to workers in the industry to talk about the standards and other rights, as they do now.

This model of “extension” is widely used in successful economies and the adaptations in Labour’s policy will continue to enable unions and employers to bargain directly with each other when that is the most effective approach. It’s nowhere near the centralised wage fixing approach of Australia.

Industry Standard Agreements are about improving the pay of New Zealand workers. It is part of the wider structural change that needs to occur in the New Zealand economy. Labour has already signalled other changes such as tax, monetary policy, research and development and our yet to be announced savings policy.

There’s a lot more detail to our work and wages policy,  but that will have to wait for further posts.


61 Responses to “Labour’s plan for lifting wages”

  1. George says:

    The Cambridge based Korean economist Chang plausibly holds that immigration controls are the prime determinant of wage gaps between countries. How can we expect NZ wage levels to be raised back to First World levels when immigration is constantly being used to suppress them?

  2. John Ryall says:

    It is not only immigration that is being used to supress wages George. It is the deregulation of the labour market that has supressed wages leaving it up to Government to move base incomes through the movement of the minimum wage, the development of policies such as Working for Families or a range of corporate welfare measures.

    NZ totally deregulated its labour market during a period where Australia went through some change, but kept the basic industry award structure in place. When you look at the history of wages growth in both countries you can why we went down the wrong track.

  3. True Wheel says:

    Re Jake 9.38: It is a worry that there are people willing to seriously ascribe credibility to Milton Friedman in the middle of an economic crisis caused by his prescriptions.

    “increasing the minimum wage is not in the interests of the general public”-well it is in the interests of low paid workers that want to eat.

  4. Gregor W says:

    @ True Wheel

    I have to agree with you here. I wouldn’t want to hitch my flag to Friedman or anything even close to the Chicago School when discussing current economic issues.

  5. Bea says:

    maria says:
    October 19, 2011 at 7:25 am
    “There were plenty of tax deductions and my tax bill was lower than it is now that I am on a salary.”

    You do realise that that means that you were making less than than you are now, eh.

  6. Jake says:

    @True Wheel – As one who has lived on the minimum wage before, I can safely say that it is sufficient (if not in excess). There is a limit though. There is a reason it is called unskilled labour. I have no issue now with paying a higher rate of tax due to the fact I presently earn more than the minimum wage. But I do have an issue with paying a vastly disproportionate amount of tax to subsidise those who do not try.

    More than happy to help those who need a hand up.
    Don’t want to help those who don’t roll out of bed at 6am every morning like I do (by the way, I finished my shift at 10pm tonight).

  7. George says:

    Dominion Post Oct 21 A1 story (http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/5825899/Chef-paid-peanuts-for-9-month-stretch)brings out a number of issues.
    1) It is an excellent example of how immigration is used to suppress wage rates. Why else would a work permit be issued for someone to work at $14 per hour when Masterton has plenty of people able to cook Indian food?
    2) It illustrates how even somebody here legally can be exploited because of the lax enforcement of labour laws.
    3) It makes one think about what must be happening to illegal immigrants who cannot appeal to the authorities for fear of deportation. Unfortunately finding and freeing these slaves seems to be the policy of no party.
    A $15 per hour minimum wage will achieve little when there are so many illegals working for much less under the table -they will get the jobs. A $15 per hour minimum wage will achieve little when there are so many local beneficiaries working for less under the table – they too will get the jobs.
    Esoteric tinkering with bargaining arrangements will achieve little as long as labour is kept in over supply by excessive immigration.

  8. Stu says:

    The minimum wage could certainly be improved as presently getting $7.40 per hour for working for cleaning Company and they dont appear to be concerned about paying less than the Minimum wage when pointed out to them.
    Firms like this should be prosecuted.
    When is something going to be done about these cowboys paying below minimum wages.?

  9. Spud says:

    Now that’s just bleepin crooked Stu! :evil: :evil: :evil: !

  10. Gregor W says:

    Stu

    Why don’t you give the Dept of Labour a call, or your MP?

  11. ed says:

    It’s basic dishonesty that keep wages low. People are people and if you take advantage of someone you are a crook, regardless of where they were born.

    Business owners know about their rivals cheating the system but keep quiet when they should complain to the law! But there is no law to complain to half the time so they just try and compete.

    The government needs to crack down on illegal wages and business owners will dobb in their croked competitors as sure as night becomes day….

Leave a Reply