Red Alert

Archive for April, 2011

T S Elliot on the Issue of the Day

Posted by on April 26th, 2011

– The Hollow Men —

A penny for the Old Guy

We are the hollow men
We are the stuffed men
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw. Alas!
Our dried voices, when
We whisper together
Are quiet and meaningless
As wind in dry grass
Or rats’ feet over broken glass
In our dry cellar

Shape without form, shade without colour,
Paralysed force, gesture without motion;

Those who have crossed
With direct eyes, to death’s other Kingdom
Remember us — if at all — not as lost
Violent souls, but only
As the hollow men
The stuffed men.


The Social Democratic Challenge: An Easter Perspective

Posted by on April 25th, 2011

Michael Wood pic

Introducing Michael Wood

Michael is 30 and lives in Mt Roskill with his family. A member of the Puketapapa Local Board of the Auckland Council, he has a keen interest in local government, community development, and the development of a robust local civil society. He has spent most of the past decade working in the union movement, most recently as a negotiator for the finance sector union Finsec.

His main interest in politics is inequality, its structural causes, and the development of a social democratic programme that fundamentally re-balances the current skewed distribution of resources. An active Anglican, he is also focussed on the role of faith in public discourse, and the need for the left to re-examine its heritage and re-connect with the broad faith community.

Michael is the former Botany by-election candidate and a Labour List candidate

The central theme of the Easter story is that of resurrection – the idea that out of the very darkest places, renewal and new life can emerge. It’s a powerful theme, and one that no particular faith or political creed can claim exclusive ownership over.

For those of us on the left who have a Christian faith (Anglican for the record) however, the notion of resurrection, the promise of something better to come, has particular resonance. Labour Parties across the world were often driven by strong base of Christian activism when they were being founded in the early 20th Century, and a common objective was to build a “new Jerusalem” in place of the dark, squalid, and brutal conditions of industrial society at that time.

I believe that the theme is just as relevant, if not more so, for social democratic politics today. The right’s wholesale adoption of amoral free-market values represents a complete abdication of responsibility for ever hoping or planning for something better. Politics is reduced to a bloodless, technocratic administration of market forces in which the lives of real people are in reality solely governed by aggregate forces of supply and demand. Their language dismisses the prospect of anything better as “utopian” and we have it drilled into us that “there is no alternative”. To me the most horrifying spectacle to unfold under this government has been the casual dismissal of rising unemployment (Key: “The figures bounce around”) as if it is by its nature uncontrollable and inevitable.

It is that hopeless inevitability that the theme of resurrection addresses. We say that a better future is always possible if we plan for it and work for it. It was out of the ashes of depression and war that social democratic movements across the western world built fair and just economic systems and social institutions when they achieved power in the 1930s and 40s. That was real resurrection in action – millions lifted out of poverty and despair, given hope, and told that they were worth caring about and had a stake in their society.

As now as we face entrenched recessionary conditions across the western world, and in many cases governments whose faith in a valueless market based system is unshakeable, it seems to me that a huge opportunity exists for social democrats to harness the values of resurrection again. This is about outlook, policy, and language – being clear with people that we are not just a differently coloured management team, but that that we are the party that believes that the current imbalances and inequities are not only wrong, but that they can be changed, and hope resurrected, through political action.

Talk to the victims of the recession – people in the poorer parts of town, the volunteers at the local CAB, or the small business owners who are going under by the score and you’ll find that they are all looking for resurrection of a kind.

Happy Easter!


The state of our services

Posted by on April 25th, 2011

A curious little article has appeared today quoting State Services Commissioner Iain Rennie. Curious for a couple of reasons. First, the whole thing sounds like a political statement rather than that from a public servant. I certainly accept that public services will change the way they deliver services over the next few years, and we all welcome efficiencies in the public service. But his certainty about “the next five years” (why five years?) is also curious. The part of the statement about a reduction in the number of agencies is the direction of the current government, but it looks at public services the wrong way round from my point of view. We should be looking at the kind of services we want and need, and then considering how they are best delivered, not having a fixed view about the number of agencies going into that.

The article notes that SSC itself is safe “at this stage”. There are many wondering if it does have a future, with the future shape of the public sector being driven elsewhere. The overall strategic direction is coming from Treasury. The IT services are now with the Department of Internal Affairs, and procurement initiatives are being driven by MED. SSC is limited to the employment of Chief Executives as its main function.

I actually think this is a bad thing for public services. Treasury’s role is important in terms of fiscal discipline, but the agenda of quality public services needs someone to balance the power of Treasury. We have seen in past decades that an over powerful Treasury can wreck havoc if there is not some balance in the system. In its current state SSC does not look much like that organisation, but some competition of ideas in terms of the future development of public services is vital to their future health.


The poppy: a symbol of death and life

Posted by on April 25th, 2011

Brass .303 poppy brooches

Until about 10 years ago I was not interested in ANZAC Day.  Like many of my generation I took the view that it was a glorification of war. Something changed my attitude.

For the last 5 years I’ve marched in the ANZAC dawn parade with my mum, wearing the medals of her two older brothers (see below) who died during WW11 in their early 20s. I guess I’ve grown up a bit. It’s amazing watching how each year more and more younger people turn up to the ANZAC parade. I take that as a sign that the newer generation feels some responsibility for the future.

I do believe wars are avoidable. But I don’t hold responsible for war those who go and fight. And I believe symbols are so important.

The red poppy has become the recognisable symbol of ANZAC Day. The red, or Flanders poppy has been linked with battlefield deaths since WW1. It was the first to grow and bloom in the mud and soil of Flanders.

Madam Guerin and Moina Michael were responsible for making the poppy the international symbol of rememberance. They saw the potential for using the proceeds to help veterans and their families.

I want to tell you a story about  a Dunedin artist who is on a quest to use the symbol of the poppy to transform an object of terror into a thing of beauty and perhaps life.

Stephen Mulqueen is a jeweller and sculpter. His poppies are crafted from the debris of war. I came across his work through an advert in the Listener about 3 years ago. Since then we’ve had various conversations.

What he produces is quite confronting, but also beautiful. He transforms a brass cartridge shell into a piece of wearable art. He makes poppies. Brass poppies. And he wants them to be made by veterans across the world and seen as a symbol of peace.

In his words;

As we move towards the centenary of the Great War (1914/18 – 2014/18) Poppies of War offers a very real connection to the collective memory of the human carnage that scarred so much of the world during the 20th century. The brass cartridge poppy lies at the heart of current social debate, and offers a space for reflection on the causes and consequences of war as people all over the globe continue to experience it daily.

…. a hybrid of the fragile poppy flower with a discarded metal fragment, a residue of war where ‘beauty meets terror’.  The brass cartridge poppy resides in the tradition of mourning jewellery and spirit of the biblical text ‘turning swords into ploughshares’.  It carries its own poetic resonance and is a signifier both for death and new life.

Whatever you think of Stephen Mulqueen’s work, his quest is admirable and worth supporting.

Lest we forget:

Private Gerald Howard, killed in action in Tunisia, North Africa, 25 April 1943 aged 22

Pilot Officer Alastair Howard shot down over Flanders, Germany 23 February 1945 aged 23


Heartland: going backwards

Posted by on April 24th, 2011

I’ve been door knocking this week in South Dunedin. Will be out regularly with a team of people touching base with how people are feeling.

In quantitative terms it’s not very efficient for the MP/candidate to be out doorknocking, because everyone wants to chat and ask you in for cups of tea. But in qualitative terms it’s pure gold.

This is heartland. Talking to people on their doorsteps keeps me grounded, lets me know in no uncertain terms where my flaws are,  where the flaws of my party lie. It also gives me great hope.

The people I speak to are honest. They don’t beat about the bush.

Many in my electorate are Labour voters and diehard Labour supporters. That doesn’t stop them giving me the odd piece of advice and sometimes a bit of a serve. I take everything they say seriously because they’re the ones who’re having to make do every week with an income which isn’t increasing though the price of everything else is.

Two conversations stand out.

The first was with a bloke in his 30s, a shift worker, Samoan, with a Maori wife and two wee kids. He said nothing had got better for him under National. Only harder. They both work and they don’t seem to be able to get anywhere. The early childhood cost increases were the thing that got him, he just didn’t understand the logic.

He’ll be voting Labour this time. He didn’t last time.

The second conversation was with an electrician, with his own business. He’s been a Labour voter in the past but not last time. He was a bit more philosophical about the wider geo-economic issues but didn’t believe the current government was investing in the economy.

His work wasn’t drying up, but people were more reluctant to pay the going rate for an electrician and he knew sparkies who were cutting their prices. He said that was the downward slope because that made it harder for all electricians to make a living.

His wife had just got a part time job, but he was concerned about the shrinking job market in Dunedin and with the lack of opportunities for kids coming out of school. He didn’t blame people for moving to Australia and was really disappointed he felt that way.

He’s thinking about voting Labour again.

The top of mind issue for everyone I spoke to was the high cost of living. I would have liked to talk more about ideas for the future. But most people are just consumed with getting through the week.

I’d rather be part of a government that’s taking people forward not backward.


Quake will cost ACC $200 million

Posted by on April 24th, 2011

The Sunday Star Times has reported today that ACC expects the cost of compensation and treatment for those injured in the Christchurch Earthquake to be about $200 million. So far ACC has received 7666 claims, making the February quake the biggest single mass injury event in ACC’s 37-year history.

ACC’s head of injury prevention and insurance products, Peter Wood, said that although the long-term costs to the corporation would be high, they were manageable.

“Obviously additional claims from the Christchurch earthquake will increase costs and ACC funding requirements,” he said.

“However, the overall size of ACC allows for these increased costs to be absorbed with the current levies or funding structure without significant increases being required.”

The costs had to be seen in the context of ACC’s $16 billion in reserves and claims costs each year of more than $3b.

“It is therefore unlikely that the long-term cost of these claims will have an impact on ACC levy rates in the future.”

This highlights once again how crazy the National Party are to try and privatise parts of ACC. As a single, nationalised scheme, ACC is able to absorb the impact of a big event like the Christchurch earthquake without too many problems.

I blogged a couple of weeks ago about the impending collapse of AMI Insurance and how National’s ACC privatisation plans could lead to a similar outcome. I’m not at all surprised that Nick Smith is delaying announcing their preferred options. Carving off a big chunk of ACC and handing it to the private insurance industry right at the time you’re having to bail out one of the big players isn’t a good look in anyone’s book.

Then there is the issue of Nick Smith’s (sensible) move to ensure that victims of the earthquake received cover for the first week of injury if they weren’t able to work. Normally that cost would either have to be met by the employer for a work-related injury, or the individual themselves. Had the government already privatised the ACC work account, they wouldn’t have been able to do this as they would have effectively been instructing a private insurance company to provide cover over and above what the victim was entitled to.

ACC is a good scheme. Sure there are some areas that we’d all like to see improved, but National’s plan to farm it out to the private insurance industry is just nuts. They should go back to the drawing board and leave ACC alone.


What were the other 3 trips?

Posted by on April 24th, 2011

John Key would have us believe that his jaunts on military planes and helicopters aren’t among the ‘nice to haves’ that Bill English says we’ll all have to learn to live without, but are essential to his ability to carry out his duties as Prime Minister. If that’s the case, then he won’t have any problem issuing a full list detailing his use of airforce planes and helicopters, including the important matters of state that he was attending to that justified their use.

Stuff reported last week that Key has used the helicopter four times in the past 3 weeks alone, including the now infamous trip from the V8 supercars to the golf club. So what were the other three trips? Looking on Key’s Facebook page, the possibilities are endless. Did he use Airforce helicopters to visit the Timaru skateboard park? Perhaps he used them to make a ‘cameo appearance’ at the NZ Shearing Champs in Te Kuiti?

The PM and other Ministers should be able to use the airforce where it is necessary to carry out their official duties. But there is a pretty clear distinction between attending to official matters of state and using them to jet between photo-ops that are clearly little more than campaigning.

Every quarter Parliament and Ministerial Services issue a breakdown of spending on air travel by MPs and Ministers, but those figures don’t include the use of military aircraft. That’s an anomaly that needs to be fixed. As a general rule, I believe that use of military planes and helicopters by VIPs should be disclosed and the public should be able to judge whether the matters that they were attending to justified their use.

Meantime John Key and his Cabinet should start practicing what they preach and stop splashing taxpayer cash on photo-ops for the PM. At the last election John Key chartered a plane so that he could flit from one photo-op to the next. He should stick to that approach rather than suck military resources into his campaign machinery.


No Asset sales even to Tuku’s Tainui team

Posted by on April 24th, 2011

Phil Goff has made it clear that No Asset sales means just that. A sample from theWaikato Times:-

Labour will not be selling any state-owned assets if elected to government later this year – not even to cashed-up Tainui iwi already sniffing around for a bargain or two.

And that’s despite it possibly costing him big votes in Tainui heartland, where tribal chiefs are actually savouring the prospect of being able to buy a major chunk of the Huntly power station under National’s election policy of privatising up to 49 per cent of state-owned assets.

Tainui has first refusal on the station under its deed of settlement for its Waikato River claim, and chairman Tukoroirangi Morgan argued this amounted to a “peculiar” situation not usually found when a government was flogging off the family silver.

“For a number of reasons we are very keen to see key assets sold, but with some major levers hinged around it,” he said, suggesting it would allow Tainui to become a “legacy investor” in major infrastructure in its own backyard.

“Iwi have never been able to get a slice of the sizeable and significant assets owned by the Crown. Is Labour opposed to iwi being able to buy SOEs?”

“My position is I don’t want to see the SOEs sold at all,” Mr Goff replied.

“What I am saying to you today very clearly is that Labour won’t be selling the assets that all of us as New Zealanders own now.

“I understand why you would want to get hold of it, because it is a licence to print money.

But I have to look after the interests of all New Zealanders, both as taxpayers and consumers. As taxpayers it doesn’t make sense to us to lose control of those assets.” Mr Goff said the power companies National planned to sell had excellent rates of return.

“We are losing something that returns us 17.5 per cent to retire debt that would be costing us a third of that amount.

“How can that make sense to us as New Zealanders?”

The $9 billion price tag would amount to just four months of debt repayment.

“The difference is when you have sold them you have lost them and lose the dividend stream forever.”

Goff scoffed at National’s plans to sell to “mum and dad” investors. “Mums and dads can’t even afford the power bills, let alone to buy the power companies,” he said.


If you want to donate $10 to help pay for a sign or a billboard go to

http://labour.org.nz/stopsigns

Tags:
Filed under: asset sales

Whaleon Rortney

Posted by on April 24th, 2011

Don’t often link to Whaleoil but his sources in this area are better than mine and it is fascinating to watch National trying to adjust to the end of Act. For the record I think it would be great if Rodney survived and won Epsom.

Apparently Rodney has already been taken into the mythical smoke filled room where he has had ACT’s financial backers tell him his personality is the problem, and that with ACT polling at the margin of error he could destroy the party. What was intended to be a session where Rodney resigned ended up as a session where Rodney negotiated and stalled for time.

The problem for Rodney is ACTs backers are most unhappy with him, and could easily with­draw financial support for him. He also has to face the distinct possibility that a strong inde­pendent or member of another party will stand in Epsom, against him, either winning the seat or allowing National’s candidate to win. Rodney’s negatives are so high that any credible centre right candidate is likely to beat him.

More visits are expected to the smoke filled room, and with them more bad news for Rodney in the form of additional polling information confirming what every other poll has said, that an ACT party led by Rodney is doomed to irrelevancy.

National’s initial response comes direct from Bill English (see Farrar’s cou ple of posts) as the PM is travelling Bill has promised all sorts of retribution on ACT and Don, perhaps in pay­back for Don rolling Bill. Bill English is one of the most spiteful and grudge-holding politicians I’ve have ever had the displeasure to encounter.

Filed under: act party

Tweet of the week

Posted by on April 23rd, 2011

Tweet of the week: Is announcing the revival of his political career on Easter weekend meant to be symbolic?

Tweet Brash

Press gallery Tweet of the week: Agree but it has been great publicity for the signs…

Screen shot 2011-04-23 at 5.34.13 PM

And congrats to Vernon Jnr :)

Tweet vernon son

Twit of the week: This is hands down the single worst argument I’ve ever heard for changing Easter trading laws. I’m no expert but I don’t remember ‘going to the mall’ being a big part of the Easter story.

Tweet tau - easter sunday

And finally from the ‘Thank heavens for small mercies’ file:

Tweet trev speedos


If it smells like a dog…

Posted by on April 23rd, 2011

Pretty disappointed with Vernon Small’s analysis in today’s DomPost of the Mediaworks debacle, where he lets Steven Joyce off the hook and by implication the rest of his government for any dodgy goings on in giving Mediaworks a $43m loan to defer radio licences.

Small neglects to mention that it wasn’t just Joyce involved. What about Key, Brownlee and Coleman’s involvement? That’s quite a lot of Ministers.

It’s my understanding that Joyce may not have been the first point of call from Mediaworks. There certainly were others involved in pushing for that decision against departmental advice. That doesn’t make him any less culpable for his government’s decisions. But the issue isn’t just about Joyce.

It’s about how a government can be so lacking in transparency about how such a deal was entered into.

And whether it should have been entered into at all.

And what it represented.

Instead Small says this:

You might even wonder if the pressure applied to local subsidiaries by the financial requirements of their overseas owners – in this case MediaWorks’ owners Ironbridge – should be ignored for fear it will be used to “game” extra concessions from the Government.

But describing the arrangement in the strong terms the Opposition has adopted goes too far in an effort to make a sow’s ear out of a silk purse.

Suggestions that Mr Joyce, the communications and information technology minister, had some sort of conflict of interest in helping out the Brent Impey-led company (that Mr Joyce established) survives only till you know that Mr Joyce and Mr Impey are . . . errr . . . not close.

I dunno what other terms one could use to describe it. Dodgy and cronyism seem pretty tame to me. And making Steven Joyce into some kind of maligned being is a bit rich. Look at what’s going on in two of his other portfolios.

There’s currently an Auditor General inquiry  into the link between former National Party Minister Pansy Wong’s husband Sammy and the deals being done by Kiwirail and the Chinese rail company that Wong was associated with. It appears that the Govt has backed off sending the major Auckland electric trains contract to China North Rail (decision in the last few days), but there are other major flatdeck wagon deals likely to go their way.

This week we discover that Joyce’s current chief Ministerial adviser on broadband was named as the chief adviser to Telecom during a major anti-competitive deal in the early 2000s. This has resulted in Telecom receiving a record $12 million fine and the adviser, Bruce Parkes, being named in the court judgement. Did Joyce know about this case when Bruce Parkes was employed? Did he care? It appears not.

But it’s interesting that Joyce’s broadband scheme is being accused of the same anti-competitiveness right now.

Re Mediaworks, the essence of Small’s analysis seems to hinge on the fact that Brett Impey from Mediaworks and Joyce are no longer close. That may well be. I reckon I know why. It’s not really the point. Because Joyce’s relationship with Mediaworks goes back a long way.

And TV3 and the mediaworks radio stations wield considerable influence on our news screens and airwaves. And it is election year.

Another interesting thing. Did Broadcasting Minister Jonathan Coleman attend a Mediaworks board meeting a few months ago? Was the future of TVNZ7 discussed? What else was discussed? Would have loved to have been a fly on the wall.

Oh, and then a week ago former Jim Bolger press sec Richard Griffin was made chair of the Radio NZ board. Keep them quiet and compliant will no doubt be his brief.

TVNZ has already been instructed it is no longer a public broadcaster.

So much for independent, vibrant, critical analysis and public broadcasting.


Katrina Shanks deciding whether to run ?

Posted by on April 23rd, 2011

Katrina Shanks Poll

Hilarious, Shanks is polling the 23 people who follow the page to predict the election result.


Crafar farms should not be sold to any foreigners

Posted by on April 23rd, 2011

Brian Gaynor makes a very solid case for retaining the Crafar chain in New Zealand ownership.

While it appears the receivers have a view on their value which is based on what cashed up international investors are prepared to talk about, protecting the interests of foreign owned bankers who lent Crafars far too much should not be a consideration for Bill English when he makes this decision.

I’ve banged on before about how Landcorp should buy, develop and on sell the farms, preferably with a NZ ownership caveat on the title and to a sharemilker.

The proposed sale of the Crafar farms to Chinese interests is an important national issue.

Such a sale will establish an important precedent because China has enormous savings and foreign exchange reserves that could be used to buy large tracts of New Zealand farmland.

Based on the experience of the forestry industry, which is now mostly overseas-owned, this would not be in New Zealand’s best economic interest.


Herald slams Chopper Key

Posted by on April 23rd, 2011

The Herald puts it well.

But, as with the vast majority who have occupied the position, he – or more probably members of his staff – has fallen prey to a peril of incumbency. A sense of entitlement has developed.

As much is underlined by the fact that the use of air force aircraft by Mr Key and his ministers – and unspecified other VIPs – more than doubled last year. The more sparing use in 2009, National’s first year in office, speaks for itself. Clearly, any such concern diminished last year.

There will be occasions when the use of the air force is justified. Taking the Prime Minister to a region stricken by a natural disaster is an obvious example. But carrying him between two events where his presence was essentially political rather than prime ministerial is not.

Could there be two less compelling events on a calendar of urgent public business? Moreover, the air force should not be called on as a quick fix for poor travel scheduling, even under the famously Sir Humphrey-esque excuse that its pilots need the time for training.

Tags: ,
Filed under: national

Hideout? Brash tries Good Friday resurrection

Posted by on April 23rd, 2011

Months of speculation have erupted into the public arena with Don Brash and John Banks making a play for Act.

It is all on. Three posts worth a look that I’ve seen so far. Stuff :-

Dr Brash confirmed yesterday that if he was offered the ACT leadership he would take it, after previously rejecting behind-the-scenes efforts to woo him back to Parliament either as ACT leader Rodney Hide’s deputy or as co-leader.

Tumeke and The Standard

The question now will be Key’s role. Will he encourage Rortney to go quietly maintaining his Ministerial roles with some post election promise, or does he back him in what could be one of the more entertaining farces of the year.

Filed under: act party

Did John Key forget to take advice?

Posted by on April 22nd, 2011

Kiwi families lose another public holiday this weekend as Easter Monday coincides with Anzac Day.  This is the second day this year that falls on a weekend and won’t be Mondayised, so Kiwis have been shortchanged by two public holidays this year.

Aussie workers are getting another day off on Tuesday to compensate, supported by their government, so they aren’t “robbed” of a public holiday.

Back in January, John Key said he would take advice on allowing holidays that fall on the weekends to be taken on another day.

Since then, silence.

I would have thought this was something to be considered, given that workers have had such an awful year.

But then we wouldn’t want to do anything to close the 30% competitive advantage between Aussie and cheaper New Zealand workers now would we?


Jordan Carter blogs

Posted by on April 22nd, 2011

There is some real talent coming into the caucus in November. Jordan thinks and blogs brilliantly.

The job of the centre left is to join those fights together on that foundational principle of equality for all.  It is not to pander to worn divides between groups who need to work together.

Easier said than done, of course, but there is no point in pretending that we will end up in a fair country without changing people’s minds on some big calls.  My point is: we are stronger as a united left when we are helping each other with our battles against various forms of inequality, rather than sniping against each other.

So while I do enjoy much of what Chris writes, I do sometimes find myself shaking my head. Not necessarily because I have a problem with what he’s written, and certainly not because it is nice to read and gets the blood flowing, but because I wish he would join that bigger fight instead of turning his face to the past.

It wasn’t an accident that Labour won three elections by being in touch with New Zealand as it is and as it will remain: a massively diverse country that can be united around social democratic principles of equality for all. 

Labour would never have won in 1999, nor won two further terms, if it had tried to practice a politics built around an imagined backward looking culture war.

I’ve said before how I think we can make sure we are in touch with the country as it is: turning the party outside in and inside out, and really connecting with the communities we claim to represent. Community politics, not focus group politics. That is exactly what we are doing now with the Stop Asset Sales campaign (got a spare $10? buy a sign on the site), and you can expect to see more of it as the year goes on.


It is happening around the world

Posted by on April 22nd, 2011

The final decisions on the last Key/English budget were taken earlier this week. I’m told the cuts are massive, going right to the core of what we value as New Zealanders. But we are not alone. Manny Herrmann of the AFL-CIO writes :-

On April 15, nearly every House Republican voted to give massive new tax cuts to corporations and the rich while demolishing services for seniors, children and low- and middle-income Americans.

This isn’t a budget bill—it’s a political payback bill that raids Medicare, Social Security and education to reward corporate CEOs with massive tax cuts.


Farrar not on Labour payroll

Posted by on April 22nd, 2011

coreflute-stop-sign
There are those on the far right who have a view that David Farrar is in fact in the words of one “a pinko”. Personally I have always felt that was undeserved. David has been actively involved in the National Party for decades, worked for various Nat leaders, managed the campaign of a National candidate in Wellington Central (ok, on that one looked like he was our plant) and so it goes on.

But his role in the furore over Labour’s Stop Asset Sales Campaign will fuel speculation again. The boost in interest in the campaign has been great. More people are wanting the signs, are asking about the issue, and voicing their disapproval of National’s plan to sell off the assets built up by past generations.

To be absolutely clear the signs are authorised and are able to be used for campaigning, taking into account all the relevant rules and avoiding anything that might confuse a reasonable person as to whether it was a traffic control device.

Will be sure to run the next campaign material past David.


Donald Trump – a prize chump

Posted by on April 21st, 2011

For the first time in a couple of weeks, I’ve had time to catch up with some international political news.

Even although times are tough in New Zealand, at least we don’t (yet) have candidates like Donald Trump for the top political positions in New Zealand.  Maggie Barry is a pale imitation of this kind of “celebrity” wanne-be politician and I’m sure she’s pretty harmless.

starsnaps_us_donald_trumpBut this man’s a chump.

The real estate magnate is readying himself for a run at the US Presidency, even although goodness knows what he stands for or believes in (although having said that, I would struggle to describe what John Key stands for or believes in as well).

Back in 2000, when Trump was strongly considering running for President as a third-party candidate under the Reform Party he said that he was a “Business Conservative, though socially moderate.”

In his book, The America We Deserve, Trump outlined a few policies he would propose as a 2000 Presidential candidate. One of the most noteworthy: universal health care. You got it. Of course now he, along with the rest of the Tea Party supports the repealing of President Obama’s universal health care law.

I particularly like this quote :

“It’s probably more refreshing to deal with the Teamsters than the AFT or NEA. At least the leaders of the Teamsters don’t blow smoke. The construction unions I deal with want more in the pay envelope for their rank and file. That’s what they tell you every time you sit down at the table. You can respect that-even as you push back to cut the best deal from your perspective. That’s the American way.”

Bet he doesn’t think that now he wants to be the Tea Party darling.

He’s getting down and dirty with his attacks on Obama’s birthplace. He’s sent his spies all over the place, he’s demanding to see the birth certificate and what hospital Obama was born in. I call that desperate and there’s another description for that as well, which I won’t use here.

Seems that Trump will make an announcement about his political future during the Celebrity Apprentice season finale on May 22. How sad, when it’s nothing to do with what someone believes in or wants to change for the better – when it’s everything to do with being a “celebrity”, a net wealth of $2.4 billion and the very scary Tea Party, who want to restore the rich and privileged in America to their rightful place.

And I know this is old, but no-one yet has revealed what is going on with that hair?