Clayton reflects on the Sensible Sentencing Trust and its role in the Garrett-Hide-Key affair:
Clayton reflects on the Sensible Sentencing Trust and its role in the Garrett-Hide-Key affair:
This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010 at 8:42 pm and is filed under justice. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Garrett
Garrett wasn’t a minister…
I find it shocking that Paul Quinn is deemed suitable to a Member of Parliament…
He’s as subtle as a bag of hammers and about as clever…
McVicar is getting off lightly.
Offensive. Rewrite or don’t comment. Clare
Way to go Clayton. We need more fiery speeches like that from Labour MPs
reminds me of that insane republican video posted on here recently
McVicar’s position needs to be questioned, and if the Media doesn’t do it, the house needs to.
Where does McVicar get his authority from to talk about law and order, is he an elected leader of a group, or an employee? What is the Sensible Sentencing Trust, and how it is funded? Who funds it?
A great speech, Clayton. Researched, passionate, visceral in its intensity. Plenty to resonate with in the electorate.
We need to be talking more in terms of the morality of the Right, and of ourselves as well.
Hypocrisy, rorting, double standards, criminality, lying, bully boy behaviour, cronyism- these are all evident in recent political behaviour. Can we clean up our politics? Yes we can.
Yes!
Clare, I don’t see what was offensive (other than the use of the F word in the URL) – I googled Garrett and McVicar and that came up; sorry, not trying to lower the standard of debate!
Poor Ian
The Stringent Sentencing for Everyone but Us Charitable Trust.
I’m over it Spud! I’ll post the link on my blog later, as the comments and allegations and quite amusing.
On my blog on the posting about ACT.