<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gee the Aussies actually think ICT issues matter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/</link>
	<description>A blog written by Labour MPs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:29:08 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nevyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85913</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85913</guid>
		<description>Regardless of the list - can we look at the topic?

Let&#039;s break this down. A debate is being broadcast on TV. The only way things end up on TV is either there&#039;s enough money to get it there or there&#039;s sufficient interest in it to be there (thus advertising revenue).

What this says to me is that the network has figured that there&#039;s enough interest in ICT in Australia to hold a debate on it.

The question is, do we in New Zealand have to wait until things have gone completely south (Internet Filter?!?!? Seriously?!?) before we show this level of interest? How would the various representatives fare in such a debate? Who has the best interest of New Zealanders in mind when looking at these issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the list &#8211; can we look at the topic?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s break this down. A debate is being broadcast on TV. The only way things end up on TV is either there&#8217;s enough money to get it there or there&#8217;s sufficient interest in it to be there (thus advertising revenue).</p>
<p>What this says to me is that the network has figured that there&#8217;s enough interest in ICT in Australia to hold a debate on it.</p>
<p>The question is, do we in New Zealand have to wait until things have gone completely south (Internet Filter?!?!? Seriously?!?) before we show this level of interest? How would the various representatives fare in such a debate? Who has the best interest of New Zealanders in mind when looking at these issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loota</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85858</link>
		<dc:creator>Loota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85858</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Internet Filter&quot; = Great Government Firewall of Australia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Internet Filter&#8221; = Great Government Firewall of Australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Curran</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85850</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85850</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what the Gershon Review changes are, but will find out. Remember this is an Australian list of issues, but most if not alla re relevant here and many I have posted about.

I do agree that jargon can be off putting. I try not to use it if I can help it. But happy to be pulled up on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what the Gershon Review changes are, but will find out. Remember this is an Australian list of issues, but most if not alla re relevant here and many I have posted about.</p>
<p>I do agree that jargon can be off putting. I try not to use it if I can help it. But happy to be pulled up on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85807</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 02:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85807</guid>
		<description>Oh well, at least Clare knows what they are :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well, at least Clare knows what they are <img src='http://blog.labour.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85798</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85798</guid>
		<description>Snooty?? I don&#039;t know personally what half the things on your list are. Some are obvious, but some are known only to people involved in the industry, I would guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snooty?? I don&#8217;t know personally what half the things on your list are. Some are obvious, but some are known only to people involved in the industry, I would guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Curran</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85782</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85782</guid>
		<description>@ Richard. That was a very snooty thing to say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Richard. That was a very snooty thing to say</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85777</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85777</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t have your discussion on Skype, your connection may not be good enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t have your discussion on Skype, your connection may not be good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85770</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85770</guid>
		<description>Clare, I suggest that the lack of responses suggests that most don&#039;t know what you are talking about.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clare, I suggest that the lack of responses suggests that most don&#8217;t know what you are talking about.  <img src='http://blog.labour.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/07/26/gee-the-aussies-actually-think-ict-issues-matter/comment-page-1/#comment-85748</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=18088#comment-85748</guid>
		<description>I hope so too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope so too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

