Red Alert

Book burning and now Key uses harpoon on whaleoil

Posted by on July 16th, 2010

John Key was encouraged by Anne Tolley’s success at suppressing a research report on national standards.

Now he has apparently gone another step – pulled Cameron Slater’s media accreditation for the National Party conference this weekend.

I don’t like much of Cameron Slater’s work. The arachnephobic blowhole is sometimes a good case for the reintroduction of criminal libel.

But banning him for telling the truth about Key’s mate the party president and caucus attempts to engineer his re-election is not the good old liberal national party of Ralph Hanan and John Marshall and won’t be that way when Simon Power is the leader.

Update – now The Nation is being pressured to stop Slater appearing.

And btw what has happened to Kiwiblog’s defence of Whaleoil. Interesting values that lets the penguin blog on lunch but not stand up for his mate when the boss puts the boot in.

Update II  Slater has now confirmed see below:-

Boy have I upset some peo­ple. per­haps I have hit too close to the bone.

Today has been full of hurly-burly, lies and bullshit.

I applied to go to National’s con­fer­ence as Media. I used the same accred­i­ta­tion that has seen me reg­is­tered as media for two Daivd Tua fights and a num­ber of other func­tions. It was rejected, I then reg­is­tered as an observer mem­ber, which I am enti­tled to do.

When I was asked to go on The Nation again this week­end I called the new Gen­eral Man­ager to enquire as to the broad­band facil­i­ties that were avail­able for the media. I was then told that I wasn’t media and there­fore any facil­i­ties that were pro­vided to the media were off-limits for me. I told him that I was appear­ing on The Nation, blog­ging from the con­fer­ence and they could be help­ful or not, and pointed out that not wasn’t going to be a good look for any­one, but I didn’t care about my look so it was up to him. The ban was re-iterated to me.

Today I went to the con­fer­ence venue, before reg­is­tra­tion had even begun to test my own pro­vi­sion of broad­band. While I was there I received a phone call from the pro­ducer The Nation to say that Kevin Tay­lor had rung him and asked whether I was appear­ing or not. He took this to be pres­sure not to have me on. After all why would you ring in the first place. Not only that a mes­sage was sent to me in per­son via a nice staffer from the new GM that I had been warned and was being warned again that I was not per­mit­ted entry to des­ig­nated media areas, and that I wouldn’t be warned again. WTF, I am appear­ing on nation­wide tele­vi­sion tomor­row, live from the con­fer­ence and I’m not allowed in the same area as the guys who are going to be film­ing me or broad­cast­ing the sig­nals or arrang­ing the tim­ings. Muppets!

The NationIn sales and it applies as well to pol­i­tics, you never ask a ques­tion you don’t already know the answer to. So Kevin Tay­lor already knew I was going to be on The Nation, plus I had blogged about it this morn­ing, so only the stu­pid­est of peo­ple wouldn’t know that I was going to be on. So then, why on earth would the Prime Minister’s SPS ring the pro­ducer of the pro­gramme if it wasn’t to put pres­sure on to pull me from the show? There is not a sin­gle rea­son for Kevin Tay­lor to legit­i­mately ring the pro­ducer about me, not one, I dare any com­menter to give one. I don’t work for the party, or with the party, nor the Prime Min­is­ters office, I am sim­ply a mem­ber with a loud mouth.

I con­fronted Kevin Tay­lor about his attempt to spike me appear­ing and he flatly denied it. Unfor­tu­nately for Kevin Tay­lor we have had words before when he has erro­neously tried to get me to shut up. I was for­tu­nate to be blessed with par­ents who encour­aged open debate and ques­tion­ing of weaselly politi­cians and a SPS is a flea com­pared to them.

I also had words with another Key staffer who joined in on the Tay­lor spin that they weren’t inter­fer­ing. I got no answer to the ques­tion as why did they bother to ring in the first place. These two mup­pets have now con­tributed to their being a story about the PMs office med­dling in the pri­vate com­mer­cial arrange­ments of an inde­pen­dent media pro­duc­tion com­pany in order to attempt to shut down discourse.

They of course will all be described as un-named sources in the PMs office because these weasels never put their names to any­thing. I don’t play by those rules, and those rules died with the advent of blog­gers. I tell it how it is and too bad if you don’t like it. The best dis­in­fec­tant is always sun­light. I say always because politi­cians hate it, there­fore it must be good, so do vam­pires and gin­gas, again excel­lent rea­sons to use sun­light to kill of the old ways.

In case Kevin Tay­lor, the PM and the other med­dling cau­cus mem­bers like Nathan Guy and Gerry Brown­lee (yes boys, you are the un-named strate­gists and min­is­ters) this is a party mat­ter not a mat­ter for the paid plebs of the Prime Min­is­ter. We also live in a democ­racy and the National party used to be known for the fine tra­di­tions of democ­racy as well. Except it looks like I have got too close to the truth and now I must be hushed up. Unfor­tu­nately for them I have a blog, and a big mouth.

For del­e­gates make no mis­take that cau­cus is try­ing to take away your con­sti­tu­tional right to vote for board mem­bers as you please. It is an affront to democ­racy that they are even try­ing to sug­gest that the PM might get embarrassed.

What is worse is that dur­ing my dis­cus­sion with one of the mup­pets, he explained that I couldn’t be media because I wasn’t part of a media organ­i­sa­tion. I pointed out that they had the pinko Damien Christie roam­ing around door-stepping del­e­gates and that he was a blog­ger. I pointed out that Tracy Watkins, who is also accred­ited has a blog on the Stuff web­site, that Pedro Gower also has a blog and he is accred­ited. The answer, they work for media com­pa­nies. So it appears that the cri­te­ria for being media now is that you get a salary and have a title with a MSM media out­fit. It is a bull­shit excuse and they know it.

One thing is for sure, if they wanted to hose this down, then they played the wrong way. I have a favourite say­ing, if you wres­tle with pigs two thing are for cer­tain. The first is that you will get dirty, sec­ond is the pig enjoys it. I’ve been play­ing in pol­i­tics since I was in nap­pies, I’ve got 40 years on these fools. No flea bit, sec­ond rate, mup­pet, repeater with a jumped up job in the PM’s office is going to fuck with me and get away with it.

Oh and they can call off the lobby fod­der txting me too, I know what went down, I’m in the mid­dle of it and, another of my two favourite lines, I’m telling this story as I see it and they are going to be famous for all the wrong reasons.

If del­e­gates didn’t believe before that cau­cus was med­dling to keep a use­less pres­i­dent, then they can be rest assured that cau­cus and the PMs office are heav­ily involved in run­ning Goodfellow’s spin. For the record I think that John Key is obliv­i­ous to all this and the mup­pets have dropped him in it big time.

The game in the media has changed, unfor­tu­nately for National their mup­pet show that runs com­mu­ni­ca­tions haven’t grasped that.


46 Responses to “Book burning and now Key uses harpoon on whaleoil”

  1. ghostwhowalksnz says:

    Surely The oily cetacean is a branch delegate, so he will still be there.
    The agenda is for the adoring masses to smile and wave.

  2. Spud says:

    I feel a bit sorry for w hale o il :-( He has stuck by those tory cronies :-(

  3. Mako says:

    How did Slater get media accreditation in the first place? I realise that the Nats are keen to get hip with teh blogz after the failure of their own forlorn efforts, but Slater’s site (despite generous tax-payer funding) is nothing more than an ill-constructed jumble of obnoxious, poorly-written, juvenile, repetitive slanders and smears. It’s merely a platform from which Slater carries out personal petty vendettas, with the odd bit of gun porn thrown in. Seriously, why would the Nats want to give his rantings even the slightest aura of credibility?

  4. chris says:

    but despite all that – it is still more popular than red alert …

  5. Trevor Mallard says:

    Mako what is evidence of taxpayer funding for whaleoil?

  6. Mako says:

    Ha! True. That’ll be the gun porn.

  7. Mako says:

    That was a reference to his ability to blog more or less full time because he’s on welfare.

  8. simon says:

    I don’t think he’s on welfare, he’s got an insurance company paying his way… And i thought the Company were trying to ditch his dodgy claims?

  9. Richard Shaw says:

    Think Rush Limbaugh, not the power broking aspect, but the as the mouth piece of the conservative national party core support.

    The toxic blogs of whaleoil are probably representative of what a large segment of Nationals core supporters think.

    Key’s smile and wave team don’t want any “good ole true blue boys and gals” spoiling the neo-national image they have worked so hard at.

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/03/08/2009-03-08_rush_limbaugh_toxic_to_republican_party_.html

  10. Mako says:

    Simon, see http://www.3news.co.nz/Slaters-wife-says-depression-fuels-bloggers-erratic-behaviour/tabid/419/articleID/158328/Default.aspx. For the avoidance of doubt, I’m not commenting one way or the other on Slater’s entitlement to a benefit, or the merits of his dispute with his insurer (I’m in no position to judge that). My point is simply that, despite not having to spend time earning a wage like so many other bloggers, his posts frequently look hurried and ill-considered. You’d think he’d at least have time to spell-check.

  11. simon says:

    Leave families out of it Simon Trevor

  12. simon says:

    Fair cop guv’nor
    I’d not seem the TV3 piece.

  13. Spud says:

    8O – interesting advice. (Resisting urge to write what I want to write).

  14. Loota says:

    Please make many copies of Slater’s comments available to delegates at Sky City.

  15. Tigger says:

    This is the problem when you allow an attack dog to do your dirty work – sometimes it turns around and bites you on the ass…

  16. DeepRed says:

    Alsom compare the approaches to dealing with depression between Cam Slater and John Kirwan.

  17. pdm says:

    Troll warned – stay on topic Trevor

  18. Cactus Kate says:

    Simon – the insurance company cut him off a year or so ago…
    Mako – “generous taxpayer funding” – I’ve seen no evidence of that like ever – please let me have more detail so I can force him to buy lunch next time.
    Deep Red – yes, comparable when WO becomes a world class athlete with adoring female groupies and packs up leaving NZ to go to Japan then Italy with his gorgeous wife and children. JK’s life didn’t exactly fall apart did it? He always had the rugby.

  19. Amused says:

    It seems Mr Slater (Jr) has had his throat cut and is about to be tossed out the back door. (One of his public quotes on the National Party and the way it deals with its failures.)

    His good friends at Fidelity Life will be watching with amazement and admiration as he musters the energy, effort and motivation to be a full time reporter and political activist, all the while continuing to insist he is not able to work.

  20. ghostwhowalksnz says:

    No self employed bloggers at the Festival of flowers??

    That means Farrar cant flounce around as part of the new media?

    They now have a rule thats cut off their biggest cheerleader ! This is so funny

    Will the cetecean now be shunned like they do at Exclusive Brethren.

    All thats left is to count the votes Mugabe style for the stage mangers to have taken over the National Party

  21. chris says:

    @ Mallard – I know you guys are still new to blogging – but good manners has it that you link to Whaleoils post – not cut / pasting it.

  22. Sufi Safari says:

    As much as I am inclined to sit back and enjoy the spectacle of Slater turning on his masters, I can’t get his Close Up appearance over the Richard Worth saga out of my head. I’m not sure whether he has a tenuous grasp of reality or just a flair for hyperbole and dramatic invention, but I think a pinch of salt should be taken when considering many of his claims of inside knowledge and now of persecution from the top.
    That said, I expect this will make entertaining weekend reading independent of its veracity.

  23. American Gardener says:

    Cameron should stop messing around with these crusades and focus on getting his life back together. These campaigns do nothing for his mental health, they just pander to his demons.

  24. Onetimereader says:

    trev says more about you than national that you take slaters posts seriously. read it, doesn’t look like he is well.

  25. American Gardener says:

    I don’t think that blogging is a healthy pursuit for someone like Cameron. He delivers the goods but at a great cost to his own well being.

  26. Loota says:

    chris, I reckon that’s a fair point.

  27. WOOF says:

    Halwo Tigger! I smell tory Rrrrrrrrr!

    (swimmer: WOOF get home! :evil: )

    Bye bye :-)

  28. Simon says:

    Um, the Simon above is an impostor. I was here first fella, change your name.

    It was my understanding too that his insurance companies cut him off ages ago too and he’s made several frivolous attempts to keep them paying out.

    Still, his attempts to out people with name suppression have been quite amusing.

  29. Spud says:

    Agreed Simon, Red Alert needs a first come first dibbs on name policy! 8O

    Sniff sniff, does anyone smell dog? :?

  30. Tracey says:

    Finally, an unequivocal stance from national on whaling!

    Did anyone see TV3′s piece on Key last night?

  31. simon says:

    Simon
    I actually believe I was here first, ie to use Simon, maybe Red alert is able to resolve the confusion ?

  32. Simon says:

    I see you’re using simon rather than Simon, which is me. Red Alert?

  33. Trevor Mallard says:

    simon who is currently using a small s but has previously called himself Simon and simo was the first to comment from the email address currently used. It also appears to be his name ! !

    And we are not going to reserve names but we reserve the right to ban people who pretend to be others.

  34. Spud says:

    :-( All these same names are making me dizzy :-( Maybe one of them could get a profile picture?

  35. Even MoreAmused says:

    I see Mr Goodfellow will be writing to Mr Slater (Jr) to thank him for all that invaluable publicity which led to his re-election to the National Party Board.

    LMAO

  36. Tracey says:

    perhaps it just means the Nat Party swallowed Mr goodfellows slight distortion of his role?

    How many women and maori and asian and PI’s on the new Nat Party Board?

  37. Even MoreAmused says:

    Tracey. Who cares? We’ve got more of ‘em in parliament than your lot.

  38. Spud says:

    For now, buddy, for now :-D

  39. Random Student says:

    Got to love Whaleoil’s reference to the National Party “spin muppets”!

  40. Julie says:

    Actually I m pretty sure Labour have more women, maori, Asian and PI MPs than National even with a smaller caucus. Haven’t counted, but just thinking about it must be more or equal on most of that list. The overall numerical difference is composed mainly of Pakeha men.

  41. Loota says:

    Then leaving parliamentarians aside there is the makeup of the actual branch memberships

  42. Spud says:

    ” “spin muppets”!” LOL :-D

  43. American Gardener says:

    Cameron is his own worst enemy – equating himself to Jesus in his latest post. Dangerous.

  44. Spud says:

    So is capital Simon or little si (simon) the one who doesn’t believe in global warming? 8O
    Why shouldn’t Tolley burn anything she doesn’t like? mmmm? :-D
    I mean she spends enough time forcing this dumbing down NS down everyone’s throat? :P

  45. dorothy says:

    @chris: the reason for not linking to Slater’s blog may be on grounds of taste – not all of us want to risk exposure to that amount of slime

Leave a Reply