<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Productivity Commission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/</link>
	<description>A blog written by Labour MPs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:44:59 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loota</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-46443</link>
		<dc:creator>Loota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-46443</guid>
		<description>A productivity commission? Lame. 

Sort of like &quot;how to use&quot; instructions on a packet of tooth picks. 

Firstly, let&#039;s agree that we all want NZ to be a very rich country. Secondly, let&#039;s agree that we want NZ to become very rich by using and abiding by the values and innovativeness which makes us proud to be New Zealanders. Thirdly, let&#039;s agree that the purpose of making NZ a very rich country is not to benefit the elite few at the top of the pile (are you listening, National and Act supporters?), it is so that we can afford to give our communities and our citizens the benefits and advantages that they deserve. Why? So that everyone can participate fully in moving our society ahead. Then we all benefit.

Last but not least, NZ is never going to get rich unless we create, build and protect advanced industrial and service sectors that can sell their production across the world. We need farming and we tourism, they are strategic strengths, they are required but they are by no means sufficient.

Nokia started out pulping logs and making rubber gumboots, now just 10 of their mobile phones (total weight ~1kg) has the same net value as a palletised tonne of NZ milk powder.

That&#039;s 1000x greater $ value per kilogram manufactured.

And that is what I call real productivity, the kind which will make this country rich - not squeezing extra blood out of poorly paid workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A productivity commission? Lame. </p>
<p>Sort of like &#8220;how to use&#8221; instructions on a packet of tooth picks. </p>
<p>Firstly, let&#8217;s agree that we all want NZ to be a very rich country. Secondly, let&#8217;s agree that we want NZ to become very rich by using and abiding by the values and innovativeness which makes us proud to be New Zealanders. Thirdly, let&#8217;s agree that the purpose of making NZ a very rich country is not to benefit the elite few at the top of the pile (are you listening, National and Act supporters?), it is so that we can afford to give our communities and our citizens the benefits and advantages that they deserve. Why? So that everyone can participate fully in moving our society ahead. Then we all benefit.</p>
<p>Last but not least, NZ is never going to get rich unless we create, build and protect advanced industrial and service sectors that can sell their production across the world. We need farming and we tourism, they are strategic strengths, they are required but they are by no means sufficient.</p>
<p>Nokia started out pulping logs and making rubber gumboots, now just 10 of their mobile phones (total weight ~1kg) has the same net value as a palletised tonne of NZ milk powder.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s 1000x greater $ value per kilogram manufactured.</p>
<p>And that is what I call real productivity, the kind which will make this country rich &#8211; not squeezing extra blood out of poorly paid workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-38053</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-38053</guid>
		<description>I miss Anne :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss Anne <img src='http://blog.labour.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-37667</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-37667</guid>
		<description>Great idea. But you can absolutely bet the house on the fact that it&#039;ll be stacked with has-been righties just like the 2025 taskforce (and the Tax Working Group to a lesser extent) and will be yet another body for the dissemination of discredited neoliberal ideology. So it&#039;ll &lt;strong&gt;deleted language. Clare&lt;/strong&gt; wasting money until Labour takes over and redefines it&#039;s role to actually be useful a la the Aussie one.

Who knows, in the mean time it might offer some easy targets to attack the government over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea. But you can absolutely bet the house on the fact that it&#8217;ll be stacked with has-been righties just like the 2025 taskforce (and the Tax Working Group to a lesser extent) and will be yet another body for the dissemination of discredited neoliberal ideology. So it&#8217;ll <strong>deleted language. Clare</strong> wasting money until Labour takes over and redefines it&#8217;s role to actually be useful a la the Aussie one.</p>
<p>Who knows, in the mean time it might offer some easy targets to attack the government over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millsy</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-37661</link>
		<dc:creator>millsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-37661</guid>
		<description>Its going to be yet another committee of priviliged businessmen who are going to tell us that we are not kicking the poor hard enough.

They will probably just copy and paste the ACT manifesto and spend its budget on hiring a graphic designer to make the fancy headings. Like the 2025 taskforce did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its going to be yet another committee of priviliged businessmen who are going to tell us that we are not kicking the poor hard enough.</p>
<p>They will probably just copy and paste the ACT manifesto and spend its budget on hiring a graphic designer to make the fancy headings. Like the 2025 taskforce did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracey</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-37650</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-37650</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s seems even independence is subjective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s seems even independence is subjective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-37648</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-37648</guid>
		<description>Independence is key. I doubt this government&#039;s ability to appoint independent people, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independence is key. I doubt this government&#8217;s ability to appoint independent people, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Winter</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-37635</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Winter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-37635</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see who&#039;s put on it first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see who&#8217;s put on it first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spud</title>
		<link>http://blog.labour.org.nz/2010/03/21/productivity-commission/comment-page-1/#comment-37633</link>
		<dc:creator>Spud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labour.org.nz/?p=12340#comment-37633</guid>
		<description>Agreed. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. <img src='http://blog.labour.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

