Red Alert

Backhanded compliment to TV3

Posted by on February 2nd, 2010

Last night I watched TV3 News at 6pm. A not-so-common occurrence these days. Not TV3 particularly; just TV.  Find myself more often watching and getting my news online, as is the global trend.

However, as is usual for TV news, the first two stories were about crime. And yes, the crimes were awful and the stories had validity. Whether they were justified as the lead items is another matter. And is not the subject of this post.

Though I would be keen for some research to be done (if it hasn’t been done already) into how often our two main TV stations run crime stories as their lead items.

The reason for this post is that I was pleasantly suprised to see a positive piece as the third item about a 15 year old boy from South Auckland named Kyrone Toko who had found a wallet with $2500 in it and taken it to the police. The wallet belonged to a guy who is undergoing extensive physio so he can walk again. The money was his ACC compensation and much needed.

Great little story and a brown face doing a good deed. Instead of a depressing story with brown faces committing crimes and reinforcing stereotypes.

It was a welcome reprieve from the usual negative stigma attached to our youth by the media (particularly Maori and PI youth).  So congratulations TV3 News – keep up the positive responsible reporting.  I think all New Zealanders would like to see more of this type of news.

Most nights when I watch the TV news I despair at the sameness of the formula we are dished up. Crime, more crime, entertainment story, political story and often more crime.

Making us feel afraid, think that crime is endemic and that we must constantly become tougher and harsher in our response. It’s rarely reflective, thoughtful, analytic or challenging. Instead it’s more often fear-inducing, conflict-based and negative, or mindless drivel.

Forgive my cynicism, but it’s based on dismay and a hankering for a robust, modern, public media service that is truly based on news values and not ratings.

Tell us Mark and Anthony (that’s ironic) that the TV news is based on news values. Please.

PS: For those who don’t know. Mark is Mark Jennings TV3 Director of News and Current Affairs and Anthony is Anthony Flannery TVNZ Head of News and Current Affairs. Both smart guys. But I have witnessed the two of them at a conference acknowledge that TV news is based on ratings, not news values.

I get it, though I don’t like it, for TV3. But TVNZ?

PPS: I do so love that phrase; “backhanded compliment”. Not sure where it comes from (my mother in my case).


8 Responses to “Backhanded compliment to TV3”

  1. Andrew says:

    Would also be interesting to see if any correlation existed between the increase in crime reportage (and the tone of reportage) and the increase in support of groups such as Sensible Sentencing and others claiming to be “tough on crime”. The old slogan ‘if it bleeds it leads’ has been taken to a whole new level; and leads to the question: is crime news?

    Crime statistics can be news, changes in the way police operate can be news, but is splashing every assault and murder across the headlines or on the screen really to be justified as news? (news in my definition not being about media profit – crazy huh?!) It appears to me that the level of crime reportage in no way links to the actual levels of crime in this country.

    Part of the problem is that crime stories are relatively cheap and easy to produce, most of the information can be obtained from the police or the courts with little research. Another part is simply aesthetics: emotional family members; eyewitness reports; police swarming about; the imagery is great for television.

  2. BLiP says:

    A cynic might say you are being manipulated. In a decent world, the story of honesty would lead the news but, no, it comes up just before the ad break; can’t have the masses watching marketing messages feeling grim about crime, wouldn’t maximise the potential sales, would it?

  3. Mrs Hawes says:

    As long as TVNZ has two mutually exclusive requirements placed on it by Governments, it will function as a commercial network. The solution is political.

  4. n0exit says:

    ah, I sell BLiP has understood the intricacies the running order…..

  5. n0exit says:

    woops, meant see not sell….

  6. Whaleoil says:

    Interesting thoughts Clare. Where you saw a brown face I saw a Kiwi.

  7. Paul 2.0 says:

    Hey Whaleoil – did you see ‘Kiwis’ in court over the shooting of the liquor store owner..? Call me racist or whatever, but I saw brown faces and I appreciate Clare’s point. It needed to be made.

  8. BLiP says:

    A week later and – after a menu of tax increases, murder, stabbings, deaths by drunk drivers, the story immediately before the ad break of TV3 – a heart warming wee tale about “the worlds toughest and luckiest dog”!!!

    No wonder more and more are seeking their news on the internet, just like I’m doing now having given up on the tele!

Leave a Reply