Red Alert

Key to decide where English has his primary residence

Posted by Trevor Mallard on September 8th, 2009

One of the interesting quirks of Key’s decision on the funding of ministerial residences is that he will now have to decide where Bill English has his primary place of residence.

We know that English has lived in Wellington since at least 1996 and for a period before that when he worked for treasury, went to university and before that went to secondary school.

Key’s call is going to be interesting.


26 Responses to “Key to decide where English has his primary residence”

  1. Axis says:

    I wouldn’t get my hopes up, Trev.

    Key has pulled off one of the biggest snow jobs ever.

    He’s decided to just give them the money and throw out all the rules so that he never has to answer another question about ministerial housing ever again.

  2. Nathan Mills says:

    Out of interest, is this change something that Labour will look at revising on return to power?

  3. Spud says:

    $$$$$$ I think Bill will be living under a pile of $100 Bills$$$$$$$$$$.

  4. Robin Capper says:

    Why not require all MP’s, Ministor or not, to live in their electorate!

  5. Unpleasantly Odouriferous says:

    What a shemozzle this is turning into. Problem is, the Nats deserve electoral punishment for this blatant rorting and duplicitous self-entitlement but there’s unlikely to be consequences because it’s too early in the electoral cycle. If Labour had been similarly exposed last year, it would have been a huge story. A year on and that nice Mr Key gets away with this.

  6. Tim Ellis says:

    Mr Mallard, I note you are cleverly avoiding making reference to Mr Goff owning a property in Wellington while taking a full accommodation allowance to live in Wellington.

  7. Trevor Mallard says:

    Tim – Phil is an Auckland resident. Everyone knows that. His ownership of property is not relevant. The question is where is Bill English’s primary place of residence. I don’t know one other person prepared to say it is Dipton.

  8. Trevor Mallard says:

    Nathan – Probably doesn’t need revising – just honesty.

  9. Nathan Mills says:

    I’m just interested to know Labour’s thoughts on the new “bulk funding” (I guess is the term for it) method, I can sort of see pros and cons. It’s gotta be easier to administer, but you can also see how some people could make out like pirates. Can’t see them bunking down at a backpackers, but sharing a house for single ministers would be a good way to spin some coin!

  10. ghostwhowalks says:

    Dont forget at a National party conferencea while back , Bill was lauded as the former Chairman of the Lyall Bay branch of the National party. lets hope he wasnt ‘billing’ them for his travel costs from Southland.
    Interestingly when down South where does Bill operate from. Queenstown is recently in his electorate, my guess is we pay for him to stay in Queenstown when visiting his electorate.

  11. Trevor Mallard says:

    Would be much cheaper than the Wellington accommodation arrangements but I’m sure he wouldn’t be silly enough to claim for both.

  12. Trevor Mallard says:

    Robin @12.21 Because some don’t have electorates, because sometimes boundaries change. I’m happy for voters to decide – but there must be transparency.

  13. andrei says:

    Bill English should go – what he has done is downright dishonest, legal maybe, but certainly not the actions of a man of honor or integrity.

    Very disappointing

  14. Janice says:

    What electorate is Bill registered to vote in, and is wife and any eligible children also registered in that electorate? If he is registered at his Dipton address and mainly living in Wellington surely that is a breach of the electorate act. If he is registered in a Wellington electorate then that is his home.

  15. Nathan Mills says:

    Nope, according to NZ law:

    You may stand:
    in a different electorate from the one that you are enrolled in, or
    in an electorate and, at the same time, be on a party list, or
    in either a M?ori or a general electorate seat irrespective of your race or ethnicity.

    You may not stand for more than one electorate or be on more than one party list.

    link: http://www.elections.org.nz/rules/electoral-law-links.html

  16. toad says:

    Janice, it is not as simple as that. He is entitled to be registered to vote in Clutha-Southland because of the operation of section 72(6)(b) of the Electoral Act:

    The place where, for the purposes of this Act, a person resides shall not change by reason only of the fact that the person—
    a) is occasionally or temporarily absent from that place; or
    b) is absent from that place for any period because of his or her service or that of his or her spouse, civil union partner, or de facto partner as a member of Parliament; or
    c) is absent from that place for any period because of his or her occupation or employment or that of his or her spouse, civil union partner, or de facto partner; or
    d) is absent from that place for any period because he or she, or his or her spouse, civil union partner, or de facto partner, is a student,—

    even if such absence involves occasional or regular residence at another place or other places.

    But that section applies only for purposes under the Electoral Act, and Parliamentary and Ministerial expenses are not paid under that Act – which is why English is potentially in a sticky situation here.

  17. Trevor Mallard says:

    Thanks Toad – no doubt on that -two separate issues he is fine on Electoral Act.

  18. jabba says:

    my only concern with Bills situation is “why DID he not have his name as an owner of the house .. indeed I think he took it off”. He didn’t actually answer that.
    Maybe he should be made a list MP .. that should sort out the problem .. Trevor may have thoughts on that that maybe helpful.

  19. Trevor Mallard says:

    Being a list MP wouldn’t make any difference. He has declared that Dipton is his primary place of residence. Key now has to decide if he is telling the truth.

  20. jabba says:

    but as a list MP, he wouldn’t need to spend so much time in Wgtn. He is the Deputy Leader and Min of Finance after all and I can’t imagine being in Dipton would be helpful. (he has also been Leader of the Party in the past so don’t be too harsh).

  21. johnbt says:

    The main reasons I voted National last November were for some financial competence and some honesty from our government. If English is rorting the system he should get the boot. I have had enough of the crap.

  22. Sean says:

    Hello Jabba.

    Being a list MP is not a disbarring of higher postion in any political party, or cabinent. Dr Brash lead the National party into the 2005 election as an list MP, just as an example. Had he won, Dr Brash would have been a list MP prime minister.

    Whether or not Dipton is Bill English’s primary address, and who decides this issue, is the point of this post.

  23. Spud says:

    I wonder if his place in Dipton has any squatters yet…

  24. jabba says:

    sorry Sean .. I was in a hurry and got confused.
    What I meant was they should make him a List MP so he couldn’t really claim to need to live anywhere but Wgtn.

  25. Worker says:

    English is being disingenuous in claiming Dipton as his home. It may have been where he was born & bred and where he may still (possibly) have family and own a second property, but as a university graduate he would surely have moved elsewhere for employment were he not an MP. One can’t imagine a B Com and a BA (Hons) in English Literature being requisites for employment in Dipton.

Leave a Reply